net/publication/315707102
Exploration and discovery: Use models carefully, think laterally, avoid dogma
CITATIONS READS
0 248
1 author:
Jeffrey Hedenquist
University of Ottawa
149 PUBLICATIONS 6,535 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jeffrey Hedenquist on 30 March 2017.
Jeffrey W. Hedenquist
Ottawa, Canada
GSN: Reno, February 2017 SEG Honorary Lecturer
Residual
(vuggy) pH 0.2
quartz
Acid Stream,
pH ≥0.6
Jeffrey Hedenquist 1
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Intermediate
sulfidation
Au-Ag
Base of
advanced argillic
lithocap
Porphyry
Cu-Au
Sillitoe, 2010
Economic Geology
Yanacocha, Peru
Chaquicocha
Jeffrey Hedenquist 2
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
pH 1-2,
H2SO4 Quartz-alunite,
barren
HCl
Base of lithocap
Sillitoe, 2010
Quartz-alunite
IS veins
Base of lithocap
Porphyry
Cu (Au) Intermediate: Lower T
Sillitoe, 2010 magmatic, <10 wt% NaCl
• White mica (up to
pyrophyllite) (≤350oC)
• Straight qtz veins, halo
• Metals (shallow HS ore,
marginal IS veins)
Jeffrey Hedenquist 3
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
dacite pyroclastics
volcaniclastic
basement
Lepanto
fault
Jeffrey Hedenquist 4
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
<50 ppb Au
Dickite ±
kaolinite
Quartz-
alunite
Dickite ±
kaolinite X Silicic
structures,
1 km 1-4 g/t Au
Chang et al., 2011
Alteration and
Mineralization
Buaki
porphyry FSE porphyry: 892
Mt @ 0.5% Cu &
0.7 g/t Au
Victoria IS veins, 11
Mt @ 7.3 g/t Au +
Ag-Cu-Pb-Zn
Guinaoang
porphyry, 500
Teresa IS veins, 0.8 Mt @ 0.4% Cu
Mt @ 5.74 g/t Au & 0.4 g/t Au
Nayak veins
1 km
Mohong Hill
porphyry + HS
Chang et al., 2011
Jeffrey Hedenquist 5
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
1.8-2.2 Ma
2 cm
1.45 Ma
1 g/t Au
0.7% Cu Mo
Jeffrey Hedenquist 6
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Discovery histories:
all associated with residual qtz lithocaps
http://www.iamgold.com/presentations2006.asp
Jeffrey Hedenquist 7
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
1991
10 holes, 1869 m, av. 185 m
Yanacocha, Peru
residual qtz
lithocap, Au ox
Carachugo
Diatreme
breccia w/
porphyry Cu
fragments
2 km
Jeffrey Hedenquist 8
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Alteration distribution
Diatreme
breccia w/
porphyry Cu
fragments,
0.2% Cu
“Stacked” lithocaps!
Strong lithologic
control to
residual quartz
llithocap: tuffs
Jeffrey Hedenquist 9
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
http://www.iamgold.com/presentations2006.asp
Jeffrey Hedenquist 10
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Loma Larga, ~ 3.3 Moz Au (2.1 Moz at 6.5 g/t Au, ~4 g/t cutoff, UG):
Know the stratigraphy! Drill sufficiently deep to test system
Geometry of lithocaps
(and high sulf’dn ore)
§ Lithocap: lithology-related
residual (vuggy) quartz + Lithology-
advanced argillic alteration controlled
horizon (“ledge”) lithocap
Mineralization
§ Structure-controlled feeder (enargite + Au)
zone
§ All lithocaps have feeders – Structure-
controlled
but not all feeders have
lithocaps (cf., Summitville)
§ Where mineralized, feeders
have higher grade than
lithocaps
Sillitoe, 1995
Chang and White, 2005
Hedenquist and Taran, 2013
Jeffrey Hedenquist 11
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
1997, 2000
(2002, 2004)
ARUNTANI
2008: CHUCAPACA
Jeffrey Hedenquist 12
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
0.4 Moz Au
2 Moz Au
High sulf’dn
High sulf’dn
Ag-Pb-Zn interm.
sulf’dn veins
Jeffrey Hedenquist 13
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
6.6 ± 0.2
7.1 ± 0.2
Eruptive center
Arichua And 7.16 ± 0.22
Antajarane And Alunite
Huilcane And/Dac
Tucari And/Dac
Rhyodac QFP
Rhyodac domes
Rhyodac tuffs
Ichujasi And Aruntani: radiometric ages (m.y.)
Maure basin seds
France et al. 1985, Bradford, 1999, unpublished, 2004
5240
m
NW-SE section
through dome
>0.25
g/t Au
Jeffrey Hedenquist 14
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Jeffrey Hedenquist 15
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Lago
Titicaca
Chucapaca
Aruntani
50 km
Jeffrey Hedenquist 16
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
W E
1.3 km
350 m
100E
300W
g/t Au 700W
Looking North
Jeffrey Hedenquist 17
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
http://pilotgold.com/ , 2012
Kunk qtz-
alunite
Gustafson et al.,
2004 Paleozoic-Mesozoic
sedimentary rocks
Co. Corona
Perol-Cocanes
Cerro
Yanacocha 16-21 Ma
Galeno
8-12 Ma
Kupfertal Michiquillay
Jeffrey Hedenquist 18
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
Patchy (dickite)
- pyrophyllite in
valleys; white
mica transition;
Porphyry stockwork veins
Cu-Au?
Sillitoe, 2010
Jeffrey Hedenquist 19
Epithermal and porphyry exploration: Dogma vs Discovery GSN Reno, February 2017
• Established in 1920
• Over 7,000 members in 105 countries
• 65% industry, 20% students, 15% research
45%
40% Locations of Members
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Benefits of Membership
Education & Training Curriculum
- Short Courses & Workshops
- Field Courses
Conferences & Symposia
Publications
- Economic Geology (1905, 8 issues / yr)
Traveling Lecturers Program - SEG Newsletter (4 issues / yr)
- Books & Maps
Networking with Professionals
Foundation Support for
Students
- Grants, Fellowships
- Student Field Trips
- Student Chapters
- Mentoring
Jeffrey Hedenquist 20
View publication stats