Department of Many randomised controlled trials have been con- traditional Chinese medicine (4 national, 10 univer-
Community and
Family Medicine,
ducted in China to evaluate the effectiveness of sity, 10 provincial or regional, and 4 specialist
Chinese University traditional Chinese medicine, but much of the journals). After special training, eight fifth year
of Hong Kong, information is inaccessible to Western doctors. We esti- medical students (working in pairs) hand searched
Shatin, New
Territories, Hong mated the total number of randomised controlled all the issues of the journals published before 1
Kong trials published in China and identified problems in January 1997 to identify randomised controlled
Jin-Ling Tang, applying such methodology to the evaluation of trials. Discrepancies were settled by one of the
associate professor in
community medicine
traditional Chinese medicine, which would serve as principal investigators (S-YZ). Data on methodologi-
preparatory work for systematic review and dissemina- cal quality of randomised controlled trials were
continued over
tion of the randomised evidence for such medicine. extracted from 414 full length articles in the Chinese
BMJ 1999;319:160–1 Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine.
Ten times as many randomised controlled trials
Methods and results appeared in that journal as in the other journals,
We randomly selected 28 journals using stratified and those published in that journal were of a higher
sampling from a total of 100 Chinese journals of quality.1 2