Contents:
Resources required
• Australians at War – The Thin Khaki Line2 (Duration: 2.01) Note: this clip contains
mild coarse language.
• Kokoda Front Line!3 (Duration: 1.58)
Lesson outline:
Homework/extension
Students explore the Australian Government’s Kokoda website4 to further develop their
understanding of the event. Students should be encouraged to consider the interviews with
Kokoda veterans and their accompanying transcripts. Students can profile a specific Kokoda
veteran, detailing their role at Kokoda and their overall experience.
1
http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Curriculum/ContentDescription/ACDSEH108
2
http://aso.gov.au/titles/tv/australians-at-war/clip1/
3
http://aso.gov.au/titles/newsreels/kokoda-front-line/clip1/
4
http://kokoda.commemoration.gov.au/
17994936 Aamina Younis
It has been said that Kokoda is to World War II as Gallipoli is to World War 1. Students
investigate this statement and develop a well-researched opinion on the matter.
SOURCE: http://www.capthat.com.au/resources/lesson-plans/history
17994936 Aamina Younis
102086 Designing Teaching & Learning 1H 2017
Assignment 2: APST and QT Analysis Template
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following Australian Professional Standards for
Teachers. Only standards directly addressed in Designing Teaching & Learning that are
relevant to this assignment have been included. However, this does not mean the other
standards are irrelevant to lesson planning and evaluation more generally.
Evaluation score – refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Students are required to use their previous work knowledge.
5
1.2 Deep understanding
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Viewing the clip and the group work leads students to demonstrate deep
5 understanding of key concepts. The class discussion can also open up wider questions for
a deeper understanding.
1.3 Problematic knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Clip contains content of race in a different context then now. This part
5 involves comparing different perspectives and is open to questioning based on student
assumptions.
1.4 Higher-order thinking
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: The clip content allows students to demonstrate higher-order thinking as the
5 concept of race is explored. The group work also allows students to undertake a process
of high-order thinking.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Experiences, notions of race, racism, and Australian soldiers are examples of
5 the metalanguage used. Teacher also explains and gets students to start thinking about
these concepts.
1.6 Substantive communication
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: The lesson involves ongoing communication with students via group
5 work and teacher communicates via the class discussion. Though groups who may
17994936 Aamina Younis
finish earlier could use guidance.
Quality learning environment
2.1 Explicit quality criteria
1–2–3–4– Comments: There is no evidence of explicit quality criteria in the lesson. The outcome covers
5 the criteria but there is no evidence of the criteria being discussed and reinforced during the
lesson.
2.2 Engagement
1–2–3–4– Comments: Most of the lesson is engagement between students and teacher. Although there
5 could be disengagement while the group work as students can tend to lose focus if they are
not on task.
2.3 High expectations
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Expectations surrounding the clip content is clearly outlined. Through
5 different lessons processes, it appears students are adhering to the expectations. Could be
thoroughly reinforced.
2.4 Social support
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Group work can be seen as a setting for social support. The teacher provides
5 some social support before viewing the clips.
2.5 Students’ self-regulation
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: No mention of student self-regulations or behaviour. However, the teacher
5 provides an outline before the clips that could have been aimed to regulate student's
behaviour.
2.6 Student direction
1–2–3–4– Comments: The viewing of the clip and group work is based on student directions. With
5 teacher's approval, the students work together and for some part of the lesson they are teacher
dependent.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: The students are asked to remember and incorporate their previous
5 knowledge on the battle. This however could be consistently incorporated into the lesson.
3.2 Cultural knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Minimal reference made about the Kokoda track while discussing the
5 involvement of Australia in the battle. There is scope to talk about the different cultures
during the war as it is a necessity while discussing war.
3.3 Knowledge integration
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: There are connections made between topics/subject areas such as the
5 concept of race and the representation of race back then and now.
3.4 Inclusivity
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: No mention of inclusivity in this lesson plan. There is scope for
5 incorporating an inclusive lesson.
3.5 Connectedness
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Student connectedness through group work where students can incorporate
5 each other's ideas. Class discussion leads the class to connect and connect with the
experiences of the soldiers.
3.6 Narrative
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: The narrative of the battle of Kokoda is the main focus of this lesson.
5 Students are required to understand the narrative of Australia's involvement in the battle.
Section 3: Identifying Areas for Improvement
Identify the two APST standards and two NSW QT model elements you are targeting for
improvement.
APST
1) 1.3 Students with diverse linguistic, cultural, 2) 1.4 Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and
religious and socioeconomic backgrounds Torres Strait Islander students
QT model
1) 1.1 Deep knowledge 2) 3.4 Inclusivity
17994936 Aamina Younis
Lesson Plan
Significant events
and experiences of
Australian at war
(ACDSEH108)
17994936 Aamina Younis
Cross Curriculum themes & General Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
capabilities
Different perspectives
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Empathetic understanding
histories and cultures Significance
Research
General capabilities: Explanation and communication
Critical and creative thinking: question
to think about while viewing the clips,
group task discussions, class discussion
Ethical understanding: Students learn
about the experiences of soldiers
Information and communication
technology capabilities (ICT): lesson
focused on the clips and group task
research
Intercultural understanding: students
learn about the world war and the
countries involved in this particular
battle
Literacy: Venn diagram results and
students will formulate the answers to
the questions given
Resources:
Whiteboard/Whiteboard markers
Teacher shows class two video Teacher: Hands out worksheet with the Student
10 minutes clips twice. Students must fill Venn Diagram with clear instructions.
out the Venn diagram Teacher needs to make sure everything
provided. Teacher should is scaffolded so students do not go off
make sure that students fill out task. Plays video clips for students
the Venn Diagram based on twice.
the following questions:
The duration of both clips is
1) What do these clips approximately two minutes.
tells us about the
experience of soldiers (NOTE: Teacher should be aware of
on the Kokoda trial? students with diverse backgrounds
2) Compare the two because of the race sensitivity. As the
different video clip contains some mild course
representations of language, teacher should seek out
these experiences in religious or cultural background
the two clips. Identify students to give a warning as they may
how their different be sensitive).
intentions, as well as
the years in which they Student: Students view the clip while
were released, affect filling out the Venn Diagram. View the
the representation. clip a second time making sure they
are filling out their diagram.
Note: Teacher should tell the
class that they will be splitting Resources:
up into groups to discuss their Australians at War – The Thin Khaki
Venn Diagram and questions Line (Duration: 2.01) Note: this clip
after viewing the clips twice. contains mild coarse language.
http://aso.gov.au/titles/tv/australians-
at-war/clip1/
10 minutes In groups of four, students Teacher: Teacher splits students into Student
share their Venn Diagrams groups of four while trying to include
and discuss the two questions. at least one Indigenous student into
1) What do these clips each group (if possible).
tells us about the Teacher should implement the Peer
experience of soldiers Tutoring Strategy based on the
on the Kokoda trial? teacher's knowledge of students with
2) Compare the two diverse linguistic, cultural, religious
different and socioeconomic backgrounds. That
representations of is to pair high performing students
these experiences in with students who may be struggling
the two clips. Identify because of various reasons.
how their different
intentions, as well as Teacher should walk around the
the years in which they classroom ensuring that the students
were released, affect are focused on the task at hand and
the representation. assist the students where needed.
Teacher should also give the Peer
Tutoring pairs more scaffolding or any
other students who may be less capable
(i.e. students with diverse
backgrounds)
13 minutes Students conduct research on Teacher: Teacher gives instructions for Student
the internet about Indigenous the research task, reminding the
soldiers that took park in the students of the time given. Teacher
Kokoda trial campaign and tells students the importance of
their experience. incorporating the experiences of
Indigenous people that also leads to
(ACHHS168, 186) empathetic and intercultural
understanding of cultures
(ACHHS172). The teacher should
scaffold this task if needed for students
having difficulty using ICT or finding
information. (In this case, teacher can
give out a couple of websites that will
help the students to research i.e.
https://www.dva.gov.au/i-
am/aboriginal-andor-torres-strait-
islander/indigenous-australians-war).
17994936 Aamina Younis
Resources: Whiteboard
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this lesson?
Through this teaching and learning process of preparing and modifying a original lesson plan, I
have learned a lot about the standards under which the lesson plans are created. The APST and
NSW QT model are so important and every teacher needs to make sure they are incorporating these
standards in their pedagogies and lesson plans. This assessment has enabled me to understand the
teaching process much better and has increased my knowledge on how to incorporate standards into
my own lesson plans. As I am constantly learning new processes as a future teacher, this process
has set me on the right path. Incorporating the modifications was not easy but using the syllabus as
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this
lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the key
WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
The risk issues that may arise in this lesson is the safety of using the computers (ICT
resource) for the research task. The teacher must walk around and be aware of what
the students are researching on the internet. Another issue that may arise is the
sensitivity of certain students when viewing the clips and discussing the concept of
race. This is where the teacher must be aware of the diverse students in the classroom
so she can address this issue or a warning to the students.
12
Academic Justification
The Stage 10 History Lesson Plan was modified to meet two standards of APST and two standards
of the NSW Quality Teaching Model. The original lesson plan was not sufficient enough in
incorporating the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers or the Quality Teaching Model.
The following will provide a justification as to why the lesson plan was modified.
Addressing the standard 1.3 and 1.4 of the APST was important because the lesson plan did not
address students with diverse linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds. It is
crucial that teachers know their students and how they learn. Therefore, they need to have
knowledge about cultural diversity or any religious and socioeconomic background which is
beyond just being aware of differences. It is important for teachers to know the facts, and the
differences between cultures in order to ensure classroom practices do not offend, discriminate or
single out any culture in any way. The lesson plan was modified in respect to diverse students. The
content in the video clips shown in class such as the mild coarse language, may be sensitive to
many students in respect to their culture or religious background. Therefore, the modified lesson
plan included support and warning from the teacher to these students. The teacher must be aware of
sensitive issues that may upset or offend a student. It also makes a huge difference if teachers are
aware of the diversity in their class in order for them to present the correct information to the
population of diverse students. Sometimes the knowledge that teachers contain may be based upon
what they hear through the media or popular culture (Gay, 2002). If teachers have an informed
approach to diversity in the classroom, they can ensure culturally responsive teaching (Gay, 2002).
Teachers need to be aware that while they may be differentiating their lessons or strategies, it
should not focus or deliver to the inferior or dominant learning experience (Westwood, 2011).The
modification made to fit under the standard 1.4, the strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres
13
Strait Islander students reflects on Westwood's (2011) approach. The original lesson plan did not
include anything about the Indigenous culture even though as a History lesson plan it should
to incorporate Indigenous studies in the modified lesson plan was for the students to conduct their
own ICT research about Indigenous soldiers and their involvement in the Kokoda battle campaign.
This strategy gets all students involved in Indigenous history and allows Indigenous students not to
feel like the inferior. This activity ensures a balance in both cultures. Harkins (1990) refers to
Indigenous students feeling shy that could lead to academic failure. This activity links to the NSW
If it is possible to incorporate the Peer Tutoring Strategy in the classroom, the teacher can
implement this to achieve an inclusive classroom in respect to QT standard 3.4 of inclusivity. The
lesson plan was modified to include this strategy in addition to the group work. This is because
Indigenous students may feel more comfortable expressing their views while working in a pair
rather than a larger group. This allows all diverse students, not only Indigenous to voice their views
on the topic. Psychologist Vygotsky advocated the effectiveness of this strategy as it allows
autonomous learning (Urbano, 2011). This strategy allows intercultural understanding and
empathic understanding between students which allows for a deeper understanding of the key
concepts of the subject. This strategy has also been proven to be effective for students who have
low self-esteem or struggle with communication skills (Killen, 2013). Therefore, this strategy can
be seen effective under the standard of 3.4 as it leads for an inclusive classroom and environment.
The last modification to the lesson plan relates back to the whole lesson. Under the QT standard 1.1
deep knowledge, brainstorming the student's previous knowledge was incorporated. For students to
gain a deeper level of knowledge in the classroom, the class activities and the interactions between
14
the students generates a deeper understanding. For example, tasks should require students to
formulate their own explanations and ideas to set questions (Hacker, 2000). The teacher scaffolds
all the material so students do not go off task leads to a deeper understanding because they stay
focused on the set task. During the video clips, the use of the Venn diagram was incorporates to
assist students to draw out the similarities and differences while thinking about the proposed
questions in order to gain a deeper knowledge. This engages students in deeper understanding of
the topic because it is not simple viewing the video and answering questions but rather it gets them
thinking into the elements of the video and they form answers based on that analysis.
15
References
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022487102053002003
Hacker, J. D., Niedherhauser, S. D. (2000). Promoting Deep and Durable Learning in the Online
Classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 53- 63. Retrieved
from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/10.1002/tl.848/epdf
Harkins, J. (1990). Shame and shyness in the Aboriginal classroom: A case for practical semantics.
Killen, R. (2013). Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice (6th Ed.).
Urbano, L., (2011). Scaffolding and Peer-learning: Thinking about Vygotsky's ‘Zone of Proximal
from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/10.1080/19404150109546651
16
Learning Portfolio Web Link URL: http://ayounis.weebly.com
17