Anda di halaman 1dari 30

CHAPTER IV

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

TABLE 4.1
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO GENDER NO OF THE RESPONDENT % OF
RESPONDENT
1 Male 51 51.0
2 Female 49 49.0
TOTAL 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the gender is 51% of the respondent is male and 49% of the
respondent are female.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are male in the
organization.
CHART 4.1
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENT


51

50.5

50
percentage

51
49.5

49
49
48.5

48
Male Female
GENGER
TABLE 4.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENT
SL.NO AGE NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Upto 20years 20 20.0
2 20-30 years 24 24.0
3 30-40 years 30 30.0
4 Above 40 years 26 26.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the age is 20% of the respondent is age group is up to 20 years,
24% of the respondent is age group is 20-30 years, 30% of the respondent are age group is
30-40 years, 26% of the respondent are age group is above 40 years.

From the above analysis it is interpreted that majority of respondents age are 30-40.In this
aged workers percentage is 30.

CHART 4.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENT

AGE OF THE RESPONDENT


30
Percentage

20
10
0
Upto 20-30
20years 30-40
years Above 40
years
years
AGE
TABLE 4.3
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT

SL.NO MARITAL NO OF THE % OF


STATUS RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Married 57 57.0
2 Unmarried 43 43.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the marital status of the respondent are 57% of the respondent are
married and 43% of the respondent are unmarried.
From the above analysis it is interpreted that majority of respondents are married workers in
the organization.

CHART 4.3
MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT

TMARITAL STATUS OF THE


60 RESPONDENT
50
PERCENTAGE

40

30

20

10

0
Married Unmarried
MARITAL STATUS
TABLE 4.4
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
SL.NO EDUCATION NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 SSLC 18 18.0
2 HSC 24 24.0
3 Diploma 23 23.0
4 UG 19 19.0
5 PG 16 16.0
Total 100 100.0
Source:Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the qualification of the respondent is 18% of the employee
are completed sslc, 24% of the employee are completed hsc, 23% of the employee are
completed diploma ,19% of the employee are completed ug , 16% of the employee are
completed pg.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are education in workers
are higher secondary school.
CHART 4.4
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

25
EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
SSLC HSC Diploma UG PG
EDUCATION
TABLE 4.5
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT
SL.NO DEPARTMENT NO OF THE % OF
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 HR 8 8.0
2 Production 35 35.0
3 R&D 16 16.0
4 Accounts 18 18.0
5 Others 23 23.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 08% of the employee are working in hr department,
35% of the employee are working in production department, 16% of the employee are
working in R&D department, 18% of the employee are working in account department, 23%
of the employee are working in other department.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are worked in
production department of the organization.

CHART 4.5
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT

35
DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPODNENT
30

25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
HR Production R&D Accounts Others
DEPARTMENT
TABLE 4.6
YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE COMPANY

SL.NO EXPERIENCE NO OF THE % OF


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Upto 2 years 15 15.0
2 2-6 years 28 28.0
3 6-10 years 29 29.0
4 Above 10years 28 28.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 15% of the employee are working in organization is up
to 2 years, 28% of the employee are working in organization is 2-6 years, 29% of the
employee are working in organization is 6-10 years, 28% of the employee are working in
organization is above 10 years.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 29% of the workers
in 6-10 years experience person in this organization.
CHART 4.6
YEARS OF SERVICE IN COMPANY

EXPERIENCE
30 OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE

20
15
10
5
0
1
2
3
4
EXPERIENCE
TABLE 4.7
MONTHLY INCOME

SL.NO MONTHLY NO OF THE % OF


INCOM RESPONDEN RESPONDEN
T T
1 Below 10000 23 23.0
2 10000-15000 30 30.0
3 15000-20000 26 26.0
4 Above 20000 21 21.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION


The above table shows that the 23% of the employee are earn the monthly income is
below 10000, 30% of the employee are earn the monthly income is10000-15000, 26% of the
employee are earn the monthly income is 15000-20000 and 21% of the employee are earn the
monthly income is above 20000.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 30% of the workers
in monthly income is 10000-150000.
CHART 4.7
MONTHLY INCOME

INCOME OF THE RESPONDENT


30

25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Below 10000 10000-15000 15000-20000 Above 20000
MONTHLY INCOM

TABLE 4.8
SATISFIED WITH THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 24 24.0
3 Neutral 27 27.0
4 Disagree 15 15.0
5 Strongly disagree 17 17.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
existing performance appraisal system is needed in organization, 24% of the respondent are
said that agree, , 27% of the respondent are says that neutral that existing performance
appraisal system, 15% of the respondent are says that disagree that existing performance
appraisal system, 17% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that existing
performance appraisal system.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 27% of the workers
are satisfied and existing of performance.

CHART 4.8
SATISFIED WITH THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE OF THE RESPONDENT
30

25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
PERFORMANCE

TABLE 4.9
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IS NEEDED IN ORGANIZATION
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 22 22.0
3 Neutral 24 24.0
4 Disagree 22 22.0
5 Strongly disagree 15 15.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
existing performance appraisal system is needed in organization, 22% of the respondent are
said that agree, , 24% of the respondent are says that neutral that performance appraisal
system, 22% of the respondent are says that disagree that performance appraisal system,
15% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 24% of the workers
in needed to the performance of the organization.

CHART 4.9
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IS NEEDED IN ORGANIZATION
25
NEED OF THE RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
PERFORMANCE NEED

TABLE 4.10
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSESSED BY SELF,
SUPERIOR OR CONSULTANT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 10 10.0
2 Agree 15 15.0
3 Neutral 28 28.0
4 Disagree 23 23.0
5 Strongly disagree 24 24.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 10% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
performance of the organization is assessed , 15% of the respondent are says that agree,
28% of the respondent are says that neutral with performance of the organization is
assessed, 23% of the respondent are says that disagree ,24% of the respondent are says that
strongly disagree with performance of the organization is assessed.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the workers
are self superior of the organization.

CHART 4.10
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ASSESSED BY SELF,
SUPERIOR OR CONSULTANT

ORGANIZATION OF THE RESPONDENT


30

25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
ORGANIZATION

TABLE 4.11
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HELPS TO WIN COOPERATION AND TEAM
WORK

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 13 13.0
2 Agree 19 19.0
3 Neutral 31 31.0
4 Disagree 25 25.0
5 Strongly disagree 12 12.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION


The above table shows that the 13% of the respondent are strongly agree with the win
cooperation and team work , 19% of the respondent are says that agree, 31% of the
respondent are says that neutral , 25% of the respondent are says that disagree that win
cooperation and team work ,12% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with win
cooperation and team work.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 31% of the workers
are performed in team work in organization.
CHART 4.11
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HELPS TO WIN COOPERATION AND TEAM
WORK

TEAM WORK OF THE RESPONDENT


40
PERCENTAGE

30

20

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
TEAM WORK
TABLE 4.12

THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL IN REDUCING GRIEVANCE


AMONG THE EMPLOYEES

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 28 28.0
4 Disagree 19 19.0
5 Strongly disagree 13 13.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with the
reducing grievance among the employees, 23% of the respondent are says that agree, 28%
of the respondent are says that neutral , 19% of the respondent are says that disagree ,13%
of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with reducing grievance among the
employees.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are helpful reducing the organization.
CHART 4.12

THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL IN REDUCING GRIEVANCE


AMONG THE EMPLOYEES

30
EMPLOYEES OF THE RESPONDENT
25

20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
EMPLOYEES

TABLE 4.13
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL FOR IMPROVING PERSONNEL
SKILL
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 12 12.0
2 Agree 29 29.0
3 Neutral 21 21.0
4 Disagree 21 21.0
5 Strongly disagree 17 17.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 12% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance appraisal is helpful for improving personnel skill , 29% of the respondent are
says that agree, 21% of the respondent are says that neutral , 21% of the respondent are
says that disagree ,17% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree with performance
appraisal is helpful for improving personnel skill.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 29% of the
employees are improving personal skill in the organization.

CHART 4.13
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS HELPFUL FOR IMPROVING PERSONNEL
SKILL

IMPROVING OF THE RESPONDENT


30
25
PERCENTAGE

20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
IMPROVING

TABLE 4.14
TRAINING PROGRAMMERS ARE EFFECTIVE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 9 9.0
2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 32 32.0
4 Disagree 28 28.0
5 Strongly disagree 13 13.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 09% of the respondent are strongly agree with effective
for individual and organization development , 18% of the respondent are says that agree
with effective for individual and organization development , 32% of the respondent are says
that neutral , 28% of the respondent are says that disagree ,13% of the respondent are says
that strongly disagree with effective for individual and organization development.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 32% of the employees
are effective and development in the organization.
CHART 4.14
TRAINING PROGRAMMERS ARE EFFECTIVE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT OF THE RESPONDENT


35
30
25
PERCENTAGE

20
15
10
5
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
DEVELOPMENT

TABLE 4.15
THE PERFORMANCE RATINGS WERE DONE PERIODICALLY

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 20 20.0
3 Neutral 30 30.0
4 Disagree 19 19.0
5 Strongly disagree 14 14.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance ratings were done periodically, 20% of the respondent are says that agree with
performance ratings were done periodically, 30% of the respondent are says that neutral ,
19% of the respondent are says that disagree ,14% of the respondent are says that strongly
disagree with performance ratings were done periodically.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 30% of the employees
are high level of the performance rating in this organization.

CHART 4.15
THE PERFORMANCE RATINGS WERE DONE PERIODICALLY

RATINGS OF THE RESPONDENT


30
25
PERCENTAGE

20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
RATING
TABLE 4.16
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM HELPS TO IDENTIFY THE
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE EMPLOYEE

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 21 21.0
2 Agree 25 25.0
3 Neutral 21 21.0
4 Disagree 22 22.0
5 Strongly disagree 11 11.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 21% of the respondent are strongly agree with identify
the strength and weakness of the employee , 25% of the respondent are says that agree,
21% of the respondent are says that neutral with identify the strength and weakness of the
employee , 22% of the respondent are says that disagree ,11% of the respondent are says
that strongly disagree that identify the strength and weakness of the employee.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 25% of the employees
are strength and weakness of the organization.
CHART 4.16
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM HELPS TO IDENTIFY THE
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE EMPLOYEE

25
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
STRENGTH & WEAKNESS

TABLE 4.17
THE PERFORMANCE RATING IS HELPFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO
PROVIDE EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 15 15.0
2 Agree 21 21.0
3 Neutral 23 23.0
4 Disagree 26 26.0
5 Strongly disagree 15 15.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 15% of the respondent are strongly agree with
management to provide employee counselling, 21% of the respondent are says that agree,
23% of the respondent are says that neutral , 26% of the respondent are says that disagree
,15% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that management to provide employee
counselling.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 26% of the employees
are attened the organization counselling.
CHART 4.17
THE PERFORMANCE RATING IS HELPFUL FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO
PROVIDE EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING
30
EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING OF THE
25
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
COUNSELLING

TABLE 4.18
MANAGEMENT FIXES SALARY THROUGH THE PERFORMANCE RATING

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 14 14.0
2 Agree 20 20.0
3 Neutral 26 26.0
4 Disagree 28 28.0
5 Strongly disagree 12 12.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION


The above table shows that the 14% of the respondent are strongly agree with salary
through the performance rating , 20% of the respondent are says that agree with salary
through the performance rating , 26% of the respondent are says that neutral , 28% of the
respondent are says that disagree ,12% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that
salary through the performance rating.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are fixed salary in this organization.
CHART 4.18
MANAGEMENT FIXES SALARY THROUGH THE PERFORMANCE RATING

30
FIXES SALARY OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
FIXES SALARY

TABLE 4.19
PERFORMANCE RATING HELPS TO FIX INCREMENT
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 11 11.0
2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 31 31.0
4 Disagree 29 29.0
5 Strongly disagree 11 11.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 11% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance rating helps to fix increment , 18% of the respondent are says that agree with
performance rating helps to fix increment, 31% of the respondent are says that neutral , 29%
of the respondent are says that disagree that performance rating helps to fix increment ,11%
of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 31% of the employees
are fixes increment in the organization.
CHART 4.19
PERFORMANCE RATING HELPS TO FIX INCREMENT

FIX INCREMENT OF THE RESPONDENT


35
30
25
PERCENTAGE

20
15
10
5
0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
FIX INCREMENT

TABLE 4.20
TRANSFER, DEMOTION, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL IS BASED ON
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE
RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 16 16.0
2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 24 24.0
4 Disagree 17 17.0
5 Strongly disagree 20 20.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 16% of the respondent are strongly agree with
dismissal is based on performance appraisal, 23% of the respondent are says that agree with
dismissal is based on performance appraisal, 24% of the respondent are says that neutral ,
17% of the respondent are says that disagree ,20% of the respondent are says that strongly
disagree with dismissal is based on performance appraisal.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 24% of the
employees are based performance in the organization.
CHART 4.20
TRANSFER, DEMOTION, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL IS BASED ON
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

25
BASED PERFORMANCE OF THE
RESPONDENT
20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
BASED PERFORMANCE
TABLE 4.21
THE DESIRED TARGET OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 15 15.0
2 Agree 19 19.0
3 Neutral 26 26.0
4 Disagree 20 20.0
5 Strongly disagree 20 20.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 15% of the respondent are strongly agree with
achieved through the performance appraisal, 19% of the respondent are says that agree with
, 26% of the respondent are says that neutral , 20% of the respondent are says that disagree
with achieved through the performance appraisal,20% of the respondent are says that
strongly disagree the achieved through the performance appraisal.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 26% of the
employees are achieve the performance in the organization.
CHART 4.21
THE DESIRED TARGET OF THE ORGANIZATION IS ACHIEVED THROUGH
THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

30
TARGET OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
TARGET

TABLE 4.22
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INCREASES EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 14 14.0
2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 29 29.0
4 Disagree 14 14.0
5 Strongly disagree 20 20.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The above table shows that the 14% of the respondent are strongly agree with
performance appraisal increases employee motivation, 23% of the respondent are says that
agree with , 29% of the respondent are says that neutral , 14% of the respondent are says
that disagree ,20% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that performance
appraisal increases employee motivation.
From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 29% of the employees
are increases the motivation in this organization.
CHART 4.22
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INCREASES EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION

30
MOTIVATION OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
MOTIVATION

TABLE 4.23
APPRAISAL SYSTEM KEEPS ON THE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE
OR SUCCESS OF WORK

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 16 16.0
2 Agree 18 18.0
3 Neutral 22 22.0
4 Disagree 23 23.0
5 Strongly disagree 21 21.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION


The above table shows that the 16% of the respondent are strongly agree with
achievement and failure or success of work, 18% of the respondent are says that agree with
achievement and failure or success of work , 22% of the respondent are says that neutral that
achievement and failure or success of work, 23% of the respondent are says that disagree
,21% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree .

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents 23% of the employees
are achievement and failure in the organization.
CHART 4.23

APPRAISAL SYSTEM KEEPS ON THE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE


OR SUCCESS OF WORK

ACHIEVEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT


25

20
PERCENTAGE

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
ACHIEVEMENT

TABLE 4.24
HAVE A SEPARATE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL RESULT

SL.NO PARTICULAR NO OF THE % OF THE


RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
1 Strongly agree 17 17.0
2 Agree 23 23.0
3 Neutral 28 28.0
4 Disagree 23 23.0
5 Strongly disagree 9 9.0
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION


The above table shows that the 17% of the respondent are strongly agree with review
the performance appraisal result , 23% of the respondent are says that agree , 28% of the
respondent are says that neutral , 23% of the respondent are says that disagree with review
the performance appraisal result ,09% of the respondent are says that strongly disagree that
review the performance appraisal result.

From the above analysis it is interpreted thatmajority of respondents are 28% of the
employees are separate committee in this organization.
CHART 4.24

HAVE A SEPARATE COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE


APPRAISAL RESULT
30
COMMITEE OF THE RESPONDENT
25
PERCENTAGE

20

15

10

0
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
agree disagree
COMMITEE