Three beams have been suggested for use, all of which satisfy the ultimate member
requirements:
200UB18.2;
180PFC (20.9 kg/m)
200*100*6 RHS (26.2kg/m) I200*100*6RHS=16.7*106mm4 (Note: cold formed
section with continuous automatic longitudinal weld)
Which beam would most easily satisfy the fatigue requirements? It is only necessary
to state which is the most appropriate beam and why – full calculations are not
required (but probably a good idea to do them for practice)
Question 2
A Grade 300 1200WB342 steel girder of a bridge requires checking for fatigue
performance. The girder can be idealised as a 15 metre long simply supported beam.
Assume the beam can be easily inspected and that the client has a strict maintenance
programme proposed. Also assume that load cannot be shed to an adjacent beam and
that no splices or stiffeners are required or used along the length of the beam.
However, the beam has a 16mm thick, 300mm wide transverse connection cleat
welded to the centre of the underside of the beam at midspan.
a) Find the worst tensile stress and stress range in the flange.
b) Determine the capacity reduction factor (φ) to be used and indicate why.
Kerri Bland 1
Lecturer
Curtin University of Technology
Department of Civil Engineering
(i) Which beam would be the most appropriate to satisfy the fatigue
requirements? It is only necessary to state which is the most appropriate
beam and why – full calculations are not required.
Kerri Bland 2
Lecturer
Curtin University of Technology
Department of Civil Engineering
Figure 1
The pile cap needs to be checked for fatigue. Not to scale
a) Initially, do a quick conservative check, using the highest stress range (due to the
highest working action), and assume this is the stress range that occurs with
every load cycle (ie: 1000kN acting 2*106 times). It will be necessary to
consider the stress range in the flange and the web. Is a full fatigue analysis
required to be carried out? If so, is the 1200WB423 beam suitable to handle the
fatigue loading?
b) Next, carry out a more representative analysis using Miner’s Rule, to determine
whether the section is suitable to resist the fatigue loading.
Kerri Bland 3
Lecturer
Curtin University of Technology
Department of Civil Engineering
Q2 Flange will be critical due to connection cleat resulting in a lower detail category,
therefore normal stresses will be critical. So, worst location for the point load will be
at midspan as that will create the greatest normal stresses.
a) fmax = 150 MPa
f* = 53.6 MPa
b) 0.7 (no load shedding available)
c) Yes, needs to be checked
d) φfc = 51.4 MPa < f* so beam not OK
Q4 a) Max stress range in flange = 64.4 MPa; Max range in web = 85.9 MPa;
Fatigue analysis is required; Considering constant stress range for web,
f*/φfc = 1.73 therefore fails (>1), Considering constant stress range for
flange, f*/φfc = 1.42 therefore fails (>1)
b) Using Miner’s Rule, Web analysis: Miner’s rule equation yields 0.96 < 1
therefore web OK for fatigue, Flange analysis: Miner’s rule equation
yields 0.53 < 1 therefore flange OK for fatigue (for both web and flange,
there are three i group terms and one j group term in the equation)
Kerri Bland 4
Lecturer