Course Description
From the course catalog: The Composition Instructors’ Workshop prepares instructors for teaching
writing in broad and local contexts. The course privileges writing pedagogy, including scholarly attention to
threshold concepts and best practices in writing studies, in addition to experiential learning, such as
classroom experience and observation. While working to construct important class materials, like syllabi
and lesson plans, instructors also craft professional documents such as teaching philosophies and
observation letters. Instructors enrolled in ENG 6020 take the course prior to or concurrently with teaching
GSW 1100, GSW 1110, or GSW 1120.
As we work together to develop the course materials you’ll need to teach your Fall 2017 GSW 1110:
Introduction to Academic Writing and Spring 2018 GSW 1120: Academic Writing, we will also explore the
real, lived experience of being/becoming a teacher of college writing. Our reading and writing this
semester will explore writing pedagogies, threshold concepts of writing studies, position statements and
guidelines for teaching writing, and examples from people and programs who demonstrate current best
practices in writing instruction. Additionally, we will explore these materials with a focus on how they might
or could relate to our local context at Bowling Green State University. Therefore, to further engage the
lived experience of writing faculty at BGSU, we will participate in professional development and service
opportunities on campus, conduct several classroom observations, and host local guest
speakers/facilitators in class. The desired learning outcomes and required course materials provided
below aim to further focus and support our learning together.
1 I also included photos, contact information/office hours, and teaching philosophies for our four Program Assistants, whose work is
integral to the ENG 6020 course. I have redacted that section to protect the PAs’ confidentiality.
3
Bibliography of Course Readings
Adler-Kassner, Linda, and Elizabeth Wardle, editors. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of
Writing Studies. Utah State UP, 2015.
“Assessing Student Multimodal Work.” Kent State University, 2017,
https://www.kent.edu/english/assessing-multimodal-student-work.
Conference on College Composition and Communication. “Principles for the Postsecondary Teaching
of Writing.” National Council of Teachers of English, March 2015,
http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/postsecondarywriting.
Council of Writing Program Administrators. “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition.”
17 July 2014, http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html.
Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, and National
Writing Project. “Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing.” Council of Writing
Program Administrators, Jan. 2011, http://wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-
postsecondary-writing.pdf.
Downs, Douglas and Elizabeth Wardle. “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions:
(Re)Envisioning ‘First Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’” College
Composition and Communication, vol. 58, no. 4, June 2007,
http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CCC/0584-
june07/CO0854Teaching.pdf.
Driscoll, Dana Lynn, and Jennifer Wells. “Beyond Knowledge and Skills: Writing Transfer and the
Role of Student Dispositions.” Composition Forum, no. 26, Fall 2012,
http://compositionforum.com/issue/26/beyond-knowledge-skills.php.
Duffy, John. “Post-Truth and First-Year Writing.” Inside Higher Ed, 8 May 2017,
https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/05/08/first-year-writing-classes-can-teach-
students-how-make-fact-based-arguments-essay.
Gardner, Traci. “Converting to a More Visual Syllabus.” Bedford Bits, 2 July 2015,
https://community.macmillan.com/community/the-english-community/bedford-
bits/blog/2015/07/02/converting-to-a-more-visual-syllabus.
Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing. “Using Peer Review to Improve Student Writing.”
University of Michigan, 2017, https://lsa.umich.edu/content/dam/sweetland-assets/sweetland-
documents/teachingresources/UsingPeerReviewToImproveStudentWriting/UsingPeerReviewto
ImproveStudentWriting.pdf.
Gee, James Paul. “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: Introduction.” Journal of Education, vol. 171,
no. 1, 1989, pp. 5-17,
http://jamespaulgee.com/geeimg/pdfs/Literacy%20and%20Linguistics.pdf.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “No One Writes Alone: Peer Review in the Classroom, A
Guide for Instructors.” MIT Tech TV, 2011, http://techtv.mit.edu/genres/25-humanities-arts-
and-social-sciences/videos/14628-no-one-writes-alone-peer-review-in-the-classroom-a-
%20guide-for-instructors.
Reiff, Mary Jo, and Anis Bawarshi. “Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre
Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition.” Written
Communication, vol. 28, no. 3, 2011,
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0741088311410183.
Sommers, Nancy. “Responding to Student Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol.
33, no. 2, May 1982, pp. 148-156,
https://faculty.unlv.edu/nagelhout/ENG714f10/SommersStudentWriting.pdf.
Sommers, Nancy. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College
Composition and Communication, vol. 31, no. 4, Dec. 1980, pp. 378-388,
4
http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CCC/1980/0314-
dec1980/CCC0314Revision.pdf.
“Syllabus and Assignment Design.” Dartmouth Institute for Writing and Rhetoric, 15 April 2016,
http://writing-speech.dartmouth.edu/teaching/first-year-writing-pedagogies-methods-
design/syllabus-and-assignment-design.
Sasser, Tanya. “Teaching Revision vs. Editing.” Remixing College English, 24 Feb. 2014,
https://remixingcollegeenglish.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/teaching-revision-vs-editing/.
Takayoshi, Pamela, and Cynthia L. Selfe. “Thinking about Multimodality.” Multimodal Composition,
edited by Cynthia L. Selfe, Hampton, 2007, http://techstyle.lmc.gatech.edu/wp-
content/uploads/2012/08/Takayoshi-Selfe.pdf.
Wardle, Elizabeth, and Doug Downs. “Reflecting Back and Looking Forward: Revisiting ‘Teaching
about Writing, Righting Misconceptions’ Five Years On.” Composition Forum, no. 27, Spring 2013,
http://compositionforum.com/issue/27/reflecting-back.php.
Course Projects
Throughout the semester we will perform a variety of professional genres with the goals of gaining
additional professional experience and reflecting on that experience. Additional expectations for the
performance narrative and feedback analysis projects will be provided in the form of assignment
sheets during the semester.
Professional Development: Over the course of the semester you will be asked to participate in
and/or host a variety of professional development opportunities, such as attending Center for Faculty
Excellence (CFE) workshops, working on/at GSW’s Fall 2017 National Day on Writing Writing
Showcase, developing an issue of paideia: GSW’s Monday newsletter, and giving a group workshop
for GSW’s Brown Bag Colloquia. Such experiences are designed to aid in your professional
development not only as a teacher of writing, but as a faculty member associated with a particular
program and institution.
Course Observations, Reflections, and Conversations: Throughout the semester you will conduct
four class observations: of your Program Assistant, a GSW faculty member, and two of your peers.
You will compose an observation and response narrative for three of these class visits (for your peers
and your GSW faculty member partner), detailing the strengths of the instructor’s teaching. Just as
you will conduct these observations, you will also invite your PA, your peers, and a GSW faculty
member to observe your course, and therefore you will receive observations and response narratives
to include in your teaching portfolio as evidence of your teaching record. Such activities promote the
culture of teaching within GSW and allow us to experience a variety of approaches to teaching writing
as they occur here at BGSU.
Pedagogy Journal: Throughout the semester you will keep an informal Pedagogy Journal where you
keep track of your lesson planning and teaching and reflect on your experiences. The journal can
take whatever form you’d like: it could be a personal notebook or an electronic document
(alphabetically or digitally composed), or it could be published publically as a blog. For the journal you
should write at least one entry per week detailing that week’s teaching—what you did in class and
how you feel it went, perhaps with future class sessions in mind—and goal-setting for the next week.
Additionally, use the journal space to think through your (developing) identity as a writing teacher.
How do or might your practices in GSW 1110 inform your identity as a college writing instructor? How
do you envision teaching writing as part of your personal identity? Your pedagogy journal can, and
most likely will, inform the Teaching Philosophy you compose for your portfolio.
5
Feedback Analysis: You will record a screencast of yourself providing feedback on one project and
reflect on your process. You may choose any of the projects you assign to your GSW students for this
analysis, and you may also choose whether you record your feedback on a rough draft or final draft.
For the analysis and reflection, you might consider why you present feedback as you do and how the
feedback is meant to support the student. Please compose the reflection as an audio narration of the
feedback video. Note: Before you complete your screencast, please remove all identifying
information from the student’s project and ask that student’s permission to use their project for your
analysis. When you submit the Feedback Analysis Project, you should include the video and proof of
written permission from the student.
Performance Narrative: During one of your peer observations, a colleague will video-record you
teaching your class. You will then compose a self-reflection (written or otherwise—audio, video, etc.)
based on the video, describing and reflecting on your practices. The reflection should include a
summary of your agenda for the class session, a self-analysis of the teaching you see in the video,
and goal-setting for future teaching. You may look to entries in your Pedagogy Journal to inform your
reflection.
Teaching Portfolio: The final project for ENG 6020 is a digital Teaching Portfolio that represents the
array of work you’ve completed this semester as a General Studies Writing instructor. You may
choose whether you would like to design your eportfolio using the Canvas portfolio tool or use
another electronic resource, such as a Wordpress blog. The portfolio is meant to support your
professionalization as a teacher of writing, which you might share with potential employers to provide
a record of your teaching. The portfolio should include a current curriculum vitae, a teaching
philosophy, at least three peer observation and response narratives (one from your PA, one from a
GSW faculty member, and one from a colleague in ENG 6020), your performance narrative and
feedback analysis projects (assignments for this class), and a sample teaching unit (e.g., your GSW
1110 course, including the syllabus, assignment sheets, and a sample lesson plan.) Additionally, you
will write a brief (one- to two-page) reflective introduction to your portfolio, describing the portfolio’s
contents and navigation as well as how the materials speak to each other and to your philosophy of
teaching writing. You are welcome to include additional materials (e.g., journal entries, feedback from
students, etc.) if you feel they contribute to your professional identity as a writing teacher; however,
additional materials are not required.
6
Course Grading Contract
Grading
ENG 6020 is a practicum/workshop course designed for us to experience the teaching of General Studies
Writing courses as a community of writing experts. As such, the activities in the course are designed not
only to aid in our teaching of GSW 1110 and 1120 by guiding us through our composing of teaching
genres such as syllabi, assignment sheets, and lesson plans, but to guide us in our professionalizing as
writing experts. Because we view writing as both an activity and a field of study, and we recognize that we
all come to writing with different interests and levels of experience, the practicum course is designed to
allow us opportunities to grow as writing experts in a labor- and engagement-based environment. Like the
GSW 1110 courses you teach this semester, the ENG 6020 grade is represented by either an “S”
(Satisfactory/pass) or “U” (Unsatisfactory/no pass).
Also like the GSW 1110 courses you teach, you will earn a narrative grade for your effort in ENG 6020.
Lee will deliver your teaching portfolio and final semester narrative grades (A, B, C, D, or F) in the form of
an end-of-semester memo to you at the end of the course. You must pass ENG 6020 in order to maintain
your teaching position in the General Studies Writing Program.
As co-instructor of the course and administrator of our grading contract, Lee will formulate grades—
narrative and final—according to a rubric based on the eight habits of mind. The habits of mind (curiosity,
openness, engagement, creativity, persistence, responsibility, flexibility, and metacognition) represent
labor and effort: a willingness to take on new tasks, perhaps tasks outside of our comfort zones, and to
try. Thus, grades in this course are largely based on labor, effort, and engagement—to do well, we will
need to push ourselves out of our comfort zones and be open to trying new or different approaches to
teaching writing. We will need to engage fully in the course and live as the writing experts our students
need us to be. The table below represents a breakdown of how experiences will translate as final and
narrative course grades.
B – Strong performance engaging with the habits of mind. Performance exceeds the
requirements for completing the course. Student-teacher accumulates two (2) non-participation
S
days, one (1) late project assignment, and zero (0) missing or incomplete project assignments,
and participates in at least two (2) professional development opportunities.
C – Satisfactory performance engaging with the habits of mind. Performance meets the
requirements for satisfactorily completing the course. Student-teacher accumulates four (4) non-
participation days, two (2) or more late project assignments, and one (1) missing or incomplete
project assignment, and participates in at least one (1) professional development opportunity.