DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

TITLE FOUNDATION DESIGN

CLIENT TRIVENI EARTH MOVERS PVT. LTD.
PROJECT OVERPASS FOR THE VILLAGE ROAD AT MANGAMPET
PART TRUSS BRIDGE PORTION
DESIGN OF OPEN FOUNDATION FOR PIER-2 AND PIER-3
Design of Footing
The design is done for the critical cases of Normal, Wind and Seismic (Factored Loads/ Moments )
2.2 1.26

5.660

PLAN
12.77 1.45 1.45

4.67

TIE BEAM 3.00

2000 SECTION

600
0

1260 2150.0 1260

P2 P4 P3 P1

length width
Size of the Footing = 12.77 x 4.67 m
Depth of the Footing = 0.60 m
C/S Area of footing = 48 m2
Factored DL of foooting 2131.9848 KN (1.35*Vol of raft+Pedestals+Beam*Concrete density)
Section Modulus ZL = 12.77 x 4.67 2
= 46.42 m3
6
ZT = 4.67 x 12.77 2
= 126.93 m3
6
This is not for soil bearing pressure check
LOAD INPUT FROM L/C 1002 L/C 1003 L/C 1007 L/C 1008
STAAD FOR ULS Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 * INCLUDES DL OF
CASE Normal* Wind Seismic L Seismic Tr FOOTING
Net P = 7583.54 6347.45 6041.09 6041.09 KN
ML 1144.80 686.88 2688.63 572.40 KNm
MT 0.00 569.80 0.00 2116.23 KNm
P/A 157.99 132.24 125.86 125.86 kN/sqm
ML/ZL 24.66 14.80 57.92 12.33 kN/sqm
MT/ZT 0.00 4.49 0.00 16.67 kN/sqm

1
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3
a+b+c 182.654 151.526 183.780 154.861 kN/sqm
a+b-c 182.654 142.547 183.780 121.515 kN/sqm
a-b+c 133.327 121.930 67.932 130.197 kN/sqm
a-b-c 133.327 112.951 67.932 96.851 kN/sqm
P1 182.654 151.526 183.780 154.861 kN/sqm
P2 133.327 121.930 67.932 130.197 kN/sqm
P3 169.345 143.541 152.523 148.206 kN/sqm
Avg Pre. In toe 176.000 147.533 168.152 151.534 kN/sqm
CG of varying pr. 0.638 0.636 0.650 0.635 m
Net Moment 1806.56 1509.01 1757.33 1547.31 kNm
d effective (m)= 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 m
Shear = 1741.82 1460.10 1664.15 1499.69 kN at deff distance from
Net Shear = 1741.82 1460.10 1664.15 1499.69 kN (after applying the f

TIE BEAM FORCES

size 2.00 mx 2.15 m= 4.3 sqm

Width of the footing = 4.67 m

Max base pressure case1 = 182.654 kN/sqm
case2 = 151.526 kN/sqm
case3 = 183.780 kN/sqm
case4 = 154.861 kN/sqm

UDL on Tie Beam case1 = 852.99 kN/m

case2 = 707.63 kN/m
case3 = 858.25 kN/m
case4 = 723.20 kN/m

BM on Tie Beam case1 = 5063.49 Kn-m

Span = 8.44 m case2 = 4200.56 Kn-m
case3 = 5094.70 Kn-m
case4 = 4293.01 Kn-m

SF on Tie Beam case1 = 3599.63 kN/m

Span = 8.44 m case2 = 2986.18 kN/m
case3 = 3621.82 kN/m
case4 = 3051.90 kN/m

2
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3
TITLE FOUNDATION DESIGN
CLIENT TRIVENI EARTH MOVERS PVT. LTD.
PROJECT OVERPASS FOR THE VILLAGE ROAD AT MANGAMPET
PART TRUSS BRIDGE PORTION
DESIGN OF OPEN FOUNDATION FOR PIER-2 AND PIER-3
Design of Footing
The design is done for the critical cases of Normal, Wind and Seismic (Unfactored Loads/ Moments )
2.2 1.26

5.660

PLAN
12.77 1.45 1.45

4.67

TIE BEAM 3.00

2000 SECTION

600
0

1260 2150.0 1260

P2 P4 P3 P1

length width
Size of the Footing = 12.77 x 4.67 m
Depth of the Footing = 0.60 m
C/S Area of footing = 48 m2
Unfactored DL of foooting 1579.248 KN (Vol of raft+Pedestals+Beam*Concrete density)
Section Modulus ZL = 12.77 x 4.67 2
= 46.42 m3
6
ZT = 4.67 x 12.77 2
= 126.93 m3
6
This is check for soil bearing pressure and stabilty
2002 2003 2011 2012
LOAD INPUT FROM STAAD Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 * INCLUDES DL OF
FOR SLS CASE FOOTING
Normal* Wind Seismic L Seismic Tr
Net P = 5210.38 5208.96 4696.23 4696.23 KN
ML 763.20 763.20 1983.22 572.40 KNm
MT 0.00 379.87 0.00 1410.82 KNm
P/A 108.55 108.52 97.84 97.84 kN/sqm
ML/ZL 16.44 16.44 42.73 12.33 kN/sqm
MT/ZT 0.00 2.99 0.00 11.12 kN/sqm

3
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3
a+b+c 124.992 127.955 140.565 121.285 kN/sqm
a+b-c 124.992 121.970 140.565 99.055 kN/sqm
a-b+c 92.107 95.070 55.112 96.622 kN/sqm
a-b-c 92.107 89.085 55.112 74.391 kN/sqm
P1 124.992 127.955 140.565 121.285 kN/sqm
P2 92.107 95.070 55.112 96.622 kN/sqm
P3 116.119 119.083 117.509 114.631 kN/sqm
Avg Pre. In toe 120.556 123.519 129.037 117.958 kN/sqm
CG of varying pr. 0.638 0.638 0.649 0.636 m

Summary of loads for Foundation Stability

Normal Wind Seismic L Seismic Tr
case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4
Axial Load 5210.4 5209.0 4696.2 4696.2
Moment Long 763.2 763.2 1983.2 572.4
Moment TR 0.0 379.9 0.0 1410.8
Allowable Str. 250 250 250 250
a = P/A 108.5 108.5 97.8 97.8
b = Mtr / Ztr 16.4 16.4 42.7 12.3
c = Ml / Zl 0.0 3.0 0.0 11.1
a+b+c 125.0 128.0 140.6 121.3
a-b-c 92.1 89.1 55.1 74.4
Overturning 0.044 0.044 0.015 0.052
e Long =M/P 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1
d =B/2-e 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.2
3d 6.6 6.6 5.7 6.6
Overturning OK OK OK OK
check 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
125.0 128.0 140.6 121.3
Pressure 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0
check OK OK OK OK

4
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

oments )

e density)

NCLUDES DL OF
FOOTING

KN
KNm
KNm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm

5
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
kN/sqm
m

6
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

TITLE FOUNDATION DESIGN

CLIENT TRIVENI EARTH MOVERS PVT. LTD.
PROJECT OVERPASS FOR THE VILLAGE ROAD AT MANGAMPET
PART TRUSS BRIDGE PORTION
DESIGN OF OPEN FOUNDATION FOR PIER-2 AND PIER-3
Design of RCC Foundation
ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011

Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 30 Mpa Ec 31220.19

Pier fck 30 Mpa Ec 31220.19
Sectional Properties
Load Case Normal Wind Seis.L Seis Tr Normal Wind Seis.L
Section at Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Tie beam Tie beam Tie beam
LC 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
No. of webs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Width of beam, B (mm) 4670 4670 4670 4670 2150 2150 2150
Depth of beam, D (mm) 600 600 600 600 2000 2000 2000
Area of Girder m2 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 4.30 4.30 4.30
Perimeter of Girder m 10.54 10.54 10.54 10.54 8.30 8.30 8.30
Moment of Inertia m4 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.43 1.43 1.43
depth of section m 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 2.00 2.00 2.00
CG of Section (bot) m 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Z bot of section m4 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 1.43 1.43 1.43
Z top of section m4 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 1.43 1.43 1.43
Width of Web m 4.67 4.67 4.67 4.67 2.15 2.15 2.15

Grade of concrete =M 30 MPa

Grade of steel = Fe500

(fck) = 30.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/g 434.7826 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.60 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-10.3.3.2 P-91
Part.mat. factor for conc (gm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-6.4.2.8 P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Mod.Elas of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
Mod.Elas of concrete (Ecm) = 31000 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.45 N/mm2
Ult.tensile strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(gs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa
Coeff.of influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder)
Factor (l ) = 0.80
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (h) = 1.00
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
.
fcd = (a*fck/gm) = 13.40
Factor Fav (hfcdl) = 10.72
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.40
sc =fcm. ((kn-n^2)/(1+(k+2)n)

7
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

DESIGN OF BEAM AT SUPPORT/MIDSPAN Normal Wind Seis.L Seis Tr Normal

Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Tie beam
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3
Shear = KN 136 0 114 0 3600
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 1807 1509 1757 1547 5063
Design Eq Shear = KN 136 0 114 0 3600
Design Eq Moment = KNm 1807 1509 1757 1547 5063
Width of beam, B = mm 4670 4670 4670 4670 2150
Depth of beam, D = mm 600 600 600 600 2000
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 2
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 20 20 20 20 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 20 20 20 20 25
deff provided = 495 495 495 495 1888
Kav= M/(B*d*d*fav) = 0.147 0.123 0.143 0.126 0.062

Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'

Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 225.76 225.76 225.76 225.76 860.87

Xu in mm = mm 77.8 64.2 75.5 66.0 119.4

IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Steel required, As = mm2 8957 7395 8696 7594 6330
Minimum Reinf.reqd = 0.20% mm2 5604 5604 5604 5604 8463

Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20 25
Nos Nos 36 36 36 36 10
Dia of bars mm 25
Nos Nos 10
Dia of bars mm
Nos Nos
Reinf provided = mm2 11310 11310 11310 11310 9817
Bar Spacing 127 127 127 127 219
Reinf provided is Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Neutral axis depth (x) = mm 98 98 98 98 85
NA is Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Ult Moment of resistance of section = kNm 2241 2241 2241 2241 7741
MR Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various X n. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-

MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compres
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compres
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; Ved is + downward

8
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

.
. 1 2 3 4 5 6

VEd 136 0 114 0 3600 2986

VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 136 0 114 0 3600 2986
fck 30 30 30 30 30 30
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.636 1.636 1.636 1.636 1.636 1.636
d m 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 1.888 1.888
bw m 4.670 4.670 4.670 4.670 2.150 2.150
Asl mm 2
11310 11310 11310 11310 9817 9817
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
S = (Ay)c m 0.841 0.841 0.841 0.841 4.300 4.300
4
I m 0.084 0.084 0.084 0.084 0.000 0.000
scp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40
fctd = fctk/gm 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
n 0.528 0.528 0.528 0.528 0.528 0.528
r1= 0.0049 0.0049 0.0049 0.0049 0.0024 0.0024
q deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 61.4 61.4
.
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*r1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15scp] bw d
VRd,c kN 1030.4 1030.4 1030.4 1030.4 1808.9 1808.9
0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
VRd,c kN 821.1 821.1 821.1 821.1 1441.4 1441.4
VRd,c I*bwc / s * sqrt [ (fctd)^2+k1.scp.fctd]
VRd,c kN 1030 1030 1030 1030 1809 1809
VEd, < 8178 8178 8178 8178 14356 14356
VEd, actual kN 136 0 114 0 3600 2986
Shear Reinforcement is . Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Reqd Reqd
. Shear reinforcement not reqd for Foundn
.
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotq / s
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotq+tanq)
VRd,max kN 7360 7360 7360 7360 10850 10850
rmin = . 0.00079 0.00079 0.00079 0.00079 0.00079 0.00079
Asw min = mm 2
552 552 552 552 212 212
n1 = 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53
Asw max = 0.5*acw*n1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 5699.60 5699.60 5699.60 5699.60 2186.68 2186.68
Asw required = mm 2
106 0 89 0 609 505
s = spacing of stirrups mm 150 150 150 150 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 16 16 16 16 12 12

9
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

No. of legs for stirrups Nos 2 2 2 2 6 6

diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 8 8 8 8 4 4
Asw provided mm2 1307 1307 1307 1307 1131 1131
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 1688 1688 1688 1688 3637 3637
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
DFtd 0.5 xVEd
DFtd 68.2 0.0 57.2 0.0 979.5 812.6
(Med - MR)/ z = 974.8 1642.8 1085.4 1556.8 1575.9 2083.9
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

10
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

GN
PVT. LTD.
D AT MANGAMPET
TION
PIER-3

Mpa
Mpa

Seis Tr
Tie beam
4
1
2150
2000
4.30
8.30
1.43
2.00
1.00
1.43
1.43
2.15

Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Clause-10.3.3.2 P-91
Clause-6.4.2.8 P-49
Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Clause-6.2.2 P-29
Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112

Cube Clause-6.4.2.8 P-49

page-242

page-242

Clause-6.4.2.8 P-48

11
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

Wind Seis.L Seis Tr

Tie beam Tie beam Tie beam

2986 3622 3052

0 0 0
4201 5095 4293
2986 3622 3052
4201 5095 4293
2150 2150 2150
2000 2000 2000
2 2 2
25 25 25
50 50 50
25 25 25
1888 1888 1888
0.051 0.062 0.052

860.87 860.87 860.87

98.6 120.2 100.8

Safe Safe Safe
5228 6370 5345
8556 8459 8546

25 25 25
10 10 10
25 25 25
10 10 10

9817 9817 9817

219 219 219
Safe Safe Safe
85 85 85
Safe Safe Safe
7741 7741 7741
Safe Safe Safe

(Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)

ember by crushing of compression struts

ea in case of inclined compression chord

ment in case of inclined tensile chord

downward; Ved is + downwards)

12
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

7 8

3622 3052
0 0 (0.9 PT)
3622 3052
30 30
500 500
1.636 1.636 1+sqrt(200/d) < 2
1.888 1.888
2.150 2.150 m
9817 9817 mm2
0 0
4.300 4.300
0.000 0.000
0.0 0.0 Ned/Ac < 0.2 x fcd
434.78 434.78 fyk/rm
13.40 13.40 a*fck/gm
1.3 1.3
1.000 1.000 Eq 10.9
0.528 0.528 Eq 10.6
0.0024 0.0024 Asl / (bw. d ) < 0.02
61.4 61.4

1808.9 1808.9 for RC members

0.45 0.45
1441.4 1441.4 (min)
Eq 10.4
1809 1809 to be taken for calculations
14356 14356 Eq 10.5
3622 3052
Reqd Reqd

Eq 10.7
Eq 10.8
10850 10850
0.00079 0.00079 Eq 10.20
212 212
0.53 0.53

2186.68 2186.68
613 517
125 125
12 12

13
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

6 6
12 12
4 4
1131 1131
Safe Safe
3637 3637
OKAY OKAY

985.5 830.5
1557.5 2029.4
0.0 0.0

14
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

TITLE FOUNDATION DESIGN

CLIENT TRIVENI EARTH MOVERS PVT. LTD.
PROJECT OVERPASS FOR THE VILLAGE ROAD AT MANGAMPET
PART TRUSS BRIDGE PORTION
DESIGN OF OPEN FOUNDATION FOR PIER-2 AND PIER-3
Crack Width Check for foundation

Concrete Grade fck = 30 N/mm2

Concrete Modulus Ec = 31220.2 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200.0 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 135.49 Tm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 600 mm
Section width bt = 4670 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 75 mm
Bar spacing s = 127 mm
Bar diameter f = 20 mm
Effective depth h = 515 mm
Area of steel As = 11310 mm2

Serviceability Limit State(SLS)

Stress Level

Moment of Inertia of
cracked section = bt*xu^3/3+m*As*(d-xu)^2
Icr = 20490435816 mm4
Stresses are calculated for Maximum bending moment
in concrete ( σcc) =
5.14 < 13.40 MPa Safe

stress in steel ( σsc) = m*Ms(d-xu)/Icr

185.20 < 347.83 MPa Safe
Crack width
Maximum crack width
where spacing of
bonded
reinforcement with
in the tension zone <= 5*(C+ф/2)
<= 5*(75+20/2)
<= 425 mm

Case 1: Spacing of bonded

reinforcement with in the
tension zone <= 5*(C+ф/2)
127.00 <= 425

15
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

bond propoerties k1 = 0.8 for deformed bars

k2 = 0.5 for bending
.
Maximum crack spacing Sr,max (3.4c)+(0.425k1k2ф)/ρp.eff Eqn 12.8

= 500 mm

Ac,eff is the effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinforcement, of depth
hc,eff, where hceff is lesser of 2.5(h-d), (h-x)/3 or h/2.
hc,eff 212.5 mm or 174.1 mm or 300
Therefore hc,eff 174.06949 mm
Ac,eff = 812904.52 mm2

rr.eff = As/Ac.eff
=
= 0.01391

Case2 :the spacing of bonded reinforcement

or
No bonded reinforcement with in the tension zone > 5*(C+ф/2)
Actual Spacing = 127.00 < 425 mm

Maximum crack spacing Sr,max = 1.3 (d-XU)

= 555.37 mm Not Applicable

Maximum of maximum cracking

spacing Sr,max = 499.60 mm

Factor dependent on the duration of the load (kt)

= 0.5

(esm-ecm) = (ssc - kt fct.eff/rr.eff (1+aerr.eff))/Es >=0.6 ssc / Es

=
= 185.20 - 0.50 2.80 x
0.01391
= 0.0003780 200000
Section in tension, Hence Cracked

>= 0.000556 >=0.6 σsc / Es

(esm-ecm) = 0.000556

Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)

16
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

= 0.278 mm < 0.3 Moderate

Section in tension, Hence Cracked (As per Table 12.1 of IRC-112)
Safe

17
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

18
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

mm

1.09

19
 DESIGN OF PIER FOUNDATION-P2,P3

20
 TITLE FOUNDATION DESIGN
CLIENT TRIVENI EARTH MOVERS PVT. LTD.
PROJECT OVERPASS FOR THE VILLAGE ROAD AT MANGAMPET
PART TRUSS BRIDGE PORTION
DESIGN OF OPEN FOUNDATION FOR PIER-2 AND PIER-3
ULS Case 1 for cross section design-Normal Case-DL+SIDL+LL
Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
38 1002 -151.32 2075.23 7.81
48 1002 -157.28 2075.12 -7.74
43 1002 -38.70 650.65 -6.50 -
33 1002 -34.30 650.55 6.43
NET FORCES -381.60 5451.55 0.00
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 1144.8 0.003

ULS Case 2 for cross section design-Normal+Wind Case-DL+SIDL+LL+WL

Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
33 1003 2.209 945.081 -42.251
38 1003 -85.484 1068.188 -37.222
43 1003 -28.795 756.525 -61.168 -
48 1003 -116.89 1445.669 -49.292
NET FORCES -228.96 4215.46 -189.93
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 686.88 569.799

ULS Case 3 for cross section design-Normal+Seismic X Case-DL+SIDL+LL+EQX

Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
33 1007 -181.402 -1144.4 2.613
38 1007 -262.481 3098.951 8.999
43 1007 -182.327 -1144.22 -2.697 -
48 1007 -270 3098.775 -8.914
NET FORCES -896.21 3909.10 0.00
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 2688.63 0.003

ULS Case 4 for cross section design-Normal+Seismic Z Case-DL+SIDL+LL+EQZ

Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
 33 1008 -4.875 1117.508 -170.82
38 1008 -74.834 256.117 -169.979
43 1008 -7.197 1585.526 -184.853 -
48 1008 -103.894 949.951 -179.757
NET FORCES -190.80 3909.10 -705.41
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 572.4 2116.227
 TITLE FOUNDATION DESIGN
CLIENT TRIVENI EARTH MOVERS PVT. LTD.
PROJECT OVERPASS FOR THE VILLAGE ROAD AT MANGAMPET
PART TRUSS BRIDGE PORTION
DESIGN OF OPEN FOUNDATION FOR PIER-2 AND PIER-3
SLS Case 1 for Pressure, Stability and crack width check-Normal Case-DL+SIDL+LL
Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
33 2002 -22.846 431.124 4.467
38 2002 -100.763 1384.442 5.401
43 2002 -25.915 431.191 -4.514 -
48 2002 -104.876 1384.376 -5.353
NET FORCES -254.40 3631.13 0.00
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 763.2 0.003

SLS Case 2 for Pressure, Stability and crack width check-Normal+Wind Case-DL+SIDL+LL+WL
Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
33 2003 -14.951 609.339 -27.627
38 2003 -90.825 1142.542 -23.639
43 2003 -35.918 483.723 -41.349 -
48 2003 -112.707 1394.109 -34.007
NET FORCES -254.40 3629.71 -126.62
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 763.203 379.866

SLS Case 3 for Pressure, Stability and crack width check-Normal+Seismic X Case-DL+SIDL+LL+EQX
Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
33 2011 -131.193 -776.845 2.148
38 2011 -196.09 2335.337 6.806
43 2011 -132.044 -776.675 -2.223 -
48 2011 -201.746 2335.167 -6.732
NET FORCES -661.07 3116.98 0.00
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 1983.219 0.003

SLS Case 4 for Pressure, Stability and crack width check-Normal+Seismic Z Case-DL+SIDL+LL+EQZ
Normal LOAD COMBINATION FX, kN FY, Kn FZ, kN ML, kNm MT, kNm
 33 2012 -13.508 731.093 -113.474
38 2012 -70.992 440.115 -112.512
43 2012 -15.291 1043.158 -123.66 -
48 2012 -91.009 902.617 -120.627
NET FORCES -190.80 3116.98 -470.27
LEVER ARM FROM TOP OF PEDESTAL TO BOTTOM OF RAFT, M 3.00 3.00
-
Moment= Horizontal force X Pedestal Lever arm 572.4 1410.82