ON
Training effectiveness
measurement & employee
retention analysis
AT
1. Executive Summary
About company
2 Company profile
Literature Review
6. HRD at Amtek
10 Employee Retention
17 Conclusion
The data was collected through well structured questionnaires. The analysis is done in 4 phases
according to Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation. For first phase that is Reaction analysis I
have taken 15 odd training programs, with sample size of 210 employees. For rest of three phases
namely Learning, Behavior and ROI about 30 employees were considered as a sample size
This survey was carried out in various departments of the company .In the course of study, it was
found that the training programmes analyzed were provided to all the employees of AIL and was
not specific to a particular category of employees. The in depth study of the welfare measures
adopted by the company revealed that majority of employees were fairly satisfied with the training
and development programs.
MANAGEMENT TEAM
The senior management at Amtek has a long and distinguished experience in handling large-scale
demands of the global automotive giants in terms of product quality, development, delivery
and cost control while improving the company's profitability and ensuring a consistent growth for
the last nearly two decades. The senior management at Amtek is as follows:
Arvind Dham Chairman
Santosh Singhi Finance Director
John Flintham CEO, Overseas Operations
D.S. Malik Managing Director
V.K.Pabby Managing Director
Gautam Malhotra Joint Managing Director
Aditya Malhotra Director
R L Sehgal Director
Sanjiv Bhasin Director
Avijit Banerjee Director
AIL Mission
Punctuated with laurels & awards, our commitment towards quality and best customer
service always got due global recognitions; ever inspiring us to effect solutions that
Literature Review
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Amtek India ltd, Bhiwadi as part of the Amtek group plays an important role in the overall
industrial landscape of not just the state of Rajasthan but the country as well. It’s one of the
largest plants producing cast iron automobile castings. In order to attain the goals of AIL over
2000 people, a number that has been steadily growing over the last few years.
AIL has been one of the fastest growing organizations in the country. However its not just the
production or profitability that has propelled it to an enviable position, a committed and talented
workforce is one of the main reasons behind it. It is a fact that has been recognized even by the
top level management of this organization. The details given in the following pages are an
attempt to try and identify some of the tasks, challenges, their corresponding responses and
initiatives that is behind this success.
HR covers a variety of processes and procedures that begins even before an individual is hired till
the time the individual is there in the company. There are in fact two departments that deal with
the people’s affair of the company. Apart from the HR department it’s the Personnel &
Administration department.
The following are the important functions of Personnel and Administration department are as
follows;
• Wage and Salary management
• Time Maintenance
The People and organization development department or more commonly known as the Human
Resource department’s function can be briefly summed up as follows:
Identification of manpower requirement in collaboration with the respective department
Acquition of requisite talent
Development and skill enhancement of the acquired talent
Retention of talent.
In order to perform the above mentioned activities the HR department at AIL is sub-divided into
four sections:
1. INDUSTRIAL ENGG
2. RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
3. TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
4. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ORGANISATION
DEVELOPMENT
Each of these sections is headed by a section head. All the sections have to work in tandem with
each other for the attainment of organizational goal. Every organization association or even a
department is guided by a vision, which in turn acts as a guide for attainment of the mission
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS:-
It is a process of inviting the people for job in a particular company by different means saying
that there is a vacancy for a particular job .
Whereas “selection” is a process of appointing the person for a particular task from among the
applicants.
• Technological changes
• Additional workload
• Retirement/superannuation
• Turnover and natural separation trend.
SOURCES OF RECRUITMENT
1.10
Potential Vacancy
inteam
Yes
1.20
ReportingOfficer /
Department Headtofill in
resource requisitionform Yes
ForwardtoHR
1.30
1.35 1.40
Within
No Needto review No Request
sanctioned
& adjust Terminated
manpower
Yes
150
HRInitiates
Recruitment
Process
Step 2:
Targeted
Recruiting
Strategy
2.10
Add position to the
w ebsite career
sectio n
2.20
R eview Sourcing
Strategy
2.80
2.33 2.74
Go to Step 3:
D irectly to S tep
4, D irectly to Step
4,
A pplication& Pre-
Stage4.1 0 Sta ge4.40
Selectio n
4.20
Candidate send call letter
for selection process at
the unit . Biodata form
send along with call letter
4.25
Above SM Position at or Below SM
above SM
Fresh Engineer
4.60
4.40
4.30 Technical round
HR Round
Technical Written conducted by
Conducted by
Test Reporting officer /HoD
Recruitment Head
+ HR manager
Yes
4.43 4.63
4.42 4.34 4.62
Candidate No No Candidate
Passed Passed Passed
Rejected Rejected
Yes No Yes
4.44
4.64
Technical round 4.38
HR Round
conducted by Candidature
Conducted by
Reporting officer /HoD Rejected
Recruitment Head
+ HR manager
4.46 4.67
4.66
Interview round with No Candidate
Passed
Plant Head Rejected
4.68
4.49
4.48 Position
Candidate No
Passed Executive &
Rejected
Above
Yes Yes
4.50 4.70
Position DGM Final round with
& above Plant Head
Yes
4.52 4.73
4.72
Final interview No Candidate
Passed
with EVC & MD Rejected
No
4.55
4.54
Candidate No
Passed
Rejected
No
Yes
4.80
Proceed to Step 5; Yes
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Offer Process
METHODOLOGY:
The appraisal form is send to the HOD of various department and they fill the form and send to
the PMS & OD Department.
The concerned employee is to fill up his/her Key Result Areas (KRA’s) in consultation with the
HOD. At the same time the HOD defines certain Key Performance Indicators(KPI’s) against
which the employee is to be assessed.
Another important part of the whole process is training need identification. As a part of the
format the HOD is also expected to specify the training requirement for the employees working
under him.
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Organizational development is the one of important part of HRD, which is being practiced at
AIL. It covers vast area of development for AIL employees. Various services are provided by
OD, These are as follows:-
1. SABBATICALS
2. RETENTION ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEES
3. MENTORING SCHEMES
4. GEM OF AIL
5. SUGGESTION SCHEMES
6. WORKERS OPINION SURVEY
7. ORGANIZATIONAL SURVEY
8. SMILE(SELF MOTIVATED INDIVIDUAL FOR LEARNING AND
EMPOWERMENT)
9. APPRECIATION CARDS
10. INDUCTION MANUAL
11. SWAGAT
12. COMPETENCY MAPPING:
• BEHAVIORAL
• FUNCTIONAL
GEM OF AIL The word G.E.M means “gone the extra mile”
The motivational concept “GEM of AIL” was launched to identify & motivate employees
performing extraordinarily which in turn triggers other employees to perform better. With this in
view, every department has to identify & nominate one / two” GEM OF AIL” per month &
bimonthly.
THE CONCEPT OF SMILE
The term smile suggests “self motivated individuals for learning & empowerment”.
SMILE is for solving problems and making decisions in a better way. By skillfully over coming
problems & making productive decisions, it will turn our team into a community of success.
Scope of SMILE:
1. Innovativeness in the project.
2. Degree of creativity.
3. Cost reduction/ cost control/ cost saving.
4. Optimization of safety, health & environment.
5. Standards/ norms
6. Mandays/ time saving
7. Optimization of existing resources
8. No extra capital expenditures.
2.DESIGNING – This phase consist of setting goal of the learning outcome, instructional
objectives that measures behavior of a participant after the training, types of training material,
media selection, methods of evaluating the trainee, trainer and the training program, strategies to
impart knowledge i.e. selection of content, sequencing of content, etc
3. DEVELOPMENT – This phase translates design decisions into training material. It consists
of developing course material for the trainer including handouts, workbooks, visual aids,
demonstration props, etc, course material for the trainee including handouts of summary.
5. EVALUATION – The purpose of this phase is to make sure that the training program has
achieved its aim in terms of subsequent work performance. This phase consists of identifying
strengths and weaknesses and making necessary amendments to any of the previous stage in
order to remedy or improve failure practices.
The ISD model is a continuous process that lasts throughout the training program. It also
highlights that feedback is an important phase throughout the entire training program. In this
model, the output of one phase is an input to the next phase.
Performance
Deficiency
Lack of skill
or Other Causes
Knowledge
Non-training
Training
Measures
What methods
Who are the Who are the
and
trainees? trainers?
techniques?
What should be
What principles of Where to conduct
the level of
learning? the programme?
training?
Lectures:
Lecture is a verbal presentation of information by an instructor to a large audience. The lecturer
is presumed to possess a considerable depth of knowledge of the subject at hand. A virtue of this
method is that is can be used for very large groups, and hence the cost per trainee is low. This
method is mainly used in colleges and universities, though its application is restricted in training
factory employees.
Limitations of the lecture method account for its low popularity. The method violates the
principle of learning by practice. It constitutes a one-way communication. There is no feedback
from the audience.. Continued lecturing is likely to bore the audience. To break the boredom, the
lecturer often resorts to anecdotes, jokes and other attention-getters. This activity may eventually
overshadow the real purpose of instruction. However, the lecture method can be made effective it
if is combined other methods of training.
Audio-visual:
Visuals Audio-visuals include television slides, overheads, video-types and films. These can be
used to provide a wide range of realistic examples of job conditions and situations in the
condensed period of time. Further, the quality of the presentation can be controlled and will
remain equal for all training group. But, audio-visuals constitute a one-way system of
communication with no scope for the audience to raise doubts for clarification. Further, there is
no flexibility of presentation from audience to audience.
Simulation
A simulator is any kind of equipment or technique that duplicates as nearly as possible the
actual conditions encountered on the job. Simulation then, is an attempt to create a realistic
decision-making environment for the trainee. Simulations present likely problem situation and
alternatives to the trainee. For example, activities of an organization may be simulated and the
trainee may be asked to make a decision in support to those activities. The results of those
decisions are reported back to the trainee with an explanation of what would have happened had
they actually made in the workplace. The trainee learns from this feedback and improves his/her
subsequent simulation and workplace decisions.
The more widely held simulation exercises are case study, role playing and vestibu1 training.
Case Study
It is a written description of an actual situation in business which provokes, in the reader, the
need to decide what is going on, what the situation really is or what the problems are, and what
can and should be done. Taken from the actual experiences of organizations, these cases
represent to describe, as accurately as possible, real problems that managers have faced. Trainee
studies the cases to determine problems, analyses causes, develop alternative solutions, select the
best one, and implement it. Case study can provide stimulating discussions among participants as
well as excellent opportunities for individuals to defend their analytical and judgment abilities. It
appears to be an ideal method to promote decision-making abilities within the constraints of
limited data.
Role playing
Generally focuses on emotional (mainly human relations) issues rather than actual ones. The
essence of role playing is to create a realistic situation, as in case study, and then have the trainee
assume the parts of specific personalities in the situation. For example, a male worker may
assume the role of a female supervisor, and the supervisor may assume the role of a male worker.
Then, both may be given a typical work situation and asked to respond as they expect others to
do. The consequences are a better understanding among individuals. Role playing helps promote
interpersonal relation. Attitude change is another result of role playing. Case study and role
playing are used in MDPs
The advantage of simulation is the opportunity to 'create an environment' similar to real situations
the manager incurs, but without the high costs involved should the actions prove undesirable. The
disadvantage is (i) it is difficult to duplicate the pressures and realities of actual decision-making
non the job and (ii) individuals often act differently in real-life situations than they do in acting
out a simulated exercise.
The next question in designing training and development programme is to decide on the level of
learning. As was pointed out earlier, the inputs passed on to trainees in training and development
programmes are education, skills, and the like.
In addition, there are three basic levels at which these inputs can be taught. At the lowest level,
the employee or potential employee must acquire fundamental knowledge. This means
developing a basic understanding of a field and becoming acquainted with the language, concepts
and relationships involved in it. The goal of the next level is skills development, or acquiring the
ability to perform in a particular skill area. The highest level aims at increased operational
proficiency. This involves obtaining additional experience and improving skills that have already
been developed.34 All the inputs of training can be offered at the three levels. How effectively
they are learned depends on several principles of learning.
Learning Principles
Training and development programmes are more likely to be effective when they incorporate the
following principles of learning:
1. Employee motivation,
2. Recognition of individual differences,
3. Practice opportunities,
4. Reinforcement,
5. Knowledge of results (feedback),
6. Goals
7. Schedules of learning,
8. Meaning of material, and
9. Transfer of learning.
Thereafter the training department goes about its business in the following manner;
1. Preparation of training calendar (both monthly as well as well on an annual basis)
2. Contacting the respective faculty members and coordinating with them
3. Informing respective departments about the training program. In case of open nomination
the department head is free to send in people from his department on his own accord. In
some cases however certain individuals are already identified, who are then informed in
this regard.
4. The Training and Development cell then has to take care of all the facilities that are to be
provided with regards to the training program. If the program is an outbound one then the
entire activity is to be coordinated like-wise.
5. The Training & Development cell is entrusted with maintenance of attendance record of
the programs along with collecting immediate reaction feedback with the help of ‘smile
sheets’.
6. The entire data in this regard is constantly uploaded on to SAP.
7. According to company policy a learning evaluation form is sent to the respective
departmental HOD’s at least two-months after the training program had been conducted.
8. On the basis of the feedback received the program is rated on a scale of 10.
Probably the most well-known framework for classifying areas of evaluation, developed by
Kirkpatrick, contains four levels of evaluation. This conceptual framework assists in determining
the types of data to collect and answers four very important questions.
Reaction is defined as what the participants thought of the program, including material,
instructors, facilities, methodology, content, etc. Participant’s reaction is sometimes a critical
factor in redesigning or continuing HRD programs. Responses on reaction questionnaire help
ensure against decisions based on the comments of a very satisfied or disgruntled participant’s.
• Level 1 Evaluation—Reaction
• Level 2 Evaluation—Learning
• Level 3 Evaluation—Behavior
• Level 4 Evaluation—Results
Level 1—Reaction
Here your goal is to measure participants’ reactions to the training program. You should measure
their reactions immediately after the program. Level one evaluation should not just include
reactions toward the overall program (e.g., Did you like the program?); it should also include
measurement of participants’ reactions or attitudes toward specific components of the program,
such as the instructor, the topics, the presentation style, the schedule, audiovisuals, etc.
Furthermore, each of these components can be further broken down into sub-components for
evaluation (e.g., you can ask participants to evaluate specific characteristics of the instructor, the
presentation, etc.). In short, level one evaluation is far more than just the measurement of overall
customer satisfaction.
Level 2—Learning
Here your goal is to determine what the training program participants learned during the training
event. Because the training instructor should have specific learning objectives, one hopes to find
clear learning outcomes. Learning outcomes can include changes in knowledge ,skills , or
attitudes . Some training events will emphasize knowledge, some will emphasize skills, some will
emphasize attitudes, and some will emphasize multiple learning outcomes. The evaluation should
focus on measuring what was covered in the training event (i.e., the learning objectives).
Level two evaluation should be done immediately after the training event to determine if
participants gained the knowledge, skills, or attitudes. A couple of issues here are (a) how shall
one measure knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and (b) what research design should be use to
demonstrate improvement in level two outcomes?
Level 3—Behavior
Here your goal is to find out if training program participants change their on-the-job-behavior
(OJB) as a result of their having attended and participated in the training program. If the behavior
change does not occur, you also want to find out why the change did not occur. The level three
question is, Did the training have a positive effect on job performance? Level three evaluation
specifically involves measuring the transfer of knowledge, skills, and attitudes from the training
context to the workplace.
Remember that level one and level two outcomes are still important because participants
generally need to react positively to the training program (level 1 outcome) and they need to learn
the material (level 2 outcome) if they are going to be motivated and able to apply what they have
learned when they return to their jobs.
Level 4—Results
Here your goal is to find out if the training program led to final results, especially business results
that contribute to the “bottom line” (i.e., business profits). Level four outcomes are not limited
return on training investment (ROI). Level four outcomes can include other major results that
contribute to the well functioning of an organization. Level four includes any outcome that most
people would agree is “good for the business.” Level four outcomes are either changes in
financial outcomes (such as positive ROI or increased profits) or changes in variables that should
have a relatively direct effect on financial outcomes at some point in the future.
Communication leadership ,and team building are essential for competing in today’s business
scenario where just individual perfection is not as desirable as a high level of collective
performance. Adventure pursuits help develop individual and leadership qualities which are
essential for achieving excellence in various fields.
This training camp was organized with the above mentioned points in mind. The participants
were divided into two batches..
It must be noted that the participants belonged to the level of Dy.Manager and above.
The participants were identified through the competency assessment which in itself was a part of
much wider ranging exercise that was carried out at AIL. impart necessary knowledge and skills
about Communication, Leadership & Team Building covering :
• Orientation to the changing world and the need for increasing production capacity.
• Increasing self-awareness.
• Overcoming the barriers to effectiveness.
• Increasing Organisational Commitment.
• Importance of team building.
• Leadership Perspective.
The workshop was organized to address the following nine aspects;
1. Clear objective and agreed goals
2. Support and Trust
3. Sound Decision Making
4. Openness and Confrontation
5. Co-operation Vs Conflict
6. Appropriate Leadership
7. Regular reviews with respect to progress at work
8. Individual Development
9. Sound Inter-group relations.
The program consisted of a number of outdoor activities like; Icebreaker, Cook’s Tour, Magic
carpet, Knotty problem, Tent Pegging and the drum game.The underlying objective of this
training initiative was to nurture a fellow-feeling and impress upon the participants the
importance and advantage of team spirit. Hence quite predictably all the exercises were team
exercises.
“It is only with committed employees that one can create the right environment for employee
retention and sustained success in the market”
Retention is a critical element of an organization’s more general approach to talent management,
which is defined as “the implementation of integrated strategies or systems designed to increase
workplace productivity by developing improved processes for attracting, developing, retaining,
and utilizing people with the required skills and aptitude to meet current and future business
needs”.
An effective retention effort is the cornerstone of strategic employee management. An
organization’s ability to promote employee’s success, persistence, and knowledge speaks to the
quality of its job experience
Retaining key employees is critical to the long-term health and success of business. Most of the
managers readily agree that retaining good employees ensures customer satisfaction, high
productivity, satisfied co-workers, effective planning and increased organizational knowledge
and learning. Employee retention does matters a lot.
Employee retention plays a significant role in the context of customer retention and companies’
enduring success within their markets. This is why we need to develop the Employee Retention
Analysis which evaluates AIL employees' retention factors towards the company. We need to
work to make our organization one of the few, the best that truly honour and appreciate
employees.
If we treat our employees wonderfully, we will seriously reduce employee turnover. When these
things are done well, not only do retention rates increase, it becomes easier to recruit new
employees as well. From a financial perspective, retaining more employees is the most cost
effective approach for improving institutional budget outcomes.
(9) LOCATION
“The proximity of the workplace relative to one’s home”
(12) LEADERSHIP
“Leadership is the process of influencing the activities of an individual or a group in
effort towards goal achievement”.
(13) MOTIVATION
“The inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and
Organizational goals”.
OBJECTIVE
Training Effectiveness Measurement
Retention Analysis
• To communicate the importance of retaining employees and keeping them satisfied.
• To convey why respect is essential to keeping employees
Interpretation: Out of 210 Employees I have taken for my study, It was found that 95%
either Strongly agree or agree with the design of the training programs .So after looking at
the results it can be said that participants are satisfied with the design of the programs.
Interpretation: Out of 210 Employees I have taken for my study, It was found that 91%
either Strongly agree or agree with the Infrastructural facilities of the programs .Only 1%
strongly disagree or disagree with the infrastructural facilities of the programs, which is
negligible. So after looking at the results it can be said that participants are satisfied with
the infrastructure of the programs.
This is second phase of evaluation of Training Programs. A questionnaire was being prepared.
Sample size Used was of 30 employees. The objective was to measure the following:
b) Giving the learners time to reflect on their learning during the program prior to their
completion of their post-training personal action plan
c) Getting useful feedback in an organized manner, to help with future training planning, and
d) Ensuring trainees and learners follow-up their training with relevant actions to apply,
improve, develop and reinforce learning attained.
HOD Feedback-Results and Interpretations:
Q2 There has been a marked change in the activity and the performance after the training
ANALYSIS: for 30 employees, I have taken view of their immediate supervisors, It was
found that 67% either Strongly agree or agree that there has been a marked change in the activity
and the performance after the training,16% disagree with the fact and 17% are neither agree nor
disagree.
Q4 There were certain innovative and useful practices implemented as a result of this
training.
ANALYSIS: for 30 employees, I have taken view of their immediate supervisors, It was
found that 47% neither agree or nor disagree that there were certain innovative and useful
practices implemented as a result of this training.,40% either agree or strongly agree with the fact
and 13% are either disagree or strongly disagree.
ANALYSIS: for 30 employees, I have taken view of their immediate supervisors, It was
found that 87% either Strongly agree or agree that the training has benefitted the department and
13% are neither agree nor disagree.
Q6 The trainee has been able to put to use the skills he acquired during the training.
ANALYSIS: for 30 employees, I have taken view of their immediate supervisors, It was
found that 67% either Strongly agree or agree that the trainee has been able to put to use the skills
he acquired during the training,17% are neither agree nor disagree and 16% either strongly
disagree or disagree with that fact.
Q7 There has being a positive change in the behavior of the employee after the training
ANALYSIS: for 30 employees, I have taken view of their immediate supervisors, It was
found that 77% either Strongly agree or agree that There has being a positive change in the
behavior of the employee after the training ,13% are neither agree nor disagree and 10% either
strongly disagree or disagree with that fact.
The model of evaluation on which I have based my study is the “Kirkpatrick’s Model”. One of
the most effective and most prevalent way of evaluating the effectiveness of a training program is
through feedback gathered from the immediate reporting authority or the boss.
The questions that were put up to the individuals( here the boss) mainly tried to get an idea as to
how beneficial the training was from the department’s point of view.
1. They agree that the training has helped in the smoother attainment of departmental goals
and that the department has indeed benefitted from the training.
2. They are also positively inclined to send other employees for such programs.
3. Another fact is the acceptance of the fact that the participants did indeed apply what they
had learned during the training. But the extent of impact of this training is what is to be
noted here. According to the respondents there hasn’t exactly been a marked change in
the performance of the department as a result of this training.
4. The respondents in this case found the participants bringing in a new zeal and a higher
level of motivation as a result of this training.
For this purpose questionnaires are filled by peers, candidates and Hod’s .
In order to try and find the effectiveness of the training program a separate questionnaire was
developed to assess the change brought about by the training program a separate questionnaire
was developed for peers to evaluate.
In order to do so herein there are results from the survey conducted and the interpretation arrived
at.
PEERS:
Q5 Your colleague/senior will consult you (regarding work) in most cases even if its time
consuming.
Q6 Your colleague/senior would prefer setting an example and expects others to follow it.
Q7 The training has helped your colleague/senior more goal oriented.
INTERPRETATION: Mere figures or pictorial depictions don’t convey the message that is to
be derieved from the responses. The following are the interpretations of the responses received;
1. Overall response to the program is quite clearly positive with all the respodents agreeing
to the fact that the training did indeed help their collegues.
2. Some of the key criterias that I attempted to capture were as follows;
a. Team spirit
b. Openess to change and flexibilty
c. Goal orientation.
3. With regards to the training program the respondents felt that their colleagues as a result
of this training had become more of a team player. This sentiment was all pervasuve with
100% of the respondents agreeing to it.
4. Furtheremore when asked as to whether the participant would consult before taking most
departmental decisions, an overwhelming 100% agreed to it. This is an important
indicator indicating towards the success of the trianing; albiet not in entirity.
5. However when asked as to whether the participant had helped the respondent in
suceeding at his job(the respondents) 13% responded negatively to it.
6. Finally as far as goal orientation is concerned all the respondents admitted that the
training had aided in developing a more goal oriented approach in their colleagues.
SELF EVALUATION:
INTERPRETATION
1. All the participants agree to the fact that the training program was indeed able to fulfill
the participants objectives.
2. The program was conducted with the object of developing team skills in the participants.
From the responses gathered an overwhelming majority of individuals have seen a
positive change in themselves. In a nutshell they themselves as better team player’s now
3. The training it seems has been fairly successful in reducing stress levels of the
participants. This fact is corroborated by the data gathered from peers as well.
4. It seems that the training has yielded its results as far as impressing upon the participants
the importance of team building.
5. The participants have noted that they have been able to implement some of the learning
that they have acquired but even then when asked to narrate any one of such incidents a
lot of them were not able to come up with anything.
6. Some participants have felt that this training has helped them adapt to the organisation
better at the same time a few have claimed that this training has helped them in coming up
with innovative ways to deal with problems faced by them.
7. Its evident from the responses that the training has helped the participants become more
receptive to change and at the same time respect the opinion of other team
members( departmental colleagues).
SELF EVALUATION:
HEREIN A TOTAL OF 13 QUESTIONS AND THEIR RESPONSES HAVE BEEN
ANALYSED KEEPING IN MIND THE OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM.
Q1. The training was well organized and clearly structured.
Q12 The training helped me come out with some innovative ideas.
Q 13 The training has helped in updating with the current trends in the
industry
INTERPRETATION
ROI analysis:
Result on investment, this part is most important in training evaluation because it gives you
ultimate results of training. for this purpose I have taken interviews of Hod’s of respective
departments. I have also done Gap analysis collectively between previous status and current
status of results.
The results of following questions asked in interview can be categorized under the following:-
Higher productivity.
Decreased in delays
I love the job; I like my job and have lots of fun; I am happy in my current position and enjoy the
work that I do here; I love my job and I feel like I am accomplishing something; I really enjoy
what I do as an employee.
The above graph shows that 95% of employees are satisfied with their jobs at JSPL. The rest 5%
of the employees surveyed are either undecided or not satisfied.
Extrinsic rewards
“The amount of benefits, or equivalents distributed in return for service”.
JSPL pays better salaries than other businesses in the field; we are provided with various
benefits like insurance, mediclaim, marriage gift, club, housing, auditorium, musical fountain
and many more; better pay and benefits are among the best in the industry.
Here in this graph, it shows that 87% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the salaries
and benefits or equivalents distributed in return to service.
CONSTITUENT ATTACHEMENT
“The degree of attachment to individuals associated with the organization such as
supervisor, co-workers, or customers.”
My coworkers are fun loving, goal oriented, and help me stay motivated; I feel like I am part of
the team; my supervisor is a great role model; the people I work with are like family to me.
ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT
“The degree to which individual’s identify with and are involved in the organization”.
I am not the type of person that jumps from job to job; I am proud to work here; I believe in
loyalty to the company that hired me; I love this place; I feel AIL as a part of my family and I am
loyal to that; Because I made a commitment to do the job and I don’t jump ship just because the
water gets rough.
From the above graph we can find out that 95% of AIL employees are loyal and committed to the
Organization.
ORGANIZATION PRESTIGE
“The degree to which the organization is perceived to be reputable and we
I feels good to say I work for JSPL; our company is highly respected; people always say JSPL is
the best place to work; has a great reputation for being good to its employees and brand name in
the manufacturing industry, which makes us more marketable.
The above graph shows that 96% of the employees surveyed are feeling proud to be a part of this
reputed organization.
ORGANIZATION CULTURE
“Organization Culture is shared values & norms”.
“A set of core values, guiding principle, behavioral norms, and behavioral patterns, which
govern the way people in an organization interact with each other and invest energy in their job
and in the organization at large”. Participative decision making system is added advantage to
have a cohesive work environment. Reduction of stress is an important brick for the success of
any organization.
Here in this graph, it shows that 86% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the core values,
guiding principle, behavioral norms, and behavioral patterns.
LACK OF ALTERNATIVES
“Beliefs about the unavailability of jobs outside the organization”.
I do not like the experiences I have had with any of our competitors; I have not received a better
job offer; I have applied in other organization: the economy is down and I cannot find another
job.
Here in this graph, it shows that 53% of the employees surveyed are disagreeing to the given point as
they are with JSPL because they are getting healthy work culture.
Advancement opportunities
“The amount of potential for movement to higher level within the organization”.
JSPL provides excellent opportunities for advancement and development; The Company offers
me the chance to move up; I see the future here; I joined JSPL few years ago and had acquired
vast exposure; I like the opportunity of growth here; JSPL hire and promote talent.
LOCATION
“The proximity of the workplace relative to one’s home”
It is really close to my house; the location to and from work is really accessible; accommodated
within company premises: not having to travel through the city to get to work; it is a short and
convenient drive from my home; the company is close to my home.
In the given graph, it shows that 86% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the location of
the organization.
ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE
“Perceptions about the fairness of reward allocations, policies and procedures, and
interpersonal treatment”.
The company cares what its employees think and lets us give input; I am treated and trusted as a
valued team member; our policies are fair & transparent; I am satisfied with the company
policies and procedures.
Question No. 25 26 27 Total
Strongly Agree (5) 203 252 228 683
Agree (4) 475 451 471 1397
Undecided (3) 57 39 59 155
Disagree (2) 39 35 22 96
Strongly Disagree (1) 11 8 5 24
This graph interprets that 88% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the perceptions
about the fairness of reward allocations, policies and procedures, and interpersonal treatment.
Here in this graph, it shows that 85% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the flexible
work arrangement within the organization.
LEADERSHIP
“Leadership is the process of influencing the activities of an individual or a group in effort
towards goal achievement”.
This graph shows that 91% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the process of
influencing the activities of an individual or a group in effort towards goal achievement.
MOTIVATION
“The inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals”.
Here
in
this
graph, it shows that 91% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the inner force that drives
individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals.
IN TOTAL
“The degree of RETENTION ANALYSIS in total”.
Here in this graph, it shows that 84% of the employees surveyed are satisfied with the
organizational work culture, opportunities, norms & principles, So, Our Retention Rate is 84%
with the survey of 785 employees of the sample data size. It definitely shows that JSPL –
Raigarh Plant is having high percentage of retention of employees in overall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITATIONS OF PROJECT:
The limitation included:-
Time Constraint: The project was limited to a period of 3 months which restricted the exposure
to the broader aspect of the topic.
Confidential data: Most of the data where confidential and for the perusal of the company
employees.
No personal meetings: it was restricted to paper work only. No session were held which could
help in getting the details.
Calculation of ROI: ROI assessment was so difficult as to be insurmountable, so that the
organization remains satisfied with general approximations or vague comparisons, or
accepts wider forms of justification for the training without invoking detailed costing.
Conclusion
After doing the study of two training programs in AIL researcher found that most of the
participants were fairly satisfied with the Design, content, Infrastructure and Job Relevance of the
program. Training helped in smoother attainment of departmental goals and researcher found that
participants bringing in a new zeal and a higher level of motivation as a result of training.
Researcher also found out that participants were able to implement their skills what they learnt by
technical training program when they return to their job. Ultimately researcher can conclude that
training helped in achieving quality of work life, improved quality of work, higher productivity
and improved human relations.
After doing a survey on Employee Retention in AIL, Researcher found that most of the
employees were satisfied with their current jobs. Researcher has identified that there are some
important factors which are responsible for retaining the employees in AIL like they feel proud to
be a part of reputed organization , employees are satisfied with the organization culture, fairness
in organization. Researcher found that Employees believe that in AIL they get opportunity to
grow, they are satisfied with the amount of potential for movement to higher level within the
organization. so researcher can conclude that most of the employees surveyed are satisfied with
the organizational work culture, opportunities, norms & principles, so retention rate is very high
in the Organization.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARTICLES
Annett, Duncan, Stammers and Gray, Task Analysis, Training Information Paper 6, HMSO,
1971.
Kirkpatrick, D.L., Evaluating Training Programs: The four levels, Berrett-Koehler, 1996.
Wills, Mike, Managing the Training Process, McGraw-Hill, 1993.
Donald Kirkpatrick's Learning Evaluation Model 1959; review and contextual material
Alan Chapman 1995-2007
Articles for books & management magazines published by ICFAI University Press.
Article posted on August 24, 2008.