CLIENT:
ES49985 ZT Z 94 004 C4
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION:
CAL-PR-004
LINE SIZING
SOFTWARE TECHNICAL SHEET
o
Status/ Date N of
Written by Checked by TA Approval CDE Approval
Revision (dd-MMM-YYYY) Pages
INFORMATION ON STATUS:
P Preliminary for Information
I Internal Discipline Checking
C For Comments and Approval
V Valid for Construction
A Approved For Construction
X “As Built”
EPM Engineering Project Manager or Assigned Substitute
© Copyright SBM Offshore N.V. 2012
Copyright by SBM Offshore N.V. or any of its subsidiaries. This document is the property of SBM Offshore N.V. or
any of its subsidiaries. This document or any part thereof is CONFIDENTIAL and may not be made known, copied, Ex No. :
multiplied, or used in any other way without the permission of SBM Offshore N.V. or any of its subsidiaries
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SOFTWARE DETAILS
2. REFERENCES
3. ACCESS DETAILS
The spreadsheet file is attached to this document; file name “CAL-PR-004”. The native
file can be accessed by searching for this document (ES49985-ZTZ94004) in EZ Search
and selecting “Preview Native”.
4. CALCULATION BASIS
4.1 GENERAL
Nominal pipe sizes, service codes and pipe material classes are specified as per the
Piping Material Classes Specifications, SPT92022 [2] and SPV92026 [3].
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
Pipe schedule, pipe material and internal pipe diameter are derived from SPT92022 [2]
and SPV92026 [3] based on the pipe material class and the nominal pipe size.
The pipe roughness is derived from §7.1.4 of the Process Design Standard [1] based on
the pipe material. Alloy Steel and Super Duplex materials are assumed to have the same
roughness as Duplex.
The Erosional Velocity Constant (C) is derived from §7.2.1 of the Process Design
Standard [1] based on the pipe material and if the service is continuous or intermittent.
Alloy Steel and Super Duplex materials are assumed to have the same “C” values as
Duplex; lined and galvanized carbon steel are assumed to have the same “C” values as
carbon steel. Erosional velocity is only valid for gas where significant liquid droplets are
expected (ex. outlet of gas cooler) and 2-phase line sizing.
If Volume Flowrate data input units are Am3/hr then the AVF equals the data input value
for Volume Flowrate.
If the Volume Flowrate input units are Sm3/hr then the AVF is calculated as follows:
AVF = Q x M / (23.689 x ρ)
If the Volume Flowrate input units are MMscfd then the AVF is calculated as follows:
Standard conditions are 15.56°C and 1.01325 bara ir respective of whether the input units
are Sm3/h or MMscfd.
W = AVF x ρ
u = AVF / (3600 x A)
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
Re = ρ x u x d / µ
The Friction Factor is calculated using the Serghides correlation. Serghides is more
accurate than Colebrook or Moody [4]. The Serghides correlation is as follows:
f = [A – (B – A)2 / (C – 2 x B + A)]-2
f = Re / 64
The Pressure Drop per 100m of length is calculated according to Equation 3-14 of Crane
[5]:
∆p = 0.000005 x f x (L / d) x ρ x u2
The Erosional Velocity Limit is calculated as per §7.2.1 of the Process Design Standard
[1]:
ve = C / ρ0.5
The Noise Velocity Limit is calculated as per §7.4.2 of the Process Design Standard [1]:
The Pressure Drop Limit is determined according to §7.4.3 of the Process Design
Standard [1] based on the operating pressure and by application of linear interpolation of
this CES data.
The Velocity, Reynolds Number, Friction Factor and ∆p are calculated as per the gas line
sizing (refer to §4.1).
The Material Velocity limit is derived from §7.3.1 of the Process Design Standard [1]
assuming that Alloy Steel, Duplex and Super Duplex have the same limits as SS /
Titanium, galvanized carbon steel has the same limits as carbon steel, and cPVC has the
same limits as GRP.
If the selected service code is seawater (WS), the selected material is galvanized carbon
steel or lined carbon steel, and the line size is 4” nominal bore or below, the material limit
is determined according to Figure 1 of [6].
The velocity limit versus pipe bore is linear on a logarithmic scale. Therefore, the
relationship between velocity limit and pipe bore takes the following form:
y = a.xb
For the galvanised carbon steel plot on Figure 1 [6] the constants “a” and “b” equal 0.1633
and 0.632 respectively. These constants shall apply to all the applicable materials, i.e.
galvanized carbon steel and lined carbon steel.
The Pump Velocity Limit is derived from Table 2.3 of API RP 14E [7] based on the type of
pump (reciprocating or centrifugal), if the line is on the pump suction or discharge, and the
pump speed (only applicable to reciprocating pumps). Table 2.3 provides ranges for
centrifugal pumps; the lower limits of the ranges are assumed. If the line is not associated
with a pump no value will be calculated.
The Maximum Allowable Velocity is determined as the minimum of the Material and Pump
Velocity Limits.
The Pump Pressure Drop Limit is determined according to §7.3.2 of the Process Design
Standard [1] based on if the liquid is sub-cooled or boiling, and if the line is on the suction
or discharge of the pump.
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
The AVF is the sum of the gas AVF and liquid AVF. The gas and liquid AVFs are
determined as per §4.2 and §4.3 respectively.
ρm = W / AVF
The Velocity is calculated as per the gas line sizing (refer to §4.1) but using ρm instead.
The Maximum Allowable Velocity is determined as the minimum of the Erosional Velocity
Limit or 15 m/s (only applicable if corrosion inhibitor is injected). This is as per §7.5 of the
Process Design Standard [1].
The vibration assessment is based on the Energy Institute (EI) Guidelines [8]. The
vibration mechanisms that are included in CAL-PR-004 are those which are affected by
the size of the line; namely:
• Flow Induced Turbulence (FIT) – applicable to gas, liquid and 2-phase lines.
• Acoustically Induced Vibration (AIV) – applicable to gas and 2-phase lines.
• Flow Induced Pulsation (FLIP) – only applicable to gas lines.
• 2-phase Flow Induced Vibration – (SHOULD BE DISREGARDED UNTIL
FURTHER ASSESSMENT IS CARRIED OUT): only applicable to 2-phase lines.
This is not covered by the EI Guidelines. This assessment is based on [9].
For more detailed information on these vibration mechanisms refer to the Piping Vibration
Technical Guideline [10].
The basis for the FIV assessment included in CAL-PR-004 is module T2.2 of the EI
Guidelines [8]. CAL-PR-004 includes the elements of T2.2 that enable the Likelihood of
Failure (LOF) score to be calculated. The formulae for these elements are included
below.
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
ρ.v2
The Fluid Viscosity Factor (FVF), which is only applicable to gas lines, is calculated using
Equation 7, T2.2 [8]:
The span interval (Lspan) between the supports is automatically calculated as per the
Piping Support CES [11] based on the pipe material, nominal pipe size and the pipe
schedule. A proposed span interval can also be entered.
Using the pipe outside diameter and the span interval (if the proposed value is blank then
the CES value is used otherwise the proposed value is used) the support arrangement is
automatically calculated according to Table 1.
The correlations in Table 1 differ from those in T2.2 of the EI Guidelines [8]; however, the
above correlations are more up to date according to the vibration experts at Xodus and
closely match the results from T2.2 [8].
Utilising the Support Arrangement and the Pipe OD the Flow Induced Vibration Factor (Fv)
can be determined by Table 2.2 of the EI Guidelines [8]. For reference this table is shown
below.
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
CAL-PR-004 automatically calculates Fv according to the table above. Note that the EI
range is up to 30”. It is assumed that the range is valid up to 32”.
If the LOF score is > 1 then CAL-PR-004 returns a High (H) risk; if between 0.5 and 1.0 a
Medium (M) risk; and less than 0.5 a Low (L) risk.
The basis for the FLIP assessment included in CAL-PR-004 is module T2.6 of the EI
Guidelines [8]. CAL-PR-004 includes the elements of T2.6 that enable the risk of FLIP to
be determined. The formulae for these elements are included below.
The critical diameter (Dcrit) of side branches from the main line is calculated as follows:
The user enters the Maximum Branch Inside Diameter of all the side branches from the
main line. If this maximum size exceeds Dcrit then there is a risk of failure due to pulsation
induced vibration. If the user leaves the Maximum Branch Inside Diameter blank then it is
assumed by CAL-PR-004 that there are no branches and hence no risk.
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
The basis for the AIV assessment included in CAL-PR-004 is module T2.7 of the EI
Guidelines [8]. CAL-PR-004 includes the elements of T2.7 that enable the risk of AIV to
be determined. The formulae for these elements are included below.
AIV is only a risk if there is a pressure letdown station (i.e. control valve, relief valve or
restriction orifice) in the line. Additionally, for a 2-phase line if the liquid mass fraction is
greater than 0.2 then there is no risk of AIV. AIV is not applicable to liquid lines.
The user specifies if there is a pressure letdown station and then CAL-PR-004 determines
if there is an AIV Potential. If there is no potential there is no risk. If there is a potential
for AIV the Power Working Level (PWL) is calculated as follows:
The EI Guidelines [8] do not provide an assessment methodology for vibration induced by
2-phase flow. Therefore, the work of Riverin et al [9] is used as the basis for the
assessment of 2-phase flow induced vibration.
The Likelihood of Failure (LOF) score is calculated using the following formula:
LOF = VP / VL
If the LOF score is > 1 then CAL-PR-004 returns a High (H) risk; if between 0.5 and 1.0 a
Medium (M) risk; and less than 0.5 a Low (L) risk.
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
Calculation of VL
Support Arrangement VL
FLEXIBLE 1.822
MEDIUM 3.547
MEDIUM STIFF 4.641
STIFF 6.905
CAL-PR-004 returns the VL value according to the Support Arrangement determined in the
FIT assessment (refer to §4.5.1).
Calculation of VP
0.0036 × H × (G pf )0.5
VP =
(ro
2 2
)[ (
− ri × 0.25 ro − ri
4 4
) (r o
2
− ri
2
)]
0.25
(
H = 0.5 × A × Dc × CF × − 2.3038 × 10 −3 ( d o / t ) 0.5 − 1.951335 × 10 −6 ( d o / t ) 2 + 0.4214579 ( d o / t ) −2 + 3.06871 × 10 −5 ( d o / t )1.5 + 0.0200985 )
−0.3862
D c = 0.5574 × d o
Where; CF = Calibration Factor (determined empirically) = 9.0
do = Pipe External Diameter (m)
t = pipe wall thickness (m)
A is defined in the following table:
Support Arrangement A
FLEXIBLE 1.850
MEDIUM 1.382
MEDIUM STIFF 1.210
STIFF 1.000
Calculation of Gpf
Qg
β=
(Q g + Ql )
OFFICIAL COPY - ES49985 - ZTZ94004C4 - - - PDF Generated on 23-Aug-2012 3:08PM
f o = 10 a
Where;
F × di
f =
j
Support Arrangement F
FLEXIBLE 1
MEDIUM 4
MEDIUM STIFF 7
STIFF 16
G pfo m2
If f > fo G pfn = 2.33 × 10 6 × m2
(f )
( f o )
Where;
G pfo = 10 b
5. Calculate Gpf
(
G pf = G pfn × ρ L × j 2 × d i ) × dj × We1
2 2 i
0.8
ρL × j 2 × di
We =
σ
6. SOFTWARE VALIDATION