Student’s Name ___________________________________________________________
Pediatric SPA Intervention Grading Rubric
Intervention Plan Grading Criteria Skill Level Demonstrated
Rebekah Strobel Below Meets Outstanding expectations Expectations +.5-2pt. -.5 – 3pts. 1. Demographic information, diagnosis, concerns, x precautions, reason for referral, therapist’s name 2. Occupational Profile +1.25 States comprehensive understanding of occ. Hx, experiences, patterns of daily living, interests, values, and needs & reason x for seeking services. strengths and weaknesses (person) identified potential areas of occupation disruption identified Supports and barriers (context & environment) identified Parent’s Priorities & concerns for intervention identified 3. Analysis of occupational performance +.5 Assets & px more specifically identified from observation Actual performance data described from observation x Performance analyzed & identified priorities supported Identified targeted outcomes – Need to relate the targeted occupations to overall outcomes (table 9 OTPF) Concise, cogent and comprehensive narrative 4. Problems prioritized +1 x 5. Identifies two personal supports/strengths X Appropriately identify two specific personal factors (client factors/performance skills) that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 6. Identifies two contextual supports/strengths X Appropriately identify two specific contextual factors that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 7. Identifies two activity demand supports/strengths X Appropriately identify two specific activity demands that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 8. Identifies two personal barriers/limitations X Appropriately identify two specific personal factors (client factors/performance skills) that are limiting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 9. Identifies two environmental barriers/limitations X Appropriately identify two specific contextual factors that are limiting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 10. Identifies two activity demand barriers/limitations x Appropriately identify two specific activity demands that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) Student’s Name ___________________________________________________________ 11. Correctly writes two long term goals Good job – in goal #1 X need to add and sustain interaction and it’s perfect! Uses COAST/SMART format +1.5 Outcomes emphasize function 12. Correctly writes two short term goals for each long term x goal 1. Good say Improve pincher grasp – and if you have min assist you don’t need accuracy. 2 – What skill are you working on here? Same as above 3 – Just approach? I would add approach get attention and initiate interaction….#4 good – this is sustaining and interaction though – your previous STG was inititating. Uses COAST/SMART format (includes 6th item – Contributing client factor or performance skill) Outcomes emphasize function 13. Correctly identifies FofR/ practice model and rationale with X each STG – I would use social participation or behavior acquisition for #4 – MOHO tell you WHAT to focus on but you +1.5 need a supporting model that directs HOW you will address the issue. Write a rationale & explain how and why you chose the model(s) to address this specific short term goal and how it addresses the contributing ‘client factor/performance skill’ stated in STG that is problematic in client performing specific occupation targeted in the goal. 14. Correctly identifies intervention approach(es)/ type(s) x 15. Correctly identifies 3 relevant outcomes x 16. Lists person(s) developing plan and date x 17. Spelling/Grammar +2 Clearly communicates information x Checks spelling Grading Rubric Student “meets expectations” in all criterion categories = 138/150 (~92/100) Add 2 points for each box marked “outstanding” +7.75 Subtract 3 points for reach box marked “below expectations” -0 145.75/150 = 97% Students Final Grade = 218.25/225 total pts. SPA Total Points: 300 (75 pts. interview/225 written documentation) Written SPA: 218.25 Interview: 68.25 Total SPA Score: 286.5/300 = 95.5%