A.L.R. Library
•0 Power and authority of president of business corporation to execute commercial paper, 96 A.L.R.2d 549
If a representative signs the name of the represented person as drawer of a check without an indication of the representative
status, and the check is payable from an account of the represented person who is identified on the check, the signer is not
liable on the check, if the signature is an authorized signature of the represented person. 1 Thus, authorized signatories on a
corporate account may not be held personally liable for the corporation’s checks.2
Observation:
The provision described above states that if the check identifies the represented person, the agent who signs on the signature
line does not have to indicate agency status. Virtually all checks used today are in personalized form and identify the person
on whose account the check is drawn. In this case, nobody is deceived into thinking that the person signing the check is
meant to be liable.3
© 2017 Thomson Reuters. 33-34B © 2017 Thomson Reuters/RIA. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. All rights
reserved.
Footnotes
1
U.C.C. § 3-402(c).
A debtor’s son was not personally liable, even though the son signed a check that the creditors claimed was a
promissory note, where the instrument met the statutory definition of a check, and the son signed the check in a
representative capacity for the father’s sole proprietorship, written on the company’s account. Billingsley v. Smith, 85
Ark. App. 128, 147 S.W.3d 697 (2004).
An employee who signed only her name on a check that was imprinted with the name of her employer was not
personally liable when the check was returned by the bank for insufficient funds, even though she did not note on the
check that she was signing in her representative capacity on behalf of the employer. Peterson v. Holtrachem, Inc., 239
Ga. App. 838, 521 S.E.2d 648, 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 527 (1999).
2
Medina v. Wyche, 796 So. 2d 622, 45 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 3d Dist. 2001) ; Helmer v.
Rumarson Technologies, Inc., 245 Ga. App. 598, 538 S.E.2d 504 (2000).
3
U.C.C. § 3-402, Official Comment 3.