Eric Zachary
After the adoption of the Common Core State Standards at the beginning of the decade,
the look of a traditional school setting has been dramatically altered. According to
Jochim, McGuinn (2016), federal and local governments have invested hundreds of
millions of dollars to dynamically change many of the aspects of our educational system
in the United States. The CCSS were written with two goals in mind: to prepare students
to be college and career ready and to implement a national set of standards (Porter,
McMaken, Hwang and Yang 2011, p. 103). The results of the CCSS adoption have been
a continuous domino effect of educational change as school districts scramble to meet the
new expectations.
This chain of events has led to three major instructional trends in K-12 education.
Each of these areas have been directly influenced by the nearly nationwide adoption of
the CCSS. The major change has been a noticeable transition from a teacher-centered to a
more learner-centered environment. Additionally, there has been a shift from multiple-
drastically increased the availability of technology to both students and teachers, thus
In educators’ efforts to better prepare learners for a 21st century workforce, many
trends have begun. One of the most noticeable trends, in the new common core
Cooperative, problem-based, and project-based learning have all become more prevalent
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY 3
The common core classroom has been designed for student collaboration. Across
the curriculum, collaborative group work can be seen in classrooms. In many classrooms,
traditional desks have been replaced with tables to encourage collaboration. The mandate
from the CCSS states “students must learn to work together, express and listen carefully
to ideas” (California Department of Education [CDE] 2013). There are many beneficial
skills that are developed while working in a collaborative learning environment. For
example, students build their academic skills by defending their own work with evidence,
while also gaining insight from their peers. Furthermore, by working in supportive
Another form of alternative learning that has become more prevalent in the
common core classroom is the use of problem-based learning (PBL). Traditionally, K-12
public education has been very well structured. Teachers prepare a lesson, deliver direct
instruction, students practice, and then students are assessed on their learned knowledge
within the parameters of that structure. Research suggests that the problem with this
method is that in the real world problems are ill structured and unrelated. PBL employs
methods that allow students to learn through self-discovery. Torp and Sage (2002)
describe PBL as learning that “confronts students with a messy, ill-structured situation in
which they assume the role of the stakeholder… they identify the real problem and learn
To further emphasize the necessity for PBL, the Smarter Balanced Assessment
Consortium (SBAC), a public agency tasked with creating the CCSS aligned state
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY 4
assessment, has included what is referred to as a performance task (PT) as part of its
students to answer a set of questions that are centered on a common theme or problem.”
The CCSS emphasize a need for students to develop greater procedural and critical
thinking skills. In an effort to prepare students for the state assessments, as well as their
college and careers, teachers are increasingly employing PBL scenarios as part of their
students in the world of the CCSS is the use of project based learning. Most of the CCSS
require students to demonstrate skills in complex ways. Furthermore, there are very few
standards that require a single step to complete. The CCSS asks students to not only
understand the content, but also have the ability to apply their learning to real life
situations.
Like many of the other alternative learning strategies, project based learning
requires inquiry, research, rigor, and it often requires collaboration. However, project
based learning differs from other alternative learning methods, in that the end result is not
audience. Lenz, Wells, and Kingston (2015) state that “the true launch of a project is
when students hear not what they are going to learn, but what they are going to create”.
One of the biggest challenges that teachers face is getting their students to care about
what they're expected to learn. Project based learning allows students to discover new
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY 5
content through discovery rather than dictation, which creates a sense of ownership in
their learning that may not be achieved using traditional learning methods.
Not only have the CCSS changed the way we deliver instruction, it has altered the
way we assess learning as well. In the past, the end of the school year state assessment
was a traditional paper and pencil, multiple-choice test. Although these tests offered a
form of measurable data, there were many flaws with the assessment system. Through
selective guessing, students were able to narrow down choices and pick the most logical
response without actually arriving at the answer through understanding. This allowed
Furthermore, in using a single set of questions based solely on grade-level criteria, there
was no true way to assess the students at their level. As a result, there was no usable data
for students performing both below and above grade-level. Multiple choice testing proved
Following the introduction of the CCSS two new assessments were created by the
SBAC as well as the Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and
Careers (PARCC). Due to greater success and more widespread implementation, the
SBAC has become the prominent model for computer adaptive testing. The SBAC
assessment attempts to solve many of the authenticity issues that existed in the older,
Through the use of a computerized adaptive testing model, the SBAC assessment
is able to meet students at their performance level. The rigor of test questions increases or
employs the use of multiple question types, including constructed response, matching,
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY 6
questions with multiple correct answers, as well as multiple choice. The variation in
guessing strategies that come with strictly multiple-choice exams. The SBAC assessment
thinking skills. In all, the SBAC assessment is a much more challenging and
comprehensive evaluation tool that provides a more detailed picture of student learning.
districts were tasked with figuring out a way to administer the test to every student in
grades three through twelve. Prior to the implementation of the CCSS, many schools had
a single computer lab that was shared between all of the classes at a school-site. School
districts soon discovered that it was not feasible to cycle hundreds, if not thousands, of
students through a single lab to complete the SBAC assessment within the small window
of time allotted to have all students complete the test. Many school districts are finding
the solution to this problem through the purchasing of a simple, inexpensive, internet
The Chromebook’s relatively low cost has allowed many districts to purchase one
device per student. The widespread implementation of Chromebooks in the classroom has
provided many new educational opportunities. Furthermore, Google has created the
Google Suite, which is provided to educational agencies free of charge. Through the use
of Chromebooks, the Google Suite, and other free or low cost applications, it is clear, as
resources and making new things possible in terms of learning and achievement.”
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY 7
The CCSS have altered the course of education in the United States. Educators
and modified to adjust the way instruction is delivered. Will these new educational trends
lead to achieving the goal of preparing today’s students for college and their careers? It
may be years before we know the full effect of the CCSS implementation, however, one
thing is certain, the technological implementation of the CCSS have provided educators
with a whole new world of instructional possibilities that would have been unfathomable
References
http://www.caaspp.org/faqs/performance-tasks.html
District Administration. (2014). Ensuring 1-to-1 success with Google for education: the
right tools are essential to reaping the benefits of 1-to-1. District Administration,
50(6). 16-17.
Jochim A., & McGuinn P. (2016). The politics of the Common Core assessments: why
states are quitting the PARCC and Smarter Balanced testing consortia. Education
Lenz, B., Wells, J., & Kingston, S. (2015). Deeper learning: transforming schools using
Porter A., McMaken J., Hwang J., & Yang R. (2011). Common Core Standards: The
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writeliving
Torp L., & Sage S. (2002). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-16
Development.