Anda di halaman 1dari 3

Professor Rico Paolo R.

Quicho
San Beda College Alabang School of Law
638-6573 (Office Hours Only)
rprq@quichoangeles.com

Civil Procedure

READING ASSIGNMENTS

1. Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts (Rule 5, Sections 1 & 2) and


Kinds of Pleadings (Rule 6, Sections 1 to 13)

Cases:
Mercader vs. DBP (Cebu Branch), G.R. No. 130699, May 12, 2000
Financial Bldg. Corp. vs. Forbes Park, G.R. No. 133119, August 17, 2000
Rubio vs. Hon. Judge Mariano, G.R. No. L-30404, January 31, 1973

2. Parts of Pleadings (Rule 7, Sections 1 to 5)

Resolution of the Supreme Court En Banc dated June 3, 2008 (Bar


Matter 1922)

Cases:
Republic vs. Kenrick Development Corp., G.R. No. 149576, August 8,
2006
Vallacar Transit, Inc. vs. Jocelyn Catubig, G.R. No. 175512, May 30,
2011
Argallon-Jocson and Tusing vs. CA, G.R. No. 162836, July 30, 2009
Vicar International Construction vs. FEB leasing and Finance, G.R. No.
157195, April 22, 2005
Maranaw Hotels and Resort Corp vs. CA, G.R. No. 149660, January 20,
2009
Huibonhoa vs. Concepcion, G.R. No. 153785, August 3, 2006
Vda. De Formoso vs. PNB, G.R. No. 154704, June 1, 2011

3. Manner of Making Allegations in Pleadings (Rule 8, Sections 1 to


12)

Cases:
Cañete vs. Genuino Ice Co., G.R. No. 154080, January 22, 2008
Imperial Textile Mills vs. CA, G.R. No. 86568, March 22, 1990
Guevarra vs. Eala, A.C. No. 7136, August 1, 2007

1
Philippine American General Insurance Co. et al vs. Sweet Lines, G.R.
No. 87434, August 5, 1992

4. Effect of Failure to Plead (Rule 9, Sections 1 to 3) and When to


File Responsive Pleadings (Rule 11, Sections 1 to 11)

Sections 5 & 9 of the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure


Section 11 of the Rule of Procedure for Small Claims
Section 8 A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC
Section 5 A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC
Rule 16, Sections 1b, 1e, 1f & 6; Rule 17, Sections 2 & 3 of the 1997
Rules of Civil Procedure
Sections 5 & 6 of the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure
Sections 11, 12 & 13 of the Rule of Procedure for Small Claims
Articles 48 & 60, Family Code of the Philippines

Cases:
Ferrer vs. Ericta, G.R. No. L-41767, August 13, 1978
Ponciano vs. Parentela, G.R. No. 133284, May 9, 2000
Gojo vs. Goyala, G.R. No. L-26768, October 30, 1970
Liam Law vs. Olympic Sawmill Co. And Elino Lee Chi, G.R. No. L-30771,
May 28, 1984
Meliton vs. CA, G.R. No. 101883, December 11, 1992
Korea Technologies Co. Ltd. Vs. Lerma, G.R. No. 143581, January 7,
2008
Gajudo vs. Traders Royal Bank, G.R. No. 151098, March 21, 2006
Laus vs. CA, G.R. No. 101256, March 8, 1993
De Guia vs. De Guia, G.R. No. 135384, April 4, 2001
Lorbes vs. CA, G.R. No. 139884, February 15, 2001
Luna vs. Mirafuente, A.M. No. MTJ-05-1610, September 26, 2005

5. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings (Rule 10, Sections 1 to 8)

Cases:
Bautista vs. Maya-Maya Cottages, Inc., G.R. No. 148361, November 29,
2005
Alpine Lending Investors vs. Corpuz, G.R. No. 157107, November 24,
2006
Philippine Ports Authority vs. WG&A, G.R. No. 158401, January 28,
2008
Azolla Farms vs. CA, G.R. No. 138085, November 11, 2004
Swagman Hotels and Travel, Inc. vs. CA, G.R. No. 161135, April 8, 2005
Young vs. Spouses Sy, G.R. Nos. 157745 & 157955, September 26, 2006

2
3

Anda mungkin juga menyukai