Available: 4
Life Cycle Assessment
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and Living
Points: Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 72 of 386
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Design Rating
1 Update whole building Carbon assessment to As built status to
demonstrate carbon content of constructed building showing
any changes did not increase carbon impact..
3 Update building WOL LCA assessment to As built status to
demonstrate carbon content of constructed building and
showing any changes did not increase WOL impacts..
Living Rating
1 Update whole building Carbon assessment to capture
maintenance and cleaning strategies to demonstrate carbon
content of constructed and maintained building showing any
changes did not increase carbon impact..
3 Update building WOL LCA assessment to capture maintenance
and cleaning strategies to demonstrate WOL impacts of
constructed and maintained building showing any changes did
not increase WOL LCA impacts..
The report should break down and illustrate graphically, impacts and
savings compared to BAU benchmark of each major building element,
group and stage as well as overall totals. It should also show history of how
either carbon or LCA modelling was used to scenario test construction and
component options to minimise overall building carbon or Life cycle
impacts.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 73 of 386
Demonstrate either :
the carbon content of the constructed building, showing any
changes did not increase carbon impacts, or
the WOL LCA assessment of the constructed building, showing any
changes did not increase WOL impacts.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 74 of 386
Requirement
LB-r1: Outdoor Thermal Comfort
Intent To reduce heat in urban open space through passive cooling strategies.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 78 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide a report demonstrating the results of the outdoor thermal
Living Rating comfort strategy employed to improve the building s exterior
microclimate.
Calculations and Shading from trees may be included in the calculation provided the
Methodology trees installed as part of development are at least three years old and are
irrigated if necessary for growth.
Shading affects of trees must consider the trees to have reached 70% of
their expected mature size.
Related Resources See Design Guide. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) calculations
and References may be suggested when the geometry or height of the semi-enclosed
spaces dictate.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 79 of 386
Requirement
LB-r5: Healthy Ventilation Sources
Intent To protect the quality of air drawn into buildings for ventilation and to
ensure the air within the immediate public domain around buildings is
not contaminated by local exhaust emissions from buildings or
carparks.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that the building mechanical system meets the following
requirements:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 87 of 386
LB-r6: Building Ventilation for Comfort Requirement
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 88 of 386
Performance Requirement
Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling report showing
how the project meets the Credit Requirements in accordance
with required parameters in Calculations and Methodology
section below. Any changes to the final building from the
original design must be included in the final model.
Credit Submission:
Living Rating
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 89 of 386
LB-19: Outdoor Air Ventilation Credit Points
Available: 3
Intent To promote the provision of building systems that support the well-
being and comfort of occupants by providing sufficient outside air
ventilation.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that 95% of the occupied area meets the following, as
appropriate:
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and Living
Points Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Ventilation meets minimum requirements
2 Ventilation exceeds minimum requirements by 30%
3 Ventilation exceeds minimum requirements by 60%
Design Rating
1 Ventilation meets minimum requirements
2 Ventilation exceeds minimum requirements by 30%
3 Ventilation exceeds minimum requirements by 60%
Living Rating
1 Ventilation meets minimum requirements
2 Ventilation exceeds minimum requirements by 30%
3 Ventilation exceeds minimum requirements by 60%
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 136 of 386
Conditional Design Mechanical Ventilation
Rating Summary report describing how the mechanical design system
meets the Credit Requirements, including outside air rates,
plant size and ventilation system
Modelling report
Drawing of mechanical system, including an air schematic
clearly indicating ventilation systems, including air handling
units, fans and enthalpy recovery units.
Mixed mode Ventilation
All Credit Submissions for mechanically ventilated buildings as
noted above.
Calculations demonstrating the project complies with CISBE
Applications Manual 10:2005.
The calculations/simulations shall cover at least one representative
sample of each type of premises (occupied areas only).
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Design Rating Mechanical Ventilation
Summary report describing how the mechanical design system
meets the Credit Requirements, including outside air rates,
plant size and ventilation system
Modelling report
As-built drawing of mechanical system, including an air
schematic clearly indicating ventilation systems, including air
handling units fans and enthalpy recovery units.
Mixed mode Ventilation
All Credit Submissions for mechanically ventilated buildings as
noted above.
Calculations demonstrating the project complies with CISBE
Applications Manual 10:2005.
The calculations/simulations shall cover at least one representative
sample of each type of premises (occupied areas only).
All reports and calculation included in the Conditional Design
Submission can be resubmitted provided there have been to changes to
the design.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 137 of 386
LB-20: Air Change Effectiveness Credit Points
Available: 1
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that occupants are receiving optimum air quality through
the air change effectiveness in 95% of the occupied spaces, as follows:
Mechanical Ventilation
Calculations or CFD simulations as per ASHRAE F25-33 & 34
(2005) or IAQ2007-34 (i.e. the air exchange effectiveness in
normally occupied spaces is equal to or greater than 0.95)
OR
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Demonstrate compliance with air change effectiveness
criteria
Design Rating
1 Demonstrate compliance with air change effectiveness
criteria
Living Rating
1 Demonstrate compliance with air change effectiveness
criteria
Credit Submission:
Conditional Design
Rating
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 138 of 386
Provide the following documentation:
Where Calculations or CFD simulations are used
Report detailing the design criteria that has been adopted for
each category of premises included in the development, and
the results of calculations and/or simulations in the specified
sample of premises to demonstrate compliance with the
assessment criteria (see Calculations and Methodology).
Drawings showing the mechanical ventilation system
AND
If the systems or controls do not continue to operate as
intended, rectification work undertaken to ensure the
operation is restored to certified Design Rating functionality
levels.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 139 of 386
Calculations and The modelling locations shall include at least one representative
Methodology sample of each type of premises (normally occupied spaces) as defined
by the type of HVAC system used, design occupancy density, nature of
usage, zoning, etc. modelling is required at the occupied zone in each
representative test space in accordance with ASHRAE.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 140 of 386
LB-21: Microbial and Humidity Control Credit Points
Available: 1
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that the mechanical ventilation system actively controls
humidity to 95% of the occupied area as follows:
60% relative humidity in the occupied areas
Less than 80% relative humidity in the supply ductwork.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Demonstrate active humidity control in ventilation system
Design Rating
1 Demonstrate active humidity control in ventilation system
Living Rating
1 Demonstrate active humidity control in ventilation system
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 141 of 386
As-built mechanical drawings showing relative humidity
sensors and extract from the BMS control specification
detailing how humidity requirements are to be achieved.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 142 of 386
LB-22: Thermal Zones Credit Points
Available: 2
Intent To reward projects that use thermal zoning of the ventilation system to
provide improved occupant comfort and energy efficiency.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that 95% of the nominated area has separately controlled
thermal zones, as follows:
Offices
Separate zones and controls for every 100m2 of common office space
and for individual offices and meeting rooms
Retail
Separate zones for each tenancy.
Residential
Separate controls for living areas and bedrooms.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
2 95% of nominated area has separately controlled thermal
zones
Design Rating
2 95% of nominated area has separately controlled thermal
zones
Living Rating
2 95% of nominated area has separately controlled thermal
zones
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 143 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Living Rating Extract from LB-40 Commissioning report verifying the
individual zones continue to operate as intended.
OR
Summary Audit report demonstrating the ongoing successful
operation of the thermal zone controls
AND
If the systems or controls do not continue to operate as
intended, rectification work undertaken to ensure the
operation is restored to certified Design Rating functionality.
Calculations and Living Rating stage Audit report may be provided by appropriately
Methodology qualified mechanical consultant, including a company involved in the
design team, provided it is not undertaken by an individual included in
the design team.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 144 of 386
LB-23: Occupant Comfort and Control Credit Points
Available: 2
Mechanical Ventilation
The ventilation/temperature control system allows for individual
occupant delivery and control of one or more of the following items:
Air temperature
Air flow, humidity
Mean radiant temperature
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points available vary by Type. There are
two levels of achievement. No Additional Credit Points are available.
Design Rating
1 N/A N/A 50% of occupied area has individual air
control
2 N/A N/A 95% of occupied area has individual air
control
Living Rating
1 N/A N/A 50% of occupied area has individual air
control
2 N/A N/A 95% of occupied area has individual air
control
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 145 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Conditional Design
Mechanical Ventilation:
Rating
Brief narrative describing how the project meets the Credit
Requirements.
Mechanical system drawings of locations of diffusers, chilled
beams, access floors and vents together with thermostats or
other individual control devices.
BMS point schedule
Mixed-mode Ventilation:
All documentation as above for mechanical ventilation.
Drawings and elevations clearly indicating the size and
location of ventilation openings and ventilation controls.
Mixed-mode Ventilation:
All documentation as above for mechanical ventilation.
As-built drawings and elevations clearly indicating the size
and location of ventilation openings and ventilation controls.
Calculations and Living Rating stage Audit report may be provided by appropriately
Methodology qualified mechanical consultant, including a company involved in the
design team, provided it is not undertaken by an individual included in
the design team.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 146 of 386
LB-24: Thermal Comfort Modelling Credit Points
Available: 2
Intent To reward projects that are designed to provide optimal thermal comfort
for their use.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that thermal modelling on the building design has been
performed to ensure a thermally comfortable environment for building
occupants, as follows:
Retail
: Demonstrate that the Predicted Mean Vote
(PMV) levels, calculated in accordance with ISO 7730, are achieved
during Standard Operating Hours of Occupancy for 98% of the year
using standard clothing and metabolic rate value:
1 credit point = PMV levels between -1.5 and +1.5, inclusive
2 credit points = PMV levels are between-1 and +1, inclusive
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and Living
Points Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all types
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 147 of 386
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Office and Residential: PMV levels between -1 and +1
Retail: PMV levels between -1.5 and +1.5
2 Office and Residential: PMV levels between -0.5 and
+0.5
Retail: PMV levels between -1 and +1
Design Rating
1 Office and Residential: PMV levels between -1 and +1
Retail: PMV levels between -1.5 and +1.5
2 Office and Residential: PMV levels between -0.5 and
+0.5
Retail: PMV levels between -1 and +1
Living Rating
1 Office and Residential:
Retail:
2 Office and Residential:
Retail:
Mechanical Ventilation:
Report describing thermal comfort design conditions and how the
project meets the conditions set forth in the referenced standard and
meets the Credit Requirements.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 148 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Living Rating Extract from LB-40 Commissioning report verifying the
individual zones continue to operate as intended.
OR
Summary Audit report demonstrating the ongoing successful
operation of the thermal zone controls
AND
If the systems or controls do not continue to operate as
intended, rectification work undertaken to ensure the operation
is restored to certified Design Rating functionality.
Calculations and Living Rating stage Audit report may be provided by appropriately
Methodology qualified mechanical consultant, including a company involved in the
design team, provided it is not undertaken by an individual included in
the design team.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 149 of 386
LB-30: Indoor Air Pollution Exhaust Credit Points
Available: 1
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Provide a dedicated tenant exhaust riser meeting the credit
requirements.
Design Rating
1 Provide a dedicated tenant exhaust riser meeting the credit
requirements.
Living Rating
1 Provide a dedicated tenant exhaust riser meeting the credit
requirements.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 160 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Living Rating Brief narrative explaining how the project meets the credit
criteria.
As Built Drawings of exhaust system for a typical entire floor
showing any changes since Design Rating-
if no changes, previous report and drawings can be
resubmitted.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 161 of 386
LB-31: Indoor CO2 Management Credit Points
Available: 1
Mechanical Ventilation
Install permanent carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring and control
systems to ensure the adequate provision of outside air at all
times. A minimum of one CO2 sensor at all return points must
be provided.
Mixed-mode Ventilation
Compliance with the requirements above for mechanical ventilation
and the provision of a CO2 alert system enabling occupants to directly
adjust ventilation rates when the mechanical ventilation system is not
in use.
In all instances comply with WHO Guidelines 2000 Air Quality
Guidelines for Europe 2nd Edition, see ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2:2007
Appendix B, Table B-1.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Provide air quality monitoring and control systems or
100% outside air
Design Rating
1 Provide air quality monitoring and control systems or
100% outside air
Living Rating
1 Provide air quality monitoring and control systems or
100% outside air
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 162 of 386
Mechanical Ventilation:
Where CO2 monitoring systems are installed
Brief narrative describing how the project proposes to meet
the credit criteria
Extracts from specifications indicating requirements for the
locations of all CO2 monitors, setpoints and control sequences
(as relevant) OR outside air requirements for ventilation
systems.
Description and drawings of any proposed enthalpy recovery
equipment
Mixed-mode Ventilation:
Documentation as above for mechanically ventilated
buildings.
Specifications indicating the requirements for the alert system.
Mixed-mode Ventilation:
Where CO2 monitoring systems are installed
Documentation as above for mechanically ventilated
buildings.
Commissioning report showing appropriate calibration, of C02
sensors and testing of the alert system have been
implemented.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 163 of 386
AND
If the systems or controls do not continue to operate as
intended, rectification work undertaken to ensure the
operation is restored to approved Design Rating functionality
levels.
Mixed-mode Ventilation:
Where CO2 monitoring systems are installed
Documentation as above for mechanically ventilated
buildings.
Report showing ongoing successful operation of C02 sensors
and testing of the alert system has been implemented.
Calculations and Living Rating stage report may be provided by appropriately qualified
Methodology mechanical consultant, including a company involved in the design
team, provided it is not undertaken by an individual included in the
design team.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 164 of 386
LB-32: Car Park Air Quality Management Credit Points
Available: 1
Intent To facilitate the provision of adequate air quality within enclosed car
parks.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that the ventilation design meets or exceeds requirements
for CO and NO2 concentrations in car parks, as follows:
(a) Carbon
monoxide 15 minutes 90
(CO)
(b) Nitrogen
15 minutes 0.1
dioxide (NO2)
Where the project does not contain any enclosed car parks (75%
enclosure), it is not eligible for this credit.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and Living
Points Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Ensure car park ventilation design meets credit requirements
Design Rating
1 Ensure car park ventilation design meets credit requirements
Living Rating
1 Ensure car park ventilation design meets credit requirements
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 165 of 386
Drawings or extracts from specifications indicating the proposed
location of air quality sensors and air quality alert system.
BMS point schedules.
The system presented in this credit must be consistent with the system
included in the energy model (e.g. variable speed drive fans).
Calculations and 75% enclosure is defined as a carpark with external walls or other
Methodology building uses to more than 75% of total external perimeter wall area of
the carpark area.
Related Resources ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2:2007 Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
and References www.ashrae.org
WHO Guidelines 2000 Air Quality Guidelines for Europe 2nd Edition.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 166 of 386
LB-33: Prevention Credit Points
Available: 1
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that no water-based cooling tower systems are used for
building cooling
AND
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Do not use water-based cooling and/or or use protocol for
Legionella prevention
Design Rating
1 Do not use water-based cooling and/or use protocol for
Legionella prevention
Living Rating
1 Do not use water-based cooling and/or use protocol for
Legionella prevention
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 167 of 386
A copy of the required protocol for the treatment of Legionella
in the project s water-based systems.
OR
Where there is water-based cooling
A copy of the required protocol for the treatment of Legionella
in the project s water-based systems.
OR
Where there is water-based cooling
A copy of the Operations and Maintenance Manual showing
the adopted protocol and process for treatment of Legionella
in project water-based systems are compliant with nominated
Reference Standards.
Related Resources ASHRAE Guideline 12- 2000 Minimising the Risk of Legionella
and References associated with Building Water Systems
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 168 of 386
LB-34: Indoor Noise Pollution Credit Points
Available: 1
Retail
Residential
Demonstrate that internal ambient noise levels do not exceed 30-35
dBA for bedrooms and do not exceed 50dBa for other occupied areas.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Office: do not exceed 40 dB(A) for 95% of occupied area
Retail: do not exceed 50 dB(A) for 95% of occupied area
and 55 dB(A) for restaurants
Residential: do not exceed 30 dBA for bedrooms and 50
dB(A) for other areas
Design Rating
1 Office: do not exceed 40 dB(A) for 95% of occupied area
Retail: do not exceed 50 dB(A) for 95% of occupied area
and 55 dB(A) for restaurants
Residential: do not exceed 30 dB(A) for bedrooms and 50
dB(A) for other areas
Living Rating
1 Office: do not exceed 40 dB(A) for 95% of occupied area
Retail: do not exceed 50 dB(A) for 95% of occupied area
and 55 dB(A) for restaurants
Residential: do not exceed 30 dB(A) for bedrooms and 50
dB(A) for other areas
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 169 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Conditional Design
A noise design report with the following details:
Rating
Short report describing how the project meets the Credit
Requirements, in relation to all relevant internal and external
noise sources, noise control features of the design and any
underlying assumptions.
Results of calculations or supporting tests demonstrating
compliance with the requirements (expressed in parameters
that are consistent with the test and/or calculation methods).
Plans, elevations and drawings representing typical floors
marked up to clearly indicate noise control features.
CV of the acoustic engineer.
Calculations and For the purposes of the calculations or measurements, all operable
Methodology windows should be considered open.
Only noise from building services and external noise sources should
be included, not noise from occupants or tenant equipment and
appliances.
Measurements and calculations should represent the four noisiest areas
of the building, typically near façades on busy streets.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 170 of 386
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 171 of 386
LB-35: Outdoor Noise Pollution Credit Points
Available: 1
Intent To minimise noise pollution associated with the building that may
affect neighbouring buildings, amenities or wildlife.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that the level of intruding noise at the facade of the
nearest noise sensitive premises will be minimised to less than 55
dB(A).
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Ensure intruding noise does not exceed 55 dB(A)
Design Rating
1 Ensure intruding noise does not exceed 55 dB(A)
Living Rating
1 Ensure intruding noise does not exceed 55 dB(A)
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 172 of 386
The required noise levels have been met in all relevant
external areas
If the noise levels do not meet the Credit Requirements, details
of the, rectification work undertaken to ensure the operation is
restored to levels consistent with the Credit Requirements.
CV of the acoustic engineer.
Calculations and Noise sensitive premises include but are not limited to the following:
Methodology Residential dwelling units
Hotel accommodation units
Dwelling Houses
Hospitals and Healthcare facilities
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 173 of 386
LB-37: Construction Indoor Air Quality Credit Points
Available: 1
Management
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design and Design
Points Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Develop a Construction IAQ plan
Design Rating
1 Implement a Construction IAQ plan
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 176 of 386
Credit Submission: There is no submission required at this stage.
Living Rating
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 177 of 386
Ý®»¼·¬ Í»½¬·±²
ÐÉæ Ю»½·±«- É¿¬»®
ÐÉóê ͬ±®³©¿¬»® ì ì ì
·² ¬¸» ß°®·´ îððê ËßÛ ×²·¬·¿´ Ò¿¬·±²¿´ ݱ³³«²·½¿¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» ˲·¬»¼ Ò¿¬·±²- ±² ½´·³¿¬» ½¸¿²¹»ô ¬¸»
´·µ»´·¸±±¼ ±º ¬¸» ½±«²¬®§ ¾»½±³·²¹ »ª»² ¼®·»® ¼«» ¬± ¹´±¾¿´ ©¿®³·²¹ ·- ¿ ¼·-¬·²½¬ °±--·¾·´·¬§ò ݱ«°´»¼
©·¬¸ °®±¶»½¬»¼ °±°«´¿¬·±² ·²½®»¿-»-ô ¬¸» ·³°±®¬¿²½» ±º ¿½½»´»®¿¬·²¹ ©¿¬»® ½±²-»®ª¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»«-»
»ºº±®¬- ·- ½´»¿®ò
•• Ѳ» ±º ¬¸» ³±-¬ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ½¸¿´´»²¹»- º±® ¬¸» Û³·®¿¬» ·- ¬± ¾¿´¿²½» ©¿¬»® -«°°´§ ¿²¼
¬¸» ¸·¹¸»-¬ ·² ¬¸» ©±®´¼ ¿²¼ ²»© ©¿¬»® -«°°´·»- ¿®» »¨°»²-·ª»ò
ײ ©¿¬»® ½±²-¬®¿·²»¼ ½·¬·»-ô ëðû ±® ³±®» ±º ©¿¬»® «-¿¹» ½¿² ¾» ¿´´±½¿¬»¼ ¬± ´¿²¼-½¿°» ·®®·¹¿¬·±²ò
Ë-» ±º ¸·¹¸ó©¿¬»®ó«-» ª»¹»¬¿¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ ¼»³¿²¼- ³±®» ©¿¬»® ¬¸¿² ²¿¬·ª» -°»½·»- ±²´§ »¨¿½»®¾¿¬»- ¬¸»
-·¬«¿¬·±²ò ̸»®»º±®»ô ®»¼«½·²¹ ±ª»®¿´´ ©¿¬»® «-» ¿²¼ ®»«-·²¹ ©¿¬»® ¿- ³¿²§ ¬·³»- ¿- °±--·¾´»ô ©·´´
¬¸¿¬ -¸±«´¼ ¾» «-»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» »¿®´§ ¼»-·¹² °®±½»--ò ̸·- Ý¿´½«´¿¬±® ©·´´ ¸»´° ¬¸» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬
-¸±«´¼ ¾» ¸»´°º«´ ·² ·¼»²¬·º§·²¹ ¸±© ¿²¼ ©¸»®» ®»¼«½¬·±²- ·² ¬¸» «-» ±º °±¬¿¾´» ©¿¬»® ³¿§ ¾» ³¿¼»ò
This page is left intentionally blank
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 193 of 386
PW-r1: Minimum Potable Water Requirement
Conservation
Credit Requirements Demonstrate the project meets the minimum water use requirements
by one of the following:
Prescriptive Requirement
Use fittings and/or flow management systems that
deliver or use no more than flow or delivery rates shown in
Appendix 1 Appliances, Equipment and Facilities and
Appendix 2 for Fittings.
Performance Requirement
Reduce potable water consumption for overall by 30% from
current Abu Dhabi consumption levels.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 194 of 386
Performance Requirement
Summary Report showing Credit Submission for PW-r3:
Water Model and percentage calculations based on required
percentages for this credit.
Summary listing all specified water-using equipment and
facilities
Schedule of fixtures and fittings
Hydraulic drawings,
BMS point schedules where BMS installed.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 195 of 386
Calculations and Living Rating stage audit report may be provided by appropriately
Methodology qualified mechanical consultant, including a company involved in the
design team, provided it is not undertaken by an individual included
in the design team.
Prescriptive Requirement
See Appendix 1 and 2 for benchmark data and assumptions to use in
the model.
Performance Requirement
See Appendix 1 and 2 for benchmark data and assumptions to
compare the proposed fittings, equipment and facilities to be used in
the project with.
If choosing fittings, equipment and facilities that are higher than the
assumptions shown in Appendix 1 and 2, the applicant will need to
ensure adequate offsets are created using different initiatives to
produce the required minimum efficiencies required.
The report to be provided must show all assumptions and the
rationale for any changes including Technical Data Sheets and/or the
actual surveyed or statistical data supporting the rationale of the
modification.
Use of Reclaimed Water should be supported by the details of the
proposed Licensed provider.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 196 of 386
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 197 of 386
Requirement
PW-r2: Exterior Water Metering
Intent To prevent water leaks and waste from building water systems and to
enable effective management of outdoor water uses.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that all irrigation and exterior water uses are separately
metered and, where available, connected to the Building Management
System (BMS).
Exterior uses include, but are not limited to: all external hose
bibs, irrigation systems, swimming pools and water features.
Irrigation main lines and laterals must be colour-
coded/Reclaimed Water labelled in accordance with the Abu
Dhabi Plumbing Code and connected to Abu Dhabi
Reclaimed Water mains where available. Where Reclaimed
Water mains are not currently available, the project must
provide quick connect valves for future connection to use
Reclaimed Water.
The system must also raise an alarm whenever any unexplained or
abnormal water consumption is detected, including but not limited to:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 198 of 386
Living Rating
Reports of any instances where meters have been shown to be
faulty or the system has raises an alarm relating to unexplained
or abnormal water consumption detected in accordance with
the Credit Requirements.
If meter/s have been shown to be faulty or the alarm has been
raised, rectification work undertaken to ensure the operation is
restored to approved Design Rating functionality levels.
Related Resources Environment Agency Abu Dhabi- Plumbing Code (Draft 2009)
and References
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 199 of 386
Requirement
PW-r3: Water Model
Intent To enable the project team to make informed decisions about the
options, implications and benefits of various water supply and
conservation strategies.
Note to Proponent This requirement establishes the foundation for all PW Credit Points, while
also helping to fulfill the Water Strategy requirements of the UPC
Development Review Process as defined in Forms C, D and E.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate using the Pearls New Building Water Calculator the
development s predicted water consumption for all uses, including
potable water, rainwater and reclaimed water, for both indoor and
outdoor uses.
The analysis must use the Calculator to compare the proposed
building s predicted performance to a Calculator Benchmark Building s
performance showing the amount of water consumption saved
compared to the Benchmark building.
(ii) Appliances
Volume of water used by the following appliances (where installed):
Dishwashers
Clothes washing machines
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 200 of 386
description of designated uses and levels of treatment must be
included.
(vi) Condensate and Bleed-off Capture
The amount of water predicted to be reclaimed and stored or treated
for higher reuse from cooling coil condensate and cooling tower
bleed-off, where installed.
(ix) Landscaping
The amount of water predicted for irrigation. Where there is no
landscaping requiring irrigation, this is excluded from the calculation.
Groundwater is a limited resource and should not be used. Any use of
groundwater cannot be deducted from a project s potable water use
requirements and makes the project ineligible for any points under
Credit PW-1.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 201 of 386
The report must be organised by items in the Water Calculator, with
documentation for each item including specifications of fittings,
equipment and schedule of consumption clearly tabbed and
matching data in the water calculator.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 202 of 386
(vi) Condensate and Bleed-off Capture
Brief narrative describing the mechanisms by which
collected condensate and bleed-off will be reused and
the relevant water quality control system to deliver
water of suitable quality for intended use
Specification or schedule extracts listing the
parameters of the HVAC and heat rejection systems.
Drawings of the collection system for capturing and
transporting condensate generated from cooling
systems and bleed off from cooling towers.
Calculations of the annual quantities of condensate
and bleed-off production, based on the system
parameters provided above.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 203 of 386
Brief narrative describing all onsite water conservation
strategies and how the Water Calculator was used to make
decisions regarding the project design to end of
construction.
Complete updated calculations for each item required in the
Water Calculator, showing total water use and savings for
each major water use. See Calculations and Methodology
section below for more details.
All documentation required for each item in the water
model, as noted below.
Calculations and To calculate the project s predicted water use savings over a Base
Methodology Case building:
1. Determine the total amount of water used by the Base Case
building for all uses .[Figure#1]
2. Then determine the total amount of water used by the
project for all uses (two options available, A&B, to test
multiple scenarios).
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 204 of 386
In addition the total area of roof (as well as type, chosen
from a drop-down menu), hardstand and landscaping area is
required. The roof and hardstand areas are used to
calculated the potential for rainwater/stormwater collection
(combining run-off coefficient and annual rainfall). The
landscape area is used to calculate landscape water usage,
based on a default usage.
2. Pools & Water Features. The total volume (kl) of pools and
water features is required, as well as determination whether
they are covered/uncovered (selected from a drop down
menu). The calculator will determine annual water loss
based on this data.
3. Heat Rejection Water. Heat rejection water covers the use
of cooling towers/district cooling for the project. The type of
system is chosen from a drop down menu and a calculation
undertaken based on building type, area and default water
usage numbers.
Fire System Test Water. Water usage from tests and their
frequency can be changed by the project. Evidence and
calculations will need to be provided to show how any
proposed reductions are achieved.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 205 of 386
Landscaping. Projects are able to classify landscaping areas
as either high use, medium use, medium-low use, low use
or no irrigation to reflect the landscaping proposed for the
project.
Emergency Override:
Projects treating blackwater and/or greywater and/or using
Reclaimed Water and condensate must have an emergency
override system to divert flow to the municipal sewer main
and be licensed by the RSB.
All water supply systems that use non-potable water, must
have an emergency mains potable water backup with
backflow prevention devices.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 206 of 386
PW-1: Improved Potable Water Credit Points
Available: 22
Conservation
Intent To reward the reduction of potable water consumption for interior and
exterior uses through efficient building design, building systems,
landscaping and substitution with reclaimed water.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate through the water model created for PW-r3 that the
building has achieved the following reduction in potable water use
over the Benchmark Building calculations from the Pearls NB Water
Calculator:
7 CREDIT POINTS = 35% reduction
8 CREDIT POINTS = 40% reduction
9 CREDIT POINTS = 45% reduction
10 CREDIT POINTS = 50% reduction
11 CREDIT POINTS = 55% reduction
12 CREDIT POINTS = 60% reduction
13 CREDIT POINTS = 65% reduction
14 CREDIT POINTS = 70% reduction
15 CREDIT POINTS = 75% reduction
16 CREDIT POINTS = 80% reduction
17 CREDIT POINTS = 85% reduction
18 CREDIT POINTS = 90% reduction
19 CREDIT POINTS = 95% reduction
20 CREDIT POINTS = 100% reduction
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 207 of 386
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
7 - 20 Achieve a 35% - 100% reduction in potable water use over
a baseline building.
2 - Demonstrate at least 20% of the
potable water reduction is from a reduction in landscape
uses
Design Rating
7 - 20 Achieve a 35% - 100% reduction in potable water use over
a baseline building.
2 - Demonstrate at least 20% of the
potable water reduction is from a reduction in landscape
uses
Living Rating
7 - 20 Achieve a 35% - 100% reduction in potable water use over
a baseline building.
2 - Demonstrate at least 20% of the
potable water reduction is from a reduction in landscape
uses
Where the additional points for water savings through landscaping are
being claimed, provide the following:
Reporting from the Water Calculator demonstrating that the
water consumption minimised through efficient landscape and
irrigation design accounts for a minimum of 20% of the overall
water reduction claimed by the project.
Site plan marked-up to clearly indicate the size of the
landscaped area and its proportion of the total project site.
Reporting of the results of improved water conservation in net
potable water consumption savings/day over the Benchmark
Building.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 208 of 386
Where the additional points for water savings through landscaping are
being claimed, provide the following:
Reporting from the Water Calculator demonstrating that the
water consumption minimised through efficient landscape and
irrigation design accounts for a minimum of 20% of the overall
water reduction claimed by the project.
As Built Site plan marked-up to clearly indicate the size of the
landscaped area and its proportion of the total project site.
Reporting of the results of improved water conservation in net
potable water consumption savings/day over the Benchmark
Building.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 209 of 386
Related Resources Pearls Design System NB-PW-r3 Water Calculator
and References:
Code requirement: Minimised Water Use
Appendix 1 and Appendix 2
PW-r3: Water Model
PW-2: Net Positive Water
PW-3: Reduced Carbon Impact of Water
Abu Dhabi Regulations and Supervision Bureau Wastewater
Residuals Reuse Regulation Draft March 2009, www.rsb.gov.ae
Environment Agency Abu Dhabi- Plumbing Code (Draft 2009)
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 210 of 386
PW-2: Net Positive Water Credit Points
Available: 10
Credit Requirements Demonstrate the following reduction in water use over a baseline
building, based on the water model created for PW-r3, as follows:
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
2 - 10 Achieve a 105% - 125% reduction in potable water use
over a baseline building.
Design Rating
2 - 10 Achieve a 105% - 125% reduction in potable water use
over a baseline building.
Living Rating
2 - 10 Achieve a 105% - 125% reduction in potable water use
over a baseline building.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 211 of 386
Updated summary results of the Water Calculator from PW-r3, clearly
demonstrating through reporting from the Calculator and narrative, the
volume of potable water (in percentage) to be saved by the constructed
project over the Benchmark Building.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 212 of 386
PW-3: Reduced Carbon Impact of Water Credit Points
Available: 5
Intent To reward projects that minimise potable water use and select the most
greenhouse-efficient water, wastewater and reclaimed water treatment
systems, thereby reducing the energy use and greenhouse gas
emissions associated with the production, treatment, storage and
transport of water.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate the reduced greenhouse impact of both potable and total
water use of the project compared to the baseline building, as follows:
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
2 Achieve a 10% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
3 Achieve a 20% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
4 Achieve a 30% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
5 Achieve a 40% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
Design Rating
2 Achieve a 10% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
3 Achieve a 20% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
4 Achieve a 30% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
5 Achieve a 40% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
Living Rating
2 Achieve a 10% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
3 Achieve a 20% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
4 Achieve a 30% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
5 Achieve a 40% reduction in the greenhouse gas impact of
water use
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 213 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Conditional Design
Rating Results of the Water Calculator from PW-r3, clearly demonstrating
through reporting from the Calculator and Calculations using Energy
Factors in Appendix 4, the reduction in carbon content of water (in
percentage) used by this project compared to the Benchmark Building.
Calculations and Attribute each water source with the appropriate greenhouse factor
Methodology then multiply by the total volume of each consumed flow as follows:
vi) Add greenhouse impacts for items i)-v) together and deduct
the total from a total calculated for the Baseline Building.
Using a similar method. Divide the difference by the total from
the Baseline Building and express as a % saving.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 214 of 386
vii) Note: The Baseline Building greenhouse impact is to include
the energy factor for Abu Dhabi mains water and RW water
supply from Appendix 4.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 215 of 386
PW-4: Indoor Water Meters Credit Points
Available: 2
Residential
Individual apartments
Shared pool/spa/sauna and laundry facilities
Domestic hot water
Cooling towers
Rainwater tank top-up and usage from tank
Water features
Reused water systems.
Lack of a nil use one minute (or more) period in any 24-hour
period.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 216 of 386
Points will be awarded as follows:
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Install water meters on all major water uses
1 link all meters to BMS
Design Rating
1 Install water meters on all major water uses
1 link all meters to BMS
Living Rating
1 Install water meters on all major water uses
1 link all meters to BMS
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 217 of 386
If meter/s have been shown to be faulty or the alarm has been
raised, rectification work undertaken to ensure the operation is
restored to approved Design Rating functionality levels.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 218 of 386
PW-5: Water Use Reporting Credit Points
Available: 1
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 Owner commitment to report water consumption data
Design Rating
1 Owner commitment to report water consumption data
Living Rating
1 Owner commitment to report water consumption data
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 219 of 386
Where the project is providing a Final Tuning report as part of
credits LB-41 and LB-42, all summary, quarterly and final
commissioning reports on the performance of all water-related
building services are considered part of the data that must be
submitted to the PDS database. All reported information is
confidential and any published data will be free of identifiers.
Calculations and Provide a copy of the written commitment, including specific time
Methodology frames, to forward the water model created for credit PW-r3 as well as
all future water monitoring and building use patterns to a central
database on an ongoing annual basis
Where the project is providing a commissioning report as part of
credits LB-41 and LB-42, all summary, quarterly and final
commissioning reports on the performance of all water-related
building services are considered part of the data that must be
submitted to the PDS database. All reported information is confidential
and any published data will be free of identifiers.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 220 of 386
PW-6: Stormwater Credit Points
Available: 4
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that the project design achieves the following
performance related to its stormwater run-off:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 221 of 386
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
2 Meet the stormwater performance levels in the Credit
Requirements
1 stormwater flows at or below pre-
development flows for a 2cm, 24-hour storm
2 - stormwater flows 25% below pre-
development flows for a 2cm, 24-hour storm
Design Rating
2 Meet the stormwater performance levels in the Credit
Requirements
1 stormwater flows at or below pre-
development flows for a 2cm, 24-hour storm
2 - stormwater flows 25% below pre-
development flows for a 2cm, 24-hour storm
Living Rating
2 Meet the stormwater performance levels in the Credit
Requirements
1 stormwater flows at or below pre-
development flows for a 2cm, 24-hour storm
2 - stormwater flows 25% below pre-
development flows for a 2cm, 24-hour storm
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 222 of 386
Calculations that show peak and annual stormwater flows from
the site pre- and post construction.
As-built drawings in support of the above report and
calculations.
Manufacturer data sheets for all relevant components (e.g.
filtration devices)
Where landscape-based treatment is used, provide calculations
showing the required amount of bioretention area and site plans
indicating the total area dedicated to bioretention and
treatment.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 223 of 386
Ý®»¼·¬ Í»½¬·±²
ÎÛæ λ-±«®½»º«´ Û²»®¹§
ÎÛó®ì
Û³·®¿¬» ·- ³±ª·²¹ ®¿°·¼´§ ¬± »³¾®¿½» ®»²»©¿¾´» »²»®¹§ -±«®½»- ·² ¿²¬·½·°¿¬·±² ±º ¿ ¬·³» ©¸»² º±--·´
••
׺ ©» ½±²¬·²«» ¿¬ ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ ®¿¬»ô ¬¸» ¼»³¿²¼ º±® »²»®¹§ ©·´´ -·³°´§ »¨½»»¼ ¬¸» -«°°´§ò ߬
¬¸» -¿³» ¬·³»ô ±«® ½±²-«³°¬·±² ±º »²»®¹§ ¿¼¼- ¬± ¬¸» ©±®´¼©·¼» °®±¾´»³ ±º ¹´±¾¿´ ©¿®³·²¹ò
ر©»ª»®ô ¬¸·- »³°¸¿-·- ±² ®»²»©¿¾´» ®»°´¿½»³»²¬ ±º¬»² ±ª»®-¸¿¼±©- ¬¸» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ±º ½±²-»®ª¿¬·±² ¿-
·³°¿½¬ ±² ±ª»®¿´´ »²»®¹§ ¼»³¿²¼ °»® ½¿°·¬¿ò ̸» λ-±«®½»º«´ Û²»®¹§ -»½¬·±² ®»¯«·®»- °®±°±²»²¬-
¬± «²¼»®¬¿µ» ¿² »²»®¹§ ½¿´½«´¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ¿--»--³»²¬ °®±½»--ò ̸·- ¿--»--³»²¬ ©·´´ º¿½·´·¬¿¬» ½¿®»º«´
½±²-·¼»®¿¬·±² ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» °´¿²²·²¹ -¬¿¹»- ±º ²»© ½±³³«²·¬·»- ¿²¼ ²»·¹¸¾±«®¸±±¼-ô ®»-«´¬·²¹ ·² ¾»¬¬»®
¾«·´¼·²¹-ô ±°¬·³·-¿¬·±² ±º °¿--·ª» ½±±´·²¹ ¬¸®±«¹¸ -¸¿¼·²¹ ¿²¼ ª»²¬·´¿¬·±² -¬®¿¬»¹·»-ô ¿²¼ º¿½·´·¬¿¬·±²
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that the building meets the energy performance
requirements as follows:
Prescriptive Requirement
Minimum building envelope specifications:
Roofs and skylight support structures:
Minimum assembly heat transfer co-efficient (U value) of 0.2
W/m2K.
Above-grade walls and opaque assemblies:
Minimum heat transfer co-efficient (U value) of 0.51 W/m2K.
Skylights maximum 5% of gross floor area. (does not apply
to retail buildings).
Below-grade walls:
Below-grade walls to occupied spaces should provide for a
minimum heat transfer co-efficient (U value) of 1.00 W/m2K.
Windows and skylights:
Less than or equal to U value of 1.5 W/m2K
Maximum Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC )of 0.45
Less than or equal to U value of 3.0 W/m2K
The average for the façade should be no more than 1.65 W/m2K.
all combined glass and opaque assemblies to
have air tightness greater than 9 m3/hr/m2 façade at 100kPa.
Performance Requirement
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 229 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Conditional Design Prescriptive Requirement
Rating Architectural drawings and specification extracts together with
a summary report detailing performance properties of all
building elements mentioned above.
Technical data sheets for all prescribed equipment and
systems including calculations for façade U-value and lighting
power density.
Report summarising how the ASHRAE requirements have been
achieved.
Extract of the façade specification detailing the air tightness
and demonstrating the requirement for façade testing on
completion.
Performance Requirement
Summary report detailing results of completed energy model showing
how much less final energy consumption is compared to the Budget
Building and including the consequent GHGs based on all fuel sources
and primary energy consumption of each fuel used.
The report must summarise the parameters used in the model including
façade performance, occupant density, internal loads, operational and
occupancy schedules.
Performance Requirement
Summary report detailing results of completed energy model showing
how much less final energy consumption is compared to the Budget
Building and including the consequent GHGs based on all fuel sources
and primary energy consumption of each fuel used.
The report must summarise the parameters used in the model including
façade performance, occupant density, internal loads, operational and
occupancy schedules.
The same report that was submitted for the Conditional Design Rating
may be resubmitted as long as there have been no changes to the
design.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 230 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Living Rating Prescriptive Requirement
Updated As-built architectural drawings and specification
extracts together with a summary report detailing performance
properties of all building elements mentioned above.
Technical data sheets for any changed prescribed equipment
and systems
Report summarising how the ASHRAE requirements have been
achieved.
The same report that was submitted for the Design Rating may be
resubmitted as long as there have been no changes to the building.
Performance Requirement
Audit report comparing utilities billing against actual
performance for all primary meters. Where consumption is
sourced from sub-meters actual energy consumption is to be
interpolated from sub meter readings. Data to separate:
o Base Building
o Tenant
o Exterior use and
o All major individual energy uses as per RE-r3.
Where BMS installed:
o BMS point schedules
o BMS reports of any leakage alerts.
AND
If the energy consumption of the building is not operating as
intended, rectification work undertaken to ensure the
operation is restored to Design Rating consumption levels.
Where balconies are inset into building facades and are above
occupied space, they should be considered as roofs.
Performance Requirement
Please refer to RE-r6 Energy Model.
Related Resources www.ashrae.org ASHRAE 90.1: 2007 plus user manual and all
and References addenda and supplements
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 231 of 386
Requirement
RE-r2: Energy Metering
Intent To encourage the provision of metering facilities that allow the energy
performance of the building to be recorded and monitored to allow
future improvement and understanding of the use of energy in
buildings.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate all individual occupancies and floor plates as well as all
major electrical uses over 100 kVa (e.g. HVAC equipment, process
loads such as pools and large equipment) are sub-metered and linked
to the building management system.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 232 of 386
Requirement
Re-r3: Cool Building Strategies
Intent To reduce heat build-up in urban areas and lower building cooling
requirements.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate the project employs building design features that serve to
minimise internal building temperatures:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 233 of 386
Report including photographs of key elevations at 9.00am,
11.00am 1.00pm, 3.00pm and 5.00pm for available summer
and winter solstice and equinox as possible given completion
program of building
Report also to include surrounding photographs of solar
obstructions including adjoining buildings, structures and
approved future developments and compared to original
modelled obstructions.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 234 of 386
This page is left blank intentionally
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 235 of 386
Requirement
RE-r4: Energy Efficient Appliances
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that all developer installed appliances meet or exceed the
top 25% Energy Star or other recognised appliance rating system
performance in their ratings category. Standard appliances to be
documented include but are not limited to:
Office
Dishwashers
Boiling and chilled water dispensers units.
Retail
Commercial dishwasher for each food service tenant.
Residential
Dishwashers
Clothes Washing machines, clothes dryers or washer/dryers
Refrigerators and/or freezers.
Calculations and Recognised appliance rating systems include but are not necessarily
Methodology limited to:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 236 of 386
Appliances specified above relate only to those items installed within
the building contract as follows:
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 237 of 386
Requirement
RE-r5: Ozone Impacts of Refrigerants
and Fire Systems
Refrigerants with an ODP of greater than 0.041 are not permitted even
with leak detection systems.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 238 of 386
As Built system specification for leak detection system where
installed and consultant report demonstrating compliance with
credit requirements.
Final content for inclusion for building owner and occupant
manuals.
CV of the engineer responsible for the design of the leak
detection system.
Calculations and Where there is no gaseous fire suppression system, credit points can be
Methodology awarded if a statement from the fire designer that no fire suppression
system is intended or needed to be installed is provided.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 239 of 386
Requirement
RE-r6: Energy Model
Credit Requirements Demonstrate through either of the following methods, the predicted
building performance on an annual basis through dynamic energy
simulation of the designed building.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 240 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Design Rating
Summary Report detailing the energy simulation per ASHRAE Standard
90.1:2007 providing clear breakdowns of all major energy loads and
percentage attributable to passive design aspects.
Calculations and Climate Zone: Use Climate Zone 1A Very Hot- Humid as per ASHRAE
Methodology Standard 90.1:2007.
BUILDING TYPE
Item Office Res Retail
Common lighting Y Y Y
Tenant lighting N Y N
HVAC to common space Y Y Y
AC to tenant space Y Y Y
Vertical transportation Y Y Y
Domestic hot water Y Y Y
Water treatment and pumping Y Y Y
Carpark ventilation and Y Y Y
lighting
Tenant equipment N N N
Renewable energy (base Y Y Y
building)
Irrigation Y Y Y
Inclusions in Model
Operational Schedules
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 241 of 386
Office and Retail: Adopt the schedules relating to how the building is
likely to be operated. If unknown, use default of 60 hours per week
occupancy (100%) over a six-day week and 65 hours per week HVAC
and lighting operation. If the schedules show less than 40 hours or
more than 60 hours then rationale should be detailed.
HVAC 60 hours, over seven days.
General: 16
W/m2
Both Methods
Renewable Energy:
Where renewable energy is exported to grid and a net surplus
exists, the energy exported is offsetting mains electricity GHGs
and this can be included in the model.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 242 of 386
Any export is offsetting power imported at another stage until
the project becomes a net exporter.
Carbon Offsets:
For offsite generation potential, the system must be capable of meeting
Kyoto Protocol (or its successor) compliance under the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) requirements as defined in Article 12
of the Protocol or meet one of the following voluntary scheme
standards:
The UK Carbon Trust
The Gold Standard
British Standards Institution Standard PAS 2050
The model can include either site-based energy generation or, where
there is a minimum operational carbon reduction of 50% by the
building, the purchase of Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) can be
used from any scheme complying with the above standards. The
greenhouse benefit of purchasing CERs can be included in the model;
however, it must be evenly distributed over a 20-year period.
District Cooling
District cooling system energy inputs should be considered in the same
way as a stand alone building HVAC system allowing for the total
cooling load times the whole system net efficiency (COP) as supplied
by the District cooling system operator. Where this is not available
assume minimum system COP of 3.2 as required by Credit
Requirements for RE-r7 District Cooling.
Simulation software
Software used shall meet either IEA - BesTest standard or
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2001 Standard Method of Test for the
Evaluation of Building Energy Analysis Computer Programme.
Related Resources International Energy Agency Building Energy Simulation Test (BESTEST)
and References: and Diagnostic Method NREL/TP-472-6132 February 1995
International Energy Agency Building Energy Simulation Test and
Diagnostic Method for Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning
Equipment Models (HVAC BESTEST) NREL/TP-550-30152 January
2002
http://www.cdmgoldstandard.org/
http://www.carbontruststandard.com/
http://www.carbontruststandard.com/
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov
www.ashrae.org
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 243 of 386
Requirement
RE-r7: District Cooling System
Intent To encourage the use and operation of efficient district cooling as well
communication of the performance of systems over time.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that any District Cooling (DC) system proposed as part of
the project within which the site is located achieves a minimum
acceptable efficiency of the overall system and regularly declares its
system performance in a formal and open way. Show:
The DC system achieves the required minimum efficiencies
overall
Full insulation of distribution pipes, including underground
distribution line(s).
Operating Contracts that require operating companies to state
design coefficients of performance, and to provide annual
audited reports confirming attainment of those standards.
Calculations and DC systems that complies with the following technical specifications
Methodology are able to comply with this requirement:
All distribution pipes from the DC to the project and onsite are
insulated with material with a minimum R value of R1.0 or
geotechnical report provided showing alternative solution as
equal to or better overall system performance.
Extracts from operating agreements specifying the coefficient
of performance (COP) of the DC system and the requirement
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 244 of 386
for annual performance audits and declaration of ongoing
system COP on at least an annual basis.
District cooling (DC) plant: minimum COP of 3.25 (kW/ton =
0.775) for total cooling plant (including cooling towers and
primary pumps).
Thermal distribution system including pumping energy
maximum losses 5%.
COP is defined as net cooling energy exported from the plant over the
total electric power used by the plant at the utility electric meters or
total energy used from any fossil fuel source.
Related Resources
and References
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 245 of 386
RE-1: Improved Energy Conservation Credit Points
Available: 20
and Carbon Reduction
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 246 of 386
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
4 - 17 Budget Building Method: Achieve a 50% - 100% reduction
in carbon emissions over a baseline building
Fixed Benchmark Method: Achieve a 35% - 100%
reduction in carbon emission over a benchmark
performance
1 10% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
2 - 20% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
3 - 30% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
Design Rating
4 - 17 Achieve a 35% - 100% reduction in potable water use over
a baseline building.
1 10% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
2 - 20% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
3 - 30% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
Living Rating
4 - 17 Achieve a 35% - 100% reduction in potable water use over
a baseline building.
1 10% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
2 - 20% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
3 - 30% of carbon reduction is from
passive environmental design
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 247 of 386
Renewable Energy inputs and Carbon Offsets
Provide the following documentation:
Summary analysis of the dynamic energy simulation model of
the designed building as per credit RE-r2 showing the
renewable energy generation capability of the projects systems
(onsite or offsite).
For site-based systems:
o Statement from the system design engineer stating that
the system as designed with all component
specification will be capable of delivering the
assumed annual average system performance relied
on in the model.
o CV of the systems design engineer.
For offsite systems:
o Copies of system certified emission reductions (CERs)
Certificate or Certificates from Approved voluntary
emission reduction scheme.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 248 of 386
o CV of the systems design engineer.
For offsite systems:
o Copies of system certified emission reductions (CERs)
Certificate or Certificates from Approved voluntary
emission reduction scheme.
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Living Rating Audit report comparing simulated building performance
against utilities billing actual performance for all primary
meters. Where consumption is sourced from sub-meters actual
consumption is to be interpolated from sub meter readings.
Data to separate:
o Base Building
o Tenant
o Exterior use and
o All major individual energy uses as per RE-r6.
Where BMS installed:
o BMS point schedules
AND
If the energy consumption of the building is not operating as
intended, rectification work undertaken to ensure the
operation is restored to Design Rating consumption levels.
Calculations and Calculate the Budget building for calculating the passive contribution
Methodology as per the energy model created above in RE-r2: Energy Model except:
Related Resources BS 5925: 1991, Code of Practice for Ventilation Principles and
and References Designing for Natural Ventilation
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 249 of 386
RE-2: Net Positive Energy Credit Points
Available: 12
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
2 Achieve a 105% reduction in carbon emissions
4 Achieve a 110% reduction in carbon emissions
6 Achieve a 115% reduction in carbon emissions
8 Achieve a 120% reduction in carbon emissions
10 Achieve a 125% reduction in carbon emissions
12 Achieve a 130% reduction in carbon emissions
Design Rating
2 Achieve a 105% reduction in carbon emissions
4 Achieve a 110% reduction in carbon emissions
6 Achieve a 115% reduction in carbon emissions
8 Achieve a 120% reduction in carbon emissions
10 Achieve a 125% reduction in carbon emissions
12 Achieve a 130% reduction in carbon emissions
Living Rating
2 Achieve a 105% reduction in carbon emissions
4 Achieve a 110% reduction in carbon emissions
6 Achieve a 115% reduction in carbon emissions
8 Achieve a 120% reduction in carbon emissions
10 Achieve a 125% reduction in carbon emissions
12 Achieve a 130% reduction in carbon emissions
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 250 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Conditional Design Summary report with analysis of the dynamic energy
Rating simulation model of the designed building as per credit RE-r6
showing the renewable energy generation capability of the
projects systems (site-based or offsite).
For site-based systems:
o Statement from the system design engineer stating that
the system as designed with all component
specifications will be capable of delivering the
assumed annual average system performance relied
on in the model.
o CV of the systems design engineer.
For offsite systems:
o Copies of system CERs certificate.
Calculations and For offsite generation potential, the system must be capable of meeting
Methodology Kyoto Protocol (or its successor) compliance under the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) requirements as defined in Article 12
of the Protocol or meet one of the following voluntary scheme
standards:
The UK Carbon Trust
The Gold Standard
British Standards Institution Standard PAS 2050
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 251 of 386
The model can include either site-based energy generation or, where
there is a minimum operational carbon reduction of 50% by the
building, the purchase of Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) can be
used from any scheme complying with the above standards. The
greenhouse benefit of purchasing CERs can be included in the model;
however, it must be evenly distributed over a 20-year period.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 252 of 386
RE-3: District Cooling Connection Credit Points
Available: 4
Credit Requirements Demonstrate where possible, through use of the Water Balance Model
and Life Cycle Costing that connection to a District Cooling (DC)
system or implementation of DC Strategy with the following key
elements is the appropriate solution for the project. If DC is shown to
be an appropriate efficient source of cooling energy for the project,
show:
Connection to a local DC system and use of available cooling.
Full insulation of distribution pipes, including underground
distribution line(s).
Covenants Codes and Restrictions (CCRs) or Operating
Contracts that require operating companies to state design
coefficients of performance, and to provide annual audits
confirming attainment of those standards.
The DC system does not use potable makeup water for heat
rejection.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Design Rating
4 Connect to a district cooling system
Living Rating
4 Connect to a district cooling system
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 253 of 386
Extracts from specifications or operating agreement indicating
the refrigerants used in the District Cooling system and their
compliance with credits RE-r1 and RE-7).
Where BMS installed:
o BMS point schedules
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 254 of 386
Extracts from CCRs or operating agreements specifying the
coefficient of performance (COP) of the DC system and the
requirement for annual performance audits and declaration of
ongoing system COP on at least an annual basis.
District cooling (DC) plant: COP of 3.25 (kW/ton = 0.775) for
total cooling plant (including cooling towers and primary
pumps).
Thermal distribution system including pumping energy
maximum losses 5%.
COP is defined as net cooling energy exported from the plant over the
total electric power used by the plant at the utility electric meters.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 255 of 386
RE-4: Easily Accessible Stairs Credits
Available: 1
Intent To reward projects that provide easily accessible, daylit or well lit
stairs as an attractive option for vertical movement through the
building or parts thereof in order to reduce electrical energy use and
improve occupant wellbeing.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that within the requirements of Fire Regulations and
adjacent to or within a close distance of the main building lifts, there
are easily accessible stairs to at least the first five floors of the building.
The stairs must have the following characteristics:
A minimum daylight level of 200 lux or be open on at least
two sides and well lit with daylight colour corrected light
sources.
No doors required for access on any floor (subject to fire safety
restrictions).
Be clearly visible from the lift area.
Connecting at least five other floors within single tenancy buildings
(subject to fire safety restrictions), or allowing access to all levels
within retail facilities will also be considered.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Design Rating
1 Provide easily accessible, daylit stairs to at least the first
five floors
Living Rating
1 Provide easily accessible, daylit stairs to at least the first
five floors
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 256 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Design Rating Brief narrative including photographs explaining how the
project meets the Credit Requirements, and including daylight
level.
Typical plans including staircase design, indicative elevations
section, showing access to daylight and access points.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 257 of 386
RE-5: Energy Use Reporting Credit Points
Available: 1
Credit Requirements Demonstrate a written commitment from the building owner to supply
the project s energy simulation data and energy monitoring results to a
central database.
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Design Rating
1 Owner commitment to report water consumption data
Living Rating
1 Owner commitment to report water consumption data five
floors
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 258 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Design Rating
A copy of the Conditional Design stage Energy Model created
for credit RE-r6 as well as an As Built Energy Model and report
comparing and explaining any differences between the two as
well as commitment by any changed owner to continue to
send the data to the central PDS database on an ongoing
annual basis
Where the project is providing a Final Tuning report as part of
credits LB-41 and LB-42, all summary, quarterly and final
commissioning reports on the performance of all energy-
related building services are considered part of the data that
must be submitted to the PDS database. All reported
information is confidential and any published data will be free
of identifiers.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 259 of 386
RE-6: Peak Load Reduction Credits
Available: 4
Credit Requirements Demonstrate that peak electrical demand load on the Abu Dhabi
electricity grid has been reduced as follows:
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
Design Rating
2 Reduce peak electrical demand by at least 15% or show
peak demand is less than 40% over average demand.
4 Reduce peak electrical demand by at least 30% or show
peak demand is less than 20% over average demand.
Living Rating
2 Reduce peak electrical demand by at least 15% or show
peak demand is less than 40% over average demand.
4 Reduce peak electrical demand by at least 30% or show
peak demand is less than 20% over average demand.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 260 of 386
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Conditional Design Summary report describing the peak load reduction
Rating strategy/ies, including summary calculations for each peak
load reduction feature, the total demand reduction figure (peak
without active system, peak with active systems and as
appropriate, average peak load) and the percentage
reduction/difference achieved.
Equipment data sheets, project specifications describing
equipment specified and showing load reduction/generation
capacities used in the calculations provided in the short report.
Letter from design engineer for any site-based generation
potential stating the system is capable of providing the
ongoing stated generating capacity into the future, given
specified long-term maintenance regimes.
Copy of the draft system maintenance requirements to be
included in the building user guide.
Where BMS installed:
BMS point schedules
Calculations and Everything except tenancy light and power must be included within
Methodology
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 261 of 386
RE-7: Global Warming Impacts of Credit Points
Available: 2
Refrigerants & Fire System
Intent To reward the selection of refrigerants and fire systems that minimise
impacts to the atmosphere.
Credit Requirements Demonstrate the refrigerants and gaseous fire systems used in the
building reduce the potential for global warming from their release into
the atmosphere, as follows:
Refrigerants
1 CREDIT POINT: =50% of the refrigerants have a global
warming potential (GWP) of 10 or less
Where systems have refrigerant leak detection systems, they must have
the following features:
Located in high-risk parts of the plant.
Able to detect and recover and contain a minimum of 80% of
the refrigerant.
Located in a relatively airtight enclosure.
Able to automatically pump down and contain refrigerants,
without any human intervention.
Triggered by a refrigerant leak alarm.
Fire Systems
Awarding Credit Credit Points are awarded at the Conditional Design, Design and
Points Living Rating Stages. Credit Points are the same for all Types.
There are two levels of achievement for the first part of the credit and
one level of achievement for the second part. Each part is awarded
independently. There are no Additional Credit Points available.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 262 of 386
POINTS, REQUIREMENTS
ALL TYPES
Conditional Design Rating
1 50% of refrigerants have a GWP of 10 or less OR 100% of
refrigerants have a GWP 100 of less than 1300 and there is
a leak detection system
2 100% of refrigerants have a GWP of 10 or less or there are
no refrigerants
2 100% of gaseous fire systems have a GWP 100 of 1300 or
less or there are no gaseous fire systems
Design Rating
1 50% of refrigerants have a GWP of 10 or less OR 100% of
refrigerants have a GWP 100 of less than 1300 and there is
a leak detection system
2 100% of refrigerants have a GWP of 10 or less or there are
no refrigerants
2 100% of gaseous fire systems have a GWP 100 of 1300 or
less or there are no gaseous fire systems
Living Rating
1 50% of refrigerants have a GWP of 10 or less OR 100% of
refrigerants have a GWP 100 of less than 1300 and there is
a leak detection system
2 100% of refrigerants have a GWP of 10 or less or there are
no refrigerants
2 100% of gaseous fire systems have a GWP 100 of 1300 or
less or there are no gaseous fire systems
Fire Systems
Where gaseous fire systems are used in base building for electrical
switchgear rooms, transformer rooms (if enclosed), telecoms rooms,
PABX rooms or for integrated fitout tenancy spaces provide:
Manufacturer's data sheets with the stated GWP for each gas
to be used in the project's fire protection system/s.
Extracts from building specifications or drawings showing
specification of gas to each area protected by a gaseous fire
protection system matching the Manufacturer data sheets.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 263 of 386
.
Credit Submission: Provide the following documentation:
Design Rating
Refrigerants
Evidence that the refrigerants installed meet the Credit
Requirements and a description of the refrigerant containment
systems.
Manufacturer's data sheets with the stated GWP for each
refrigerant used in the project's cooling systems.
Details (drawings, manufacturer technical data sheets for the
refrigerant leak detection and recovery system) and a
statement from the design engineer that the system installed, is
as designed and suitable o recover 80% of refrigerant charge.
Fire Systems
Where gaseous fire systems are used in base building for electrical
switchgear rooms, transformer rooms (if enclosed), telecoms rooms,
PABX rooms or for integrated fitout tenancy spaces provide:
Evidence that the fire suppressant gases installed meet the
Credit Requirements.
Manufacturer's data sheets with the stated GWP for each gas
used in the project's fire protection system/s.
Fire Systems
Where gaseous fire systems are installed provide site inspection report
showing the regular maintenance schedule, programmed maintenance
that has occurred and certifying the correct ongoing operation of the
system with gaseous fire suppressant in accordance with this credit.
Calculations and Living Rating stage Audit report may be provided by appropriately
Methodology qualified mechanical consultant, including a company involved in the
design team, provided it is not undertaken by an individual included in
the design team.
Estidama Pearls Design System New Buildings Rating Method: August 2009, Version 1.0 264 of 386