TABLE 4.1
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO GENDER NO OF THE RESPONDENT % OF
RESPONDENT
1 Male 51 51.0
2 Female 49 49.0
TOTAL 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the gender is 51% of the respondent is male and 49% of the
respondent are female.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are male in the
organization.
CHART 4.1
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT
50.5
50
percentage
51
49.5
49
49
48.5
48
Male Female
GENGER
TABLE 4.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO AGE NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Upto 20years 20 20.0
2 20-30 years 24 24.0
3 30-40 years 30 30.0
4 Above 40 years 26 26.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the age is 20% of the respondent is age group is up to 20 years,
24% of the respondent is age group is 20-30 years, 30% of the respondent are age group is
30-40 years, 26% of the respondent are age group is above 40 years.
From the above analysis it is interpreted that majority of respondents age are 30-40.In this
aged workers percentage is 30.
CHART 4.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENT
20
10
0
Upto 20-30
20years 30-40
years Above 40
years
years
AGE
TABLE 4.3
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT
CHART 4.3
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT
40
30
20
10
0
Married Unmarried
MARITAL STATUS
TABLE 4.4
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
SL.NO EDUCATION NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 SSLC 18 18.0
2 HSC 24 24.0
3 Diploma 23 23.0
4 UG 19 19.0
5 PG 16 16.0
Total 100 100.0
Source:Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the qualification of the respondent is 18% of the employee
are completed sslc, 24% of the employee are completed hsc, 23% of the employee are
completed diploma ,19% of the employee are completed ug , 16% of the employee are
completed pg.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are education in workers
are higher secondary school.
CHART 4.4
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
25
EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
SSLC HSC Diploma UG PG
EDUCATION
TABLE 4.5
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT
SL.NO DEPARTMENT NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 HR 8 8.0
2 Production 35 35.0
3 R&D 16 16.0
4 Accounts 18 18.0
5 Others 23 23.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 08% of the employee are working in hr department,
35% of the employee are working in production department, 16% of the employee are
working in R&D department, 18% of the employee are working in account department, 23%
of the employee are working in other department.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are worked in
production department of the organization.
CHART 4.5
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT
35
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT
30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
HR Production R&D Accounts Others
DEPARTMENT
TABLE 4.6
YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE COMPANY
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 29% of the workers
in 6-10 years experience person in this organization.
CHART 4.6
YEARS OF SERVICE IN COMPANY
EXPERIENCE
30 OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
5
0
1
2
3
4
EXPERIENCE
TABLE 4.7
MONTHLY INCOME
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 30% of the workers
in monthly income is 10000-150000.
CHART 4.7
MONTHLY INCOME
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Below 10000 10000-15000 15000-20000 Above 20000
MONTHLY INCOM
TABLE 4.8
SATISFIED WITH THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 27% of the workers
are satisfied and existing of performance.
CHART 4.8
SATISFIED WITH THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE OF THE RESPONDENT
30
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
PERFORMANCE
TABLE 4.9
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IS NEEDED IN ORGANIZATION
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 22 22.0
3 Neutral 24 24.0
4 Disagree 22 22.0
5 Strongly disagree 15 15.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
existing performance appraisal system is needed in organization, 22% of the respondent are
said that agree, , 24% of the respondent are says that neutral that performance appraisal
system, 22% of the respondent are says that disagree that performance appraisal system,
15% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 24% of the workers
in needed to the performance of the organization.
CHART 4.9
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IS NEEDED IN ORGANIZATION
25
NEED OF THE RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
PERFORMANCE NEED
TABLE 4.10
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSESSED BY SELF,
SUPERIOR OR CONSULTANT
CHART 4.10
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSESSED BY SELF,
SUPERIOR OR CONSULTANT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
ORGANIZATION
TABLE 4.11
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HELPS TO WIN COOPERATION AND TEAM
WORK
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 31% of the workers
are performed in team work in organization.
CHART 4.11
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HELPS TO WIN COOPERATION AND TEAM
WORK
30
20
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
TEAM WORK
TABLE 4.12
The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
reducing grievance among the employees, 23% of the respondent are says that agree, 28%
of the respondent are says that neutral , 19% of the respondent are says that disagree ,13%
of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with reducing grievance among the
employees.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are helpful reducing the organization.
CHART 4.12
30
EMPLOYEES OF THE RESPONDENT
25
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
EMPLOYEES
TABLE 4.13
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL FOR IMPROVING PERSONNEL
SKILL
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 12 12.0
2 Agree 29 29.0
3 Neutral 21 21.0
4 Disagree 21 21.0
5 Strongly disagree 17 17.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 12% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance appraisal is helpful for improving personnel skill , 29% of the respondent are
says that agree, 21% of the respondent are says that neutral , 21% of the respondent are
says that disagree ,17% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with performance
appraisal is helpful for improving personnel skill.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 29% of the
employees are improving personal skill in the organization.
CHART 4.13
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL FOR IMPROVING PERSONNEL
SKILL
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
IMPROVING
TABLE 4.14
TRAINING PROGRAMMERS ARE EFFECTIVE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 32% of the employees
are effective and development in the organization.
CHART 4.14
TRAINING PROGRAMMERS ARE EFFECTIVE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
DEVELOPMENT
TABLE 4.15
THE PERFORMANCE RATINGS WERE DONE PERIODICALLY
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 30% of the employees
are high level of the performance rating in this organization.
CHART 4.15
THE PERFORMANCE RATINGS WERE DONE PERIODICALLY
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
RATING
TABLE 4.16
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM HELPS TO IDENTIFY THE
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE EMPLOYEE
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 25% of the employees
are strength and weakness of the organization.
CHART 4.16
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM HELPS TO IDENTIFY THE
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE EMPLOYEE
25
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
STRENGTH & WEAKNESS
TABLE 4.17
THE PERFORMANCE RATING IS HELPFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO
PROVIDE EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 26% of the employees
are attened the organization counselling.
CHART 4.17
THE PERFORMANCE RATING IS HELPFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO
PROVIDE EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING
30
EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING OF THE
25
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
COUNSELLING
TABLE 4.18
MANAGEMENT FIXES SALARY THROUGH THE PERFORMANCE RATING
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are fixed salary in this organization.
CHART 4.18
MANAGEMENT FIXES SALARY THROUGH THE PERFORMANCE RATING
30
FIXES SALARY OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
FIXES SALARY
TABLE 4.19
PERFORMANCE RATING HELPS TO FIX INCREMENT
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 11 11.0
2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 31 31.0
4 Disagree 29 29.0
5 Strongly disagree 11 11.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 11% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance rating helps to fix increment , 18% of the respondent are says that agree with
performance rating helps to fix increment, 31% of the respondent are says that neutral , 29%
of the respondent are says that disagree that performance rating helps to fix increment ,11%
of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 31% of the employees
are fixes increment in the organization.
CHART 4.19
PERFORMANCE RATING HELPS TO FIX INCREMENT
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
FIX INCREMENT
TABLE 4.20
TRANSFER, DEMOTION, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL IS BASED ON
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 16 16.0
2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 24 24.0
4 Disagree 17 17.0
5 Strongly disagree 20 20.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 16% of the respondent are strongly agree with
dismissal is based on performance appraisal, 23% of the respondent are says that agree with
dismissal is based on performance appraisal, 24% of the respondent are says that neutral ,
17% of the respondent are says that disagree ,20% of the respondent are says that strongly
disagree with dismissal is based on performance appraisal.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 24% of the
employees are based performance in the organization.
CHART 4.20
TRANSFER, DEMOTION, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL IS BASED ON
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
25
BASED PERFORMANCE OF THE
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
BASED PERFORMANCE
TABLE 4.21
THE DESIRED TARGET OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 26% of the
employees are achieve the performance in the organization.
CHART 4.21
THE DESIRED TARGET OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
30
TARGET OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
TARGET
TABLE 4.22
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INCREASES EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION
30
MOTIVATION OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
MOTIVATION
TABLE 4.23
APPRAISAL SYSTEM KEEPS ON THE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE
OR SUCCESS OF WORK
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 23% of the employees
are achievement and failure in the organization.
CHART 4.23
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
ACHIEVEMENT
TABLE 4.24
HAVE A SEPARATE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL RESULT
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are separate committee in this organization.
CHART 4.24
20
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
COMMITEE