10thPlanet?
This distant, icy rock whose discovery shook up the solar system and led
to Pluto's planetary demise has been given a name: Eris.
The christening of Eris, named after the Greek goddess of chaos and
strife, was announced by the International Astronomical Union on
Wednesday. Weeks earlier, the professional astronomers' group stripped
Pluto of its planet-hood under new controversial guidelines. Since its
discovery last year, Eris ignited a debate over what constitutes a planet.
Astronomers were split over how to classify the object — which had
been known as 2003 UB313, its provisional numerical designation; or as
Xena, the informal code name that was chosen by its discoverers. Some
argued that it should be welcomed as the 10th planet since it was larger
than Pluto, but others felt Pluto was not a full-fledged planet. After much
bickering, astronomers last month voted to shrink the solar system to eight
planets, downgrading Pluto to a "dwarf planet," a category that also
includes Eris and the asteroid Ceres.
The dwarf planet Eris, which measures about 70 miles (110 kilometers)
wider than Pluto, is the farthest known object in the solar system at 9
billion miles (14 billion kilometers) away from sun. It is also the third
brightest object located in the Kuiper Belt, a disc of icy debris beyond the
orbit of Neptune.
The discovery of Dysnomia, the moon of Eris, from the W.M. Keck
Observatory. Eris appears in the centre, while the moon is the small dot at
the 3 o'clock position. Credit: M.E. Brown, W.M. Keck Observatory.
The sun and other planets appear in the distance. Credit: R. Hurt, IPAC.
While we know that Eris is larger than Pluto, that doesn't necessarily
mean it is more massive than Pluto. For example, a snowball could be
bigger than a rock, but still be much less massive. Pluto appears to be a
combination of ice and rock. If Eris were purely made out of ice, it could be
a good deal less massive than Pluto. Alternatively, if it is mostly rock, it
could be much more massive than Pluto. The one way to find out the mass
of an object like Eris is to hope to find a moon around it. Finding a moon,
and then determining the distance that the moon is from the planet and
how long it takes the moon to circle the planet allows us to precisely
measure the mass of the body. A more massive body will pull on the moon
tightly and it will circle the body more quickly.
A less massive body will allow the moon to have a slow lazy orbit
around the planet.
From a series of seven observations using the Keck Telescope and the
Hubble Space Telescope, we have now measured the complete orbit of
Dysnomia going around Eris. Dysnomia takes almost 16 days to go around
Eris. Using equations for used by Isaac Newton to figure out the mass of
Jupiter, we can now tell that Eris has a mass 27% higher than that of Pluto
(with an uncertainty of only 2%). The full orbit can be seen below.
Our best images came from the Hubble Space Telescope, and clearly
showed (much to our surprise) that Dysnomia is the only moon around.
These images, shown below, are so good that you also can see some of the
artefacts caused by the Hubble Space Telescope itself. In particular, the
spikes coming out of Eris, the spotty "ring" around Eris, and the slight
elongation to the right of Eris are all expected patterns caused by the
telescope itself, rather than from anything going around Eris.
A second reason that discovering the moon is important is that
understanding how moons form provides insight into the history of the solar
system. It is quite surprising the 3 of the 4 largest objects in the Kuiper belt
(Eris, Pluto, and 2003 EL61) all have moons. Such a large fraction of objects
with moons suggests that some very common mechanism must be
responsible.
Images of the four largest Kuiper belt objects, from the Keck Observatory Laser
Guide Star Adaptive Optics system. Satellites are seen around all except for 2005
FY9. Without the adaptive optics system the images of the Kuiper belt objects
would he smeared out so much by the earth's atmosphere that the satellites would
not be visible.
We do know that the moon of 2003 EL61 (the third largest object in
the Kuiper belt, after Eris and Pluto) appears to be a ball of almost pure
frozen water. We know this because we have been able to look at the
sunlight reflected off the moon at infrared wavelengths and the pattern of
the light reflected shows us that there is frozen water and nothing else.
From the limited information that we have, Dysnomia appears like it might
be similar to the moon of 2003 EL61 (2003 EL61 was code named Santa, by
the way, so the satellite is, of course, Rudolph). We are planning to use the
Hubble Space Telescope later this year to study Dysnomia in more detail.
Arc Orb.