Tenderevaluationprocedure

COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA TENDER EVALUATION

EVALUATION STAGES -JKR PROCEDURE
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 1

COURSE OUTCOME
COURSE OUTCOME • Enable to understand the tender
OBJECTIVES evaluation process.
EVALUATION PROCESS • Knowledge on tender evaluation
stages and the criteria involved.
CRITERIA
• Enable to know all information
EVALUATION STAGES
needed during tender.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
• Enable to strategize work during
OTHERS ANALYSIS
tender stages.
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

OBJECTIVES
COURSE OUTCOME • To determine and to recommend to
OBJECTIVES the Board of Procurement a tender
EVALUATION PROCESS
which offers the most profit to the
GOVERNMENT. Only contractor
CRITERIA
which has the financial and technical
EVALUATION STAGES capabilities is eligible for Award and
SPECIAL CRITERIA Acceptance.
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION PROCESS
1.
Tender opening
COURSE OUTCOME committee
6.
OBJECTIVES Issuing of 2.
tender Processing
Acceptance tender
EVALUATION PROCESS letter
In validity
CRITERIA Tender
period
EVALUATION STAGES 5. 3.
Determine Procurement
SPECIAL CRITERIA budget board
4.
OTHERS ANALYSIS Treasury
(if applicable)
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Tender evaluation must be done in validity of tender period
(minimum 90 days) from tender closing date.

EVALUATION PROCESS
FIRST STAGE
Tender price adjustment
Arrange the tender price

COURSE OUTCOME (from low to high)
Price reasonableness based

on budget or “cut-off”
OBJECTIVES
Determine the number of
tenderers to be evaluated
EVALUATION PROCESS
qualify Not Fulfill requirement
CRITERIA
SECOND STAGE
Tender compliance
EVALUATION STAGES
Tender compliance analysis Not Fulfill requirement
Rejected Contractor
Completeness of document analysis
SPECIAL CRITERIA
Adequacy of minimum capital
analsys
OTHERS ANALYSIS
qualify Not Fulfill requirement
ENDORSEMENT
THIRD STAGE
Experience and capability
TENDER REPORT
Tenderer experience analysis
Technical personnel analysis

CRITERIA
COURSE OUTCOME • PWD practice tender evaluation
OBJECTIVES
procedure has been divided into 3
categories, namely:
EVALUATION PROCESS
i. Large projects (more than RM10.0 million)
CRITERIA ii. Medium projects (RM2.0 million to RM10.0
EVALUATION STAGES
million)
iii. Small projects (less than RM2.0 million)
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

CRITERIA
- INFORMATION REQUIRED
COURSE OUTCOME
INFORMATION FORMS
OBJECTIVES
a) Borang A – Surat pengakuan kebenaran
EVALUATION PROCESS maklumat dan kesahihan
dokumen yang dikemukakan
pentender
CRITERIA
a) Borang B – Maklumat am latarbelakang pentender
b) Borang C – Data-data kewangan
EVALUATION STAGES c) Borang CA – Laporan Bank/Institusi Kewangan
d) Borang D – Rekod pengalaman kerja
SPECIAL CRITERIA e) Borang E – Kakitangan teknikal
f) Borang F – Keempunyaan loji dan peralatan
OTHERS ANALYSIS pembinaan asas
g) Borang G – Senarai kontrak kerja semasa
ENDORSEMENT h) Borang GA-1 – Laporan Jurutera Projek (JKR)
i) Borang GA-2 – Laporan Jurutera Projek (Swasta)
TENDER REPORT

CRITERIA
- INFORMATION REQUIRED
COURSE OUTCOME OTHERS DOCUMENT
OBJECTIVES
i. Audited account copy for last 2 years
EVALUATION PROCESS
ii. Account bank statement copy for last 3 months
iii. Bank report / financial institution (sealed)
CRITERIA iv. Copy of the certificate / confirmation of completion for
each project listed in Form D and G
EVALUATION STAGES v. EPF statement and a copy of Form A or copy service
agreement for contract staff
SPECIAL CRITERIA vi. Copy of the certificate of approval of technical staff
vii. Copy of Grant / hire-purchase agreement plant /
OTHERS ANALYSIS equipment
viii. Copies of the final interim payment certificate for the
ENDORSEMENT current project
ix. Project report (sealed)
TENDER REPORT

Sample of summary of tender submission
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- FIRST STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
• Preparation need to be done by
OBJECTIVES evaluator before start any tender
EVALUATION PROCESS evaluation process such as:
CRITERIA • Prepare summary of tender in ascending order
based on tender table prepared by Tender
EVALUATION STAGES Opening Committee.
. Prepare tender analysis based on cut-off pricing.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
. Select list of tenderers to be evaluated.
OTHERS ANALYSIS . Check and fill up Checklist of Compulsory
Documents.
ENDORSEMENT
. Prepare analysis of percentage (%) of price
TENDER REPORT distribution and obtain agreement from tenderers.
. Carry out arithmetic checking.

EVALUATION STAGES
- FIRST STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME • Number of tenderer should be assessed is
OBJECTIVES between 15-20 tenderer to produce between 3-
5 tenderer who will pass.
EVALUATION PROCESS • "Range" of tenderer can be selected is between
CRITERIA + / - 20% (+ / - 25% for Civil Engineering) from
the Mean Price.
EVALUATION STAGES • For the tenderers who are below the "cut-off"
SPECIAL CRITERIA will be checked the compulsory document first.
Select tenderer with special criteria to be
OTHERS ANALYSIS evaluated.
ENDORSEMENT • For tenderers who are outside the “cut-off” to be
referred to tender committee for consideration.
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME • A system of evaluation based on predetermined
conditions to ascertain whether tenderers are
OBJECTIVES eligible for further evaluation.
EVALUATION PROCESS • Evaluation Criteria:

i. Analysis on Compliance to Tender
CRITERIA ii. Analysis on Completeness of tender
documents.
EVALUATION STAGES iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Capital
iv. Analysis on performance of current work.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
• Objectives:
OTHERS ANALYSIS
To ensure tenders under consideration are
reasonable, in compliance, complete, have
ENDORSEMENT adequate capital and have good current work
performance free from sick project,
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
i. Analysis on Compliance to Tender
OBJECTIVES • Only Tenderers which comply and free from any
imperfection in term of legal and contractual which may
EVALUATION PROCESS jeopardize their qualification based on current practice are
to be considered.
CRITERIA – To check if form of tender has been signed by
tenderers
EVALUATION STAGES – The signing person has been given the power to sign.
– To check if tender price is stated in the form of tender.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
– Are PKK/CIDB registration still valid.
OTHERS ANALYSIS – Has tenderer returned all the basic tender documents,
– Check proposed construction period is stated in the
ENDORSEMENT form of tender.
– Failure to submit any of the forms of tender may effect
TENDER REPORT the ranking of tenderer,

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Common mistakes during filling of forms of
COURSE OUTCOME tender
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
FORM OF TENDER
NOT SIGNED
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
August 29, 2013 FORM

NURUL OF TENDER
ASRA NOT SIGNED
ABD RAHMAN 14
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
SIGNED ON WRONG FORM

Summary of Tender Price
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
TENDER PRICE
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS VALIDITY PERIOD
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA AHMAD BIN ABU
OTHERS ANALYSIS SIGNING PERSON

GIVEN POWER
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
SIJIL PKK
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
VALIDITY PERIOD
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
CIDB CERTIFICATE
FORM OF TENDER
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
CONTRACT PERIOD
NOT STATED
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS TENDER PRICE

NOT STATED
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

FORM OF TENDER
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
PRICE IN WORDS
SPECIAL CRITERIA
PRICE IN
OTHERS ANALYSIS FIGURES
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
OBJECTIVES a) Tender which is complete and comply to the
requirement of tender/regulation/Authority.
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA b) Mandatory Tender Documents includes:

i. Forms of Tender
EVALUATION STAGES ii. List of Quantity/ Summary of Tender
iii. Addendum (if any)
SPECIAL CRITERIA
iv. Schedule of rates
OTHERS ANALYSIS v. Design proposal, specification, pricing by
contractor etc. (where applicable) as
ENDORSEMENT required
TENDER REPORT
to enable design work by tenderer to be
evaluated.

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
OTHERS - Analysis on Construction Period
OBJECTIVES
• Ensure the construction period offers by tenderers is
EVALUATION PROCESS analysed such as:
CRITERIA a) not exceeding the maximum construction period

stated in the tender document.
EVALUATION STAGES b) Construction period if offerred by tenderer is not
too short that it becomes unreasonable
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Analysis on Completeness of Tender
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
OBJECTIVES
MANDATORY DOCUMENTS
EVALUATION PROCESS a) Audited account copy for last 2 years, or
Account bank statement copy for last 3 months, or
CRITERIA Bank report / financial institution (sealed)
EVALUATION STAGES
b) Project report by project superintendence officer
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS Without mandatory documents

(especially regarding financial)
ENDORSEMENT
evaluation of tenders can not be made
TENDER REPORT and therefore tender will be rejected.

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Balance Sheet statement
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Current Bank Statement
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME Financial Statement Report
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
ii. Analysis
COURSE OUTCOME on Completeness of Tender
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital
OBJECTIVES Method of calculation
EVALUATION PROCESS i. Rolling capital = asset liability – current liability
ii. Bank account = average of latest 3 months
CRITERIA
iii. Make comparison between rolling capital and bank
EVALUATION STAGES
account. Select the higher amount
iv. Include credit facilities report
SPECIAL CRITERIA v. Add (+) iii and iv = total liquidated capital (>3%)
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
OBJECTIVES Sample of calculation for minimum capital 3% from
value of construction work.
EVALUATION PROCESS
Tender price = RM 1,000,000.00
CRITERIA
PC Sum = RM 50,000.00
EVALUATION STAGES Provisional Sum = RM 50,000.00
SPECIAL CRITERIA Construction work value = RM 900,000.00
OTHERS ANALYSIS
So, 3% = RM 27,000.00
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
MINIMA CAPITAL

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
OBJECTIVES
Forms of Capital
EVALUATION PROCESS a) Rolling capital
CRITERIA b) Shares, unit trust, fixed deposit, Bond
c) Balance of credit facilities
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA For joint venture tender submission, minimum

capital is analyse based on combined
OTHERS ANALYSIS
equity agreed by both parties.
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
Adequacy of Minimum Capital
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
iii. Analysis on performance of current work
OBJECTIVES
• Work still on progress during the tendering
EVALUATION PROCESS process (Form D, G and GA)
• No sick project – below 30% of work schedule
CRITERIA
• No termination record
EVALUATION STAGES
• Checking will carry out through;
SPECIAL CRITERIA i. PKK / CIDB / JKR scale
ii. Superintendence project report
OTHERS ANALYSIS
iii. T.K.S. if no project on hand.
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

Current progress report
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME REASONABLE FACTORS
Faktor Civil Building Mechancal /
OBJECTIVES
Enginering work Electrical
EVALUATION PROCESS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial capability 45% 50% 50%
CRITERIA Technical
Work experience 35% 35% 35%
EVALUATION STAGES Technical staffs 15% 10% 15%
Machineries / plant 5% 5% 0%
SPECIAL CRITERIA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
OTHERS ANALYSIS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
i. Financial Capability
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY (Financial Bid Capacity)
= Working capital
CRITERIA
Yearly project value
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
ii. Technical
OBJECTIVES
• Working experiences
EVALUATION PROCESS • Technical staff
• Machineries / plant
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES • Working experience

SPECIAL CRITERIA
Evaluation criteria
OTHERS ANALYSIS -. Completed total work value past 5 years
ENDORSEMENT - Largest work value done in past 5 years
- Type of work is limited to recognized work
TENDER REPORT
Comparable or similar (follow by head / sub-head

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
• Technical staff
COURSE OUTCOME
Evaluation criteria
OBJECTIVES
-. Number and working experience of technical staff
EVALUATION PROCESS compares with Estimate Minimum Requirement
CONSTRUCTION WORK VALUE BUILDING CIVIL ENGINEERING

CRITERIA
CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT
EVALUATION STAGES A B C A B C
More than RM5.0 m and not more 1 3 3 2 3 4
SPECIAL CRITERIA than RM 8.0 m

OTHERS ANALYSIS than RM 15.0 m

ENDORSEMENT than RM 25.0 juta
More than RM25.0 m and not more

TENDER REPORT than RM 50.0 m 5 11 11 8 11 14
More than RM50.0 m 8 18 18 13 19 23

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME • Technical staff

OBJECTIVES
Staff categories:
• Category A (Engineer, architect, quantity surveyor)
EVALUATION PROCESS
• Category B (Diploma, Technician / polytechnic)
CRITERIA • Category C (assistant technician))
EVALUATION STAGES Must be employed by employer during tendering

• Certificate and KWSP
SPECIAL CRITERIA • For contract staff – Contract agreement
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME • Machineries / plants
OBJECTIVES Plant and equipment that could be accounted is limited to:

• As listed in the Estimated Minimum Requirement. Plants / machineries
EVALUATION PROCESS can be considered if function equivalently
• Owned / hire-purchase before the closing of tender
• Useful life not exceeding 150 years
CRITERIA
• If rent-mortgage, the agreement should cover the contract period.
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
Minimum Score
OBJECTIVES
Criteria Minimum Score
EVALUATION PROCESS
BW CE M&E
CRITERIA
1. Financial capability 20.0 18.0 20.0
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA 2. Technical capability 12.5 13.8 12.5
OTHERS ANALYSIS
3. Overall capability 45.0 45.5 45.0
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

SPECIAL CRITERIA
COURSE OUTCOME • Tender submission which is below the “cut-
off” price and passes Stage 2 Tender
OBJECTIVES
Evaluation can be considered if comply to
EVALUATION PROCESS the following criteria:
CRITERIA - Excellent performance for current project
EVALUATION STAGES
and completed project for the last 5 years.
- Good quality workmanship
SPECIAL CRITERIA
- Tender price not less than -20% of the
OTHERS ANALYSIS
“cut-off” price
ENDORSEMENT - Tender price is not too unreasonable
TENDER REPORT (Freak).

SPECIAL CRITERIA
COURSE OUTCOME Examples of low tender price can be
considered.
OBJECTIVES
- Own factory for main building materials
EVALUATION PROCESS
- Currently undertake equivalent
CRITERIA construction work at neighboring site
- Own scaffolding / formwork for recently
EVALUATION STAGES
completed project
SPECIAL CRITERIA - For roadwork / earthwork – own plants
and machineries readily available for use
OTHERS ANALYSIS
- Satisfactorily completed 3 projects of
ENDORSEMENT similar nature consecutively prior to this
tender
TENDER REPORT

OTHERS ANALYSIS
COURSE OUTCOME • Arithmetic checking
• Table for price comparison
OBJECTIVES
- comparison of price for every building
EVALUATION PROCESS
category with the estimated price
CRITERIA prepared by consultant by each
EVALUATION STAGES
tenderer taking into account the
arithmetic checking
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

OTHERS ANALYSIS
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

COMMITTEE ENDORSEMENT
FOR EVALUATION REPORT
COURSE OUTCOME • Ensure tenderer is not too occupied with on
going project.
OBJECTIVES • If the lowest tender price is too high as
compared to estimated mean price,
EVALUATION PROCESS
recommendation by committee should be:
CRITERIA – Award the tender to the lowest tenderer
– Decline all tender offer and re-tender.
EVALUATION STAGES
• Recommendation should list down at least
SPECIAL CRITERIA five (5) tenderers in ascending order who had
passed each stage of evaluation.
OTHERS ANALYSIS • Joint signature by qualified three (3) tender
ENDORSEMENT
committee members
• Prepare Q14A/2005/A form for result of
TENDER REPORT tender together with complete tender
evaluation report

TENDER EVALUATION
REPORT
COURSE OUTCOME • Step to be undertaken if there is any fake documents
are detected.
OBJECTIVES
- check all submitted documents, and
EVALUATION PROCESS verify in compulsory document checklist.
- Check with the parties which is
CRITERIA responsible to supply the document. (if
EVALUATION STAGES suspicious arise)
- Verification of fake document should be
SPECIAL CRITERIA in writing.
- Ensure the affected tenderer not to be
OTHERS ANALYSIS
recommended
ENDORSEMENT - Lodge a police report and send the report to
CIDB and PKK.
TENDER REPORT
- Evaluation officer to request show cause letter
from tenderer via CIDB and PKK
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES Thank You

SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT

Tenderevaluationprocedure

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Tenderevaluationprocedure

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

COURSE OUTCOME

CRITERIA TENDER EVALUATION

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 1

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 2

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 3

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 4

Arrange the tender price

Price reasonableness based

Technical personnel analysis

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 5

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 6

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 7

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 8

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 9

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 10

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 11

EVALUATION PROCESS • Evaluation Criteria:

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 12

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 13

August 29, 2013 FORM

SIGNED ON WRONG FORM

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 16

EVALUATION PROCESS VALIDITY PERIOD

SPECIAL CRITERIA AHMAD BIN ABU

OTHERS ANALYSIS SIGNING PERSON

OTHERS ANALYSIS TENDER PRICE

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 19

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 20

CRITERIA b) Mandatory Tender Documents includes:

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 21

CRITERIA a) not exceeding the maximum construction period

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 22

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 23

OTHERS ANALYSIS Without mandatory documents

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 24

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 25

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 26

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 27

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 28

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 29

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 30

SPECIAL CRITERIA For joint venture tender submission, minimum

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 31

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 32

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 33

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 34

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 35

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 36

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 37

EVALUATION STAGES • Working experience

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 38

CONSTRUCTION WORK VALUE BUILDING CIVIL ENGINEERING

More than RM8.0 m and not more 2 4 4 3 4 5

More than RM15.0 m and not more 3 7 7 5 7 9

More than RM25.0 m and not more

More than RM50.0 m 8 18 18 13 19 23

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 39

COURSE OUTCOME • Technical staff

EVALUATION STAGES Must be employed by employer during tendering

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 40

COURSE OUTCOME • Machineries / plants

OBJECTIVES Plant and equipment that could be accounted is limited to:

August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 41