Lifetime exposure to child sexual abuse (CSA) and other forms of sexual harm
Elizabeth J. Letourneau, PhDa
William W. Eaton, PhDa (e.g., sexual exposure, sexual harassment, and Internet sex talk) affect approxi-
Judith Bass, PhDa mately 10% of a nationally representative sample of U.S. children aged 0–17
Frederick S. Berlin, years, including 12% of girls and nearly 8% of boys.1 Such exposure
MDb Stephen G. Moore, significantly increases the likelihood of subsequent sexual and nonsexual
MDc revictimization for boys and girls and subsequent sexual offending for boys.2
CSA is among 24 global risk factors identified by the World Health Organi-
zation that substantively affect the global burden of disease, contributing an
estimated 0.6% to the global burden of disease, or 9 million years of healthy life
lost.3 Unipolar depression, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immuno-
deficiency syndrome, alcohol use disorders, violence, and self-inflicted injuries
are among the leading contributors to the global burden of disease4 for which
CSA is a risk factor.5–7 Other studies have shown that CSA is associated with
unsafe sexual behaviors, alcohol use, and obesity,6–8 which also contribute to
the burden of disease.3
A separate evaluation of the disability and costs associated with 11 serious
mental health disorders identified four disorders with the highest disability
weights and with costs of $$70.0 billion, including schizophrenia, bipolar dis-
order, drug abuse/dependence, and major depressive disorder.9 CSA is a risk
factor for each of these disorders or their defining symptoms.6,10 Clearly, CSA
extracts a considerable toll on its victims and society.
The benefits of effective and widely adopted prevention programs for CSA
are, therefore, sizable, and it is not surprising that numerous efforts have been
made to encourage the development and evaluation of primary prevention
programs during the past 30 years. What is surprising are the outright failures
and significant limitations of these efforts.11–18 While some advances have been
noted,13,17,19 many existing primary prevention programs still suffer from a lack
of rigorous evaluation, limited implementation settings, ineffective program
content, and insufficient skills practice. Many current programs also fail to
target parents and other adults who might protect children, and few if any
a
Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
b
Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
c
CarDon & Associates, Inc., Bloomington, IN
Address correspondence to: Elizabeth J. Letourneau, PhD, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
624 N. Broadway, HH831, Baltimore, MD 21205; tel. 410-955-9913; fax 410-614-7469; e-mail <eletourn@jhsph.edu>.
©2014 Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health
Preventing Child Sexual Abuse 223
Figure. Depiction of how risk factors for child sexual abuse victimization and perpetration might vary across the
life course and levels at which factors occur
Agency
Life stage
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
i
t
y
Several developments
seem poised to reduce
the complexity and
improve the scientific
understanding of CSA,
including recent
federal research
Public Health Reports / May–June 2014 / Volume 129
Preventing Child Sexual Abuse 229