A JH
Safety and efficacy of rapid (1,000 mg in 1 hr) intravenous
iron dextran for treatment of maternal iron deficient anemia
of pregnancy
Lee Wong,1 Samuel Smith,1 Marisa Gilstrop,2 Richard Derman,2 Sarah Auerbach,3 Nicola London,1 Steven Lenowitz,1
Huzefa Bahrain,4 Jessica McClintock,1 and Michael Auerbach5*
Maternal iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is associated with risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Oral iron is
recommended to reverse anemia, but has gastrointestinal toxicity and frequent non-adherence. Intravenous
(IV) iron is reserved for intolerance of, or unresponsiveness to, oral therapy, malabsorption, and severe
anemia (1% with hemoglobin [Hgb] levels <7 g/dL). With rare (<100 per one million) adverse events (AEs)
ability to infuse a sufficient dose of low molecular weight iron dextran (LMWID) over 60 min, LMWID is an
attractive option. This study demonstrated safety and efficacy of rapid IV infusion of 1,000 mg LMWID to
gravidas with moderate to severe IDA. An observational treatment study of 1,000 mg LMWID administered
over 1 hr for IDA in 189 consecutive, unselected second and third trimester gravidas after oral iron failure
was conducted. All received a test dose of 25 mg LMWID and were monitored for AEs during the 60-min
infusion. No premedication was administered unless more than one drug allergy or asthma was present in
which case IV methylprednisolone was administered. All were followed through pregnancy and delivery.
Monitored parameters included Hgb, mean corpuscular volume, serum ferritin, and percent transferrin
saturation. About 189 subjects received 1,000 mg LMWID. No serious AEs occurred. About 2% experienced
transient infusion reactions. Hgb improved by 1–1.9 g/dL in 82% and 2 g/dL in 24%. Second trimester
treatment was not associated with greater Hgb improvement than third trimester treatment. Anemia
resolved in 95%. Administration of a single large dose of IV LMWID was effective, safe, and convenient.
Am. J. Hematol. 91:590–593, 2016. V
C 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
䊏 Introduction
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) has been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight,
and small-for-gestational age infants [1–3]. Children born to iron-deficient mothers demonstrate lower cognitive function, memory, and motor
development [4–6] recognizable up to 10 years after iron repletion. Maternal iron deficiency potentially affects fetal, neonatal, and childhood brain
growth and development with adverse effects on myelination, neurotransmitters, and brain programming [7]. The prevalence of IDA in pregnancy
can reach 8.2% in the second trimester and 27.4% in the third trimester, especially in minority, low-income populations [8]. A recent global esti-
mate of anemia reported a prevalence of 38% in pregnant women, 29% in non-pregnant women, and 43% in children [9,10].
Oral iron is standard for preventing and treating iron deficiency in pregnancy. Although daily oral supplementation is simple to use and inex-
pensive, there is a high incidence of gastrointestinal side effects and poor adherence to therapy. Whereas dose reduction and modifications in diet,
both of which require adherence, may partially manage the side effects, up to 70% to whom oral iron is prescribed report gastrointestinal distress
[11]. A study of adherence and side effects of three ferrous sulfate regimens in anemic pregnant women in clinical trials concluded the incidence
of gastrointestinal side effects was unacceptably high [12,13].
While numerous publications report the safety and efficacy of IV iron during pregnancy its use is sporadic at best, largely reserved for women
who are intolerant of, or unresponsive to, oral therapy, with malabsorption syndromes and who are severely anemic [14]. This reluctance is at
least in part due to the fact that no IV formulation had been assigned Pregnancy Category A by the Food and Drug Administration, persistent
fears of anaphylactic reactions to parenteral iron preparations, and the misperception among clinicians that the incidence and severity of infusion
reactions is unacceptably high [15].
The availability of an IV iron preparation with a favorable safety profile that is convenient to administer is likely to result in a decrement in ane-
mia rates in pregnancy and improve maternal and fetal outcomes. The ability to safely infuse up to 1,000 mg over 60 min makes LMWID an attrac-
tive option to treat maternal IDA. A recent analysis of over thirty million doses of IV iron reported that the overall frequency of adverse drug
events is extremely low at less than 100 events per million doses administered [16]. Further analysis revealed that most of these events occurred
with high molecular weight iron dextran as compared with low molecular weight iron dextran (LMWID) (OR 5.5, 95% CI). The Cochrane Review
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care
Health System, Newark, Delaware; 3West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, West Virginia; 4Auerbach Hematology and Oncology, Baltimore, Mary-
land; 5Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
Conflict of interest: Dr. Auerebach and Bahrain have received data management funding (only) for clinical trials from AMAG Pharma and Pharmacosmos.
No principal investigator fees or start-up fees were provided and any travel related to study was paid by the investigators.
*Correspondence to: Michael Auerbach; 5233 King Ave #308, Baltimore, MD 21237. E-mail: mauerbachmd@abhemonc.com
Received for publication: 22 February 2016; Revised: 5 March 2016; Accepted: 7 March 2016
Am. J. Hematol. 91:590–593, 2016.
Published online: 11 March 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24361
590 American Journal of Hematology, Vol. 91, No. 6, June 2016 doi:10.1002/ajh.24361
RESEARCH ARTICLE Intravenous Iron for Maternal Iron Deficient Anemia
TABLE I. Descriptive Statistics TABLE II. Change in Mean Hemoglobin and MCV from Diagnosis to Deliv-
ery by Trimester of Treatment
Study measure Result
All Second Third
Total number of patients 189 patients trimester trimester
Patients treated in second trimester 27
Patients treated in third trimester 162 Number of patients 189 27 162
Mean days from diagnosis to delivery (SD) 58.6 (42.6) Mean change in 1.40 (0.09)* 1.39 (0.18)* 1.40 (0.07)*
Mode of delivery hemoglobin (SE)
Cesarean section (% of total) 68 (36%) Mean change in MCV (SE) 1.61 (0.37)* 3.27 (0.77)* 1.34 (0.30)*
Vaginal (% of total) 121 (64%)
a
Gestational age at delivery *P <0.0001 for change from diagnosis to delivery.
<37 weeks (%) 20 (11%)
37–41 weeks (%) 169 (89%)
doi:10.1002/ajh.24361 American Journal of Hematology, Vol. 91, No. 6, June 2016 591
Wong et al. RESEARCH ARTICLE
These new formulations have been used in recent years for treat-
ment of iron deficient anemia in oral iron intolerant gravidas [28,29].
The results of our study, as well as the preponderance of published
evidence, corroborate these data, and support the favorable side effect
profile of IV iron.
The IV formulations available for use in pregnancy include iron
sucrose, ferric gluconate, LMW iron dextran, and ferric carboxymal-
tose (FCM). Their safety and efficacy are similar [16,30,31]. Iron
sucrose and ferric gluconate require multiple visits since doses
exceeding 200 mg are associated with frequent unpleasant infusion
reactions [32]. In contrast, LMW iron dextran and FCM can be
administered as a complete replacement dose in a single setting. We
recently reported the safety and efficacy of 1,000 mg of LMW iron
dextran administered over 1 hr in 1,266 infusions to 888 patients,
Figure 1. Change in mean hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) 6 SE from
diagnosis to delivery to postpartum follow up. [Color figure can be viewed 162 of whom were pregnant [18]. Over a 4-week median follow-up,
in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.] the mean hemoglobin increased significantly by 1.5 g/dL (95% CI:
0.79–1.65; P < 0.0001). No red cell transfusions were required. Thir-
study of 1,266 infusions of LMWID (INFeD, Actavis) in 888 subjects, teen minor infusion reactions resolved without therapy and no SAEs
164 of whom were pregnant. No serious adverse events (AEs) were were reported. These data are consistent with that reported by Ayub
observed [18]. Two recent studies in pregnant women greater than 12 et al., who treated 100 iron-deficient pregnant women with a total
weeks gestation with documented iron deficiency found consistent dose infusion of LMWID without any serious AEs [20].
results, that a total parenteral iron replacement with LMWID or mul- The safety and efficacy of total dose infusions of iron dextran have
tiple infusions of iron sucrose are effective and safe in gravidas been reported in thousands of pregnant women [33,34]. Recently
[20,21]. Myers et al., compared LMWID and FCM for the treatment of iron
Anemia affects up to 42% of pregnant women [14,22]. Iron defi- deficiency in 92 oral iron intolerant second and third trimester gravi-
ciency during pregnancy is associated with a two-fold increased inci- das [29]. All responded with no clinically significant toxicity reported.
dence of preterm labor and three-fold increase in the incidence of These data were consistent with an Australian study reporting similar
low birth weight [23]. If iron deficiency and heavy vaginal bleeding efficacy and safety with FCM for ID in pregnancy [35]. The incre-
are present at the beginning of pregnancy, the incidence of preterm mental increase in Hb when LMWID was administered in either the
labor is increased five-fold [1]. About 20 of 189 patients (10.6%) second or third trimester was numerically significant in our study
delivered preterm, similar to the hospital average for this period. population, corroborating previous publications [36–39]. Although
Recent data suggests that iron deficient neonates have delayed growth there is data to suggest correction of iron deficiency results in
and development and a statistically significantly increased incidence improvements of quality of life measures prior to correction of hemo-
of behavioral and cognitive abnormalities up to 10 years after iron globin, our study was not designed to measure these parameters.
repletion [3,4]. Whereas routine screening for anemia, with a com- The results of this series support the convenience, safety, and effi-
plete blood count, is recommended by both the American College of cacy of a single infusion of 1,000 mg of LMWID as therapy for iron
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and United States Preventa- deficiency of pregnancy. Anemia resolved in 95% of patients. We
tive Services Task Force (USPSTF), additional screening studies to believe IV iron should be administered as soon as oral iron intoler-
identify iron deficiency are not routinely recommended in the ance occurs or as front line therapy to those in whom oral iron is
absence of anemia [24]. It is well recognized that many pregnant known to be ineffective or harmful.
women lack sufficient iron stores. Published evidence reports 58% of This study was observational in a single large ambulatory hematol-
nulliparous college freshman have no stainable iron in their marrows ogy practice. While there was no control group, all patients were
[25]. intolerant of oral iron and our data supports the preponderance of
Both the Center for Disease Control and ACOG recommend low- published evidence. Many patients in our series were from poor com-
dose iron supplementation for all pregnant women [26]. Oral iron is munities and postpartum follow-up with repeat iron parameters was
front line therapy for iron deficient gravidas. It is inexpensive, easy to only partial. The data is limited to those items maintained in the de-
obtain and effective if taken. However, oral iron is associated with identified data base. To address this limitation we are currently pre-
poor absorption and adherence. Up to 70% of patients report gastro- paring the results of the first United States prospective study of IV
intestinal side effects, most commonly metallic taste, nausea, vomiting iron in oral iron intolerant gravidas (FDA IND 114696).
and constipation [11,27]. In second and third trimester gravidas who
are already constipated due to elevated progesterone levels slowing 䊏 Acknowledgment
bowel transit and the gravid uterus pressing posteriorly on the rec-
Statistical support was provided by Pharmacosmos, Holbaek,
tum, constipation with oral iron can be particularly burdensome.
Denmark.
592 American Journal of Hematology, Vol. 91, No. 6, June 2016 doi:10.1002/ajh.24361
RESEARCH ARTICLE Intravenous Iron for Maternal Iron Deficient Anemia
8. Scholl T. Iron status during pregnancy: Setting dextran (INFeD) for the treatment of iron defi- nancy: Intravenous route versus oral route. Am
the stage for mother and infant. Am J Clin Nutr cient anemia. Am J Hematol 2011;86:860–862. J Obstet Gynecol 2001;186:518–522.
2005;81:1218S–1222S. [PMID:15883455] 19. Avni T, Bieber A, Grossman A, et al. The safety 29. Myers B, Myers A, Moore J. Comparative effi-
9. Stevens G, Finucane M, De-Regil L, et al. of intravenous iron preparations: Systematic cacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxy-
Global, regional, and national trends in haemo- review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; maltose (Ferrinject) and iron(III) hydroxide
globin concentration and prevalence of total and 90:12–23. dextran (Cosmofer) in pregnancy. Obstet Med
severe anaemia in children and pregnant and 20. Ayub R, Tariq N, Adil M, et al. Efficacy and 2012;5:105–107.
non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: A system- safety of total dose infusion of low molecular 30. Auerbach M, Al Talib K. Low-molecular weight
atic analysis of population-representative data. weight iron dextran in the treatment of iron iron dextran and iron sucrose have similar com-
Lancet Glob Health 2013;1:e16–e25. deficiency anemia during pregnancy. J Coll Phy- parative safety profiles in chronic kidney dis-
10. Reveiz L, Gyte G, Cuervo L, et al. Treatments sician Surg Pak 2008;18:4242427. ease. Kidney Int 2008;73:528–530.
for iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy 21. Kochhar P, Kaundal A, Ghosh P. Intravenous 31. Auerbach M, Kane R. Caution in making infer-
(Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;10: iron sucrose versus oral iron in treatment of ences from FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting Sys-
CD003094. [PMID:21975735] iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: A tem. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2012;69:922–923.
11. Souza A, Batista F, Bresani C. Adherence and randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 32. Chandler G, Harchowal J, Macdougall I. Intra-
side effects of three ferrous sulfate treatment 2013;39:504–510. venous iron sucrose: Establishing a safe dose.
regimens on anemic pregnant women in clinical 22. Reveiz L, Gyte G, Cuervo L, et al. Treatments Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:988–991.
trials. Cad Saude Publica 2009;6:1225–1233. for Iron-Deficiency Anaemia in Pregnancy. The 33. Kanakaraddi V, Hoskatti C, Nadig V, et al.
12. Van Wyck D, Martens M, Seid M, et al. Intrave- Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford, UK: Wiley and Comparative therapeutic study of T.D.I. and
nous ferric carboxymaltose compared with oral Sons; 2012. I.M. injections of iron dextran in anemia.
iron in the treatment of postpartum anemia: A 23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Assoc Physicians India 1973;21:849–854.
randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol Recommendations to prevent and control iron 34. Varde K. Treatment of 300 cases of iron defi-
2007;110:267–278. deficiency in the United States. MMWR ciency of pregnancy by total dose infusion of
13. Dhanani J, Ganguly B, Chauhan L. Comparison Recomm Rep 1998;47:1–29. iron-dextran complex. BJOG 1964;71:919–922.
of efficacy and safety of two parenteral iron 24. Cantor A, Bougatsos C, Dana M, et al. Routine 35. Froessler B, Collingwood J. Hodyl. Intravenous
preparations in pregnant women. J Pharmacol iron supplementation and screening for iron ferric carboxymaltose for anaemia pregnancy.
Pharmcother 2012;3:314–319. deficiency anemia in pregnancy: A systematic BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:115–119.
14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecol- review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task 36. Cook JD. Iron deficiency anemia. Bailieres Clin
ogists. ACO Practice Bulletin No. 95: Anemia in Force. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:566–576. Hematol 1994;7:787.
pregnancy. Obstets Gynecol 2008;112:201–207. 25. Beutler E, Robson M, Buttenwieser E. A com- 37. Alleyne M, Horne M, Miller J. Individualized
15. Auerbach M, Ballard H, Glaspy J. Clinical parison of the serum iron iron-binding capacity, treatment for iron-deficiency anemia in adults.
update: Intravenous iron for anemia. Lancet sternal marrow iron and other methods in the Am J Med 2008;121:943–948.
2007;369:1502–1504. clinical evaluation of iron stores. Ann Intern 38. Schrier S, Auerbach M. Treatment of Anemia
16. Chertow G, Mason P, Vaage-Nilson O, et al. On Med 1958;48:60–82. Due to Iron Deficiency. In: Basow D, editor.
the relative safety of parenteral iron formula- 26. Adebisi O, Strayhorn G. Anemia in pregnancy UpToDate,UpToDate. Waltham, MA: Walters
tions. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:1571– and race in the United States: Blacks at risk. Kluwer; 2013.
1575. Fam Med 2005;37:655–662. 39. Rosso P. Nutrition and Metabolism in Preg-
17. Markova V, Norgaard A, Jorgensen K, et al. 27. Tolkien Z, Stecher L, Mander A, et al. Ferrous nancy: Mother and Fetus. Food and Agriculture
Treatment for women with postpartum iron sulfate supplementation causes significant gas- Organization of the United Nations. New York,
deficiency anemia. Cochrane Database of Syst trointestinal side-effects in adults: A systematic NY: Oxford University Press Inc.; 1990, p 27.
Rev 2015;(4):CD004222. review and meta-analysis. Plos One 2015;10:
18. Auerbach M, Pappadakis J, Bahrain H, et al. e0117383.
Safety and efficacy of rapidly administered (one 28. Bayoumeu F, Subiran-Buisset C, Baka N, et al.
hour) one gram of low molecular weight iron Iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia in preg-
doi:10.1002/ajh.24361 American Journal of Hematology, Vol. 91, No. 6, June 2016 593