Customers arrive at a facility where they are serviced through one operation. The time between two customers is an
exponential random variable with average AT. The time required to service a customer is also an exponential
random variable with average ST1. The CEO of the service facility wants to estimate the effects of high utilization of
the service operation (due to change in arrival rate of customers) on the system performance (capacity and
responsiveness).
Customers Operation 1
Interarrival Time ~ Exp (AT) Service Time ~ Exp (ST1)
Through a simulation experiment for 100 days the CEO has obtained the following data.
1 10 5 14262 0.98
2 9 5 15825 1.22
3 8 5 17780 1.60
4 7 5 20436 2.53
5 6 5 23865 4.88
6 5.5 5 25966 8.76
7 5.1 5 27610 29.48
2. Plot the graph showing the variation of MLT with utilization of Operation 1.
3. Plot the graph showing the variation of actual system capacity with the utilization of Operation 1.
Now assume another facility with two operations. The objective of this exercise is to see the effects of change in
utilization of a non-bottleneck operation (Operation 1) on the system performance. The bottleneck operation
(Operation 2) still services customers with an exponentially distributed service time (ST2). The customer inter arrival
times follows an exponential distribution with average of 10 minutes.
1 10 2 5 14302 2.17
2 10 2.5 5 14275 2.78
3 10 3 5 14339 3.75
4 10 3.5 5 14226 5.22
5 10 4 5 14277 8.40
6 10 4.5 5 14392 21.03
5. Plot the graph showing the variation of MLT with utilization of Operation 1 (non-bottleneck).
6. Redo exercises 2, 3 and 5 neglecting variability in arrival and service times. Should your answers change?