Excel Tool Prozessaudit VDA 6.3 2010 en

396574721.
xlsx
Audit Contract VDA 6.3-2010
Client: (e.g. management, person responsible for the product, person responsible for the audit programme)
Audited Party: (e.g. internal department, supplier)
Reason for Audit:
Audit Objective:
Audit Variant:
Internal Audit Potential Analysis
External Audit Special Audit
Audit Location:
Internal Audit external
Audit Team:
Lead Auditor: Process Specialist(s):
Auditors:
Audit Extent:
Processes: Products:
Manufacturing
Locations: Interfaces:
Outside Processes:
Audit Date
Desired Date: Shifts:
Audit period:
Date of Contract
Essential Documents (test/inspections regulations, contracts, important agreements, cost stipulations, etc.)
Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 1 of 41

396574721.xlsx
History (complaints, rejects, delivery performance, project status)
Remarks (background information)

396574721.xlsx
ct, person responsible for the audit programme)
Potential Analysis
Special Audit
tant agreements, cost stipulations, etc.)

396574721.xlsx

396574721.xlsx
VDA 6.3-2010 Audit Report: Assessment of Quality Capability

Supplier: Client: Date:
Supplier No.: Reason for contract: Contract No.:
Location:
Assessment
Process/Product index Achieved Classified Findings / requirements
Overall Process P2 to P7 EG nb Highlights
before SOP ED nb
after SOP EP nb
Product Group*
Product group 1 EPN nb
Product group 5 EPN nb Areas of improvement
* Values automatically taken from Assessment Matrix
Classification scale: A: 90-100% (Q-capable); B: >= 80 <90% (conditionally Q-capable); C: <80% (not Q-capable)
Audit history / Certificates
Audit Basis Date Carried out Result
Participants: Distribution to:

396574721.xlsx
Timing for improvement plan:

For actions see 'Improvement program' and/or 'Immediate actions'
Lead Auditor Co-Auditor signed for Organisation

396574721.xlsx

396574721.xlsx
or Organisation

396574721.xlsx
Explanations
The improvement program was discussed in the final meeting on site and handed over as a draft.. The audited Organization is asked to define sustainable corrective actions for the identified weak points and
to implement them rapidly.
We point out that within the audit the processes only can be checked randomly. Other weak points and / or potentials for improvement may be possible.
It is the responsibility of the audited parties to expand the investigation and necessary measures to similar areas / issues.
Participants: Auditor:

396574721.xlsx
actions for the identified weak points and

396574721.xlsx
VDA 6.3-2010 Audit Report: Assessment of Quality Capability

Assessment Elements / Process Stages Assessment after Process Analysis (mean value, process stage E 1 - n) and
generic baseline
Target
Minimum requirement 80 90 Minimum requirement
per assessment element per assessment element
60 70 80 90 100 60 70
Grade of fulfilment Grade of fulfilment
Assignment to
Assessment elements / pre-
Assessment elements / pre
Product group Process stages audit actual Process stages audit actual
Process input
Project Management
P2 nb EU 1 nb
Planning Product/Process Process sequence
P3 nb EU 2 nb
Carrying out Personnel support
Product/Process
P4 nb EU 3 nb
Supplier Management Material resources
P5 nb EU 4 nb
Product group 1
Product group 2
Product group 3
Product group 4
Product group 5
Process Analysis Process effectiveness level

Serial production
P6 nb EU 5 nb
Customer Satisfaction Process result
P7 nb EU 6 nb
Transport / parts handling
Process Name 1 E1 nb / storage EU 7 nb
Process Name 2 E2 nb Generic Baseline
Process Name 3 E3 nb Process responsibility PR nb
Process Name 4 E4 nb Target orientation TO nb
Process Name 5 E5 nb Communication CO nb
Process Name 6 E6 nb Risk orientation RI nb

396574721.xlsx
Process Name 7 E7 nb
Process Name 8 E8 nb Overall Compliance EG nb
Process Name 9 E9 nb Before SOP ED nb
Process Name 10 E 10 nb After SOP EP nb
Comment: Please input values Pre-Audit yourself

Values of actual audit will be automatically entered

396574721.xlsx
alue, process stage E 1 - n) and
Target
80 90
80 90 100

396574721.xlsx

396574721.xlsx
VDA 6.3-2010 Assessment Matrix including Product Groups Notes:
Supplier: Client: Date: Generic Baseline

A Development
P 2 Project Management Entry: only following values are allowed Achievement level % G1 G2 G3 G4
nb not assessed
2.1 2.2* 2.3 2.4 2.5* 2.6 2.7* 10 Requirements fully satisfied PR TO CO RI
EPM
8 Requirements mainly satisfied
6 Requirements partly satisfied
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb 4 Requirements inadequately satisfied nb nb nb nb nb Note: Entry "n.b." = Question not answered
0 Requirements not satisfied
Note: Entry "n.a." = Question not applicable
P 3 Planning Product/Process Development
Product Process
3.1 3.2* 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.1 3.2* 3.3 3.4 3.5
nb nb nb nb nb EPdP nb nb nb nb nb nb EPzP nb EPP nb nb nb nb nb 3.1.
nb Green fields for entering

P 4 Carrying out Product/Process Development Blue writing -> example entry
Product Process
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5* 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5* 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb EPdR nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb EPzR nb EPR nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb
Automatic Calculation of the

B Full Production grey, blue, yellow and red fields
5.1* 5.2 5.3 5.4* 5.5* 5.6 5.7
P 5 Supplier Management nb nb nb nb nb nb nb ELM nb nb nb nb nb
P 6 Process Analysis Serial Production
1 Process Input 2 Work Content / Process Sequences 3 Personnel Support 4 Material Resources 5 Process Effectiveness 6 Process Result / Output 7 Transport and Part Handling Generic Baseline
Level
6.1.1* 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.5 6.2.1* 6.2.2 6.2.3* 6.2.4* 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.3.1 6.3.2* 6.3.3 6.4.1 6.4.2* 6.4.3 6.4.4 6.5.1 6.5.2 6.5.3* 6.5.4* 6.6.1* 6.6.2 6.6.3 6.6.4 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.4.4 6.6.2 6.6.3 G1 G2 G3 G4
Process step 1: Process Name 1 PR TO CO RI PR Process Responsibility
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb E1 nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb TO Target Orientation
Process step 2: Process Name 2 CO Communication
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb E2 nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb RI Risk Orientation
Process step 3: Process Name 3
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb E3 nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb E4 nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb Reasons for downgrading
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb E5 nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb Down-grading from A to B despite an
Process step 6: Process Name 6 achievement level of EG ≥ 90%
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb E6 nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb > At least one process elements P2-P7 or
process stage E1-En assessed <80 %.
> Level of achievement of the sub-elements
Process step 8: Process Name 8 of P6 (EU1-EU7) assessed <80 %.
Farbcode
Process step 9: Process Name 9 > At least one *-question awarded with 4
E9 points.
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb
Process step 10: Process Name 10 > At least one question from process audit
E10 awarded with 0 points.
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb
> Assessments from generic baseline
Assessment of Sub elements of the Process analysis (mean value step 1 - n)
assessed <70 %.
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.4.4 6.6.2 6.6.3
nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb EPG nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb
EU1 nb EU2 nb EU3 nb EU4 nb EU5 nb EU6 nb Transport, Part Handling EU7 nb for down-grading to C despite an achievement
G1 G2 G3 G4 level of ≥ 80 %
7.1* 7.2 7.3* 7.4 7.5 7.6 PR TO CO RI > At least one process element P2-P7 or
P 7 Customer Support / Customer Satisfaction / Services nb nb nb nb nb nb EK nb nb nb nb nb
process stage E1-En assessed <70 %.
Farbcode
PR TO Co RI > Level of achievement of the sub-elements
of P6 (EU1-EU7) assessed <70 %.
Achievement level EPG by Product Groups Element P6[%] (mean value Ex-En)
Overall Achievement Level EPN [%] by Achievement level [%] for nb nb nb nb
Product group 1 Product group 2 Product group 3 Product group 4 Product group 5 Product Groups Generic Baseline > At least one *-question awarded with 0
Product Group points.
Process Steps Product EPN [%] Classification
Group
EPGN [%] Overall Achievement Level EG [%]:
nb
Classi- Achievement Description of
Classified fication Level EG[%] Classification
nb
Achievement Level Classification A EG ≥ 90 Quality capable
ED [%] nb nb
nb
before SOP (Part A) 80 ≥ EG < 90 Conditionally quality-
B capable
nb
EG < 80 Not
C quality-capable
after SOP (Part B) EP [%] nb nb Classification results (A, B, C) must be entered manually, by taking into
account the downgrading rule!

396574721.xlsx
Questionnaire VDA 6.3-2010 Date:

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.
Nr. Points Comments / Assessment Remarks

A Development
P 2 Project Management
2.1 Is the project organisation (project management)
established and are tasks & authorities specified for nb
the team leader and team members?
###
2.2* Are the resources required for the project
development planned and available and are all nb
changes displayed?
2.3 Is there a project plan and has this been agreed with
the customer? nb
2.4 Is change management in the project ensured by the
project organisation? nb
2.5* Are the responsible personnel within the organisation
and in the customer's company involved in the change nb
control system?
2.6 Is there a QM plan for the project? Is this implemented
and monitored regularly for compliance? nb
2.7* Is there an established escalation process and is this

implemented effectively? nb

Product
3.1 Are the product-specific requirements laid down?
nb
3.2* Has manufacturing feasibility been assessed in a cross-
functional manner, based on the requirements which
have been determined for product & process? nb
3.3 Are there plans for the product and process

development? nb
3.4 Have the necessary resources been taken into account
for the product and process development? nb
3.5 Is QM planning arranged for sourcing bought-in

products and services? nb
Process
3.1 Are the process-specific requirements laid down?
nb
3.2* Has manufacturing feasibility been assessed in a cross-
functional manner, based on the requirements which
have been determined for product & process? nb
3.3 Are there plans for the product and process

development? nb
3.4 Have the necessary resources been taken into account
for the product and process development? nb
3.5 Is QM planning arranged for sourcing bought-in

products and services? nb
P 4 Carrying out Product/Process Development

Product

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

4.1 Have the Product FMEA / Process FMEA been drawn
up? Are they up-dated as the project progresses and
are corrective actions laid down? nb
4.2 Are the stipulations arising from the plans for product
and process development put into effect? nb
4.3 Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?

nb
4.4 Is the infrastructure in place and appropriate? nb
4.5* Based on the requirements, are the necessary
evidence and releases available for the various phases? nb
4.8 Are the planning activities associated with sourcing

outside products and services implemented nb
effectively?
4.9 Is the transfer of the project to production controlled
in order to secure the product launch? nb
Process
4.1 Have the Product FMEA / Process FMEA been drawn
up? Are they up-dated as the project progresses and
are corrective actions laid down? nb
4.2 Are the stipulations arising from the plans for product
and process development put into effect?
nb
4.3 Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?

nb
4.4 Is the infrastructure in place and appropriate? nb
4.5* Based on the requirements, are the necessary
evidence and releases available for the various phases? nb
4.6 Are the productions control plans used for the various
phases and are production, test and inspection nb
documents derived from them?
4.7 Has a pre-production run been carried out under serial
production conditions to obtain production approval / nb
release?
4.8 Are the planning activities associated with sourcing
outside products and services implemented nb
effectively?
4.9 Is the transfer of the project to production controlled
in order to secure the product launch? nb
B Full Production
P 5 Supplier Management
5.1* Are only approved/released and quality-capable
suppliers selected? nb
5.2 Are the customer's requirements taken into account in
the supply chain? nb
5.3 Have target agreements for delivery performance been
agreed with suppliers and put into operation? nb
5.4* Are the necessary approvals/releases available for the

out-sourced products and services? nb

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

5.5* Is the quality of the out-sourced products and services
ensured? nb
5.6 Are incoming goods stored appropriately? nb
5.7 Are personnel qualified for the various tasks and are
responsibilities defined? nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* Has the project been transferred from development to
serial production? nb
6.1.2 Are the necessary quantities / production batch sizes
of incoming materials available at the right time and at
the right place (stores; work-station)? nb
6.1.3 Are incoming materials stored appropriately and are

transport facilities / packing arrangements suitable for
the special characteristics of the incoming materials? nb
6.1.4 Are the necessary identifications / records / approvals

available and allocated appropriately to the incoming nb
materials?
6.1.5 Are changes to the product or process in the course of
serial production tracked and documented? nb
2 Work Content / Process Sequences

6.2.1* Are all the relevant details listed in the production and
test/inspection documents, based on the production nb
control plan?
6.2.2 Are production operations checked / approved and are
setting data logged? nb
6.2.3* Can the customer's specific product requirements be
satisfied with the production facilities used? nb
6.2.4* Are significant characteristics controlled in production?
nb
6.2.5 Are scrap, rework and setting parts kept separate and
identified? nb
6.2.6 Is the flow of materials and parts secured against
mixing / wrong items? nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 Are operators given responsibility and authority to
monitor the quality of product and process? nb
6.3.2* Are the operators able to carry out their allotted tasks
and are their qualifications kept up-to-date? nb
6.3.3 Is there a personnel employment plan? nb

4 Material Resources
6.4.1 How are the maintenance and overhaul of production
facilities / tools controlled? nb
6.4.2* Can the quality requirements be monitored effectively
with the test, inspection and measurement facilities nb
employed?
6.4.3 Are the work-stations and test/inspection areas
suitable for requirements? nb
6.4.4 Are tools, equipment and test/inspection facilities
stored correctly? nb

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

5 Process Effectiveness Level
6.5.1 Are target requirements set for product and process?
nb
6.5.2 Are quality and process data logged in such a way that
they can be assessed? nb
6.5.3* In the case of deviations from product and process
requirements, are the causes analysed and the
corrective actions checked for effectiveness? nb
6.5.4* Are processes and products audited regularly? nb

6 Process Result / Output
6.6.1* Are the customer's requirements met in terms of
product and process? nb
6.6.2 Are quantities / production batch sizes aligned with
requirements and are they forwarded to the next nb
process stage in a targeted manner?
6.6.3 Are products / components stored in an appropriate
manner and are transport facilities / packing
arrangements suitable for the special characteristics of
the products / components? nb
6.6.4 Are the necessary records / releases carried out and

stored appropriately? nb
Process step 2:
Process Name 2
1 Process Input


materials?

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.


employed?
nb


Process step 3:
Process Name 3
1 Process Input


materials?

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.


control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

employed?
nb



396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.
Process step 4:
Process Name 4
1 Process Input


materials?

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

employed?
nb

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.



Process step 5:
Process Name 5
1 Process Input


materials?

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

employed?
nb


Process step 6:
Process Name 6
1 Process Input


materials?

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

employed?
nb


Process step 7:
Process Name 7
1 Process Input

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.



materials?

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

employed?
nb

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.


Process step 8:
Process Name 8
1 Process Input


materials?

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support


396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

employed?
nb


Process step 9:
Process Name 9
1 Process Input


materials?

control plan?

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.

nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

employed?
nb


Process step 10:

Process Name 10
1 Process Input

396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.


materials?

control plan?
nb
identified? nb
3 Personnel Support

employed?
nb


396574721.xlsx

Supplier:
Client:
Quest Question
Pos.


P 7 Customer Support / Customer Satisfaction / Services

7.1* Are the customer's requirements satisfied regarding
QM system, product (on delivery) and process? nb
7.2 Is customer support ensured? nb

7.3* Is the supply of parts ensured? nb
7.4 If there are deviations from quality requirements, are
failure analyses carried out and corrective actions
implemented effectively? nb
7.5 Is there a process which ensures that analysis of

defective parts is carried out? nb
7.6 Are personnel qualified for the various tasks and are
responsibilities defined? nb

396574721.xlsx
Improvement Program VDA 6.3-2010 Date:

Supplier: Client:
To be filled by auditor to be filled by audited party

Quest Weaknesses, recommended actions, Actions and cause analysis by the Respon-
Pos.
No. findings Points organisation Timing sibles Effectiveness
A Development
P 2 Project Management
### nb
2.1
2.2* nb
2.3 nb
2.4 nb
2.5* nb
2.6 nb
2.7* nb

Product
3.1 nb
3.2* nb
3.3 nb
3.4 nb
3.5 nb
Process
3.1 nb
3.2* nb
3.3 nb
3.4 nb
3.5 nb
P 4 Carrying out Product/Process Development

Product
4.1 nb
4.2 nb
4.3 nb
4.4 nb
4.5* nb
4.8 nb
4.9 nb
Process
4.1 nb
4.2 nb
4.3 nb
4.4 nb
4.5* nb
4.6 nb
4.7 nb
4.8 nb
4.9 nb
B Full Production
P 5 Supplier Management
5.1* nb
5.2 nb
5.3 nb
5.4* nb
5.5* nb
5.6 nb
5.7 nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
y 6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb
6.6.4 nb

1 Process Input
6.1.1* nb
6.1.2 nb
6.1.3 nb
6.1.4 nb
6.1.5 nb
6.2.1* nb
6.2.2 nb
6.2.3* nb
6.2.4* nb
6.2.5 nb
6.2.6 nb
3 Personnel Support
6.3.1 nb
6.3.2* nb
6.3.3 nb
6.4.1 nb
6.4.2* nb
6.4.3 nb
6.4.4 nb
6.5.1 nb
6.5.2 nb
6.5.3* nb
6.5.4* nb
6.6.1* nb
6.6.2 nb
6.6.3 nb

396574721.xlsx

Pos.
6.6.4 nb
P 7 Customer Support / Customer Satisfaction / Services

7.1* nb
7.2 nb
7.3* nb
7.4 nb
7.5 nb
7.6 nb

396574721.xlsx
Disclaimer:
This template is provided free of charge by ORGAImprove to be used by interested parties.

The use of this template is within the responsibility of the user and at users risk only!
ORGAimprove will not take any responsiblity or liability for any errors e.g. in calculations / evaluations!
There is no right of support or delivery of updates by ORGAimprove!
Please note: The exact requirements for each question are provided in the 'Red Book' VDA 6.3!
Änderungshistorie
Version-Nr. Kommentar Datum Name

1.0 Neuerstellung 11/1/2010 R. Demmeler-Wirth
1.1 Berechnungsfehler behoben 12/1/2010 R. Demmeler-Wirth
Berechnungsfehler P2 behoben
Ermöglichung der Eingabe 'na' nicht anwendbar
1.2 Berechnungsfehler P7 behoben 2/10/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
* Rundungsfehler in %ualen Berechnungen

behoben
* P4 Feld 4.6 + 4.7 n.a., da nicht bei
Produktentwicklung nicht relevant
* Korrektur div. Formatierungen
* Feldformatierungen bei Werten, die zu
Abstufungen führen (Orange zu B, Rot zu C)
* Verknüpfung Werte Auditbericht mit
Bewertungsmatrix
* Verknüpfungen Lieferent, Auftraggeber und
Datum mit Auditbericht
* Verknüpfungen Fragen mit Bewertungsmatrix
2.0 und Verbesserungsprogramm 4/2/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
Verbesserungen in Bewertungsmatrix (5.Feld

Gesamterfüllungsgrad Produktgruppe)
Formatierungen (zulassen von Zeilenhöhe /
Spaltenbreite
Dropdown im Fragekatalog inkl. Farb-
2.1 Formatierung 4/12/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
Verbesserungsprogramm & Fragenkatalog:
Spalten E & I neu formatiert (Zeilenumbruch,

Einzug horizontal links, Ausrichtung vertikal oben)
Bewertungsmatrix:
P3 & P4 Prozess neu mit Fragenkatalog verknüpft
P4 Frage 4.5 auf nb und 4.7 mit Fragenkatalog
2.2 verknüpft
Korrektur Berechnung Produktgruppenbewertung

Überarbeitung automatische Farbcodierung
Korrektur P4 4.5-4.7 Fragekatalog 4.5 eingestellt
2.3 und 4.7 gelöscht 4/29/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
Layoutverbesserung Bewertungsmatrix,
Korrekturen Automatische Farbe
Div. Verbesserungen und Überarbeitung
Verlinkungen
Korrektur Gruppierungen
2.4 Ergebnisübersicht Vor / Nach SOP eingefügt 5/29/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
2.5 kleinere Korrekturen (Rahmen, Text) 6/27/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
2.6 Generischen Ansatz Berechnung korrigiert 9/27/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth
2.7 Kommastelle beim generischen Ansatz zugefügt 9/27/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth

Formatierung Generischer Ansatz (Rahmen)
2.8 Abkürzungen PR,CO,TO,RI zugefügt 3/14/2012 R. Demmeler-Wirth
Korrektur Rechtschreibfehler und Übersetzungen

Korrektur Bewertung Erklärung Einstufung >= 90
2.9 = A statt >90 = A 4/10/2012 R. Demmeler-Wirth

Excel Tool Prozessaudit VDA 6.3 2010 en

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Excel Tool Prozessaudit VDA 6.3 2010 en

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

396574721.

Audit Contract VDA 6.3-2010

Audited Party: (e.g. internal department, supplier)

Reason for Audit:

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 1 of 41

History (complaints, rejects, delivery performance, project status)

Remarks (background information)

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 2 of 41

ct, person responsible for the audit programme)

tant agreements, cost stipulations, etc.)

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 3 of 41

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 4 of 41

VDA 6.3-2010 Audit Report: Assessment of Quality Capability

Participants: Distribution to:

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 5 of 41

Timing for improvement plan:

Lead Auditor Co-Auditor signed for Organisation

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 6 of 41

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 7 of 41

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 8 of 41

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 9 of 41

actions for the identified weak points and

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 10 of 41

VDA 6.3-2010 Audit Report: Assessment of Quality Capability

Process Analysis Process effectiveness level

Process Name 2 E2 nb Generic Baseline

Process Name 3 E3 nb Process responsibility PR nb

Process Name 4 E4 nb Target orientation TO nb

Process Name 5 E5 nb Communication CO nb

Process Name 6 E6 nb Risk orientation RI nb

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 12 of 41

Process Name 8 E8 nb Overall Compliance EG nb

Process Name 9 E9 nb Before SOP ED nb

Process Name 10 E 10 nb After SOP EP nb

Comment: Please input values Pre-Audit yourself

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 13 of 41

alue, process stage E 1 - n) and

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 14 of 41

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 15 of 41

VDA 6.3-2010 Assessment Matrix including Product Groups Notes:

Supplier: Client: Date: Generic Baseline

nb nb nb nb nb EPdP nb nb nb nb nb nb EPzP nb EPP nb nb nb nb nb 3.1.

nb Green fields for entering

nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb EPdR nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb EPzR nb EPR nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb nb

Automatic Calculation of the

P 5 Supplier Management nb nb nb nb nb nb nb ELM nb nb nb nb nb

P 6 Process Analysis Serial Production

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 16 of 41

Questionnaire VDA 6.3-2010 Date:

Nr. Points Comments / Assessment Remarks

2.7* Is there an established escalation process and is this

P 3 Planning Product/Process Development

3.3 Are there plans for the product and process

3.5 Is QM planning arranged for sourcing bought-in

3.3 Are there plans for the product and process

3.5 Is QM planning arranged for sourcing bought-in

P 4 Carrying out Product/Process Development

Set up: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version: 2.9/10.04.2012 Page 17 of 41

Questionnaire VDA 6.3-2010 Date:

Nr. Points Comments / Assessment Remarks

4.3 Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?

4.8 Are the planning activities associated with sourcing

4.3 Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?