September, 2018
dl-sw-17/4194/16-18
Indian Highways published on 23 August, 2018
`20/- Advance Month, September, 2018
Indian Highways
sa infrastructure consultants pvt. ltd
(An ISO 9001-2008 Certified Company)
About saicpl
SA infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Ltd along with its subsidiary UPHAM International Corporation and QUEST
Engineers & Consultants are focused on delivering multi-disciplinary infra projects with innovative ideas of
International Standards. The Group forms an ambious consortium of consultancy firms with commitment to
provide high quality specialized consultation into the field of Highways, Structures and Design.
Services
SA Infrastructure synchronizes every aspect of engineering with imbibed commitment to deliver high quality infrastructure and development • Storm water enters the
consultation that glorifies a new world. We have successfully carried out numerous consultancy projects in Civil Infrastructure development adjacent green area
through kerb cuts.
transportation, primary & secondary highway networks, Project Management under BOT/Annuity Model, Resource Management, Social aspects
including poverty alleviation and institutional support. • the green area lvl is
always lower than
road lvl.
Corporate Address : 1101, 11th Floor, Tower A-II, Ansal Corporate Park, Sector 142, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh India
Tel : +91-120-6148000 / Fax : +91-120-6148090 www.sainfra.com Email - info@sainfra.com
Edited and Published by Shri S.K. Nirmal, Secretary General, Indian Roads Congress, IRC HQ, Sector-6, R.K. Puram,
Kama Koti Marg, New Delhi - 110 022. Printed by Shri S.K. Nirmal on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress
at M/s. India Offset Press, New Delhi-110 064 https://www.irc.nic.in
Indian Highways
Volume : 46 Number : 9 ● September, 2018 ● ISSN 0376-7256
Indian Roads Congress
Founded : On 10th December, 1934
Contents
From the Editor's Desk 4-5
Advertisements 2, 7-14, 36, 66-68
Letter to Editor 6
IRC Technical Committee Meeting Schedule for September 2018 13
Announcement 36, 57-58, 60 & 65
Registration Form and Accommodation form 79th Annual Session 61-64
New/Revised Publications of Irc in 2017 and 2018 59
Technical Papers
Aquaplaning Assessment and Mitigation on the Road Near the Superlevation Transition 15
By Ravi Shenker
Hydraulic Considerations for Planning and Design of Guide Banks 21
By S.K. Mazumder
Use of Recycled Asphalt Material for Sustainable Road Construction 29
By Dr. Umesh Sharma, Harish Kumar Giri and Ankita Khatri
Innovations in Repair to Maintain Pavements and Structures 37
By Satander Kumar
MoRT&H Circular 49-53
Tender Notices 54-56
Publisher & Editor: S.K. Nirmal, Secretary General, IRC
E-mail: secygen.irc@gov.in
Headquarter: IRC Bhawan, Kama Koti Marg, Sector-6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110 022.
Phone No.:
+91-11-26171548 (Admn.), 23387140 & 23384543 (Membership), 23387759 (Sale),
26185273 (Tech. Papers, Indian Highways and Tech. Committees)
No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Secretary General, IRC.
The responsibility of the contents and the opinions expressed in Indian Highways is exclusively of the author(s) concerned. IRC and the Editor
disclaim responsibility and liability for any statements or opinion, originality of contents and of any copyright violations by the authors. The
opinion expressed in the papers and contents published in the Indian Highways do not necessarily represent the views of the Editor or IRC.
`20
PAVEMENT DRAINAGE
pavement. Water entrapped in the pavement is also indicated by the water patches on
the earthen shoulders and embankment slopes. For drainage of such entrapped water,
longitudinal aggregate drain as per clause 309.3.7 of MORTH Specification needs to
be provided upto 5 to 10 cm below the subgrade level. The trench shall be excavated
so as to expose clearly the granular pavement layers to be drained. The grading
requirement for aggregate are given in Table no 300-4 of MORTH specifications. The
minimum width of the drain shall be 300 mm. The lateral drains at 5 to 10 m c/c below
the earthen shoulder shall be provided for discharge of water from the longitudinal
aggregate drain. The drainage outlet for lateral drains shall not be under water or
plugged with debris but should be a free outlet discharging into natural drain. The end
of lateral drain shall be protected with grate or screen.
A filter layer (such as a geotextile or graded aggregate layer) may be provided to
prevent the migration of fines into the permeable base from the subgrade, subbase or
shoulder base material. Excess fines in the permeable base will clog its drainage routes
and render it ineffective.
Rainy season is the best season to check the adequacy of drainage system. Standing
water on the road is an indication of blockage of drains. With the removal of blockage
rain water should flush out. This underlines the importance of timely maintenance of
our existing drainage system to ensure preservation of our road assets.
Sir,
i)
“Disaster Mitigation for Highway Engineers from the Editors Desk” – Indian Highways, May,
2018
ii) “Skill Development of Workmen and Training of Highway Professionals” – Indian Highways,
June, 2018
iii) “Planning & Development of Urban Roads” - Indian Highways – July 2018
Your choice of dwelling upon these subjects for your editorial articles as mentioned above, are
the needful and useful necessity of the present times. Your writings are innovative, thought
provoking and very useful for Highway Engineers, may I add a few lines to each article.
a) Disaster Mitigation of roads in hilly areas against landslides, flood disasters, heavy flash
floods, earthquakes and structural failures which are very common need to be solved
scientifically keeping in mind economics of sustainable solutions.
b) “Skill Development and Training of Highway Professionals”
We are very short of skilled laboratory Technicians who are responsible for quality control
of running road projects. Quality control engineers/scientists must be imparted training
at least for three months exclusively in well set up Highway Laboraties in the subjects of
testing, application and specifications of road making materials. Wrong results given by
untrained, unskilled technicians had in my past experience misled the highway engineers
into either over designing or under designing thickness of road pavements, thus leading
to higher construction cost or premature road failures. Skill Training of lab. Technicians
is a urgent need of the present. IAHE/CRRI are the most suitable Organizations, who in
my opinion are the best to contact with for such training. I appeal to Secretary General,
IRC to imitate necessary action, I appeal to NHAI also for such action.
c) “Planning and Development of Urban Roads”
Urban Roads are to cater for mixed traffic and pedestrians. BRT was not very successful
in Delhi because of inadequate road widths very high volume of traffic and some
undisciplined users, unmindful of traffic rules BRT is very successful in Western
Countries. There is a requirement for separate lanes for heavy and light traffic, high
speed and slow speed vehicles and even for cycle tracks. I had noticed separate lanes
more than 30 years back in Imphal and Dimapur in the Northeast. It is possible in big
cities also. This is to curtail traffic Jams and help decongest roads and save fuel.
I wish my letter is published in next a few publications of “Indian Highways” many
more readers Editor may join with me to appreciate and congratulate the Editor for such
knowledge imparting articles, the need of the hour.
May God bless the Editor with good health and energy to continue publishing such
useful articles for highway professionals.
Thanking you,
Yours Faithfully
(Bhupindar Singh)
Ex, Scientist CRRI and
Former Chief Sc. Officer
Ghana Highway Authority
Govt. of Ghana, W.Africa
07-09-18 Fri 11.00 AM Transport Planning & Traffic Engineering Committee (H-1)
18-09-18 Tue 11.00 AM General Design Features (Bridges and Grade Separated
Structures) Committee (B-1)
Ravi Shenker1
Abstract
The road accidents are usually the combination of the driver, the road, the vehicle & the weather. Drivers are often
involved in accident because of their own errors, but also because they are affected by a combination of
highway and/or vehicle elements and/or weather.
During the geometric design of roads/highways normally designer follows the codal provision of geometric design
parameters (i.e. horizontal curve, transition, vertical curve, gradient, carriageway width, crossfall & superelvation
etc.) independently. In the wet weather condition, the combination effect of geometric design parameters itself
create the prone area for aquaplaning which become hazardous for the road users. Seems aquaplaning is drainage
issue, actually it is more of geometric issue than a drainage issue. A comprehensive model study shall be carried out
to assess the combination effect of these parameters.
The objective of this paper to demonstrate the assessment of the aquaplaning and its mitigation to reduce the
accidents on the road. Also, an example shown to carried the aquaplaning assessment on National Highway.
This is useful for highway design professional to eliminate the aquaplaning areas on carriageway as a statutory
requirement of IRC:SP:42-2014 “Guidelines of Road Drainage”.
1
Head of Department, ICRC-Sweden Civils, WSP India Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Noida, E-mail: ravi_shenker@rediffmail.com
2. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO manuals for comparing with the calculated water film
AQUAPLANING depth are as follows.
● Road design/operating speed; ● The maximum water film depth of 2.5 mm
● Road surface characteristics; (desirable) to 4.0 mm (absolute) applies to:
● Roadway geometry design □ stretches where the operating or design
● Rainfall intensity speed is 80 km/h or higher;
● Surface drainage design □ At the approaches of entry and exits from
● Water film depth intersections and roundabouts;
● Vehicle characteristics (tyre tread depth, tyre □ Intersections and roundabouts;
pressure and vehicle weight etc.); and □ Steep downhill sections;
● Driver behaviour. □ At the merging and diverging section of
3. ASSESSMENT OF AQUAPLANING lanes.
As suggested in Queensland manual, these are □ Superelevated curves sections.
following two criteria shall be consider to assess the ● A maximum water film depth of upto 5.0 mm
aquaplaning potential. (desirable and absolute) to all other locations.
● Determining the predicted water film depth, D, 4.2 Average Pavement Texture Depth (T)
for a given flow path across a carriageway of the The pavement ‘texture depth’ is the average depth
road; and of the macrotexture of the road surface as shown in
● Compare the calculated water film depth with Fig. 3 and the pavement texture depth of different
acceptable limits. type of pavement surface are shown in Table 1 to
4. DETERMINATION OF WATER FILM calculate the water film depth as recommended
DEPTH by RTA (1994) and Dash (1977). The lower value
Numerous models are available for aquaplaning should be considered for the calculation of water film
assessment, the Department of Transport and Main depth.
Roads (DTMR), the Federal Highway Administration, Table 1 Average Pavement Texture Depth
Florida Department of Transport (FDOT) and the
Wearing Course Surface Texture Depth
National Roads Authority of Ireland (NRA) all utilised
(mm)
the Gallaway Equation in various ways and forms.
This suggests that although Gallaway’s equation is Dense graded asphalt 10 mm or 0.4–0.8
most appropriate for aquaplaning assessment as it larger
is more flexible, considers a variety of influencing Dense graded asphalt, 7 mm 0.3-0.5
factors and achievable desired maximum water film
Open graded asphalt >0.9
depth.
Stone mastic asphalt >0.7
The equation developed by “Gallaway” to calculate
water film depth on the pavement surface, Grooved Concrete 1.2
4.3 Length of Flow Path (L) Calculation of water film depth of the critical path
The flow path length to be determined by the must be carried out by using the Gallaway formula
modelling and analysis of the proposed surface of to compare the calculated water film depths against
road by assessing contours and flow arrows/slope acceptable limits.
line. The longest flow path to be considered as critical 4.4 Rainfall Intensity (I)
path to carry out the water depth analysis on the As in high rainfall situation driver start reducing the
carriageway within the assessment area. Figs. 4 & 5 vehicle speed due to poor visibility on the road. As
illustrate the Plan & Profile of assessment area and speed decreases, the potential for aquaplaning also
Fig. 6 illustrate the closer view of the flow paths decreases. The adopted rainfall intensity is maximum
based on road surface contours and flow arrow at a 50 mm/hour as recommended by Queensland
superelevation transition at the entry of a left hand department.
curve.
4.5 Slope of Drainage Flow Path (%)
The slope of the drainage path used to develop the
Gallaway formula was over a simple, planar surface.
But the full drainage path contains several sections
or sub paths, each with a different slope. The Point
to Point Slope or Average Slope, as determined by
calculating the slope from point of analysis straight
back to the start of the flow path, has been used for
some time.
In such cases, it is necessary to consider the
Fig. 4 Road Profile carriageway’s sections with individual drainage sub-
paths, each having a different slope and direction. The
best ‘single slope’ representation of the flow path at
any location which contains more than one sub-path
is the Equal Area Slope method.
4.6 Equal-Area Slope
Assumed a longitudinal profile of flow path DB as
shown in Fig. 7. The profile has varying slope from
point to point. The equal area slope method involves
Fig. 5 Road Plan to calculate the equivalent single slope at point B. For
calculation of slope, an imaginary line is so positioned
that the enclosed areas above and below it, i.e. areas X
and Y, are equal as shown in Fig. 7.
Fig. 9 Process
Project data Step 10: Compare the calculated water film depth
● Pavement surface type = Dense Graded Asphalt with desire water film depth (As per sec. 4.1.).
● Texture depth (T) = 0.4 mm Step 11: If the calculated water depth is less than
● Rainfall Intensity (I) = 50 mm/h desired water film depth, then design is safe. Otherwise
These are following steps for assessment the apply the mitigation methods and redesign the
aquaplaning areas & water film depth calculations. same.
Step 1: Draw the contours & flow paths for identify Step 12: Re-calculate the water film depth and
the aquaplaning areas. compare it with desired water film depth. Repeat the
whole process until unless the calculated water film
Step 2: Identify the critical flow path.
less than the desired water film depth.
Step 3: Draw the critical flow path profile from start
The above calculations shown in Table 2.
to end and extract the data chainages & levels of
critical path. As the maximum calculated water film depth 3.39 mm
(from Table 2) is less than the absolute value
Step 4: Calculate the average horizontal ordinates.
4.00 mm. So the design is comply with requirements
Step 5: Calculate the level differences. and safe. Where the design does not comply (on
Step 6: Calculate the areas as shown in Fig. 9. wide carriageway, i.e. 4 or 6 lanes or more lanes)
with the requirements and the calculated water film
Step 7: Calculate the cumulative areas.
depths is unacceptable, the aquaplaning potential is
Step 8: Calculate the equal area slopes. considered too high and a redesign of road shall be
Step 9: Calculate water depth from Gallaway formula. required.
S. No. Flow Path Levels Avg. Hor. Level Area Cum. Equal Area Slope Calculated
Chainage (m) Ord. Diff. (m2) Area (%) Water Depth
(m) (m) (m) (m2) (mm)
(L) (W) (h) (A)=W*h (Ad) (S%) = 100*2Ad/L2 (D)
1 0.000 317.863
2 4.000 317.746 2.000 0.117 0.234 0.234 2.925 0.683
3 8.000 317.638 6.000 0.108 0.648 0.882 2.756 1.096
4 12.000 317.542 10.000 0.096 0.960 1.842 2.558 1.437
5 16.000 317.449 14.000 0.093 1.302 3.144 2.456 1.715
6 20.000 317.361 18.000 0.088 1.584 4.728 2.364 1.966
7 24.000 317.277 22.000 0.084 1.848 6.576 2.283 2.196
8 28.000 317.196 26.000 0.081 2.106 8.682 2.215 2.410
9 32.000 317.115 30.000 0.081 2.430 11.112 2.170 2.601
10 36.000 317.030 34.000 0.085 2.890 14.002 2.161 2.763
11 40.000 316.946 38.000 0.084 3.192 17.194 2.149 2.917
12 44.000 316.856 42.000 0.090 3.780 20.974 2.167 3.044
13 48.000 316.761 46.000 0.095 4.370 25.344 2.200 3.153
14 52.000 316.666 50.000 0.095 4.750 30.094 2.226 3.259
15 56.000 316.562 54.000 0.104 5.616 35.710 2.277 3.342
16 58.680 316.489 57.340 0.073 4.186 39.896 2.317 3.390
6. MITIGATION OF AQUAPLANNING particular, these two methods are likely to be the only
These are following methods must be consider to practicable means of reducing surface water depths. A
adjusting the flow path length or gradient to reduce Departure from standard shall be required for both of
the water depth in order of preference: these options.
i) Amend the design of horizontal or vertical
alignments, or both, to reduce drainage flow path
lengths.
ii) Amend the alignment to locate the rollover on a
section with sufficient longitudinal gradient.
iii) Adjust the rate of change of superelevation to
steepen drainage flow paths.
Fig. 10 Typical Superelevation Application2
iv) If the above measures are not deemed
satisfactory results, following methods shall be 6.1 Rolling Crown Design
consider, i.e. introducing additional crown lines Rolling crowns can represent an abrupt change to
(diagonal or longitudinal crowns) as described road users on high speed roads and the effects of an
in the following section. instantaneous change in crossfall. As shown in figure
Where surface drainage problems exist, and limiting 10, the typical superelevation application and the
water depths cannot be achieved by the above set out water flow path starts from median edge and formed
methods, alternative methods can be used to reduce the in “U” shape and returning to on same median edge.
potential for aquaplaning. Two methods are presented To reduce flow path length an additional diagonal
here, which can be very effective in reducing surface crown introduced between crossfall change from
water depths at locations of superelevation transition, -2.5% to +2.5% as shown in Fig. 11 and the -2.5%
these are: rolling crowns (diagonal crowning) and crossfall applied either side of the diagonal crown line
staggered longitudinal crowning (independent lane by limiting 5% change of crossfall at diagonal crown
rotation). In case of existing road pavements, in as shown in Figs. 11 & 12.
S.K. Mazumder1
Abstract
Guide banks are meant to confine and guide the river flow through the bridge without causing excessive afflux
and damage to the approach embankments with the objective of reducing overall cost of the bridge and approach
embankments. They help ensuring bridge safety and considerable reduction of scour in abutments. The current
design practice (IRC-89:1997) has several draw backs. The paper intends to improve the current design practice
introducing design consideration for deciding bridge length which in turn determine length of guide bank. Lagasse’s
elliptical guide bank and length of guide bank as per Lagasse’s curves have been recommended. An illustrative
example is worked out at the end.
1
Former AICTE Emeritus Professor, Delhi College of Engineering/Delhi Technology University, E-mail: somendrak64@gmail.com
Indian codes, however, prescribe just the opposite with highest degree of wave amplitude at critical flow
as it states that length of guide bank (Lg) should be when F0 = 1. Excessive contraction of sub-critical
varying from 1.1W to 1.5W. This means more is the flow causes high loss in head due to higher velocity
fluming/restriction or in other words smaller is W of flow velocity at the contracted section resulting in
(= L in Fig. 2), less will be length of guide bank and higher afflux. Any contraction beyond a critical limit
more is W, longer will be guide bank length. This (at F0 = 1) will result in the formation of hydraulic
is hydraulically incorrect as explained afterwards. jump downstream and there will be excessive afflux
IRC-5-2015 and other Indian codes recommend that upstream. To be on safe side, it will be wise not to
waterway under a bridge should be equal to Lacey’s contract a channel for F0-value higher than 0.50.
(1930) regime width
P = W = 4.8 Q0.5 ... (1)
Where, P is the wetted perimeter (P=W) in meter and
Q is the design flood discharge in cumec.
In the meandering and braiding flood plains where
guide bank is required, the above equation may not be
applicable (Mazumder, 2017; 2010,2009).
3. HYDRALIC CONSIDERATIONS IN
FIXING WATERWAY
As stated under section 2.2 the length of guide bank
(Lg ) is dependent on waterway (L in Fig. 2) provided
under a bridge. Higher is the restriction of flow or
Fig. 3 Variation of B0/B1 with F0 for Different F1-Values
greater is the fluming, more should be guide bank
length for improved hydraulic performance. It is, 3.2 Permissible Afflux
therefore, necessary to understand the basic hydraulic Construction/Fluming of natural waterway will always
criteria governing waterway, shape and length of result in afflux (Mazumder, 2003). In case of a straight
guide bank discussed in following paragraphs. channel with uniform flow and firm bank without
3.1 Permissible Fluming of a Channel with Sub- any flood plain, Molesworth formula prescribed by
critical Flow IRC:5-2015 may be adopted to compute afflux given
In a mild sloping channel where the flow is at sub- by Eq. (3) below.
critical stage, the normal waterway in the channel h1 * = [V2 /17.88 + 0.015] [(A/A0)2 –1 ] ... (3)
can be contracted to an extent so that the flow under where,
the bridge is not choked. If B1 = (W) is the normal
waterway and B0 (= L) is the contracted waterway h1* is the afflux in m, V is the mean velocity of flow in
under the bridge, contraction/fluming ratio (B0/B1) the river prior to bridge construction in m/s, A0 and A1
can be derived from the fundamental relation given are the areas (in m2) of flow section at design HFL in
by equation (2). the approach section and under the bridge respectively.
Molesworth equation (3) is not applicable for rivers
Bo/B1 = (F1 / Fo) [ (2 + F2o) / (2 + F12)]3/2 ... (2) with wide flood plains and non-uniform approach
where F1 and F0 are the Froude’s number of flow flow for which Bradley (1970) suggested equation (4)
at the normal and the contracted sections for finding an approximate value of afflux.
respectively. Fig. 3 shows the functional relation h1* = 3 (1 – M) Vn2/2 g ... (4)
between B0/B1(=L/W) and F0 for different values
of F1 for approaching normal flow. Flow is choked where,
(also called critical flow) when F0 = 1. It may be seen M = A0/A1, and Vn is the mean velocity of flow
(Fig. 3) that higher is the F1-value, less is the under the bridge at design HFL. Eq.4 shows that
opportunity of contracting/fluming. It also shows that with increase in contraction, M will decrease and
there is hardly any advantage/economy if contraction/ Vnwill increase thereby increasing afflux. Too high
fluming is made such that F0 exceeds approximately afflux will result in submergence of flood plain of the
0.70. Flow surface becomes wavy when F0 > 0.70, river causing damage to life and properties upstream.
Excessive afflux may cause overtopping and washing plain width, The difference between the high kinetic
out of the bridge. Due to loss of freeboard, debris energy (K.E.) of flow (V02/2g) at the contracted
will accumulate near the piers and abutments leading section and the normal K.E. of flow (V22/2g) in tail
to increase in scour near piers and abutments and channel i.e.(V02/2g-V22/2g) does not get converted to
consequent failure of the bridge. IRC-5 (2015) potential energy unless the jet flow coming out from
recommends that permissible maximum afflux due the contracted section is provided with a very long
to bridge should not exceed 15 cm. As per FHWA expanding transition downstream with a total angle
(2012), afflux should be limited to a maximum value not exceeding about 10º to 12º (Mazumder, 1993 ).
of 30 cm where submergence of flood plain will not The only way a stream with a given flow, given tail
result in any substantial damage upstream. water depth (y2) and a given mean velocity in the
3.3 Instability of Flow and Outflanking of a tail channel (V2) can contain the unconverted excess
Bridge kinetic energy. (V02/2g- V22/2g) is through distortion
Too much restriction of flow may cause river of flow resulting in flow non-uniformityand jet type
instability both upstream and downstream of a bridge flow downstream. (Mazumder, 2010 ).
(Mazumder, 2004) resulting in decrease of hydraulic Experimental investigations were carried out
gradient (Sw = dy/dx). In the absence of bridge, the (Mazumder and kumar, 2001) to determine flow
bed slope (S0) is the same as water surface slope (Sw) regimes, hydraulic efficiency and flow stability in
and energy slope (Se) i.e. S0 = Sw = Se as the flow is sub-critical straight expansion. It was noticed that
normal. With afflux, both S¬w and Se reduces which flow stability downstream of expansion is governed
causes reduction of stream power (Ω) expressed as by both the parameters expansion ratio (B1/B0) and
Ω = γQSe ... (5) rate of expansion 1/2(B1-B0)/Le. Here B1 is the
normal width of channel and B0 is the contracted
Higher the afflux , lower will be the hydraulic gradient
width of channel at bridge site, Le is the length of
(Sw) and energy slope (Se) and lower will be stream
expansion. Since there is an abrupt expansion of flow
power (Ω) causing loss of sediment carrying capacity
downstream of all bridges (Le = 0 ), expansion ratio
of river. Sediments start depositing upstream resulting
(B2/B0) alone governs stability of flow downstream
in reduction in bed slope (S0). As propounded by
of a bridge. Higher the expansion/’fluming ratio,
Kennedy (1895), Lacey (1930) and Bharat Singh
higher is the instability. The flow was found to be
(1983), regime width of a channel increases with
stable with symmetric eddies on either side up to a
fall in bed slope. Maximum increase in stream width
critical value of expansion ratio (B1/B0) of about 1.5
occurs upstream of the bridge where the magnitude of
to 2. When B1/B0 exceeded 1.5 to 2, the side eddies
afflux is the highest and bed slope is minimum. Highly
became asymmetric and central jet flow was found to
restricted waterway, often provided to reduce cost of a
be unstable. Such unstable jet type flow downstream
bridge, results in local widening of the river upstream
of a bridge or barrage can attack river banks causing
and downstream of the bridge. Development of eddies
unprecedented erosion requiring costly protection/
and silting in the flood plain of the river causes flow
training works.
instability and shifting of its main channel either left
or right of the bridge. As shown in Fig. 4 a bridge on 4. IDEAL SHAPE OF GUIDE BANK IN SUB-
NH-6 is likely to be outflanked due to high restriction CRITICAL FLOW
of flood plain. Guide banks are similar to a transition structure.
Upstream guide bank connecting normal waterway
(B1) to the flumed section of width (Bo = L) under the
bridge is similar to a contracting transition. In sub-
critical flow, performance of contracting transitions
of different shapes and lengths have been tested
by several workers (Hinds,1928, Vittal et al,1983
and others). Mazumder and Ahuja (1978), tested
Fig. 4 Showing Widening of a River Upstream of a Bridge contracting transition developed by Jaeger (1956) to
on NH-6 in M.P. minimize head loss, prevent separation of flow and
Similar instability may occur downstream of the achieve uniform distribution of flow at the throat
bridge also when there is too much restriction of flood section i.e. at the abutment of the bridge. Hydraulic
example has been worked out to illustrate the hydraulic 15. IRC:89 (1997), “Guidelines for Design and
design principle. Construction of River Training Works for Road
Bridges”,The Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi.
REFERENCES 16. IS:10751(1994) “Planning and Design of Guide
1. Breussers, HNC and Randviki, A.J. (1991) Banks for Alluvial Rivers - Guidelines (Second
“Scouring”, Chapter-5 “Scour at Bridge Piers” A.A. Revision)” Bureau of Indian Stadard, ManakBhawan,
Balkema Pub., IAHR Hydraulic Structures Design New Delhi.
Manual. 17. Jaeger,C.(1956)"Engineering Fluid Mechanics" Pub.
2. Bharat Singh(1964) “Self Adjustment of Alluvial by Blackie and Sons, First. Ed.
Streams”, Proc. 2nd Int. Sym. On River Sedimentation, 18. Kennedy, R.G. (1895) “Prevention of Silting in
Nanjing, China, Vol.2 Oct. Irrigation Canals”, Proc. Institution of Civil engineers
3. Bradley, Joseph, N. (1970) “Hydraulics of Bridge (London),Vol.119.
Waterways” Federal Highway Admn, Hydraulic 19. Kothyari, U.C., Garde, R.J. and Ranga Raju, K.G.
design Series No.1. (1992) “Temporal Variation of Scour Around Circular
4. CBIP(1989) “River Bhaviour, Management and Bridge Piers”, JHE, A.S.C.E., 118(8), PP 1091-1106.
Training, Vol.I”, Central Board of Irrigation and 20. Lacey, G.(1930) “stable Channel Design in Aluvium”
Power, Malcha Marg, New Delhi. Paper no.4736, Min of Proc., Institution of Civil
Engineers (London),Vol.229,.
5. CWPRS (1945, 1938) “Annual Report-Tech.”, Central
21. Lagasse, P.F., Schall, F., Johnson, E.V., Richardson,
Water and Power Research Station, Khadakwasla,
E.V. and Chang, F. (1995) “Stream Stability at
Pune.
Highway Structures”, Deptt. of Transportation,
6. Dey, S. (2005-06), “Determination of Scour Depth Federal Highway Administration, HEC-20,
for General Bed, Within Channel Contraction and Washington,D.C.
at Bridge Piers in Boulder- Bed Rivers Under High 22. Mazumder, S.K. (2017) “Some Hydrologic and
Stream Velocities (B-33)”, Highway Research Hydraulic Aspects of Planning and Design of Road
Record No.33, ( 2005-06), IRC Highway Research Bridges” Paper Published in the Journal of ‘the Indian
Board, Indian Roads Congress. National Group of the International Association
7. FHWA(2012) “Hydraulic Design of Safe Bridges,” For Bridge & Structural Engineering’ B&SE_
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Volume 47_Number 1_March, pp 103-111.
Administration, Publication Number FHWA- 23. Mazumder, S.K. (2016)”Morphology and Training
HIF-12-018, April. of Rivers Near Bridges” Indian Highways, Vol. 44,
8. Garde,2006 “River Morphology”,New Age Int.(Pvt. No. 7, July, 2016, pp. 25-35.
Ltd),New Delhi. 24. Mazumder, S.K. and R.K. Dhiman (2014) “Local
9. Gales, R. (1938),”The Principle of River Training for Scour in Bridge Piers on Coarse Bed Material-
Railway Bridges and Their Applications to the case of Observed and Predicted by Different Methods”,
Hardinge Bridge Over the Lower Ganges at Sara” J. paper presented and pub. in the J. of Indian Roads
of The Institutions of Civil Engineers , London, Paper Congress during the annual session at Bhubneshwar.
no. 5167, Dec. 25. Mazumder, S.K. (2010) “Behavior and Training of
10. Gole,S.V. and Chitale,S.V.(1967) “River Bed Scour River near Bridges and Barrages-Some case Study”-
atn Bridge Constritions’ International Assoc. of Paper presented and pub. in the “Int. Conf on River
Hydraulic Research Congress, Fort Collins, Colorado, Management - IWRM-2010” Org. by IWRS and
USA. WRDM, IIT, Roorkee and held at New Delhi, Dec.
14-16.
11. Hinds, J. (1928) “Hydraulic Design of Flume and
Syphon Transitions” Trans. ASCE, vol.92 pp. 1423- 26. Mazumder, S.K.(2009) “Determination of Waterway
Under a Bridge in Himalayan Region - Some Case
59.
Studies” Paper presented at 70th IRC Congress Held
12. Inglis,C.C (1949) “Behavior and Control of at Patna on 11-14 Nov., 2009 and Published in the
Rivers and Canals”, Research Publication no. 13, Journal of IRC, Vol.70-2, July-sept.2009.
Punepp.369-380. 27. Mazumder (2004) “Mazumder, S.K. “River Behaviour
13. Inglis ,C.V. and Joglekar, D.V. (1936) “Investigations Upstream and Downstream of Hydraulic Structures”,
Carried out by means of Models at Khadakwasla Proc. Int. Conf. On “Hydraulic Engineering Research
Hydro-Dynamic Research Station near Pune in and Practice (ICON-HERP-2004) in honour of Prof.
connection with the Protection of the Hardinge K.G.Rangaraju, org. by Deptt. Of C.E., IIT, Roorkee,
Bridge which Spans the River Ganges near Paksey, Oct 26-28, 2004.
Eastern Bengal Railway”, Public Works Department, 28. Mazumder, S.K. and Dhiman, Rajni (2003)
Bombay,Tedchnical Paper no.55. “Computation of Afflux with Particular Reference
14. IRC:5 (1998) “Standard Specifications and Code of to Widening of Bridges on roadway”, Proc.
Practice for Road Bridges – Section 1” Published by National Conf. Of Hydraulics and Water Resources,
Indian Roads Congress, R.K.Puram, New Delhi. HYDRO-2003, CW & PRS, Pune, Dec.
RAP materials in the construction of new pavements. It has excellent adhesive and bonding properties
Now with the latest development in technology, with aggregates, excellent waterproofing properties,
milling machines have been made available in the resistance to acids and alkali as well.
market which cut the pavement to desired thickness 2.4 Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen
thereby making the use of RAP materials much easier.
The asphalt milling machine also known as pavement Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen (CRMB 55) is a
planer or pavement recycler is a construction machine hydrocarbon binder obtained through physical and
chemical interaction of crumb rubber (produced
used to remove asphalt pavement or asphalt concrete
by recycling of used tyres) with bitumen and some
from roadways. The milled surface is accomplished
specific additives which are available in market
by bringing a rotating mandrel or “head” into contact
(Source: Indian Oil, Panipat Refinery). It is a unique
with the pavement at an exact depth or slope. The
kind of bitumen whose properties are enhanced by
mandrel has hundreds of hardened spikes or teeth on
mixing it with crumb rubber and special additives as
its surface, which bite and cut away at the roadway’s
per the provisions of IRC:SP:53-2002 and IS 15462:
surface. The surface material that is removed is
2004. CRMB 55 is prescribed for moderate climatic
normally fed by conveyor into a dump truck or semi-
regions and was procured from the local sources.
trailer, but can be left in place to be removed or
recycled later. A water spray system provides cooling 2.5 Mineral Fillers
for the mandrel, as well as dust management[5]. In the Mineral fillers have substantial influence over the
present work is to determine and compare the physical properties mix design. The utilization of hydrated
and Marshall Properties of virgin aggregates, recycled lime is encouraged because of its very good anti-
aggregates and to assess the suitability of usage of stripping and anti-oxidant properties. In the present
RAP in flexible pavement design. work lime and sand are used as fillers for bituminous
mix specimen.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.6 Marshall Method of Mix Design
2.1 Virgin Aggregates
Marshall Stability Test of a mix is characterized as
The coarse aggregates are crushed by utilizing
maximum load carried by a compacted specimen at
crusher to get varying size of aggregates from 19 mm
a standard test temperature at 60ºC. The flow value
and retained on a 2.36 mm sieve while fine aggregate
is the deformation the Marshall Test specimen under
should comprise 100% of fine crushed sand passing
goes during the loading up to the maximum load in
the 2.36 mm sieve and retained on 0.075 mm sieve.
0.01 mm units. The Marshall Stability Test is relevant
2.2 Recycled Aggregates for hot mix design using bitumen and aggregate with
The main source of recycled aggregates is demolished maximum size of 26.5 mm.
flexible pavement removed by milling process and it 2.7 Aggregate Gradation
should free from any other contaminants. Aggregates The aggregate gradation (Grading-I) for bituminous
are collected from demolition site in front of Punjab concrete mix in the present study is adopted as per
Engineering College (Deemed to be University), MoRT&H (Vth revision) specifications and is shown
Sector-12, Chandigarh. The aggregates are crushed in Table 6. The Fig. 1 shows the gradation curve of
manually with hammer and the reclaimed materials both virgin and recycled aggregates.
(aggregates and bitumen) are separated out with
bitumen/centrifugal extractor by using benzene. The
usage of recycled aggregates (100%) was decided
based on physical/mechanical test of recycled
aggregates as compared to virgin aggregates as
per MoRT&H Specification. The aggregates are
sieved through 25 mm, 19 mm, 10 mm, 4.75 mm,
2.36 mm, 425 micron and 75 micron IS sieves for
proper gradation.
2.3 Bitumen (VG 30)
Bitumen is the byproduct of petroleum and its grading
depends upon its penetration value and viscosity Fig. 1 Gradation Curve of Virgin Aggregate and
grade for different climatic factor and nature of duty. Recycled Aggregate
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The test results of Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen
3.1 Physical Properties of Aggregates, Bitumen (CRMB 55) as per Indian Standards are shown in
and Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen Table 3.
Test results of virgin aggregates and recycled The test results shows the Specific Gravity of Fillers
aggregates for bituminous concrete as per Indian
are shown in Table 4.
Standard are shown in Table 1.
The test results of Bitumen (VG 30) as per Indian Test results of shows the properties of Extracted
Standard are shown in Table 2. Bitumen from RAP are shown in Table 5.
Table 1 Test Results of Virgin Aggregates and Recycled Aggregates
Bitumen Marshall Flow Air Voids Voids Filled with Voids in Mineral Bulk Density
(%) Stability (kN) (mm) (%) Va Bitumen (%) VFB Aggregate (%) (g/cc)
VMA
4.5 12.20 2.4 5.6 65.52 16.51 2.38
5.0 14.65 2.8 4.5 73.41 16.78 2.41
5.5 16.55 3.1 4.0 77.25 17.62 2.53
5.65 16.75 3.4 3.9 77.35 17.69 2.55
6.0 15.10 4.4 3.1 81.56 17.87 2.42
6.5 13.33 4.8 2.3 86.77 17.98 2.47
From the test results the following observations are □ The air voids decreases continuously from
made:- 4.5% to 6.5% bitumen content. The air voids
□ The stability value increases when bitumen achieved in total mix is 3.9 % at 5.65% bitumen
content is increased from 4.5% to 5.5 % and then content.
it decreases from 6.0% to 6.5% bitumen content. □ The percentage of voids filled with bitumen
Maximum value of stability is found to be increases continuously from 4.5% to 6.5%
16.75 kN at 5.65% bitumen content. bitumen content the value of VFB is found to
□ Flow value increases with the increase in be 77.35% at 5.65% bitumen content.
bitumen content from 4.5% to 6.5% and the □ Void in mineral aggregates decreases from
value is found to be 3.4 mm at 5.65% bitumen 4.5% to 5.5% and then increases from 6.0% to
content, the criteria of 2 mm to 4 mm for BC 6.5% bitumen content. The value of VMA is
(Grade I) are almost satisfied. found to be 17.69% at 5.65% bitumen content.
□ Bulk Density value decreases from 4.5% to Optimum Binder Content is found to be 5.65% by
5.0% and then increases from 5.5% to 6.5% weight of aggregate in conventional bituminous
bitumen content. The value of bulk density is concrete mix.
found to be 2.55 g/cc at 5.65% bitumen content.
Fig. 2 Different Parameters of Marshall Stability Test on Conventional Bituminous Concrete using Virgin Aggregates
3.3 Marshall Properties of Rubber Modified rubber modified bitumen in VG30 on strength and
Bituminous Concrete (BC) Grade I Mix flow characteristics of mixes.
Design using Recycled Aggregates Initially, CRMB has been added with percentage of
Marshall method for rubber modified bituminous +1.0% and +0.5% without replacing bitumen. After
that the varying percentage of -0.5%, -1.0%, -1.5%
concrete mix design is carried out by using recycled
and -2.0% of VG30 has been replaced with the same
aggregate and by replacing bitumen with CRMB percentage of CRMB 55 by weight of the total mix
55 at optimum binder content. The same optimum at optimum binder content i.e. at 5.65%. The outputs
binder content i.e. 5.65% of conventional bituminous of stability-flow, density and volumetric analysis are
concrete mix is used for evaluating the effect of shown in Table 8. The obtained test results are plotted
adding or replacing of different percentage of crumb graphically and are shown in Fig. 3.
Table 8 Marshall Properties of Rubber Modified Bituminous Concrete Mix using Recycled Aggregates
CRMB 55 at Marshall Flow Total Air Voids Filled with Voids in Mineral Bulk Density
OBC (%) Stability (kN) (mm) Voids (%) Va Bitumen (%) VFB Aggregate (%) VMA (g/cc)
+1.0 11.88 5.5 3.3 65.20 18.30 2.64
+0.5 13.20 4.4 4.0 71.42 17.50 2.51
-0.5 14.78 3.4 4.1 75.66 17.0 2.44
-1.0 16.10 3.6 4.0 78.20 17.10 2.48
-1.5 17.50 3.8 3.6 82.50 17.40 2.66
-2.0 14.92 5.3 3.4 76.62 17.70 2.23
Fig. 3 Different Parameters Obtained from Marshall Stability Test on Rubber Modified
Bituminous Concrete Mix Using Recycled Aggregates
From the test results the following observations are binder content. The value of VFB is found to be
made:- 82.50% of the total mix.
□ The stability value decreases on adding CRMB □ Void in mineral aggregates decreases from
from +0.5% to +1.0% by weight of total mix +1.0% to -0.5% and then increases up to 2.0%
in bitumen and increases on replacing CRMB replacement of binder content. The value of
from -0.5% to -1.5% by weight of total mix and VMA is found to be 17.40% of the total mix.
then decreases rapidly for -2.0% replacement of The density increases from +0.5% to +0.1% of
bitumen by CRMB at OBC. Maximum value CRMB content and -0.5% to -1.5% replacement
of stability is found to be 17.50 kN at -1.5% of bitumen with CRMB. The maximum value
replacement of bitumen with CRMB. of bulk density is found to be 2.66 g/cc at -1.5%
□ Flow criteria of 2 mm to 4 mm for rubber and then decreases at -2.0% replacement of
modified mix are almost satisfied at -0.5%, binder content.
-1.0% and -1.5%. The higher flow value is Considering the criteria of maximum stability,
found at -2.0%, +0.5% and +1.0%. maximum density and keeping flow value within the
□ The air voids decreases from +0.5% to +0.1% limits, -1.5% replacement of VG30 with CRMB 55 at
and -0.50% to -2.0% of CRMB content. The air OBC i.e. at 5.65% is considered as the most optimum
voids is found to be 3.6% of the total mix at replacement.
-1.5% replacement of binder content.
□ The percentage of voids filled with bitumen 3.4 Comparisons of Mixes
increases continuously from +1.0% to - 1.5% A. Comparison of Conventional Bituminous Concrete
and then decreases for -2.0% replacement of Mix & Recycled Asphaltic Mix is shown in Table 9.
Table 9 Comparisons of Conventional Mix & Recycled Asphaltic Mix at same OBC
Properties Conventional mix Recycled Asphaltic Mix
Marshall stability (kN) 16.75 17.50
Flow (mm) 3.4 3.8
Air voids (%)Va 3.9 3.6
Voids filled with bitumen (%) VFB 77.35 82.50
Voids in mineral aggregate (%) VMA 17.69 17.40
Bulk density, (g/cc) 2.47 2.66
□ Considering the criteria of maximum stability, increase in the values of Marshall Stability, Flow
maximum density and keeping flow value within value and Bulk density in bituminous concrete mix.
limits replacing -1.5% of bitumen with CRMB at Thus, the performance based analysis carried out
OBC and it is found out to be the most optimum can be implemented in road construction and can be
binder replacement in Recycled Asphaltic Mix. beneficial in reducing the load on mining of stones
□ The stability value of Recycled Asphaltic Mix and will solve the problem of overlay.
increases by 4.55% with the replacement of REFERENCES
1.5% bitumen by CRMB at OBC as compared
1. Airey, G. D. & Rahimzadeh, B., 2004, ‘Combined
to Conventional Bituminous Concrete.
Bituminous Binder and Mixture Linear Rheological
□ The density of Recycled Asphaltic Mix
Properties’, Journal of Construction and Building
increases by 4.31% with the replacement of
Materials, 18 (7), 535-548.
1.5% bitumen by CRMB at OBC as compared
to Conventional Bituminous Concrete. 2. Atis, C. D. & Celik, O. N., 2008, ‘Compatibility of
□ CRMB mixtures have better adhesion than the Hot Bituminous Mixtures Made with Crumb Rubber-
mixed prepared with conventional bitumen. Modified Binders’, Construction and Building
Mixture prepared with the combination blend Materials, 22 (6), 1143-1147.
has improved adhesion as compared to the 3. Colbert, B. & Zhanping Y., 2011, ‘The Determination
mixture developed with conventional mix. of Mechanical Performance of Laboratory Produced
□ The use of rubber modified bitumen needs to Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures Using Controlled RAP
be encourage in maintenance treatments for and Virgin Aggregates Size Fractions’, Construction
extension in life of renewals. The renewal cycle and Building Materials, 26 (1), 655-662.
of bituminous concrete with modified bitumen
4. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
may be taken as 1.5 times of the conventional
(MoRT&H), 4th Revision, 2001, Specification for
bitumen.
Roads and Bridge Work, Indian Roads Congress,
4. CONCLUSIONS New Delhi.
This study essentially deals with the need to sustain 5. Mohammad, L. N. & Cooper, S. B., 2011,
the roads with recycled asphalt materials such as by ‘Characterization of HMA Mixtures Containing High
using 100% recycled aggregates in HMA mixtures for Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Content with Crumb
both construction and maintenance. On comparing Rubber Additives’, Journal of Materials in Civil
the obtained results, it is found that the stability value Engineering, 23(11), 1560-1568.
of recycled asphaltic mix is higher than the stability
value of conventional bituminous mix. The recycled 6. Veeraragavan, A., 2012, ‘Investigation on Laboratory
asphaltic mixes are expected to be more durable, less Performance of Bituminous Mixes with Reclaimed
susceptible to moisture in actual field condition with Asphalt Pavement Materials’, International Journal
enhanced properties. CRMB enhanced the properties of Research in Engineering and Technology, 73(3),
of the mix as the Inter-molecular bonding between 339-352.
bitumen and crumb rubber coated aggregate enhance 7. Xiao, F.P., Amirkhanian, S.N., & Juang, C.H., 2007,
strength and thus upgrades the quality of bituminous ‘Rutting Resistance of Rubberized Asphalt Concrete
concrete mixes. Therefore, as a result the use of 100% Pavements Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
reclaimed aggregates and replacing some percentage Mixtures’, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,
of VG30 with CRMB 55 at same OBC there is an 19(6), 475–483.
Indian Buildings Congress invites entries for the following Awards for 2016-17:
(a) ‘IBC Awards for Excellence in Built Environment’ in five categories, viz, (i) Buildings
including individual residential units, housing complexes, commercial and office buildings;
(ii) Institutional Campuses; (iii) Industrial Structures; (iv) Rehabilitation/Retrofitting of
Buildings; (v) Infrastructure Projects. Award consists of a Trophy & Citation. For details, visit
IBC website www.ibc.org.in
(b) ‘Smt. Satya Goel Memorial Award’ meant exclusively for women in building profession
for her contribution to the profession with a remarkable achievement during the preceding 3
years. Award includes a citation with a Plaque and Certificate.
The above Awards will be presented during the Inaugural Function of 23rd Annual Convention of
IBC to be held in December 2018. Entries for the Awards complete in all respects should reach
IBC Secretariat latest by 31st October, 2018.
Satander Kumar1
Abstract
The purpose of maintenance is to ensure that the pavements and structures remain serviceable throughout its
design life. Maintenance prolongs their life by reducing the rate of deterioration, thereby safeguarding investments
in repair and rehabilitation, which will lower the cost of operating vehicles by providing a smooth-running surface,
keeps the road open for traffic with least delay, contributes to better transport services, sustains social and economic/
toll benefits due to improved road and structures access. Deterioration depends on original design, material types,
construction quality, loads, geometry, age, environmental conditions and preservation policy selected.
The paper covers innovative scenario of roads and structures maintenance and consequently innovative repair
methodologies covering the respective deterioration/defects. The major innovative techniques are use of modern
low viscosity epoxy resins, pressure grouting techniques, jacketing with concrete or steel/ fibre reinforced polymer
plates, cross stitching of long cracks, repair of patches/pot holes, edge spall, blowups, raveled/smooth surface,
bearing and expansion joints repairing, widening of structures etc. in case of concrete road and structures; and
further innovative techniques for rectification of stripping, showing, streaking, rutting, raveled surface, smooth
surfaces etc of asphalt pavements mainly liquid seal, slurry seal, micro-surfacing with modified bitumen emulsion
using latex, prefabricated mastic rolls made with different types of fibres, cold mix technology etc.
d) IRC:SP:74-2007 “Guidelines for Repair and 5 to 25% of bitumen. Higher the asphaltene
Rehabilitation of Steel Bridges” content, greater is the hardness.
e) MORTH-2001 “Report of the Committee on b) Resins with particle size 1 to 5 nm with H/C
Norms for Maintenance of Roads in India close to 1.3 to 1.4. It is a dispersing agent/
2001”. peptisers for the asphaltenes. It is polar in
f) IRC:SP:83 “Guidelines for Repair, Maintenance nature.
and Rehabilitation of Rigid Pavements” c) Aromatics constitute 40 to 65% of the total
g) IRC:SP:43 “Strengthening and Rehabilitation bitumen in which peptised asphaltenes are
of Bridges”. dispersed. It dissolves other high molecular
h) MORTH Specification for Road and Bridge weight hydrocarbons to make the bitumen
Works 2013 (Clauses 2800 for structures and stiffer. H/C ratio is much higher than resins.
3000 for road maintenance.) d) Saturates are nonpolar straw coloured viscous
i) IRC:SP:70-2016 “High Performance Concrete oils constituting about 5 to 20% of the bitumen,
and Self Compacted Concrete” molecular weight range is similar to that of
j) IRC:121-2017 “Guidelines for Use of resins.
Construction and Demolition Waste in Road
Sector”,
k) IRC:122-2017 “Guidelines for Construction of
Precast Concrete Segmental Box Culverts”
l) IRC:123-2017 “Guidelines on Geophysical
Investigation for Bridges”
m) IRC:125-2017 “Guidelines on Dozers for
Highway Works”
n) IRC:126-2017 “Guidelines on Wet Mix Plant”
o) IRC: SP:111-2017 “Capacity Building of Road
Agencies In Charge of Implementation of Road
Projects in Urban Areas”
p) IRC:SP:112-2017 “Manual for Quality Control
in Road and Bridge Works”
2. INNOVATIVE MAINTENANCE
TECHNIQUES
Fig. 1 Asphaltene-Resin Micelles
Presently following innovative techniques are
being used for repair and maintenance of roads and 2.2 Defects
structures: Considering the above facts, following defects
A) Flexible Pavements: in bituminous roads are generally found due to
inadequate compaction at right temperature leading to
2.1 Composition of Bitumen
early oxidation of hydro carbons, raveling, cracking
Asphalt (Bitumen) is a by product available from and disintegration:
refinery by processing of crude oil along with
i) Surface Defects (Fatty, Hungry, Streaking)
gasoline, kerosene, light gas oil, diesel oil, motor
oil, and asphaltenes provide stiffness to the bitumen. ii) Cracks (Hair Line, Alligator, Reflection,
These having high carbon to hydrogen ratio are called Transverse, Longitudinal, Reflection)
micelles. The micelles and the hydrocarbon medium iii) Deformation (Slippage, Rutting, Corrugation)
form a colloidal system. Colloids are stabilized by iv) Disintegration (Stripping, Pothole Raveling)
resins adsorbed on their surface, and the dispersion Efforts shall be made initially to know the causes of
of colloids in the fluid form a two-phase system. distress to avoid further distress after repair again.
Fig. 1 from Leontaritis (Ref 11) schematically shows Compaction shall be carried out at desired temperature
asphaltene-resin micelles that are suspended in the as per Table 1 (as per clause Mixing 501.3 of MORTH
oil. Bitumen has four components as given below: Vth Revision). Minimum water/oil shall be applied on
a) Asphaltenes with particle size 5 to 30 nm with roller top surface during rolling to avoid sticking of
H/C (Hydrogen/Carbon) close to 1.1. It forms bitumen on the roller.
2.3 Causes of Distress and Remedial measure in cracking - pavement shoulder settling, joint widening
Flexible pavements due to high embankment on very poor/black cotton
Causes of short cracking may be due to less binder, soil (very high free swelling index) or no stepping
more filler, compaction of too hot surface, supporting method used for bonding two layers in horizontal
layer unstable; for alligator cracking - unstable direction- alternate wetting/drying beneath shoulder
subgrade/subbase/base, high saturation, brittleness due to poor drainage, shoulder settlement/drop-off,
by ageing, overheating, tender mixes, for longitudinal weak joint etc, (Figs. 2 to 9).
Short crack sealing: Fog seal shall be sprayed for treatment before micro-surfacing in case flexible
short cracks less than 3 mm as per MORTH clause pavement is broadly distressed.
3004.3.2 after using compressed air, and scrubber @ Slurry Sealing: It is a mixture of modified bitumen
0.7 liter/sqm. emulsion, aggregates, water (6-12%), filler (OPC
Sealing of wide cracks 3 mm-6 mm wide: Before 0.5 to 2%), additives spread uniformly with glass
crack filling of such cracks of width more than 3 mm fibre sheet. Generally, Type II slurry sealing (4-6 mm
and less than 6 mm, as per MORTH clause 3004.3.3, thick) is applied. Quantity of slurry shall be about 10
cracks shall be first cleaned with compressed air/ kg/sq m and binder content shall be 13.5 % by weight
scrubber, then filled with dust passing 2.36 mm, of aggregates. Maximum size of aggregates shall not
having 75 micron 10% and then finally filled with be more than 4.75 mm and 65-90% must pass through
the slow curing bitumen i.e. SS1 or medium setting 2.36 mm; passing 75 microns i.e. silt content not more
emulsion (MS). than 15%. The emulsion may be set in 2 hours also.
High Severity Alligator: Reconstruction with dense The mix shall be prepared in 3 minutes. The traffic
bituminous mixes using chicken wire, geo- synthetic shall be permitted within 4-6 hours.
mesh, fibre glass sheet or geo grid may be carried out Slurry sealing shall not be carried out when
as per IRC:111 and IRC:SP:81. temperature is less than 10ºC. Surface shall be just wet
Asphalt Shoving and –upheaval: This may occur due and saturated with water, but surface dry. The existing
to heavy weight impact (Figs 7 and 8). The remedial surface shall be properly cleaned with compressed
measure is milling affected portion and overlay with water/air, and if cracks are wide enough (> 3 mm)
dense mixes. shall be pretreated with SS 1 emulsion before doing
Liquid Seal: In liquid seal penetration grade or slurry sealing. Apply tack coat of RS 1 @200 gm/sq m
an emulsion bitumen is sprayed and covered with before slurry seal which shall be laid with machine as
aggregate. Emulsion used is RS 10-12 kg per per IRC:SP:81-2008 after due calibration in motion.
10 sq. m. Cover aggregate are nominal size 6.3 mm Rolling with PTR will give much better results. Traffic
(10-2.36 mm) 0.09 cum per 10 sq. m. This may be shall be opened after 12 hours.
used for rectification of streaking (corrugation), If quantum of cracks is moderate or severe; polymer-
stripping, and raveling of bituminous surfaces. modified membranes (insitu/prefabricated) may also
Most Innovative Solution: For Repair of most of the be applied on slurry seal coat for longer life. This
defects commonly slurry sealing and micro-surfacing is composed of reinforcing fabrics i.e. that serve as
as per IRC:SP:81-2008 on “Tentative Specifications carriers for the hot polymer-modified bitumen as it is
for Slurry Seal and Micro-surfacing” is being used. manufactured into a roll material and in-situ as well.
This is applicable for preventive maintenance or Following are some of the ASTM specifications on
renewal treatment of flexible pavements. This also polymer modified bitumen membranes:
acts as preservation of pavement strength besides ● ASTM D 6222, “Standard Specification
rectification of surface defects due to ageing, wear for Atactic Polypropylene (APP) Modified
and tear etc. till detailed methodology is approved Bituminous Sheet Materials Using Polyester
and fund available. Slurry seal is considered as pre- Reinforcements”
Fig. 16 Pressure Grouting from Lower End to Upper End- Drilling, Pump, and Grouting
Fig. 17 Sealing Crack Fig. 18 (a) Blow up Fig. 18 (b) Blowup after Repair
Fig. 19 Faulting of Concrete at Joints Fig. 20 Construction of Expansion Joint Grinding to avoid Tyre Bursting
needs Diamond Grinding
Fig. 21 Slope Compactor Fig. 22 Repair of Bearing Fig. 23 Weep Holes Repair for
Compaction of Slope
In case of major failure of costly structural components not recover atleast 75% of the deflection under the
such as girders; load deflection tests are carried out on imposed load, the test is repeated after a lapse of 72
doubtful components and then if deflection and crack hours, if recovery is <80%, then structure component
width are with in permissible limit, then only repair is unacceptable and also deflection , shall be less than
may be carried. As per IS: 456, load equal to full dead 40 ℓ2/D in mm , ℓ - effective span m, D –overall depth
load +1.25 times the imposed load is imposed for 24 in mm. The crack width under loaded conditions shall
hours. If in 24 hours of removal of load, structure does not be more than 0.3 mm in severe conditions. (Fig. 24).
(a) Prestressed Girder (b) Checking Crack Width (c) Load Deflection Testing Broken
during Erection
Fig. 24 Testing and Evaluation of Damaged Girder
high pressure, provision of additional reinforcement One of the major reasons for the damage of roads and
with a cast-in-situ or gunnited, proper free cover of structures in India may there fore be overloading. It is
concrete, provision of additional beams, external pre- said that about 70 percent of funds meant to be spent
stressing (post–tensioning), FRP wrapping for seismic for the maintenance of roads actually goes behind
deficiency, bolting steel stirrups externally on RC paying laborers. The magnanimity of the expenditure
beams which are weak in shear or flexure, externally incurred in order to repair roads and structures is
bonded plates by bolting/epoxy adhesive etc. alarming and hence the government is stressing on
Shotcrete is applied where reaching that place is not building large scale concrete roads and structures with
feasible like repair of top of tunnels. RCC jacketing higher factory of safety considering appropriate HFL/
increases member size significantly and stiffness. It is invert level.
more suitable where deformations are to be controlled.
Shear keys and the bond coat in the form of epoxy References
coat shall be applied for load transfer. 1. MORTH Specification 2013.
There are other special IRC codes on IRC:SP:73-2015, 2. IRC:SP:81-2008 on “Tentative Specifications for
IRC:SP:84-2014 etc covering and dealing with all Slurry Seal and Micro-surfacing”.
types of structures that is tunnel, hill road construction, 3. IRC:82-2015 “Code of Practice for Maintenance of
causeways, Cable stayed bridges (new), Integral Bituminous Surfaces of Roads”.
bridges and necessary data for the maintenance of
4. IRC:SP:100-2014 “Use of Cold Mix Technology for
these structures may be reffered in respective codes.
Construction and Maintenance of Roads”.
5. CONCLUSION 5. IRC:SP:80-2008 “Guidelines for Corrosion
Use of the latest polymer and concrete technologies as prevention, Monitoring and Remedial Measures for
appropriate depending on terrain and weather, which Concrete Bridges”.
may be costly initially but lower maintenance costs 6. IRC:SP:74-2007 “Guidelines for Repair and
and longer life may be tried for maintenance. That Rehabilitation of Steel Bridges”.
technique shall be cost effective.
7. IRC:SP:83 “Guidelines for Repair, Maintenance and
Further due to over loading, the different layers in Rehabilitation of Rigid Pavements”.
road work and components of structures may deflect
8. Leontaritis, K.J. 1989. Asphaltene Deposition:
exceeding their elastic limits and there will be void A Comprehensive Description of Problem
in layers or loss of uniform contact support, since Manifestations and Modeling Approaches. Presented
required recovery and deflection (IS:456 and MORTH at the SPE Production Operations Symposium,
Specification) of the structure may not be possible Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 13-14 March. SPE-
particularly during flooding or heavy rains. 18892-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18892-MS.,
Therefore, enforce and check shall be adopted or care 9. Pfeiffer, J.P. and Saal, R.N.J. 1940. Asphaltic
in the design shall be taken i.e stresses for execution Bitumen as Colloid System. The Journal of Physical
and overloading which mostly ensued on all types Chemistry 44 (2): 139-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/
of roads. Since as the highway is built, industrial j150398a001.
development is immediately started and more and 10. Leontaritis, K.J. and Mansoori, G.A. 1987. Asphaltene
more traffic come. This is the major reason for Flocculation During Oil Production and Processing:
damages the roads and structures (currently) before A Thermodynamic Colloidal Model. Presented at the
their life. Sometime more than the design load comes SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry,
when its life is about 50% or less (That is after about San Antonio, Texas, USA, 4–6 February. SPE-16258-
50 years of structures life and about 10 to 20 years in MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16258-MS.
case of roads life in case of flexible and rigid pavement 11. IRC:SP:70-2016 “High Performance Concrete and
respectively.). Self Compacted Concrete”.
b) A candidate once nominated should be considered for a total period of 3 years, if otherwise eligible,
unless revised nomination is received. Once such nomination has been received, the Secretary
General, IRC may correspond directly with the candidate for supplementary information, if
necessary.
PROFORMA
IRC-PT. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU BIRTH CENTENARY AWARD
(NOMINATION FOR THE YEAR 2017)
1. Name of the Nominee.
2. Roll. No. as member of IRC and the year since he is member of IRC.
3. Discipline under which to be considered.
4. Date of Birth.
5. Academic qualifications beginning with Bachelor’s Degree.
6. Present employment and post held.
7. (a) Outstanding achievements of the nominee (in about 500 words) during the last 5 years (Attach
separate sheet)
(b) Benefit derived/anticipated or measurable impact of the work/contribution/achievement.
(c) Assessment by the sponsor of the importance of the contribution (not more than 100 words)
8. Whether these achievements/contributions have already been recognized for awards by any other body. If
so, the name of the body, the name of award and the year of award may be given.
9. Other awards/honours already received including fellowships of professional bodies.
10. Papers published, if any (reprints to be enclosed).
11. Names & address of three experts in the area (preferably in India) as possible reference.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Place : ____________________________ Signature _____________________________
Name & Designation of the Sponsor
(IRC Council Member)
NOTE : Ten copies of the Proforma along with ten copies of the detailed statement of achievement/contribution
neatly typed should be supplied along with reprints of relevant Papers.
IRC:SP:71-2018 “Guidelines for Design and Construction of Precast Pre-Tensioned 400.00 20.00
Girders for Bridges” (First Revision)
IRC:83-2018 Part II: “Standard Specification and Code of Practice for Road Bridges” 600 40.00
IRC:SP:89-2018 Part II: “Guidelines for the Design of Stabilized Pavements” 800.00 20.00
IRC:SP:113-2018 “Guidelines on Flood Disaster Mitigation for Highway Engineers” 800.00 40.00
IRC:SP:114-2018 “Guidelines for Seismic Design for Road Bridges” 1000.00 40.00
IRC:SP:115-2018 “Guidelines for Design of Integral Bridges” 500.00 20.00
IRC:SP:116-2018 “Guidelines for Design and Installation of Gabion Structure” 600.00 20.00
IRC:99-2018 “Guidelines for Traffic Calming Measures in Rural and Urban Areas” 1000.00 20.00
(First Revision)
Copies of these publications can be obtained from IRC Office against cash payment. For more details please contact +
91 11 2338 7759 and E-mail: ircsale1934@gmail.com
On the invitation of Government of Maharashtra, the 79th Annual Session of the Indian Roads
Congress will be held at Nagpur (Maharashtra) from 23rd November to 26th November 2018.
It is expected that more than 3000 Highway Engineers from all over the country and abroad
will attend the Session. During the Annual Session of IRC, there has been a practice for various
firms/organizations to make Technical Presentations on their products/technologies & case
studies (with innovative construction methods or technologies or having special problems
requiring out of the box thinking and special solutions). The presenters will get an opportunity
to address a large gathering of highway professionals from Private Sector as well as decision
makers in the Govt. Sector. These presentation evoke lively interaction among the participants.
A time slot of about 12-15 minutes is normally allocated for each Technical Presentation. Time
is also given for floor intervention. Audio visual equipment is made available at the venue for
these presentations. During such Technical Presentation Session no other meetings will be held
parallel so as to ensure maximum attendance during the Technical Presentation Session. The
stakeholders are, therefore, requested to participate in the event and book slots at the earliest.
Interested Organizations may write to IRC conveying their willingness for participation and
send the topics of their Technical Presentation by E-mail: ad.irc-morth@gov.in or through
Speed Post alongwith a Demand Draft for Rs.60,000/- (Rupees Sixty Thousand only) drawn in
favour of Secretary General, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi latest by 18th October, 2018
so that necessary arrangements can be made by IRC.
ATTENTION INVITED
For any enquiry about the 79th Annual Session like Registration, Membership & Technical Presentation
etc. please address to Secretary General, (Kind Attn. Shri D. Sam Singh, Deputy Secretary (i/c)) Indian
Roads Congress Kama Koti Marg, Sector-6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110022. Phone +91 11 2610
5160/26171548
E-mail: admn.irc-morth@gov.in or contact the following officers:
Airport : Airport :
Train Name Time Date Train Name Time Date
Class Station Class Station
_______________________Days from_______________________to______________________________
Accommodation for delegates (Paying Full) Single (S) / Double (D)
Hotel Name: _________________________________@ Rs. ________________________________
Days from___________________________to___________________ November, 2018___________
Note : Draw Demand Draft in favour of “Local Organising Secretary, 79th Annual Session, IRC” payable
at Nagpur for accommodation. Accommodation would be confirmed only on receipt of payment in
advance.
Excellent opportunity to learn the best practices from renowned experts from the country and
across the globe.
All are benefited from better road construction. All the stakeholder are invited to attend the two
days International Seminar to become partner in road construction.
Who should attend: Central/State Government Departments/Agencies, Manufactures,
Consultant, Public Sector Undertakings, Autonomous Organization, Research/Academic
Institutions, Road Sector Project Executing Agencies both from Government and Private Sector
including Concessionaries.
Themes of the Seminar:
Session 1: Planning and Design of Rigid Pavement
Session 2: Construction Materials and Technology
Session 3: Evaluation and Health Monitoring
Session 4: Repair and Rehabilitation
Session 5: Case Studies
Abstract of the Papers may please be submitted by the 30th September, 2018 to IRC
E-mail: internationalseminar2019@gmail.com
Opportunity available for Advertisers and Exhibitors to Display of Products on first-come-first
serve basis.
For further details and enquiry for getting associated with the International Seminar, please
contact following officers.
September, 2018
dl-sw-17/4194/16-18
Indian Highways published on 23 August, 2018
`20/- Advance Month, September, 2018
Indian Highways
sa infrastructure consultants pvt. ltd
(An ISO 9001-2008 Certified Company)
About saicpl
SA infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Ltd along with its subsidiary UPHAM International Corporation and QUEST
Engineers & Consultants are focused on delivering multi-disciplinary infra projects with innovative ideas of
International Standards. The Group forms an ambious consortium of consultancy firms with commitment to
provide high quality specialized consultation into the field of Highways, Structures and Design.
Services
SA Infrastructure synchronizes every aspect of engineering with imbibed commitment to deliver high quality infrastructure and development • Storm water enters the
consultation that glorifies a new world. We have successfully carried out numerous consultancy projects in Civil Infrastructure development adjacent green area
through kerb cuts.
transportation, primary & secondary highway networks, Project Management under BOT/Annuity Model, Resource Management, Social aspects
including poverty alleviation and institutional support. • the green area lvl is
always lower than
road lvl.
Corporate Address : 1101, 11th Floor, Tower A-II, Ansal Corporate Park, Sector 142, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh India
Tel : +91-120-6148000 / Fax : +91-120-6148090 www.sainfra.com Email - info@sainfra.com
Edited and Published by Shri S.K. Nirmal, Secretary General, Indian Roads Congress, IRC HQ, Sector-6, R.K. Puram,
Kama Koti Marg, New Delhi - 110 022. Printed by Shri S.K. Nirmal on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress
at M/s. India Offset Press, New Delhi-110 064 https://www.irc.nic.in