Types of Stimuli SSVEP applications Problem Solution Example Stimuli in action Hybrid System Summary Reference extra
Youmna Ismaeil1
1 Computer Science
June 7, 2018
Overview
1 What is SSVEP?
2 Types of Stimuli
3 SSVEP applications
4 Problem
5 Solution
Change of Stimuli
Visual Motion Stimulus
6 Example
7 Stimuli in action
EEG
Algorithm
SSVEP Results
Motion Results
8 Hybrid System
Hybrid System Results
9 Summary
10 Reference
11 extra
What is SSVEP?
Brain signal
Flickering stimuli at constant rate
stable over time
Trigger harmonics
Types of Stimuli
Types of Stimuli
Figure: A music player controller with flickering light as proposed by [Zerafa et al., 2018]
Problem ?
Solution
Proposed Solutions
Text
Youmna Ismaeil Saarland University SSVEP June 7, 2018 8 / 25
What is SSVEP? Types of Stimuli SSVEP applications Problem Solution Example Stimuli in action Hybrid System Summary Reference extra
Text
Expectations vs Realty
Text
Figure: motion stimuli simulated as motion to the right Figure: motion stimuli is in reality flickering with 7 Hz
Working example
EEG
EEG
recording brain signals
location of importance
EEG
Electrode Locations
EEG
contribution of f
Welch PSD
Fourier transform
EEG
Algorithm
SSVEP Algorithm
Start
EEG signal
processing Baseline
(PSD)
Extract features
PSD - baseline
Normalize
remove -ve
features
yes
right left > Right
No
yes No
Nothing left = Right left
Figure: Diagram showing the SSVEP Algorithm for both O1 and O2 signals
SSVEP Results
SSVEP
Subject accuracy(%)
1 92.5
7 healthy subjects 2 82.5
No prior experience 3 80.0
40 trials 4 85.0
20 right 5 85.0
20 left 6 77.5
7 82.5
mean 83.57±4.76
SSVEP Results
Different Notations
Motion Results
Start
EEG signal
processing
(PSD)
Attention indices
ratio => PSD_alpha/
PSD_(alpah, beta)
Difference
alpah - beta
Normalize
remove -ve
& >0.25
yes
right Ndiff_1< Ndiff2
No
yes No
Nothing Ndiff_1= Ndiff2 left
Figure: Diagram showing the motion stimuli Algorithm for both O1 and O2 signals
Motion Results
SSVEP vs Motion
Subject SSVEP(%) motion(%)
SSVEP
13 HZ option
Forward option
Motion Stimuli
13 HZ option
Forward option
stop command
Hybrid system
Subject Hybrid(%)
1 85.83
2 89.18
10 healthy subjects 3 82.93
3 no prior experience 4 86.68
5 83.35
15 mins training
6 85.75
30 mins SSVEP
7 86.68
30 motion stimuli 8 82.5
-trials/command
9 83.33
10 90.0
mean 85.62±2.48
meantime/command 4.14
Summary
Reference I
Asanagi (2018).
cerebral cortex.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:
21_electrodes_of_International_10-20_system_for_EEG.svg.
Chumerin, N., Manyakov, N. V., van Vliet, M., Robben, A., Combaz, A., and Hulle,
M. M. V.
Processing and decoding steady-state visual evoked potentials for brain-computer
interfaces.
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Campus
Gasthuisberg, O&N 2, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Issa, N. P. (2018).
cerebral cortex.
https://www.docneuro.com/cerebral-cortex.html.
Lopes, P. A. C., Germano, J., Almeida, T. M., Sousa, L., Piedade, M. S., Cardoso,
F., Ferreira, H. A., and Freitas, P. P. (2007).
A new handheld biochip-based microsystem.
In 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pages
2379–2382.
Reference II
mrbobowen (2018).
Visual evoked potential (vep) - can also uncover scotomas.wmv.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEd1h_lz4rA.
Walters, J. (2018).
A quick intro to ssvep: Steady state visually evoked potential.
http://synaptitude.me/blog/
a-quick-intro-to-ssvep-steady-state-visually-evoked-potential/.
Yunyong, P. and Yodchanan, W.
Enhancement of steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain–computer
interface systems via a steady-state motion visual stimulus modality.
IEEE Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 12(S1):S89–S94.
Zerafa, R., Camilleri, T., and Falzon, O. (2018).
Ssvep-based brain-computer interface (bci) system for real-time application.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uekFQ6X5Gg0.
extra
extra
Motor Cortex
central area
C2, C4
Motion Visual
stimuli
Simulation
extra