BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli have historically dominated as abstract
causes of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Widespread use of intrapartum prophylaxis for GBS
disease led to concerns about the potential adverse impact on E coli incidence.
METHODS: Active, laboratory, and population-based surveillance for culture-positive (blood
or cerebrospinal fluid) bacterial infections among infants 0 to 2 days of age was conducted
statewide in Minnesota and Connecticut and in selected counties of California and Georgia
during 2005 to 2014. Demographic and clinical information were collected and hospital live
birth denominators were used to calculate incidence rates (per 1000 live births). We used
the Cochran–Amitage test to assess trends.
RESULTS: Surveillance identified 1484 cases. GBS was most common (532) followed by E coli
(368) and viridans streptococci (280). Eleven percent of cases died and 6.3% of survivors
had sequelae at discharge. All-cause (2005: 0.79; 2014: 0.77; P = .05) and E coli (2005: 0.21;
2014: 0.18; P = .25) sepsis incidence were stable. GBS incidence decreased (2005: 0.27;
2014: 0.22; P = .02). Among infants <1500 g, incidence was an order of magnitude higher for
both pathogens and stable. The odds of death among infants <1500 g were similar for both
pathogens but among infants ≥1500 g, the odds of death were greater for E coli cases (odds
ratio: 7.0; 95% confidence interval: 2.7–18.2).
CONCLUSIONS: GBS prevention efforts have not led to an increasing burden of early-onset E coli
infections. However, the stable burden of E coli sepsis and associated mortality underscore
the need for interventions.
aNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Widespread
Atlanta, Georgia; bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, intrapartum prophylaxis for perinatal group B
Georgia; cAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia; dConnecticut Department of Public Health, streptococcal disease provoked concerns about
Hartford, Connecticut; eDivision of Epidemiolgy, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkley, Berkley,
California; and fMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota
potential increases in Escherichia coli sepsis in
the first week of life, particularly among preterm
Dr Schrag conceptualized and designed the study, carried out the analyses, and drafted the initial infants. Approximately 30% of US deliveries are
manuscript; Drs Farley, Petit, Reingold, and Lynfield supervised data collection at each of their exposed to intrapartum antibiotics.
respective sites and provided critical input on the manuscript; Ms Weston, Ms Pondo, and
Ms Hudson Jain coordinated design of the data collection instruments, performed quality checks, WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Using active, population-
cleaning, and management of the data from all sites, and critically reviewed the manuscript; and based surveillance from 2005 to 2014, we
all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted. documented stable rates of all-cause and E coli
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2013 sepsis in the first week of life and characterized
current epidemiology. Notably, rates were stable
Accepted for publication Sep 12, 2016
among preterm infants and for those with a birth
Address correspondence to Stephanie Schrag, DPhil, MS C25, Centers for Disease Control and weight <1500 g.
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30329. E-mail: sjschrag@cdc.gov
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics To cite: Schrag SJ, Farley MM, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology
of Invasive Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, 2005 to 2014.
Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20162013
DISCUSSION
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
FUNDING: This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Emerging Infections Program Network/Active Bacterial Core surveillance.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2016-3038.
REFERENCES
1. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 3. Van Dyke MK, Phares CR, Lynfield R, group B streptococcal disease: revised
2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;65(2):1–14 et al. Evaluation of universal antenatal guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR
2. Schrag SJ, Verani JR. Intrapartum screening for group B streptococcus. Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-10):1–32
antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention N Engl J Med. 2009;360(25):2626–2636 5. Centers for Disease Control and
of perinatal group B streptococcal 4. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag S; Division Prevention. Prevention of perinatal
disease: experience in the United States of Bacterial Diseases, National Center group B streptococcal disease: a
and implications for a potential group for Immunization and Respiratory public health perspective. MMWR
B streptococcal vaccine. Vaccine. Diseases, Centers for Disease Control Recomm Rep. 1996;45(RR-7):
2013;31(suppl 4):D20–D26 and Prevention. Prevention of perinatal 1–24
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
/content/138/6/e20162013.full.html