Shear Problem in Timber Structure

© All Rights Reserved

1 tayangan

Shear Problem in Timber Structure

© All Rights Reserved

- 2640
- Uses and Desirable Properties of Timber
- h_slabs
- 11
- Mechanics of Materials
- Lecture 5 Foundations
- Base Block Calc WO 1989
- Timber Design for Bridges
- MNL-133-97_ch8_10
- diseño y detalles end plate
- Failure Mode and Strength Predictions of Anisotropic
- CFD-AS-3600-09
- Capacity Design Principles
- IJCTT-V4I4P188
- ZYTEL ST 801 AHS NC 010.pdf
- Playhive-playhouse-thoughtbarn.pdf
- Design of Connection-01a
- Steel Design
- CH 9
- Concrete Masonry Design.pdf

Anda di halaman 1dari 6

SOLUTIONS

Ernst Gehri

ABSTRACT: Actual knowledge in shear behaviour has not been enough considered in engineering practice, resulting

in avoidable failures. Reason for that is an inadequate basis of actual shear values in the Codes, without consideration of

real design situations. In the paper are presented factors which have major influence on the shear behaviour: test

configuration, size or volume, moisture content and temperature. Proposals are made for a more realistic approach.

KEYWORDS: Shear failure, size effect, test configuration, moisture content, temperature

Wood – like all layered materials – shows in shear, In Figure 1 are shown two similar design situations.

compared to the lengthwise properties (parallel to the The beam elements are the same, the only difference

grain), a very weak and brittle behaviour. Due to this consists in the way of load introduction: in case (a) are

brittle behaviour the size effect on the characteristic acting compression forces, in case (b) tensile forces. In

shear strength is strong. This is not enough considered any case the equilibrium is fulfilled and the resulting

in actual design procedures. As a result lot of failures shear force in the beam is the same.

in timber structures are initiated by shear.

Shear problems may be reduced by:

- more appropriate and realist design values

- use of wood species with higher shear capacity

- use of engineered products with cross-linked compo-

site configuration.

2.1 GENERAL

Figure 1: Design situations for a beam (same shear

Principles for the design of timber structures are laid force and diagram); load introduction by glued-in bars

down e.g. in the Eurocodes. There is written, that the

design models shall take in account: Questions:

- material properties (e.g. modulus of elasticity, Do we have the same shear capacity? Do we have for

strength and failure mode) these two design situations the correct strength and

- time dependent behaviour of the materials stiffness parameter for the action “shear”? Can we use

- climatic conditions for the materials (temperature, the same materials properties? For which test situations

moisture and variations) or test configurations are the properties determined?

- design situations.

3 MATERIAL PROPERTY: SHEAR

Material properties like strength and stiffness 3.1 GENERAL

parameters to be used in the design shall be Frequent design situations are beams subjected to shear

determined: forces (see Figure 1). Shear failure occurs longitudinal

- on the basis of tests (longitudinal shear or shear parallel to the grain). The

- for the types of action effects which the material will shear values to introduce are given in EN338 for sawn-

be subjected in the structure. timber or EN1194 for glulam. In both cases possible

The last requirement – a very important one – has in cracking may be considered, by the introduction of a

the past often been overlooked. Inadequate material crack factor.

properties may lead to unsafe design and construction. The values are based on dry material (normal climate:

__________________________ 20°C and 65% relative humidity)

Ernst Gehri: Im Lindengut 13, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland, Remark: Background of an elementary (and not new)

Email: gehri@emeritus.ethz.ch property like shear seems not to be so clear!

3.2 SHEAR STRENGTH AND TIMBER SPECIES 3.3 SHEAR AND CRACKS

In older structures most connections were based on the In sawn timber of larger section cracks due to drying

shearing strength of the timber. Experience had shown are unavoidable. Only by splitting up the log into

the better behaviour of hardwoods – in relation to shear smaller sections like boards and using an adequate

strength and stiffness – compared to softwoods. For drying procedure cracks may be reduced or avoided.

keys and dowels higher performing hardwood like oak The reason for that is that the piece can more easily

was commonly used. deform without cracking; unequal shrinkage causes

It is therefore astonishing to see that – meanwhile and warp.

based on erroneous research – the shear capacity and In glued-laminated timber and adequate grading of the

stiffness of softwoods has increased and on the other laminations only minor cracks, which can be

side of hardwoods decreased (see EN338). disregarded, may appear. The introduction of a crack

Note: Shear tests according to EN408 are done on a factor for glulam is therefore not justified.

defect free material called “wood” and not on lumber The problem is here, that the characteristic values fixed

or timber available for structural use. in EN1194 are too high, and can not be reproduced by

According to EN338 the shear strength and stiffness of tests. Instead of correcting the shear values an artificial

softwood boards C40 and ash boards D50 are the same: crack factor was than introduced.

- shear strength: fv,k = 4,0 N/mm2 After years of service more intense cracks and in

- shear modulus: Gmean = 0,88 kN/mm2. glulam also delaminations are appearing (see Figure 4).

Own tests made on glued-laminated timber using This is on one side a matter for quality assurance and

spruce laminations C40 and ash laminations D50 on the other side of material aging.

showed striking differences.

characteristic values)

laminations N/mm2 kN/mm2

Spruce: C40 3,6 0,65

Ash: D50 6,7 1,10

Factor: ash/spruce 1,9 1,7

120/480 mm and a shear area Ashear =66·103 mm2. The

load configuration can be seen from Figures 2 and 3.

The shear modulus is directly determined from the

measurement of the shear deformation in each panel.

Figure 4: A near 100 years old glued-laminated arch

with large zones of open glue-lines

experimentally evaluated. About 1/3 of the nowadays

required material property was achieved, still enough

for an arch type structure. A similar reduction was

found on the shear modulus.

To have a better insight in the influence of cracks, a

series of artificial “cracked” beams has been tested.

Only the inner 1/3 of the lamination with was glued

(the outer 2/3’s of the beam section 120/480 mm

remained unglued or open). The mean shear strength

was about 2 N/mm2 or more than 50% of an uncracked

Figure 3: Test at “neue Holzbau”

similar girder.

3.5 TO SUM UP

Moisture and temperature have on the shear properties

major influence. For service class 2 where higher

moisture and temperature (than occurring in the test

values based on climate 20°C and 65% r.h.) may occur

and are admitted, a reduction on shear strength and

stiffness should be provided for. It is recommended to

reduce the values by 20%.

Cracks reduce strength and stiffness. The degree of

cracking is not assessable to a direct measurement. An

indirect way would be to measure the shear stiffness

and based in a similar relationship between modulus of

elasticity and tensile strength to obtain indications

about the level of cracking and about the shear

Figure 5: Artificial “cracked” beams strength. Naturally as for tensile strength other factors

additionally affect the shear strength.

3.4 SHEAR AND MOISTURE CONTENT

Shear properties are based on tests made at normal 4 TEST CONFIGURATION

climate, e.g. 20°C and 65% relative humidity, which 4.1 TEST CONFIGURATION IN EN408

lead to about a moisture content of 12%.

In service class 2 the average moisture content can vary The actual test configuration in EN408 can only be

between 12 and 20%, but it is accepted that it may applied with defect material and small size. Effectively

exceed 20% a few weeks per year. the material tested is “wood” and not “timber”. The

With increasing moisture content the resistance against results may not be used directly, only the relationship.

internal slipping of one part upon another along the Furthermore the test results not to “real” shear, but to a

grain decreases. The shear strength for moisture combination of shear and compressive stress

content between 12 and 20% decreases by 2.5% per perpendicular to the grain (see Figure 6).

1% increase of moisture content.

fv,w% = fv,12% [1 - 0.025 (w – 12%)] (1)

The same reduction can be applied on the shear

modulus. The relationship is based on tests with clear

wood [1].

Since the shear properties are quit not influenced by the

timber quality (knots may even have a positive effect)

the relationship is generally valid.

The effect of moisture content on shear has been

confirmed on shear block tests [2] and on finger-joints

tested in tension [3]. In both cases shear is a

determinant property for the load transmission. Since

shear is affected by moisture content, higher moisture

in the finger-joint decreases the tensile strength of the

joint. The result is also a decrease of bending strength

of the glued-laminated timber: in service class 2 a Figure 6: Combination of shear parallel to the grain and

reduction of about 20% should therefore be considered. compressive strength perpendicular to the grain

Higher temperature leads to a “softening” of the wood Bending test configuration was created to obtain

structure, resulting in a reduction of strength and bending failures and eliminate as possible other failure

stiffness. A good approximation (for the range 20°C to modes like shear: for sawn timber normally with span

100°C) is given by equation (2). to depth of 18, for glulam often with reduced side

spans (4.5 h instead of 6h).

fv,T = fv,20° [1 – 0,0038 (T -20°)] (2) Through better grading higher bending strength is

It is practice to accept, that no reduction is needed up achieved, but not higher shear strength (in the contrary

to 50°C, even though the difference is more than 10%. the defect free material shows lower shear strength). As

This must therefore be covered by the partial factor for a result increasing number of shear failures are

material properties γM . The reason for this practice is occurring in bending tests. This may be frustrating for

the small influence on the bending strength, material establishing bending values, but very interesting in

propriety which is only used for the timber strength regard to shear. We obtain here representative shear

classification. values (lower values of the shear distribution).

In the same way as for bending, where shear failures 4.3 SIZE OR VOLUME EFFECT

may be avoided by a correct relationship shear to

Knowing the very brittle behaviour at failure state, an

bending, we may avoid bending failures by fixing

another relationship. As a result we will obtain a beam important size effect must be expected. One of the

with the following geometry: most extensive research data was done in Canada by

Longworth in 1977 [4]. As reference were proposed

shear area and shear volume. Reanalysing the test data

and taking in consideration the moisture content of the

specimens, the following relationship can be used:

fv,mean = 100 · Ashear -0,28 (3)

2

where fv,mean= shear strength in N/mm and Ashear =

shear span area, as defined in Figure 9, in mm2.

4.5 to 6 h; (b) for shear with possible bending; (c) for

shear with a about 1.5 to 2h

shear strength (much greater than for bending) there is

Figure 9: Definition of shear span area

an imperative requirement to declare the size of the test

specimens or refer the value to a so-called reference

size or reference shear-beam (in analogy to the Longworth (equ.3) and own results

6

shear strength in N/mm^2

0

0 100 200 300 400 500

shear area in *10^3 mm^2

Figure 8: Reference shear-beam (dimensions)

Figure 10: Influence of shear span area on the shear

Test configuration has to be as near as possible to the strength

problem envisaged: from point of view of material

(similar as possible in the structure) as for the way the Note that the tests were made on new beams (without

forces are acting. drying cracks). For the reference size (see Figure 8)

The load introduction has been done – usually – by mean shear strength of about 3.5 N/mm2 is obtained.

compression perpendicular to grain. This results in

very large (long) plates; the effective shear field (with 4.4 INFLUENCE OF LOAD INTRODUCTION

high constant stress) is much smaller than the By the use of glued-in rods it is easily possible to

geometric one. The shear strength is only valid for the examine the effect of different cases of load

smaller shear area or volume (see 4.3). introduction (see Figure 11).

Such long supports are in practice unrealistic. The A series of 4 beams with the configuration (a) and (c)

loads are introduced more concentrated using large were tested. The beam depth was 480 mm; the shear

screws or glued-in rods. This should therefore also be panel quadratic.

considered in the test configuration. The test configuration (c) or ZZ-configuration showed

lower shear strength of about 15% compared to the test

In the test procedure easily the measurement of the

configuration (a), “usual” test condition.

shear stiffness may be included (shear modulus can

The result was expected and confirmed the formulation

also be obtained in normal bending tests).

given in Swiss Code SIA 265:2003 for shear combined

with normal stresses perpendicular to the grain.

- Leicester/Young (1991) [6]

“Shear strength tends to be more important in the

design of continuous rather than single span beams.

Because of this, there has been a proposal in Australia,

that double span test specimens should be used for in-

grade shear strength measurements. However, in some

recent studies using LVL (laminated veneer lumber),

some anomalies were noted in short-span shear tests,

including the fact that shear failures appeared to be

inhibited in double-span tests”.

These findings let the Authors a little perplex and they

concluded:

“However, it is already obvious from the test results,

that some modification to conventional structural

theory needs to be made in the case of design for the

shear strength of continuous beams”.

- Sanders (1996) [7]

Sanders (1996) and Rammer et al (1997) proposed to

Figure 11: Cases of load introduction change the common shear test on single span (3-point

test configuration) to a double-span configuration (or

4.5 CONTINUOUS BEAMS 5-point test). Only by such a test configuration realistic

4.5.1 Earlier statements shear values (higher values without possible influence

Based on the commonly simplified design of beams the of end cracks) could be obtained.

following will be found when going from the single-

4.5.2 5-point-configuration versus 3-point

span with central concentrated load F to the double

Fortunately the findings of Egner were never

span beam (see Figure 12):

introduced in the Codes; about the modification of the

- if bending determinant: 1/3 more load

conventional structural theory nothing was more heard

- if shear determinant: about ¼ less load.

about from by Leicester/Young; only the 5-point test

configuration is still alive. Therefore only this point

will be discussed.

The protagonists showed that the shear strength

obtained is higher and therefore should better

correspond with the “true” shear value.

Figure 12: Single versus double-span beam

The test were made – as usually – by introduction of

The following are the load carrying capacities: the loads on compression perpendicular to the grain,

on shear:

resulting in large or long plates to reduce possible

Fv,single = 1,33 (b·h·fv) Fv,double = 0,97 (b·h·fv)

crushing.

on bending: Comparing directly the failure loads Fsingle to Fdouble it

Fm,single = 0,111 (b·h·fm) Fm,double = 0,148 (b·h·fm) was found that Fsingle ≈ Fdouble, as can bee seen in Figure

These findings seem not to be covered by test results. 14 (which is not in accordance to the classical approach

Therefore many researchers conclude that the as presented in Figure 12).

continuity over the middle support might be the reason. In Figure 14 are given the loads in function of a

Three researchers and their statements are cited below. relative shear volume; this is possible since the

dimensions of plates for load introduction were chosen

- Egner (1958) [5] proportional to beam size. The differences in shear

“It seems justifiable to allow over the continuous strength between 5-point to 3-point are justified by the

support higher shear design values, e.g. the double of absence of drying checks (end splits) in the central part

those admissible for end supports”.

of the beam. Unfortunately the same relationship can beam showed clearly, that 3-point testing is still an

be found for wet beams, as can be seen from Figure 14. adequate test configuration for shear.

Furthermore it could be shown that the shear strength –

12

by relating to the same shear span area – is independent

of the system used (single-span or double-span), if the

10 same load introduction direction is applied (see 4.4).

relative shear capacity

8 5 CONCLUSIONS

6 It is amazing (for not to saying unbelievable) that such

a fundamental timber property like shear is not proper

4

defined.

- Need for a test configuration which takes in

2

consideration the predominate type of action and the

0 material to be applied. Use structural timber instead of

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 wood and a shear-beam configuration.

relative shear volum e - Need for a reference size (or reference sizes for sawn

timber and glulam). Shear values are strongly size

Figure 14: Analysis of [7] based on failure loads: upper dependent; therefore relationships for other sizes

curves for dry beams; lower curves for wet beams (blue needed.

for 5-point and red for 3-point test configuration) - Need for a better defined shear field for testing using

glued-in bars (or large screws) for the introduction of

A look on Figure 14, were the dimensions are drawn the loads.

true to scale, show the unrealistic small volume of the - Need for modification factors for other climate

beam subjected to shear and the much smaller volume conditions than 20° and 65% relative humidity: for

tested in the 5-point configuration compared to the 3-

other moisture contents and for higher temperatures up

point configuration. In view of the large size effect – as

to 60°C.

presented in 4.3 – and the incorrect calculation of the

- Show the way to measure directly the shear or

central reaction (without taking in consideration for the

analysis the shear deformation) no justification for the angular deformation and from that the easy and simple

5-point configuration is found. determination of the shear modulus.

- Use the shear stiffness as indicator of the extent of the

4.5.3 Own tests cracking; this using a similar relationship as between

It may be disappointing that 2 single-span beams have modulus of elasticity and strength parallel to the grain.

higher shear capacity than a double-span beam. By - Need for corrective indications for other load

connecting rigidly over the support the two single-span applications.

beams the shear capacity will decrease, whereas the Proposals where made to establish reliable strength and

bending capacity and the stiffness will increase. stiffness values on shear.

ACKNOWLEGMENT

Thanks goes to the “neue Holzbau AG, Lungern” for

all the support and to my friend Peter Haas for

preparing and testing most of the specimens.

REFERENCES

[1] Wood Handbook. Forest Product Laboratory.1987

[2] Gehri E.: Einfluss der Feuchte auf die Druckscher-

festigkeit verklebter Proben. Interner Versuchs-

bericht 2006.

[3] Gehri E.: Feuchteinfluss auf Festigkeit – Zugfes-

tigkeit von Keilzinkenverbindungen. Interner

Versuchsbericht 2006.

[4] Longworth J.: Longitudinal shear strength of

timber beams. Forest Prod. J. 27(8), p. 19-23.1977

Figure 15: Tests on continuous beams at “neue [5] Egner K.: Belastungsversuche mit durchlaufenden

Holzbau”

geleimten Holzbalken in I-Form. Bauen mit Holz

Own tests with measurement of the shear deformation 18, S. 431-436. 1958.

(which is linear correlated through the shear modulus [6] Leicester R.H. and Young F.G.: Shear strength of

to the shear stress and shear force) – made on the same continuous beams. CIB-W18/24-10-1 Oxford 1991

beam – once as single-span and once as continues [7] Sanders C.L.: The effects of testing conditions on

the measured shear strength of wood beams.

Washington State University, Pullman. 1996.

- 2640Diunggah olehpkjenaleo
- Uses and Desirable Properties of TimberDiunggah olehJed Aguirre
- h_slabsDiunggah olehalvin_tan
- 11Diunggah olehmarzacia
- Mechanics of MaterialsDiunggah olehsergey500
- Lecture 5 FoundationsDiunggah olehCarel De Jager
- Base Block Calc WO 1989Diunggah olehRavindra Barange
- Timber Design for BridgesDiunggah olehMichael Gregory Villanueva
- MNL-133-97_ch8_10Diunggah olehJosue Lewandowski
- diseño y detalles end plateDiunggah olehCesar Ceron
- Failure Mode and Strength Predictions of AnisotropicDiunggah olehkhudhayer1970
- CFD-AS-3600-09Diunggah olehDavid Gutierrez
- Capacity Design PrinciplesDiunggah olehAnonymous UnVea6Tn
- IJCTT-V4I4P188Diunggah olehmagdyamdb
- ZYTEL ST 801 AHS NC 010.pdfDiunggah olehAdam Gordon
- Playhive-playhouse-thoughtbarn.pdfDiunggah olehshiknew
- Design of Connection-01aDiunggah olehAbu Abdul Fattah
- Steel DesignDiunggah olehSantosh Rai
- CH 9Diunggah olehrammech85
- Concrete Masonry Design.pdfDiunggah olehDipika
- ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON STRENGTH AND BEHAVIOUR OF EXTERIOR BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS WITH DIAGONAL CROSS BRACING BARS AND STEEL FIBRES FOR IMPROVING THE JOINT DUCTILITYDiunggah olehIAEME Publication
- 20-29.pdfDiunggah olehray m derania
- ch4Diunggah olehFofer Fofe
- Comp. FlexureDiunggah olehrahuljoag
- 2. Flexural and Strength Analysis of Beams and One-way SlabsDiunggah olehindri
- Lecture 1- Review of Statics Analysis of Internal ReactionsDiunggah olehHeiro Keystrife
- 10x JRP1656 ManualDiunggah olehTheodor Eike
- 3434Diunggah olehvasil877
- SFD-SP-16-13330-2011.pdfDiunggah olehBoby Culius
- Comparison_of_experimental_strength_of_R.pdfDiunggah olehPiyush Prajapati

- Kerto Manual Bolted ConnectionsDiunggah olehM Refaat Fath
- Safe Rc DesignDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Safe Rc DesignDiunggah olehKatracho2
- OutriggerDiunggah olehHisham Hamed
- Universal Beam Section PropertiesDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- SCI P318 SecureDiunggah olehMarcoFranchinotti
- STRUCTURAL SCHEME DESIGN GUIDE BY ARUPDiunggah olehNatalie Sullivan
- As1684 Split Level c2 House BracingDiunggah olehUday Pratap
- Esteem 8Diunggah olehIvan Liew
- IEM announcementDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- AS 1720.1-1988.pdfDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Study Note on DynamicsDiunggah olehSan Yu Khaing
- Relazione AbDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- 07.Mr Philip Doyle (INTEL QUEST) - MALAYSIAS LEAD IN AFFODABLE IBS .pdfDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Handbook 4 BridgeDiunggah olehVlad Mihai
- HOLLOW_Square.pdfDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Example CalculationDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Linear Analysis of Crack ProblemsDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Gcrc5510 Iss 2Diunggah oleh임동우
- About ScrewsDiunggah olehshanlsr
- Structures BoxCulvert SectionDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- (1) Implementation of Eurocodes in Malaysia - A View Point From Consulting Engineer (Iem)Diunggah olehraritylim
- Pressure ClassDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- Orion Col Drop IssueDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- THE EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER AND MASONRY DWELLINGS IN TURKEYDiunggah olehIvan Liew
- UTM Thesis Manual 2007Diunggah olehifahkhalid
- burjDiunggah olehAyush Agarwal
- RAFT-SlabDiunggah olehIvan Liew

- ps5Diunggah olehTimur Ergin Babakol
- TG 25_AAPMDiunggah olehglaildo
- Reservoir GeomechanicsDiunggah olehFilipe Af
- The Katharometer DetectorDiunggah olehVarun Kumar
- Pressure Testing of Valves API-6D ISO14313Diunggah olehIsqa
- How to Use a Refractometer - GrapestompersDiunggah olehbigstar42
- In Fd 5940 TransDiunggah oleharie5161d
- ASTM C 1074-04Diunggah olehVasco Sorte
- ar_bricks-21 (1) (1)Diunggah olehManishaChary
- Indoor Residual SprayDiunggah olehPrakash Kumar Kumar
- Ch17 - peter nolanDiunggah olehjohnb2b
- ch06awdDiunggah olehAgung Tri Widodo
- Stucture & Function of the CellsDiunggah olehAmmar Harits
- Fire Snake2Diunggah olehHyacinth Calumpong
- Polyamide_6_and_66Diunggah olehMorkizga
- Daftar PustakaDiunggah olehLalala
- qmDiunggah olehjayson_09876
- DIADiunggah olehShamim Ahsan Zubery
- Deflection and Traction TestDiunggah olehIonescu Stefan
- Mining in Cameroon Source BookDiunggah oleheuclude
- 060208052000000_VALVE_BOSCH_REXROTHDiunggah olehAan Tee
- colloids and it uses 2.docxDiunggah olehMaricon Muyco Galido
- Leblanc Process - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaDiunggah olehCarlo Galicia
- Characterization and Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Crude Mahua Oil by Two Stage TransesterificationDiunggah olehAJER JOURNAL
- Chap 11Diunggah olehapi-3704690
- 9ha-power-plants.pdfDiunggah olehmead6356
- DMRC-Placement-Paper--29257.pdfDiunggah olehShuja Mehdi
- The scanning tunneling microscope.docxDiunggah olehDidarul Alam
- Chemistry Work-2 (by Kumar Anjan)Diunggah olehKumar Anjan
- LeanDiunggah olehkilkamish

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.