82073 iF LEGALLOGIC. Copyright Pbilipsines 205 ——- FRANC}S JUDINS N. EVANGELISTA v nsiongsirre.aauvo AIL Rights Feserved [No pat of his Book may be reproced in any fashion without permision from the authors. In adr fo trace unauthorized Feproductiv the authors have inchidea insgsicat errors Ahroxghowt this material ISBN 978-971-0115900-4 Bus Published in 205, Conn ok Supply ‘a Peis Baling. Quszon Aver, Qaezen Cy bie tte FOREWORD 1 veould be tie 1 stese the Imputtonce of Jog in the stuuly and procice of law. ter atl, 98 Sie Ealwand Coe hoe verter, “roo i the eo ea.” W is quite sping then hat fesal reasoning has received scant attention tea our egal ‘scoters and scholar, ‘The tools of legal loge ate indispensable fo ta student fn analyzing eases and problems axl in presenting thelr arguments fn aking the bay, examines age exhort to eesent their answers in «logical maniser In the practi of lta the administration of juste, the avecate and the dge wil soon realize that the persuasive power of tual and appellate arguments and of judicial decisions ts socked lit logeal ‘organization, In fine, legal logic is etc to success in tow scot in the bar examination, an i fegal practice. ‘The nuthous deserve stong commendation for hei work whlch should be requind reacting for law students md professors a5 well as forthe members ofthe bench and the bar ‘Lega eduention should place more emphasis onthe acquisition of egal shi and competencies rather than onthe te ‘memorization and regurgitation of legal res. The pulicaion of this book isa salient stp in his disecton Ally. MANUELR, RIGUERA ‘Montz Legal Education BortMESSAGE “Those who sil ellove that any legal wasoning shoul be gud by the principles of lage wl beni eam his tok. Widh lear nguage, “the boule esses ond itastates through actual Supine Court decisions what rakes any easoningin law valli inv or fallacious, We teaches la} reasoning shill in a sf for better thon “hat of some a schol Prof. RENATO 8. MANALOTO Lawyer and Feat, Dyer Pioy Una Pippin «Dion MESSAGE Fray + textbook on lyl logic that 6 spetically “signe foe Flip law stems. Wiis dear and enganze Presentation ofthe ceneepts and principles of il tage and use ‘of examples involeng actual tel cases i he country this werk ‘wit surely euke the study of legal reasoning, mow engoging, Prucuctive, and enjoyable fr Filipino ta sents, [Congratulations to the authors ofthis estbowk, Deals Joli Evangsinta and At, David Robert Aquino, fa job well one! What hey ave accomplished isan ingptation to anyone thinking of making Phiippine education more elevant and reaningfl or Filipino students. Dr. NAPOLEON M. MAAQUIAO, Jk Atacl Preset Paogay Deta Soe Usiesiy “Mone‘TABLE OF CONTENTS: FOREWORD, Atty Meet R Riguera Member Le eat Bo MESSAGES: Prof. Reno B, Mavatoto Layers Ect prt of Psp tf he ips Di 1 Napoleon M. Mabeguio, Je “sce Des of Py Det Sole Ua = me INTRODUCTION Chapter o Intl gic and Law om sal Res n 0° Argusnen sen Expression of Roos Recognining Argunents Components of Legal Reasoning vali gal Resoving, Chspter 2 Paaett Co pisinLegl Reaming Burden of Pro tence Relevance and Admissibility Testy of nesses Expert Testimony Examination Depenatencr ot Patents Chapters Daductive Rosoning i ane Deduction end Induction Sytem Types of Syllosisms Categories Spogicas Es Pa 4 2% a 26