Full Short Communication Chromatographia 2007, 66, November (No. 9/10) 751
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-007-0394-4
0009-5893/07/11 2007 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH
Separation Method
752 Chromatographia 2007, 66, November (No. 9/10) Full Short Communication
the drug peak from the nearest resolving
peak. Overall selectivity was established
through determination of purity and Rs
of each peak using a PDA detector.
Ruggedness of the method was estab-
lished through separation studies on the
mixture of degradation samples by dif-
ferent persons on the same chromato-
graphic system as well as on a different
chromatographic system in a different
laboratory on a different day by another
analyst. Various system suitability
parameters were also evaluated on the
mixture sample on six different days by
using freshly prepared mobile phase each
time.
Development and 35% acetonitrile flowing at a rate of medium and also to characterize the
Optimization of the 0.8 mL min 1 on a C18 column employ- degradation products by mass spectrom-
Stability-Indicating Method ing 235 nm as detection wavelength. The etry, an LC-MS compatible method was
method resolved the drug and degrada- targeted. The phosphate buffer was re-
Initially, the forced degradation samples tion products in neutral, acidic and oxi- placed with ammonium acetate (0.025 M;
were analyzed by using a mobile phase dative media, but a cluster of peaks was pH 3.0) and all other variables were kept
composed of 65% sodium dihydrogen- observed in alkaline medium. To separate the same. However, degradation products
phosphate buffer (0.02 M; pH 3.0) and the degradation products in alkaline in alkaline condition still remained unre-
Full Short Communication Chromatographia 2007, 66, November (No. 9/10) 753
Table 1. Relative retention time (RRT), peak purity data and system suitability parameters of gliclazide and its degradation products
Parameter Peak
a
with respect to the succeeding peak
Actual conc. Measured concentration Conc. (lg mL 1) Calculated conc. Recovery (%)
(lg mL 1) (lg mL 1) Mean ± SD; %RSD (lg mL 1) Mean ± SD;
%RSD (n = 3)
Intra-day (n = 6) Inter-day (n = 3)
25 28.04 ± 0.20; 0.73 25.27 ± 0.49; 1.92 25 24.95 ± 0.46; 1.84 99.81
100 102.35 ± 0.81; 0.79 97.43 ± 1.81; 1.86 50 50.48 ± 0.66; 1.31 100.97
250 254.22 ± 1.87; 0.74 247.35 ± 2.27; 0.92 125 125.15 ± 1.24; 0.99 100.12
solved. The change in stationary phase intensity of 1.2 million lux. Drug solu- inter-day precision were <1% and
from C18 to C8 also did not yield encour- tions in water and 0.1 N NaOH under- <2%, respectively (Table 2) confirming
aging results. However, a gradual decrease went significant degradation in light the method to be sufficiently precise.
in flow rate of the mobile phase resulted in (Fig. 2g–h, respectively) with degradation Excellent recoveries (99.81–100.97%)
better separation of the products. Even- behaviour similar to that in the dark, but were achieved at each added concentra-
tually, mobile phase composed of 60% a new small peak VII was formed in tion (Table 2) indicating the method to
ammonium acetate buffer (0.025 M; pH 0.01 N HCl in the light (Fig. 2f). The be accurate. The method was sufficiently
3.0) and 40% acetonitrile flowing at a rate product II was the major peak in acidic specific to the drug and selective to the
of 0.25 mL min 1 over a C18 column and neutral media under photolytic con- individual degradation product as indi-
could optimally resolve the drug and all ditions in contrast to the hydrolytic con- cated by purity angle and threshold
the degradation products in the mixture ditions indicating that formation of II (Table 1). The drug and all the degrada-
sample in a single run (Fig. 2a). The rel- was facilitated at a temperature of 40 C. tion products resolved from each other
ative retention time (RRT) of each peak Further, in alkaline medium under light with an Rs of >1.90 (Fig. 2a) during
with respect to gliclazide is summarized in condition, peak area of V increased with ruggedness studies indicating that opti-
Table 1. concomitant decrease in VI and disap- mum resolution was always achieved
pearance of III. This suggested that VI under the tested conditions. The various
and III undergo probably a light cata- system suitability parameters determined
Degradation Behaviour lyzed intermolecular reaction to produce on six different days (Table 1) indicated
V which could also be produced by direct that the method is suitable for the pur-
The drug degraded to I and III in oxi- alkaline hydrolysis of the drug. In general pose. The Rs particularly for the separa-
dative medium at r.t. (Fig. 2b). The deg- the rate of degradation was accelerated tion of most closely placed peaks (IV and
radation behaviour in 0.1 N HCl at r.t. by light in solution state. V) was always >1.90.
(Fig. 2c) and in water at 85 C (Fig. 2d)
was similar where I and III were the
major degradation products where as II Validation of the Developed Stability Testing
and IV were the minor ones. In addition Stability-Indicating Method of the Gliclazide Tablets
to I, III and IV, two new products, V and
VI, were also formed in 0.1 N NaOH at The method was strictly linear in the No decrease in drug content in loose and
85 C (Fig. 2e) suggesting that the deg- concentration range of 5–500 lg mL 1. packed tablets kept in the dark at 40 C/
radation behaviour in alkali was different The mean (±%RSD) values of slope, 75% RH was observed in comparison to
from that in acid and water. No degra- intercept and correlation coefficient were the control tablets. Product VII was
dation was seen in solid drug at 50 C for 35568 (±3.51), 49687 (±2.81) and 0.9998 formed in trace amounts in packed tab-
31 days and also upon exposure to light (±0.04), respectively. The intra-day and lets (Fig. 2i) and its level was increased
754 Chromatographia 2007, 66, November (No. 9/10) Full Short Communication
insignificantly in loose tablets upon Acknowledgments 12. Mendes GD, Moreira LD, Pereira AS,
exposure to light. However it was <0.1% Borges A, Yui F, Mendes FD, de Nucci G
(2007) Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 45:175–
of the drug peak and no other peak was The authors are thankful to Prof. Saranjit 185
formed in both the packed and loose Singh, Head of Department of Pharma- 13. Kenichi K, Kojima T, Honda H, Doi K
tablets. ceutical Analysis, National Institute of (2005) J Health Sci 51:453–460
14. Yao J, Shi YQ, Li ZR, Jin SH (2007)
Pharmaceutical Education and Research, J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed
SAS Nagar, India for providing the Life Sci 853:254–259
Conclusion facility of photostability chamber and 15. Vasudevan M, Ravi J, Ravisankar S, Sur-
PDA analysis for the study. The authors esh B (2001) J Pharm Biomed Anal 25:77–
84
The forced degradation study on gliclaz- are also thankful to Punjabi University, 16. Li B, Wang B, Huang P, Wei C, Guo R
ide has been carried out under ICH pre- Patiala, India for providing financial (2006) Acta Chimica Sinica 44:843–845
scribed conditions and an isocratic assistance in carrying out the project and 17. Ling G, Sun J, Tang J, Xu X, Sun Y, He Z
stability-indicating HPLC-UV method is (2006) Anal Lett 39:1381–1391
to M/S Panacea Biotec Ltd, Lalru, India 18. Berecka A, Gumieniczek A, Hopkala H
developed. The validation experiments for providing gliclazide as a gift sample. (2006) J Assoc Off Anal Chem Int 89:319–
have proved the method to be linear, 325
precise, accurate, specific to drug and 19. Zhong G, Bi H, Zhou S, Chen X, Huang
M (2005) J Mass Spectrom 40:1462–1471
selective to each degradation product. In References 20. Venkatesh P, Harisudhan T, Choudhury
total, seven degradation products (I–VII) H, Mullangi R, Srinivas NR (2006) Bio-
are formed under different forced condi- 1. ICH (2003) Stability testing of new drug med Chromatogr 20:1043–1048
tions and each peak is optimally resolved substances and products. In: International 21. Lv J, Wang Q, Chen X, He P, Fang Y
conference on harmonization, IFPMA, (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 39:843–847
from the nearest peak with Rs of at least Geneva 22. Ku YR, Chang LY, Ho LK, Lin JH (2003)
1.90. The drug has been found susceptible 2. Campbell DB, Lavielle R, Nathan C (1991) J Pharm Biomed Anal 33:329–334
to hydrolytic and photolytic degradation Diab Res Clin Pract 14:S21–S36 23. Kimura M, Kobayashi K, Hata M,
3. Kurzer F (1952) Chem Rev 50:1–46 Matsuoka A, Kanoko S, Kitamura H,
at elevated temperature. The rate of
4. Sarmah AK, Sabadie J (2002) J Agric Kimura Y (1980) Chem Pharm Bull
degradation is accelerated by light and a Food Chem 50:6253–6265 28:344–346
photodegradation product is formed in 5. El Kousy NM (1998) Mikrochim Acta 24. Igaki A, Kobayashi K, Kimura M,
acidic medium. The method has been 128:65–68 Sakoguchi T, Matsuoka A (1989) J Chro-
6. The European Pharmacopoeia (2005) Vol. matogr 493:222–229
applied in stability testing of the com- I, pp 1660–1662 25. El-Enany N (2004) Il Farmaco 59:63–69
mercially available gliclazide tablets. In 7. Noguchi H, Tomita N, Naruto S (1992) 26. Park JY, Kim KA, Kim SL, Park PW
comparison to methods available in the J Chromatogr Biomed Appl 583:266–269 (2004) J Pharm Biomed Anal 35:943–949
literature, this method can be applied 8. El-Enany N (2003) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 27. ICH (1996) Stability testing: photostability
86:209–214 testing of new drug substances and prod-
to quantify gliclazide as well as its indi- 9. Rouini MR, Mohajer A, Tahami MH ucts. In: International conference on har-
vidual degradation products during the (2003) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol monization, IFPMA, Geneva
stability studies. Also, the chromato- Biomed Life Sci 785:383–386 28. ICH (1995) Draft guidelines on validation
10. Foroutan SM, Zarghi A, Shafaati A, of analytical procedures: definitions and
graphic conditions being compatible with Khoddam A (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal terminology, Federal Register, vol. 60,
LC-MS instrument requirements will be 42:513–516 Switzerland, pp. 11260
of use to characterize the degradation 11. Kuo CY, Wu SM (2005) J Chromatogr A
products. 1088:131–135
Full Short Communication Chromatographia 2007, 66, November (No. 9/10) 755