The things Eleonora Argues that Infopaq has ‘Originality in a
that amount Rosati dictated a harmonized test Work, or a Work to ‘work’ for originality and that the of Originality: The and the test subsequent Bezpecˇnostní Effects of the for softwarová asociace case Infopaq Decision’ originality further dictates that all (2011) 33(12) works EIPR 746–755 involving intellectual creation (regardless of categorization issues) should be protected.
The things Jonathan Argues that an EU approach ‘Dematerialisation
that amount Griffiths will have to be developed , Pragmatism and to ‘work’ and notes that artistic the European and the test works will, like literary Copyright for works, be judged by their Revolution’ originality content, not their manner (2013) 33(4) of expression. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 767–790 Does the Richard Arnold Argues for photographs to ‘Copyright in CDPA deal be protected by both an Photographs: A with authorial right (protecting Case for Reform’ photograph original photographic art (2005) 27(9) EIPR s and films but not mere snaps) and a 303–305 rationally? neighbouring right like films (protecting the fixation regardless of any originality, but only from reprographic copying). Also that the cinematographic content of films should be protected by an authorial copyright.
Are the Christina J Ashdown has not properly ‘Freedom of
defences to Angelopoulos brought a defence of Expression and copyright freedom of expression into Copyright: The infringemen UK Double Balancing t adequate copyright law. Act’ [2008] 3 IPQ to protect 328–353 freedom of expression?
79 Fair Empl - Prac.cas. (Bna) 1446, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,771, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 540 Mashell C. Dees v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc., 168 F.3d 417, 11th Cir. (1999)