Abstract: This article has the goal to expose a great metrological method to get
the electrical resistivity, and hence the conductivity, of a certain brand of water,
then treat this data and analyze the difference between the obtained data and the
presented values in the label. Then, finally, to discuss the importance of this
knowledge.
3. RESULTS
After the measurement process, a table was
created containing those eleven values,
distributed over seven different measures
Figure 1: Wenner array. (cycles), each value having a pair of information
(voltage and current over the sample).
The data treatment and statistical analysis,
which it was submitted, allows us to determine
the random uncertainty of each value and the
repeatability over each cycle.
Combining the uncertainty given in the 𝜎! ! 𝜎! 𝜎!
𝑤 = 𝑎 ∗ (𝑦 𝑥) ( ) = ( )! + ( )!
manual of each equipment and the random one, 𝑤 𝑥 𝑦
𝜎! 𝜎!
already determined, it was possible to present all 𝑤 = 𝑥! = 𝑚∗
the factors of uncertainty in only one value. 𝑤 𝑥
[4]
After treating the data, it was possible to
Applying correctly the uncertainties values
plot the graph to relate each applied current (I)
to their voltage (V). In the first Ohm’s law was over each mathematical operation it’s possible
stated that V = R * I, which makes possible the to conclude:
linear fit of the values plotted before, where R
represents the linear coefficient of the linear fit. 𝜌 = (7,11 ± 0,20) kΩ cm
The software SciDavis was used to
generate this linear fit and it provided a Pearson And, therefore:
linear correlation coefficient (r = 0,99997), and a
dispersion coefficient (Chi^2/doF = 10,55403). 1
Both coefficients indicates that the mathematic 𝜎= = (140,74 ± 3,96) µS cm
𝜌
model is correct and appropriate, and the
dispersion of the sample values and the linear fit
It’s essential to ensure that the average
are low. Thus the linear fit can be written as:
temperature is taken into account to normalize
those results and then define the reproducibility
𝑌 = 3,4039 ± 0,0698 ∗ 10! 𝑥 – (0,005
conditions. Thus, taking into account the
+/− 0,019) random and the equipment uncertainties
combined, the final result was stated as:
4. CONCLUSION
By finishing the experience, even without a
lab with a controlled environment, it’s possible
to confirm some of the data presented in the
labels, which is important for a mineral water,
once the variation of these values can be
harmful to the human health.
From this equation, it’s possible to Besides it, analyzing the obtained data
conclude that the sample resistane is, as a allows us to conclude that the method applied to
matter of fact, the angular coefficient of the this experience is not only didactically
linear fit, which means: accessible, but it also has a great metrological
3,40 ± 0,07 kΩ quality to determine the resistivity of the water,
by using the 4-wire measurement and the
Having these values, it’s possible to Wenner array concepts.
proceed to the determination of the resistivity of
the sample of water. To determine this number, 5. REFERENCES
Ohm’s second law was applied. By applying
this law, the geometrical uncertainties must be [1] Ensino de Física On Line -
taken into account according to the uncertainty Universidade de São Paulo (2007). Disponivel
propagation table: em:
http://efisica.if.usp.br/eletricidade/basico/eletroli
𝑤 =𝑥±𝑦 𝜎! ! = 𝜎! ! + 𝜎! ! se/intro/. Access on June 28th, 2015.
𝜎! 𝜎! 𝜎!
𝑤 =𝑥∗𝑦 ( )! = ( )! + ( )!
𝑤 𝑥 𝑦 [2] DOS SANTOS, Fabiola Lopes;
TEIXEIRA, Taise Fachini; DE LIMA, Elisete
Peixoto; DE MACEDO, Maurício Ferreira.
Avaliação de valores de ph e condutividade
elétrica em amostras de água mineral natural em
embalagens de 20 litros comercializadas no
município de Lins/SP. Available at:
http://revista.unilins.edu.br/index.php/cognitio/a
rticle/view/48/50. Access on June 28th, 2015.