Beth Rachlin
Abstract
Stemming from recent political and social changes, prison populations are drastically increasing
past the number of inmates the facilities have the means and finances to support. Prisoners
experience many negative psychological effects from living in such crowded quarters. This study
compares prisoners’ levels of depression in spatially and socially crowded areas by administering
questionnaire was given to an equal proportion of male and female inmates three times over an
18-month span. Results are exploratory but spatial and social crowding are expected to be
Recently prisons have been experiencing an unprecedented influx of inmates whom they
do not have the means or finances to support without effecting the inmates’ wellbeing. Political
and social factors contribute to how prisons, or correctional facilities, are managed. When
President Nixon began the “war on drugs” in 1971, he advocated for policies such as mandatory
sentencing and more federal drug control agencies, while unintentionally causing prison
populations to skyrocket (“A Brief History of”, n.d.). In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in
“Brown vs. Plata” that the California prisons violated inmates’ 8th amendment rights due to
overcrowding. The prisons held 156,000 inmates while only being legally able to house 85,000
inmates (Newman & Brown, 2012). Due to the recent severe overcrowding of prisons, many
studies, including the proposed study, are examining the psychological effects of prisoners living
The rapid overfilling of prisons is motivating many researchers to analyze exactly how
living in such cramped spaces effects inmates. Inhumanely crowded quarters cause higher levels
of depression and put inmates at a higher risk for depression and suicide. Sharkey (2010)
examined the main contributory factors to suicide among female prisoners, and during interviews
found inmates claimed overcrowding was one of the factors leading to suicidal thoughts. She
asserts if prison staff were more willing and able to communicate with prisoners, suicide risks
would decrease even if the overcrowding was unchanged. Almost all of the participants believed
overcrowding contributed to suicidal thoughts whether it was because of staff being too busy to
treat them like humans, or the anxiety associated with sharing a cell with another person.
Constant noise and activity due to the large number of people in such a small space reportedly
contributed to feelings of being trapped and nervous. This conclusion is supported by other
EFFECTS OF OVERCROWDING 4
researchers who assert people living in an overcrowded space not only experience higher levels
of anxiety and depression but also form a lower tolerance for crowded areas. (Paulus, McCain, &
Chandler, 1975). Overcrowding can increase inmates’ stress levels due to the uncertainty
stemming from forcing cell sharing between prisoners who might not coexist well. The constant
moving of prisoners can lead to anxiety, confusion, and upset feelings since the prisoners are in
foreign, unfamiliar places instead of feeling like their cell is a safe space (Liebling, 1999).
Some suggest the issue is not only overcrowding, but also the changes stemming from
overcrowding. Kupers (1996) asserts the rapidly growing population paired with the declining
state of conditions inside the facilities contributes to traumatic experiences. Lichtenstein, Jenkot,
and Forde (2012) supports this, saying overcrowding decreases recreational space and
rehabilitation programs which in turn provokes inmates to participate in more violent behavior.
A study by Snow, Paton, Oram, and Teers (2002), compared prisons with the highest and lowest
rates of self-inflicted deaths in hopes of finding which factors lead to suicide in prison. Results
indicated the proportion of positive drug tests, average hours of daily purposeful activity, time
out of cell, staff sickness, and staff/prisoner ratios did not differ significantly. However, the level
of overcrowding between the two prisons did, indicating overcrowding plays a significant role in
the emotional stability and depression levels of prisoners. These findings portray the various
negative effects inmates experience while incarcerated due to the exponentially increasing prison
populations.
have different effects on inmates’ levels of depression, I am proposing a study where prisoners’
mental states, specifically levels of depression, from two correctional facilities will be examined.
Many studies have examined various effects of prison on inmates’ psychological wellbeing,
EFFECTS OF OVERCROWDING 5
however this is the first to examine if spatial and social density effect prisoners’ depression
levels differently. Density, the proportion of inmates to the capacity of a correctional facility, is
often used to determine whether a prison is “overcrowded”, but overcrowding and density are
refers to the square footage of the inmates’ living spaces, calculated as a proportion of inmates to
the available space the facility has to offer. Social-density takes into regard the number of people
occupying an area and is measured by the amount of double and triple bunking found in a prison
(“Prison Overcrowding”, n.d.). A prison is considered overcrowded when its prisoner count
exceeds the certified normal accommodation (CNA). The CNA is the standard level of services
and accommodations that each prison provides to its prisoners (Sharkey, 2010). I hypothesize
that spatial and social density in prisons will be associated with different levels of inmates’ stress
and anxiety.
Method
Participants
Participants will include 128 randomly selected inmates from two correctional facilities.
For the analysis, this sample size provided a power of .75 (α=.05) to detect a medium effect.
Group 1 will be 64 participants who are incarcerated in a spatially overcrowded facility. Group 2
will be 64 participants who are incarcerated in a socially overcrowded facility. All of the
participants will be over 18 years of age. The participants will be half men and half women, with
each group having an even number of women and men. Participants will be recruited by asking
randomly selected inmates if they will be interested in participating. Prisoners are a vulnerable
EFFECTS OF OVERCROWDING 6
population, and IRB guidelines will be followed in order for participants to be at minimal risk
Materials
The Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) will be used to collect self-reported
data. The scale will be printed on paper and given to each participant. This scale is broken into 3
subscales which are comprised of 42 negative emotional symptoms (e.g. hopelessness, self-
deprecation, situational anxiety, subjective experience of anxious affect, difficulty relaxing). The
3 subscales are: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Each subscale is presented to participants in
random order, with a four-point scale for each item ranging from “Did not apply to me at all” (0),
to “Applied to me very much, or most of the time” (3). Instructions at the top of the sheet asked
participants to indicate which statement applied to them regarding the past week. Scores for each
scale will be calculated by summing the scores indicated on the questionnaire (Lovibond &
Lovibond, 1993).
Procedure
A researcher and guard will administer the questionnaire to each participant individually
in a safe room within the correctional facility. No time limit will be imposed, however
instructions stress speed and accuracy. After completing the questionnaire, the inmate will be
debriefed then carry on as usual. A small gift of 50$ is given to each participant as an incentive.
Proposed Analysis
In the proposed study, the data analyses will be conducted by running an analysis of
variance (ANOVA). The ANOVA will compare mean DASS scores for Group 1 and Group 2
with α=.05 and a medium effect size. Results are expected to support my hypothesis that there is
a difference between spatial and social density’s effects on inmates’ stress and anxiety levels.
EFFECTS OF OVERCROWDING 7
References
solutions-drug policy/brief-history-drug-war-0
Kupers, T. A. (1996). Trauma and its sequelae in male prisoners: Effects of confinement,
Martin, J., Lichtenstein, B., Jenkot, R., & Forde, D. (2012). “They can take us over any time they
want”: correctional officers’ responses to prison crowding. The Prison Journal. 88-105.
Newman, W., Scott, & C. (2012). Brown v. Plata: prison overcrowding in California. Journal of
Nicole Shoener, LegalMatch Legal Writer. (n.d.). Three Strikes Laws in Different States.
different-states.html
Paulus, P., Cox, V., McCain, G., & Chandler, J. (1975). Some effects of crowding in a prison
Ruback, R. B., & Carr, T. S. (1984). Crowding in a woman's prison: attitudinal and behavioral
Managing depressive symptoms in substance abuse clients during early recovery. (2008).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64063/
Sharkey, Lauren. (2010). Does overcrowding in prisons exacerbate the risk of suicide among
women prisoners? The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice. 49, 111-124.
Snow, L., Paton, J., Oram, C. and Teers, R. (2002) ‘Self-inflicted deaths during 2001: an analysis
Tyler, T., & Boeckmann, R. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of
public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review, 237-266.
Wooldredge, J., & Steiner, B. (2009). Comparing methods for examining relationships between
Appendix A