Santaquin Elementary students would never have been put at risk. More importantly, further
abuse/grooming could have been averted-- instead, transferring a potentially harmful employee
to a different area occurred.
We know that Mrs. Slye found adequate cause and justification for concern, and this
should have served as a sufficient impetus for notifying the parents of the child involved in
the incident.
2. When a situation occurs in which a faculty/staff member of a school is arrested for abuse of a
child on school property, the issue needs to be addressed more thoroughly than in an emailed
timeline. More specifically, the school district should be obligated to provide parents with (at a
minimum):
* appropriate questions to ask children who may have been exposed to possible abuse or
grooming
* resources available to parents and students in the school, district, and community
The minimal response and support from Nebo School District makes it appear as if you are
ignoring the issue in order to avoid culpability. The primary concern and objective of Nebo
School District in regards to this incident should be providing assistance to identify possible
additional victims affected, directing them in getting the help they need, and providing resources
that will prevent future cases of abuse. Please do more to educate and protect the children you
are responsible for.
Additional Questions:
1. Mrs. Slye asserts that Mr. Villar was already in the bathroom with the student when he got the
call from the office. This directly contradicts the timeline provided by the school. Is the district
able to provide evidence that supports your version of events? Even if Mr. Villar was responding
to a call from the office, he should not have been alone in the bathroom with a child.
Mrs. Slye also maintains there were statements made by the head secretary, the skills coach, and
herself—all of whom were present and involved on February 14, 2017; and those statements are
in line with the video surveillance that was recorded that day. However, these statements
contradicted Villar’s statement, but ironically, it’s his statement that is in line with the timeline
the district provided to parents. Why was the testimony of three staff members and video
surveillance discounted for the testimony of the accused?
2. Nebo School Districts asserts, "Police conducted an investigation and later notified Nebo
School District that no charges would be filed and that this complaint was unfounded.” Is Nebo
School District able to provide corroboration from the Spanish Fork Police Department
supporting this? It seems unlikely charges were unfounded since Villar was arrested three
3
months later on the same charges that were being investigated in February.
3. It is currently understood that after police turned available evidence over to the Utah County
Attorney, the determination was made that there was an insufficient burden of proof to prosecute
Mr. Villar, but not the assertion of his innocence. Additionally, while there may not have been
enough evidence to pursue legal action, there was possible justification for termination of
employment. What is the rationale for retaining an employee who had multiple violations of
prohibited adult-to-student conduct?
4. A tenured teacher reported observing several incidents of inappropriate boundary
invasions/prohibited adult-to-student conduct. Why were her concerns so easily dismissed?
After the same teacher (Janna Slye) alerted the principal by email, she received his response via
iPhone message. In regards to the inappropriate behavior of Villar it states, “I was aware of
[another student] but not [this student].” The principal’s response suggests that he had already
been alerted to a possible problem with the custodian through another source. This makes the
teacher’s concerns even more valid, and should have caused stronger suspicion from the
principal.
The very nature of a school environment (which puts adults in a position of trust and influence
with young children) requires a more aggressive and intense investigation of allegations than
appears to have occurred in the case of Adrian Villar. It is critical that accusations aren’t easily
dismissed based on personal relationships and subjective perceptions of an individual. It is
extremely challenging to make impartial judgments concerning an employee/friend when it
comes to sexual abuse.
After the district’s HR department insinuated Mrs. Slye acted incorrectly when reporting the
incident, it should be noted that Mrs. Slye states that she apologized to Sierra Bonita principal
Garrett Anderson for anything she said that was misconstrued or exaggerated, although she
maintains that she saw and heard what she reported.
More weight should have been given to Mrs. Slye’s opinion, and the school should have been
required to submit concerns immediately to an independent, outside source such as DCFS or the
police department. When it concerns the safety of our students, it is imperative to err on the side
of caution instead of relying on one’s ability to determine guilt or innocence based on intuition.
5. What documents are Nebo School District legally obligated or allowed to release to the public
concerning Adrian Villar? If legally possible, when the investigation is complete, all incident
reports, video surveillance, and actions taken should be made available.
6. Was Chad Argyle, principal of Santaquin Elementary, instructed or influenced by Nebo
School District to hire Adrian Villar? Was Mr. Argyle given the full scope of information
concerning Adrian Villar’s investigation and discipline, including both the February 2017 and
March 2017 incidents? (Dodson, B. 2018, June 12. Records Show That School Custodian,
4
Counselor Had Been Reprimanded For Behavior Prior to Arrests. Daily Herald.) It seems
unlikely that he would choose to hire someone with such serious allegations against him over
other possible candidates on his own accord.
According to Mrs. Slye, on March 16, 2017, she was at a meeting with district HR officials
discussing this matter when she was told that Villar had requested a transfer to Santaquin
Elementary. This is another discrepancy in the district timeline that suggested Adrian Villar
applied to Santaquin Elementary in May 2017.
Parents are justifiably alarmed at the transfer of Adrian Villar to Santaquin Elementary, and our
trust in Nebo School District has been shaken. We would like to believe that Nebo School
District is taking steps to prevent this kind of situation from happening in the future rather than
just shuffling the problem to a different school and hoping it goes away. What actions are being
taken by Nebo School District to assure parents that a similar issue will not occur in the future?
7. According to a copy of a letter addressed to the district HR director by Mrs. Slye, “On March
17, 2017, I received a phone call from my UEA rep... instructing me that I was required to ask
for a transfer from Sierra Bonita or else you ... would make sure I was transferred from Sierra
Bonita for the following school year.” The letter goes on to say, “I found your demeanor to be
fairly hostile towards me.” The letter maintains that the HR director told Mrs. Slye’s attorney
what school she would be transferring to, but there was no communication about it to her
personally. Two months later she received an email from her new principal informing her of her
demotion from mentor teacher to a classroom teacher.
Why would HR personnel treat a teacher in this manner (which is clearly against district policy
10.3.3.) when her only actions were to report suspicious behavior between a custodian and a
student (which she was obligated to do per her training) and her desire for parents to be alerted to
the behavior? (Nebo Certified Employee Handbook. P. 29) There should be no HR retribution
when a teacher is performing due diligence. Clearly, the Spanish Fork Police Department and
Utah County Attorney have found sufficient evidence to charge Adrian Villar with two felony
counts and one misdemeanor, backing up the Mrs. Slye’s initial report and continued assertions.
What actions will the district take to restore Mrs. Slye’s reputation and prior teaching status?
What will be done to ensure that an employee won’t be vilified, demoted, and transferred for
following up on his/her duty to report inappropriate actions of a fellow employee? Mrs. Slye’s
continued persistence in achieving a proper investigation should be commended, not
discouraged.
8. What action is being taken in regards to those employees who knew about the incidents but
did not inform police or the involved children's parents?
9. Why is Adrian Villar still listed as the custodian for Santaquin Elementary on their website? Is
he still a district employee? Nebo District spokesperson Lana Hiskey’s response to 2News on
Friday stating she did not know if Villar's employment status has changed seems rather
5
disingenuous. (Harris, J. 2018, July 27. Nebo School District Custodian Charged With Sexually
Abusing Children. KUTV.com)
She stated that “[Villar’s] status could not be checked until Monday.” In light of the updated
photos of the new principal and teachers, it is highly doubtful that Villar’s staff photo remaining
on the school website is a mere oversight. We are opposed to Adrian Villar remaining a district
employee, and we request official confirmation that his employment has been terminated. There
is absolutely no circumstance where he should be working around our children.
We put the well-being of our children as our highest priority. We rely on the school district and
our individual school administration to provide a safe environment for our children. We advocate
for transparency and responsibility from Nebo School District. What assurances will you give
that this is being done?
These questions need to be addressed without delay. We look forward to receiving your answers
promptly.
Sincerely,
The Concerned Parents of Santaquin Elementary Students
6
6
The Concerned Parents of Sierra Bonita Elementary Students, who have read and agree with the
letter as stated above: