Anda di halaman 1dari 1

HL External Assessment Criteria- Paper 2: Essay

Criterion A: Knowledge 0 Marks 1 Marks 2 Marks 3 Marks 4 Marks 5 Marks


and understanding The work does not reach a There is some knowledge There is mostly adequate There is adequate There is good knowledge There is perceptive
• How much knowledge standard described by the but virtually no knowledge and some knowledge and and understanding of the knowledge and
and understanding has descriptors below understanding of the part 3 superficial understanding of understanding of the part 3 part 3 works in relation to understanding of the part 3
the student shown of the works in relation to the the part 3 works in relation works in relation to the the question answered. works in relation to the
part 3 works studied in question answered. to the question answered. question answered.. question answered.
relation to the question
answered?
Criterion B: Response 0 Marks 1 Marks 2 Marks 3 Marks 4 Marks 5 Marks
to the question The work does not reach a The student shows little The student responds to The student responds to The student responds to the The student responds to all
• How well has the standard described by the awareness of the main some of the main most of the main main implications and some the implications, as well as
student understood the descriptors below implications of the question, implications of the question implications of the question subtleties of the question, the subtleties of the
specific demands of the and ideas are mainly with some relevant ideas. with consistently relevant with relevant and carefully question, with convincing
question? irrelevant and/or There is a superficial ideas. There is adequate explored ideas. The and thoughtful ideas. The
• To what extent has insignificant. There is little attempt to compare the comparison of the works comparison makes some comparison includes an
the student responded meaningful comparison of works used in relation to the used in relation to the evaluation of the works used effective evaluation of the
to these demands? the works used in relation to question. question. in relation to the question. works in relation to the
• How well have the the question. question.
works been compared
and contrasted in
relation to the demands
of the question?
Criterion C: 0 Marks 1 Marks 2 Marks 3 Marks 4 Marks 5 Marks
Appreciation of the The work does not reach a Some literary conventions Examples of literary Examples of literary Examples of literary Examples of literary
literary conventions of standard described by the are identified but there is conventions are sometimes conventions are conventions are clearly conventions are
the genre descriptors below limited development correctly identified and satisfactorily identified and identified and effectively perceptively identified and
• To what extent does relevant to the question developed, with some developed, with relevance developed, with relevance persuasively developed,
the student identify and and/or the works used. relevance to the question to the question and the to the question and the with clear relevance to the
appreciate the use of and the works used. works used. works used. question and the works
literary conventions in used.
relation to the question
and the works used?
Criterion D: 0 Marks 1 Marks 2 Marks 3 Marks 4 Marks 5 Marks
Organization and The work does not reach a Ideas have little Ideas have some Ideas are adequately Ideas are effectively Ideas are persuasively
development standard described by the organization; there may be a organization, with a organized, with a suitable organized, with a very good organized, with excellent
• How well organized, descriptors below. superficial structure, but recognizable structure, but structure and attention paid structure, coherence and structure, coherence and
coherent and developed coherence and/or coherence and to coherence and development. development.
is the presentation of development are lacking. development are often development.
ideas? lacking.
Criterion E: Language 0 Marks 1 Marks 2 Marks 3 Marks 4 Marks 5 Marks
• How clear, varied and The work does not reach a Language is rarely clear and Language is sometimes clear Language is clear and Language is clear and Language is very clear,
accurate is the standard described by the appropriate; there are and carefully chosen; carefully chosen, with an carefully chosen, with a effective, carefully chosen
language? descriptors below many errors in grammar, grammar, vocabulary and adequate degree of good degree of accuracy in and precise, with a high
• How appropriate is the vocabulary and sentence sentence construction are accuracy in grammar, grammar, vocabulary and degree of accuracy in
choice of register, style construction, and little sense fairly accurate, although vocabulary and sentence sentence construction; grammar, vocabulary and
and terminology? of register and style. errors and inconsistencies construction despite some register and style are sentence construction;
(“Register” refers, in this are apparent; the register lapses; register and style are consistently appropriate to register and style are
context, to the student’s and style are to some extent mostly appropriate to the the task. effective and appropriate to
use of elements such as appropriate to the task. task. the task.
vocabulary, tone,
sentence structure and
terminology
appropriate to the task.)