Kelly W. Bayless
NUR 4122
“I Pledge….”
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 2
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this integrative review is to identify the relationship between the long-
effects of these drugs on the growth of these pediatric patients has yet to be completely
Method: This is an integrative review in which a literature analysis was conducted through
online databases. The articles discussed are quantitative studies that were chosen based on
applicable criteria. This information was then used to determine the effect on growth in
Limitations: The greatest limitation of this review is in the authors inexperience in conducting
Results and Findings: The findings accumulated for this integrative review offer a mixed notion
Implications and Recommendations: More research is recommended on this topic due to the
mixed consensus by researchers. Future areas of study include expanding the number of
The purpose of this integrated review is to identify the relationship between long-term
corticosteroid use in asthmatic children and suppressed growth rate. Asthma is one of the most
common chronic disease of children with over 7 million diagnosed cases in the United States
(Singh, Weinberger, Zimmerman, & Starner, 2013). Long courses of corticosteroids are
Choonara, & Conroy, 2017). Although there are various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are
associated with the use of corticosteroids, such as weight gain and headaches, there has not been
Being such a common affliction among children, it is important to research and ensure
that the methods prescribed by pediatricians are doing more good than harm to the patients and
not leaving them with long-term, irreversible side effects. Due to the frequent use of
corticosteroids as a common treatment option for asthma in children, researchers have already
identified the need for these studies. The intention of this review is to examine and discuss
published data related to the researchers PICO question: In adolescents with asthma will inhaled
This integrative review focuses on five research articles. The researcher utilized
EBSCO’s Nursing Resource Center, Google Scholar, and Academic Search Complete databases.
The key search words were child, asthma, corticosteroids, and growth. These keywords resulted
in over 60,000 articles. The articles were filtered by publication year, peer-review, and
application to the PICO question. The researcher expanded the date range to 2008-2018 due to a
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 4
high volume of meta-analyses and reviews. Full-text accessibility was a significant limiting
These articles were then evaluated by the researcher for relevance to the PICO question.
Quantitative articles were a necessity due to the nature of the PICO question. Articles by
appropriate and qualified authors were then prioritized. Examples of relevant qualifications
include Medical Doctor (MD), Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm. D.), and Master of Health Science
(M.H.S.). Five articles were selected for inclusion in this integrative review, four of which were
quantitative studies (Kelly et al., 2012; Renosto et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2013; Skoner, Maspero,
& Banerji, 2008) and one systematic review of literature (Alijebab et al., 2017).
Findings
The results and findings of the articles identified a mixed consensus on the connection
between corticosteroid use and growth suppression in asthmatic children. Three of the five
research articles found a direct correlation between corticosteroid use and growth retardation
(Alijebab et al., 2017; Kelly et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2013). The two remaining articles did not
find a direct correlation between the two variables (Renosto et al., 2017; Skoner et al., 2008). A
In a systematic literature review conducted by Alijebab et al. (2017), the authors aim to
identify the most likely ADRs from long-term corticosteroid use in children. The design was a
systematic literature search from six databases. The academic databases were searched by using
keywords, such as “corticosteroid” and “adverse drug reaction”. The researchers accumulated
7,714 articles total in which 101 met the appropriate inclusion criteria. The Cochrane
Collaborations tool was used to detect bias in the randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis
of the randomized controlled trial was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. There were a
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 5
combined 6,817 children involved in the studies that reported 4,321 ADRs. The children of these
studies were commonly afflicted with inflammatory conditions such as asthma. Growth
retardation was reported in 18.1% of cases, showing a correlation between the long-term use of
Management Program (CAMP) trail to research the long-term effects on growth in relation to
long-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. This study aimed to investigate a previously
neglected area of research in long-term growth suppression as opposed to during and shortly
after use. There were 1,041 pediatric participants, of which 943 completed the trial. Children
were divided into three different groups: Budesonide, Nedocromil, and placebo. These children
ranged in age from 5-13 years old and their height was measured every 6 months for the first 4.5
years. For the subsequent 8 years, participants were measured 1 to 2 times a year. Adult height
was determined at a mean of 24.9 years of age. A multiple linear regression was used to compare
mean height of the participants. The researchers revealed that the Budesonide group had a mean
height deficit of 1.2cm less than the placebo group. This correlation was also directly linked with
a higher dosage of this medication required by the participant. The Nedocromil group and the
correlation between the use of a particular ICS as well as higher dosage and growth suppression.
In a retrospective cohort study conducted by Renosto et al. (2016) growth velocity and
weight gain were investigated in prepubertal asthmatic children. These researchers also took into
account the use of ICS and all ICS used by participants were converted into beclomethasone as a
reference for dosage considerations. The researchers had a sample of 85 pediatric patients
diagnosed with asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. These patients
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 6
were between 2 to 9 years of age, represented both sexes, and had been monitored for a
de São Paulo (EPM-Unifesp) in São Paulo Brazil. A z-score of body mass index for age was
calculated using height and weight data with the use of WHO Anthro Plus® Software. Tanner &
Whitehouse curves were used to analyze growth rate. The researchers did not find an association
between ICS use and growth rate. However, they did find a positive correlation between asthma
Singh et al. (2013) conducted a retrospective cohort study on the effects of daily ICS in
preschool age children. The purpose of this research was to study an age group that had been
previously neglected in ICS use and the effects on children. These researchers had a sample of
145 children all under the age of 5. The participants were divided into 3 groups that were
by MDI, and Montelukast sodium orally. The use of intranasal steroids (INS) was also monitored
and recorded as well. These participants visited the Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic at
the University of Iowa a minimum of every 3 weeks over the course of 12 months. A random
coefficient regression model was used for comparing growth during treatment course. The
clinical height measurements were converted to z-scores and then the slopes of linear growth
were utilized. The researchers found no significant effects on growth with ICS use. They did,
however, find an unexpected correlation between INS use and growth suppression.
conducted by Skoner et al. (2008) on the long-term safety with inhaled Ciclesonide on growth in
asthmatic children. The researchers aimed to see if using Ciclesonide, a newer ICS, would have
the adverse reaction of growth suppression effects. The researchers had 1,127 patients screened
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 7
at 85 centers in 4 different countries. Of these, 661 were selected and 609 completed the study.
These participants were between the ages of 5 and 8.5 and had an asthma diagnosis for at least 3
months. This study took place over the course of 12 months with measurements taken every 6
months. Each clinic location was provided the same stadiometer which was required to be
calibrated within 4 hours of measuring a participant. Growth rate was measured as a linear
regression of the slope height versus time. The linear regression was analyzed by using the
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. The researchers found no significant delay in growth
rate over the one-year course of Cicelsonide; the growth rates were comparable to the placebo.
Discussion/Implications
The articles selected for review show both a correlation between corticosteroid use and
growth suppression and no correlation between the two. The researcher outlined the review
corticosteroid related growth suppression, and medication and dosage. The following is a
One particular study made a connection that the others did not: asthma severity itself, as
opposed to its prescribed medications, may have a consequential effect on growth in children
afflicted (Renosto et al., 2017). Although these researchers still investigated use of ICS and
growth suppression, they were only successful in finding a strong connection between more
severe asthma forms and growth rate. The researcher believes that this is a semi-neglected and
vastly important area of research. This theme is one that has major implications for future
research studies and should be further investigated. This finding suggests that the perceived
correlation between ICS use and suppressed growth rate could potentially be attributed to severe
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 8
asthma. ICS use is assumed in patients with severe asthma and therefore the direct causation may
Two studies did find a direct correlation between the use of corticosteroids and growth
suppression in asthmatic children (Aljebab et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2013). Researchers from the
systematic review were unique in stating the implications from their conclusions should be taken
into consideration for pediatrician practice (Aljebab et al., 2017). Researchers stated that the idea
of growth suppression due to the use of these corticosteroids has often been overlooked by
pediatricians and has not been emphasized to parents when prescribing these medications to their
children. These researchers believe their findings indicate a need for more transparency in
pediatric practice. Singh et al., (2013), even expanded their research to a younger age group that
has so far been neglected. This study was especially important and relevant in looking at the
route of the corticosteroid as well. The implications behind this are massively important in
realizing that intranasal steroids may not be as strong of an option for younger children due to
Researchers from two separate studies expanded the approach to this topic by analyzing
differences among diverse corticosteroids (Skoner et al., 2008) and the dosage of corticosteroids
(Kelly et al., 2012). The researcher noticed a lack of studies that investigated such aspects of
corticosteroid use in children. These researchers realized that for some pediatric asthmatic
patients, there were not as many effective options for treating their asthma outside of
corticosteroids. These researchers aimed to find these patients a way to use the medications they
needed while hopefully avoiding the adverse effects on growth suppression. Researchers of
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 9
Skoner et al., (2008) found that Ciclesonide, a newer ICS on the market, would be a viable
alternative to asthmatic children as it did not appear to have adverse reactions, including growth
suppression. It is important to note, however, that these researchers were financed by Altana
Pharma US, Inc. Kelly et al., (2012) opened up the idea of future research investigating careful
dosages to prevent the growth suppression in asthmatic children. The researchers provided two
studies that imply research could be greatly expanded on corticosteroid use in asthmatic children,
Limitations
In the execution of this integrative review, the researcher encountered various limitations.
A significant limitation is in the researcher’s deficit of knowledge and experience in the process
within the past 10 years was also a limitation in that it did not allow for an exhaustive review of
the subject. The researcher was only able to offer a limited review of the topic presented by the
PICO question. The researcher was instructed to find articles within a 5-year time frame, but this
had to be expanded to 10 years due to the vast amount of meta-analysis and reviews on the topic.
The greatest limitation determined by the author in regard to the 5 articles was the narrow
focus of their conclusions. More comprehensive studies are needed to address the large number
of variables that can play a role in growth suppression of asthmatic children. Many of the
researchers addressed this issue in the discussion of their findings, suggesting investigating
greater number of corticosteroids and varying dosages for future research. Renosto et al. (2016)
and Singh et al. (2013) both admitted a strong limitation of their research was in its retrospective
Conclusions
INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW 10
The evidence compiled for this integrative review both supports and opposes the idea that
long-term corticosteroid use suppresses growth in asthmatic pediatric patients (Aljebab et al.,
2017; Kelly et al., 2012; Renosto et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2013; Skoner et al., 2008). Themes
that emerged during this review were: non-corticosteroid related growth suppression,
corticosteroid related growth suppression, and medication and dosage. Researchers supported the
notion that growth suppression was directly correlated to corticosteroid use, did not find a
correlation between the two, or found that it was dosage/medication dependent. From this
integrative review, the researcher believes that different types of studies with larger samples,
presence of a correlation or not. In relation to the PICO question being addressed, whether long-
term corticosteroid use has negative effects on growth rate in asthmatic children, the literature
References
Aljebab, F., Choonara, I., & Conroy, S. (2017). Systematic review of the toxicity of long-course oral
Kelly, H. W., Sternberg, A. L., Lescher, R., Fuhlbrigge, A. L., Williams, P., Zeiger, R. S., . . .
Strunk, R. C. (2012). Effect of inhaled glucocorticoids in childhood on adult height. The New
Renosto, L. C., Acatauassu, C., Andrade, I., Neto, M. R., Paulino, T. L., Suano-Souza, F. I., . . .
Sarni, R. O. (2017). Growth velocity and weight gain in prepubertal asthmatic children. Revista
Singh, S. B., Weinberger, M. M., Zimmerman, M. B., & Starner, T. D. (2013). Growth of preschool
age children receiving daily inhaled corticosteroids. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings,34(6), 511-
518. doi:10.2500/aap.2013.34.3700
Skoner, D. P., Maspero, J., & Banerji, D. (2008). Assessment of the long-term safety of inhaled
First Author Aljebab, F., Choonara, I., & Conroy, S. (2017). Systematic review of the toxicity of long-
(Year)/Qualifications course oral corticosteroids in children. Plos One,12(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170259
Background/Problem Long term corticosteroid use in children has been associated with adverse drug
Statement reactions
This article designed a review to identify the most common and serious adverse
drug reactions
Conceptual/theoretical The researchers want to identify the most likely adverse drug reactions from long-
Framework term corticosteroid use in children and have this information incorporated into
medication teaching from pediatricians
Design/ Systematic literature search from six databases
Method/Philosophical
Underpinnings
Sample/ Setting/Ethical 7, 714 articles retrieved, 101 met the inclusion criteria
Considerations The authors identified a conflict of interest in Imti Choonara is an Academic Editor
of Plos One
Major Variables Studied Adverse Corticosteroid effects – Weight gain, growth retardation, and Cushingoid
(and their definition), if features
appropriate
Measurement Tool/Data Academic databases searched using key words
Collection Method Age limited from 28 days to 18 years
Studies used included corticosteroid use greater than 15 days
Data Analysis Quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane
collaborations tool to detect bias
Prospective cohort studies were assessed using the STROBE checklist. Anything
with a score of less than 70% was not included
Meta-analysis of the randomized control trial was done by RevMan 5.3 software
Findings/Discussion Weight gain, delayed growth, and Cushingoid features were the top three adverse
drug reactions
The most serious ADR was infection, with Varicella zoster being the most common
Behavioral changes were found to be the most common reason for discontinuing
corticosteroids
Growth delay was greater with Prednisolone and more prominent in boys
One study found oral corticosteroids to delay growth more in comparison to
inhaled
Appraisal/Worth to The adverse drug reactions of long term corticosteroid used by children is
practice “underappreciated” by pediatricians. Pediatricians as well as parents, need to be
aware of the long-term effects, such as delayed growth.
First Author Kelly, H. W., Sternberg, A. L., Lescher, R., Fuhlbrigge, A. L., Williams, P., Zeiger, R. S., .
(Year)/Qualifications . . Strunk, R. C. (2012). Effect of inhaled glucocorticoids in childhood on adult height. The
New England Journal of Medicine,367(10), 904-912. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1203229
Background/Problem While the effects of inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) have shown temporary growth
Statement delays in children, these researchers aim to see if this growth delay becomes a
decrease in adult height
Conceptual/theoretical Researchers want to provide more long-term effects on growth in relation to long-
Framework term childhood ICS use
Design/ Double-blind, placebo-controlled Childhood Asthma Management Program
Method/Philosophical (CAMP) trial
Underpinnings Children divided into three groups: Budesonide use, Nedocromil use, and placebo
Height and weight were measure every 6 months for the first 4.5 years
For the next 8 years, these were measured 1 to 2 times a year
Adult height determined at a mean age of 24.9.
Sample/ Setting/Ethical 1041 children from the ages of 5 to 13
Considerations Children had mild to moderate asthma
Studies approved by institutional review board at each study center
Participants of age provided consent; Minors provided assent and informed
consented by a parent or guardian
Major Variables Studied Long term height deficit due to childhood ICS use
(and their definition), if
appropriate
Measurement Tool/Data Children were assessed by their primary care physicians under the advisement
Collection Method from the CAMP physicians
At each clinic, there was a trained technician to measure height of the patients
Detailed history of participants health and medication use was obtained
Data Analysis Multiple linear regression model was used to compare mean height
Data Analysis A z-score of body mass index for age was calculated from weight and height data
with the use of WHO Anthro Plus® Software. These values were compared to the
WHO reference values.
Tanner & White house curves were used to analyze growth rate
SPSS 19.0 was used for statistical analysis
Findings/Discussion The researchers found an association between lower growth rate and asthma
severity, regardless of the use of IC
Children with more severe asthma had greater impaired growth rate
Several side effects of asthma could lead to lower growth rate in these children:
hypoxemia, sedentary behavior, or metabolic demands due to increased
respiratory effort
Appraisal/Worth to Children afflicted with severe asthma will have impaired growth rates
practice There was a direct correlation found between severity of asthma and the impaired
growth rate in children
Use of steroids was not associated with the growth rate
First Author Singh, S. B., Weinberger, M. M., Zimmerman, M. B., & Starner, T. D. (2013). Growth of
(Year)/Qualifications preschool age children receiving daily inhaled corticosteroids. Allergy and Asthma
Proceedings,34(6), 511-518. doi:10.2500/aap.2013.34.3700
Background/Problem The effect of daily use of inhaled corticosteroids on the growth of children less
Statement than 5 years of age
Conceptual/theoretical The researchers of this study narrow the focus on children less than 5 years of
Framework age and the effects of daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on their growth rates
The researchers aim to
Design/ Retrospective cohort
Method/Philosophical
Underpinnings
Sample/ Setting/Ethical 145 children, < 5 years old, divided into 3 different treatment groups that visited
Considerations the Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic at the University of Iowa
Researchers received funding from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Study approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board
Major Variables Studied Children <5 years old on ICS asthma symptoms
(and their definition), if Measured height (growth) over treatment period
appropriate
Measurement Tool/Data Minimum of three height measurements taken each visit 3 weeks apart for 6
Collection Method months
Nursing personnel measure the height and recorded them during clinic visits
Measurements taken with stadiometers
Medications were reviewed at each visit
Each medication needed to be continued for the 6 month period
Data Analysis Linear mixed model analysis for a random coefficient regression model
Clinical height measurements were converted to z scores
The z score slopes of linear growth were used
Findings/Discussion There were no significant effects on growth with low to medium ICS use
The study did find a correlation between intranasal corticosteroid (INS) use and
growth suppression
Appraisal/Worth to There have been few studies performed on childhood inhaled corticosteroid use
practice with an age group of less than 5 years old
First Author Skoner, D. P., Maspero, J., & Banerji, D. (2008). Assessment of the long-term safety of
(Year)/Qualifications inhaled ciclesonide on growth in children with asthma. Pediatrics,121(1).
doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2206
Background/Problem Long term use of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids has been proven to cause
Statement growth suppression in pediatric patients
Researchers aim to study if Ciclesonide, a newer ICS, will cause this same
adverse reaction
Conceptual/theoretical Researchers wanted to see if Ciclesonide could be a better ICS alternative for
Framework asthmatic children due to decreased adverse events
Findings/Discussion There was not a significant delay in growth rate over a year in children that used
Ciclesonide – the growth rates were comparable to the placebo
There also were no significant adverse effects reported
Appraisal/Worth to The majority of ICS therapy have shown some growth suppression in pediatric
practice patients
The use of Ciclesonide could be an alternative to traditional ICS use that would
not have the negative growth suppression effects