Lymphomas
Sara J. Abramson, MD, FACR*, Anita P. Price, MD, FACR
KEYWORDS
Lymphoma Children Non-Hodgkin Hodgkin Burkitt
Lymphoma is the third most common malignancy hallmark of HL. RS cells are giant multinucleated
in the pediatric age group following leukemia and lymphocytes with eosinophilic nucleoli. The term,
malignant brain tumors.1,2 Hodgkin lymphoma HL, is preferred to Hodgkin’s disease.
(HL) and non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) account Male incidence is slightly increased under age
for 10% to 15% of all cancers in children and 15 (male-to-female ratio 5 1.3) and significantly in-
adolescents younger than 20, with nearly 1700 creased under age 5 (male-to-female ratio 5 5.3).1
new cases per year reported in the United HL is more common, however, in adolescent
Sates.1 The incidence of lymphoma increases females over age 15. The incidence is equal in
with age, representing 3% of cancers in children African American and Caucasian children younger
younger than 5 and 24% of cancers in adoles- than 10. Above this age, the incidence is higher in
cents aged 15 to 19. Although the total number Caucasians.
of new cases of HL per year exceeds new cases Age-adjusted incidence rates comparing
of NHL, NHL is more frequent in children younger 1975–1979 to 1990–1995 time periods reveal
than 10 and HL is more common in adolescents.1 comparable rates of decrease in both genders,
Pediatric HL and NHL each include several differ- in patients younger than 15, and a greater male
ent histologic subtypes. Pediatric lymphomas than female decline in the 15- to 19-year-old age
may not be limited to a single organ system. group.
Classic HL involves contiguous nodal groups at The overall 5-year survival for HL diagnosed in
presentation, unlike NHL, which is more com- patients younger than 20 is reported to be 91%.
monly extranodal. Although the 5-year survival for both genders
and all age groups is similar, the 5-year survival
HODGKIN LYMPHOMA is slightly decreased (84%) in African Americans.1
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with an
HL was first described as a separate entity in 1832 increased risk for developing HL. EBV is associ-
by Thomas Hodgkin, MD, a pathologist at Guy’s ated with nearly 50% of HL in developed countries
Hospital in London. He reported ‘‘peculiar enlarge- and up to 90% in developing countries. EBV-
ment’’ of cervical and other lymph nodes associ- infected B cells may inhibit normal apoptosis of
ated with splenic enlargement.3 In 1856, Samuel Reed Sternberg (RS) cells.4,5 EBV in RS cells oc-
Wilks reported similar cases. Crediting Hodgkin curs more frequently in the mixed cellularity (MC)
with the original description of this entity, Wilks subtype, male patients, children younger than 10,
named it ‘‘Hodgkin’s Disease’’ in 1865. In 1898, and lower socioeconomic groups.6,7 Increasing
Carl Sternberg provided the first histologic de- evidence links EBV-positive HL and infectious
scription of the neoplastic cell seen in HL. Four mononucleosis. Increased risk factors for devel-
years later, Dorothy Reed described the cellular oping HL in adolescents and young adults are
abnormalities and clinical findings in more detail. socioeconomic status, smaller family size, and
Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells are considered the early birth order.1 The incidence of HL is increased
radiologic.theclinics.com
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: abramsos@mskcc.org (S.J. Abramson).
The 5-year survival rate for children younger BL into three clinical variants: endemic, sporadic,
than 10 is 76% versus 70% for children and ado- and immunodeficiency associated.16 BL is a B-
lescents 10 to 19 years old. Survival is similar for cell lymphoma. These mature lymphocytes are
Caucasian and African American children and is medium-sized round blue cells with a very high mi-
similar for male and female children.1 totic rate. Microscopic sections may demonstrate
a ‘‘starry sky’’ appearance as a result of tingible
bodies–laden macrophages scattered among the
Burkitt Lymphoma
abnormal lymphocytes. BL is one of the fastest
BL takes its name from Denis Burkitt,15 a surgeon growing malignancies, with a tumor doubling
working in equatorial Africa, who identified a group time of 12 to 24 hours.17 BL typically expresses
of children who had jaw masses. WHO classifies certain B-cell surface antigens, including CD19,
Fig.1. Endemic BL. A 12-year-old African boy who had jaw mass, enlarged neck nodes, anorexia, and weight loss.
CTs of soft tissue (A) and bone (B) reveal a destructive lesion in the right mandible with ‘‘floating teeth’’ (white
arrow), soft tissue mass, and enlarged neck nodes. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) PET image (C) demon-
strates the lesion in the mandible (black arrow) and left rib (arrowhead), gastrointestinal, and nodal disease.
Mass involving the left obturator muscle also is seen (gray arrow). Fused coronal PET image (D) shows right
mandibular (arrow) and left rib disease (arrowhead).
316 Abramson & Price
Fig. 3. A 9-year-old girl who had NS HL presented with cough on exertion, night sweats, weight loss, and pallor.
Contrast-enhanced chest CT (A) and fused PET-CT images (B) at diagnosis. Large anterior mediastinal and precari-
nal masses that compress the airway (A) are hypermetabolic on PET (B). Increased FDG uptake also is seen in the
spleen (white arrow). CT (C) and PET-CT (D) after 1 month of therapy demonstrate residual mediastinal masses on
CT (C) with resolution of hypermetabolic activity on PET (D), indicating response to therapy.
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 317
oncogenic.15 It is now recognized that BL occurs United States and Western Europe.24 BL occurs
in a worldwide distribution.16 This form of the dis- throughout childhood and adolescence. The
ease is more common in male children usually median age at diagnosis is 8, with 40% of patients
younger than 8.19 Clonal EBV DNA is found in between 5 and 9 years old, 24% of patients be-
up to 95% of these tumors.16,23 tween 0 and 4 years old, 28% of patients between
Sporadic or nonendemic BL is found worldwide 10 and 14 years old, and 9% of patients between
and makes up 40% of all NHL in children in the 15 and 21 years old. A 4:1 male to female ratio is
seen.23,25,26 Sporadic BL is associated with EBV
in up to 20% of cases.
Immunodeficiency-associated BL refers to BL
associated with HIV27 and to BL seen in patients
who are allograft recipients28 or who have congen-
ital immunodeficiencies. BL accounts for up
to 40% of NHL in HIV-positive patients.29 Forty per-
cent of these HIV-associated BL are also EBV
positive.25 Most transplant patients who have
BL are solid organ recipients but recipients of
stem cells also may be affected. EBV is present in
30% to 40% of such cases.28,30 A 5-year, event-
free survival rate (EFS) in patients who have high-
risk diseases is over 80%.31 In patients who have
low-stage disease, 5-year EFS rate is up to 98%.32
Table 2
Normal measurements of the thymus on CT: mean values
From Francis IR, Glazer GM, Bookstein FL, et al. The thymus: reexamination of age-related changes in size and shape. AJR
Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:249–54; with permission.
called primary mediastinal large B lymphoma disseminated form of the disease.33,36 PMBL is
(PMBL),33–36 and (2) disseminated disease. difficult to differentiate from HL on imaging studies.
PMBL occurs more commonly in adolescents Up to 75% of patients present with dissemi-
and is associated with a better prognosis than the nated disease.32 Like BL, the most common site
Fig. 6. CT images of the chest at the level of the aortic arch demonstrate the appearance of the normal thymus at
representative ages. (A) 7 months, (B) 5.5 years, (C) 13 years, and (D) 20 years.
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 319
Fig. 7. Contrast-enhanced CT of the chest. A 3-year-old girl who had normal thymus at diagnosis (A). Involution
of the thymus is seen after 6 months of therapy (B). Thymic rebound is noted 3 months after the completion
of treatment (C).
of involvement is the gastrointestinal tract. B sym- Although an 80% to 90% 5-year EFS is seen in
ptoms also frequently are present.32 patients who have early-stage LBL, the prognosis
DLBCL is associated with immunodeficiencies, is poor in patients who have recurrent or refractory
inherited or acquired, and is the most common LBL.
form of NHL seen in immunocompromised
patients.37–39
All tumors contain large, mature B cells that are Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
positive for B-cell markers CD19, CD20, CD22,
and CD79a. No specific cytogenetic abnormalities ALCL makes up 10% of all pediatric NHL.13,40 It is
are associated with DLBCL in children and adoles- seen in older children, with a mean age of 10, and
cents.40,41 The 5-year EFS for low-stage disease is is three times more common in male children.44,45
greater than 90%.14,31 It is the most common mature T-cell lymphoma in
the pediatric population. There is a primary cuta-
neous form of the disease, which is rare in chil-
dren. Most pediatric patients present with
Lymphoblastic Lymphoma advanced systemic disease.46,47 B symptoms
LBL accounts for nearly 30% of pediatric NHL al- are common.44,45 Morphologically, the classic
though representing less than 10% of NHL in adults. features of ALCL consist of large, multinucleated
Males are affected more than twice as frequently as tumor cells that frequently contain horseshoe-
females (male-to-female ratio 5 2.5). The incidence shaped nuclei with abundant cytoplasm with an
of LBL is similar in all pediatric age groups.1 By con- area of eosinophilia near the nucleus. These are
vention, when 25% or more of the marrow is infil- called ‘‘hallmark cells.’’48,49 These findings are
trated with lymphoblasts, the disease is termed, present in 75% of patients. Virtually all tumor cells
acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).13,42,43 express the CD30 (Ki-1) antigen.50,51 ACLC cells
The abundance of apoptotic bodies that un- are positive for T-cell antigens, CD2, CD3. CD4,
dergo phagocytosis by macrophages (tingible CD5, and CD7.
bodies–laden macrophages) and the high mitotic
rate present in LBL are responsible for creating
the histologic starry sky appearance akin to that IMAGING WORK-UP
seen in BL. T-cell lymphoblasts are associated
with CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, and CD8 surface Imaging studies in lymphomas are related to emer-
markers. Translocation involving the TAL-1 gene, gency imaging and to studies for staging the
t(1;14), frequently is seen.32 extent of disease.
320 Abramson & Price
Table 3
Cotswold staging classification for Hodgkin lymphoma
Stage Description
Stage I Involvement of a single lymph node region or
lymphoid structure (eg, spleen, thymus, or
Waldeyer’s ring) or involvement of a single
extralymphatic site (IE).
Stage II Involvement of two or more lymph node regions on the
same site of the diaphragm (II) or localized
contiguous involvement of any one extranodal organ
or side and its regional lymph nodes with or without
other lymph node regions on the same side of the
diaphragm (IIE).
Stage III Involvement of lymph node regions on both sides of
the diaphragm (III), which also may be accompanied
by involvement of the spleen (IIIS) or by localized
contiguous involvement of only one extranodal
organ side (IIIE) or both (IIISE).
Stage IV Disseminated (multifocal) involvement of one or more
extranodal organs or tissues, with or without
associated lymph node involvement or isolated
extralymphatic organ involvement with distant
(nonregional) nodal involvement.
Designations applicable to any disease stage
A No symptoms
B Fever (temperature >38 C), night sweats, unexplained
loss of more than 10% of body weight during the
previous 6 months.
X Bulky disease in pediatric patients: a contiguous nodal
aggregate that measures >6 cm in the longest
transverse diameter or a mediastinal mass where the
tumor diameter is greater than one third of the
thoracic diameter.
E Involvement of a single extranodal site that is
contiguous or proximal to the known nodal site.
Modified from Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, et al. Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and
staging of patients with Hodgkin disease: Cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:1630–6. Reprinted with permission
of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Table 4
St. Jude staging system for childhood
non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Stage I
A single tumor (extranodal) or single anatomic
area (nodal), with the exclusion of the
mediastinum or abdomen
Stage II
A single tumor (extranodal) with regional node
involvement Fig. 8. Contrast-enhanced chest CT. A female 19 year
Two or more nodal areas on the same side of old who had MC HL presented with cough and B symp-
the diaphragm toms. Anterior mediastinal and precarinal adenopathy
Two single (extranodal) tumors with or without displace the airway. A large left internal mammary
regional node involvement on the same side lymph node (black arrow) is seen on the same plane
of the diaphragm as a metastatic soft tissue nodule (white arrowhead).
Fig. 9. Contrast-enhanced CT chest (A) and PET (B). A 10 year old after completion of treatment of NS HL Residual
calcified mediastinal mass (A), which is not FDG avid. (B) Nonspecific thymic activity is seen (white arrow).
radiation exposure in children by eliminating the lymphomatous involvement (Fig. 5).73 False-posi-
need to perform separate diagnostic CT scans.59 tive PET also occurs with muscle tension.71
Combined reading of PET and conventional imag- PET-CT has become extremely important in the
ing modalities is essential for accurate staging in follow-up and prognosis of pediatric lymphoma.74
pediatric HL. Early PET responsive disease is associated with
Nonmalignant FDG activity includes reactive no- a excellent prognosis and is used to modify ther-
des, inflammatory lung disease, and infection.70,71 apy.56,63,75 Likewise, persistent FDG uptake after
Radiation pneumonitis also may be PET positive. front-line chemotherapy in patients who have
Brown adipose tissue is metabolically active in lymphoma is associated with relapse.56,76–79
children, decreasing with age. Sites of FDG avidity New PET-based response criteria are discussed
include the neck, around the coronary arteries, the in Chapter 2.
perinephric space, and the para-aortic and inter-
costal regions (Fig. 4).72 Granulocyte colony-
stimulating factor (GCSF) causes proliferation
and activation of neurophil-granulocyte lines
causing conversion of yellow marrow to red
marrow. Increased FDG uptake is seen in spine,
pelvis, long bones, and spleen and mimics
Fig. 12. A 15-year-old boy who had NS HL presented with night sweats and right cervical and supraclavicular
adenopathy. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen (A). The spleen is enlarged with multiple hypoattenuating
lymphomatous lesions. A 1.5-cm gastrosplenic ligament lymph node is present (arrow). PET-CT coronal fused
image (B) confirms multiple splenic lesions and adjacent lymph node involvement. Cervical and mediastinal
adenopathy also is identified.
Imaging of the Thymus in Pediatric Patients rebound, a form of true hyperplasia, usually ap-
pears within 6 to 12 months after the cessation
Familiarity with the imaging spectrum of the thy-
of chemotherapy, it can develop in a period as
mus is important in differentiating disease from
short as 1 week.63,87,88 Rebound hyperplasia can
normal physiologic states. The normal thymus
occur in ectopic thymic tissue and be misinter-
varies in size, shape, and composition with age
preted as new disease. Thymic rebound affects
(Table 2).80,81
25% of pediatric patients who have HL and is
The thymus, a bilobed structure, maintains
self-limiting and reversible. The size and shape of
a quadrilateral shape with convex borders in chil-
the thymus on CT plus the degree of activity on
dren younger than 5 (Fig. 6A). In late childhood
PET scan help differentiate new or persistent dis-
and adolescence, the thymus becomes triangular
ease from benign thymic hyperplasia. In some
in configuration with concave or flat margins and
cases the nonmalignant enlarged thymus may be
a more prominent left lobe (Fig. 6B,C).82,83 The ho-
mogenous soft tissue attenuation of the thymus
seen on CT of infants becomes heterogeneous
as fatty infiltration begins after the first year of life Table 5
(Fig. 6D).84 Normal anatomic variants, such as Normal spleen size versus age (ultrasound)
a posterior mediastinal extension between the su-
Age Spleen Length (cm)a
perior vena cava and trachea, extension between
the right brachiocephalic vein and innominate ar- 0–3 months %6
tery, and superior mediastinal extension anterio- 3–6 months %6.5
medial to the left brachiocephalic vein must be 6–12 months %7
recognized. These variants may be confused 1–2 years %8
with pathologic mediastinal masses because
2–4 years %9
they may cause superior mediastinal widening on
4–6 years %9.5
plain radiographs and increased soft tissue on
cross-sectional imaging. Increased FDG activity 6–8 years %10
may be seen on PET. Normal thymic tissue does 8–10 years %11
not displace or compress adjacent struc-
a
tures.83,85,86 When present, these findings are Measurement obtained in the coronal longitudinal
plane.
indicative of thymic infiltration or mass. Stress- Data from Rosenberg HK, Markowitz RI, Kolbeg H, et al.
induced thymic involution may be followed by a pe- Normal splenic size in infants and children: sonographic
riod of thymic rebound (Fig. 7). Although thymic measurements. AJR 1991;157:119–21.
324 Abramson & Price
Table 6
Sites of involvement in pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma
a
Intrathecal methotrexate.
positive on nuclear imaging studies. Then, the size begins. Burkitt tumors have such a fast doubling
and shape of the thymus and degree of uptake de- rate that residual tumor may grow significantly
termine the status of the disease.59,60,68,89 between the time of surgery and the beginning of
chemotherapy.
Sequence of Imaging Follow-up CT scans should be performed on
CT of chest abdomen and pelvis should be per- a routine basis in conjunction with gallium or PET
formed before institution of chemotherapy and ob- scans. They should be performed after a single
tained after surgery and before chemotherapy cycle of chemotherapy to assess response to
treatment and then at suitable intervals to detect
new disease.
Fig.15. A 10-year-old boy who had sporadic BL who presented with abdominal pain (A). Contrast-enhanced CT of
the abdomen demonstrates an ileocolic intussusception (B). Barium enema demonstrates non-reduced intussus-
ception (arrows) (C). Pathologic specimen shows BL as lead point of intussusception.
Fig. 24. DLBCL. A 16-year-old boy who had abdominal distension, fever, and vague abdominal discomfort.
Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen. (A) Hepatosplenomegaly with multiple low-attenuation lesions in the
liver, spleen, and kidneys representing lymphomatous infiltration. Precaval adenopathy (black arrow) (B) MIP
PET. Numerous sites of nodal disease in the mediastinum, abdomen, and pelvis. FDG uptake in liver, spleen,
and axial and appendicular skeleton. Coronal fused PET-CT image (C) shows liver, spleen, abdominal, and pelvic
nodes and pericardial node. Posterior coronal fused PET-CT image (D) demonstrates FDG-avid disease in the spine,
right ileum, proximal humeri, and proximal right femur in addition to the liver and spleen.
manifestations of HL.82,99,100 Pleural and pericar- that measures greater than 6 cm in longest trans-
dial effusions are infrequent findings in HL verse diameter is considered bulk disease. Inguinal
(Fig. 11). Pleural effusions usually are negative adenopathy is an uncommon presenting finding.
for malignant cells.95,101 Pericardial effusion sug- Among patients who have HL, 35% have splenic in-
gests tumor involvement of the pericardium from volvement presenting as nodules or generalized
direct extension of a mediastinal mass. MR imag- splenic enlargement. When present, multiple small
ing is better than CT in evaluating pericardial nodules in the spleen are more common than large
involvement. lesions.101 Adenopathy in the splenic hilum may be
Primary infradiaphragmatic disease is rare, oc- seen (Fig. 12).103 Hepatic involvement in the ab-
curring in less that 4% of HL.82,99 Single nodes or sence of splenic involvement is uncommon.82,92
nodal conglomerates in the retroperitoneum may The size of the normal spleen varies with age
be involved. US or CT may demonstrate conglomer- (Table 5).104
ate mesenteric nodal involvement with encasement Renal involvement is rare in pediatric HL.95 On
of mesenteric vessels (sandwich sign).102 On CT, CT, renal disease may be manifest as diffuse infil-
a contiguous nodal conglomerate in any region tration or multinodular involvement.82
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 329
Fig. 26. DLBCL. Primary bone disease. A 12-year-old girl who had diffuse bone pain. CT of the pelvis (A) demon-
strates multiple lytic destructive lesions in both iliac bones and in the right side of the sacrum (white arrow). MIP
PET (B) shows diffuse osseous disease without evidence of soft tissue involvement.
330 Abramson & Price
Fig. 27. LBL. A 15-year-old boy who had wheezing, fever, and night sweats. CT of the chest (A) and PET (B) at
diagnosis. CT (A) demonstrates a large anterior mediastinal mass displacing the carina and bilateral pleural effu-
sions. PET (B) demonstrates FDG uptake in the anterior mediastinal mass. Imaging after 5 months of therapy dem-
onstrates resolution of the mediastinal mass on CT (C) and PET (D) with no evidence of FDG avid disease.
are involved. Unlike sporadic BL, 60% of these is seen.105 In girls, ovarian involvement is com-
patients demonstrate peripheral adenopathy. Up mon. Involvement of the kidneys and omentum
to 15% of patients present with paraplegia caused also are common (Fig. 18).106 If the abdominal dis-
by extradural masses extending into the neural ease can be completely resected, surgical inter-
canal (Fig. 13) and compressing the spinal cord. vention is indicated. This correlates with a good
CNS disease is seen in up to 30% of patients. prognosis. Peripheral adenopathy is uncommon
Bone marrow involvement is rare.23 in BL. Mediastinal and pulmonary parenchymal in-
Sporadic BL is an extranodal disease. The most volvement is rare (Fig. 19). Pharyngeal and tonsilor
common presentation is a right lower quadrant ab- tumors infrequently are seen. Bone involvement is
dominal mass that may involve the terminal ileum, uncommon (Fig. 20). When jaw tumors are pres-
cecum, ascending colon, or appendix (Fig. 14). In- ent, they do not involve the developing molar
tussusception is a common presentation of this teeth, as commonly seen in endemic BL, but
disease (Fig. 15). Involvement of the liver and may be associated with diffuse bone marrow in-
spleen is uncommon. Retroperitoneal and mesen- volvement. Bone marrow involvement is common
teric nodal masses frequently are present (Fig. 16). (22%) (Fig. 21) but CNS involvement is infrequent
Any of these masses may cause obstruction of (12%). Although these may be seen at diagnosis,
ureters, kidneys, or biliary tree and may lead to they are more common in progressive dissemi-
gastrointestinal obstruction. Pancreatic involve- nated disease. When present, they signify a poor
ment is rare (Fig. 17). Malignant ascites frequently prognosis.52
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 331
Fig. 28. A 4-year-old boy who had LBL. Left forearm (A) and axial T1 postcontrast fat-saturation MR images (B).
Image of the left forearm (A) shows permeative changes and periosteal reaction (white arrows). T1 axial postcon-
trast MR image (B) demonstrates cortical destruction (black arrows) and enhancing soft tissue mass.
Fig. 29. ALCL. A 5-year-old girl who had fever, night sweats, and left neck pain and swelling. CT of the neck (A)
demonstrates bilateral lymphadenopathy, left greater than right (arrows). CT of the upper thorax (B) shows
extensive mediastinal (black arrow) and left axillary adenopathy (white arrow).
332 Abramson & Price
Fig. 30. A 14-year-old girl who had with avascular necrosis of the shoulder post treatment of LBL. Irregular lucency
and sclerosis of the humeral head is present on radiograph (A). Signal abnormalities on T2 fast spin-echo MR image
shoulder (B) and coronal PD fat-saturation MR image pelvis (C) demonstrate multiple areas of bone infarction.
result from pericardial invasion. Malignant pleural also is seen.112 The most common sites of extra-
effusion also may be seen.107 Painless adenop- nodal disease include skin, soft tissues, bone,
athy in the head and neck, axilla, and inguinal re- and lung.45 Masses in the soft tissues and muscles
gions may occur. Hepatosplenomegaly may be are common. Skin nodules may be single or multi-
present but renal involvement is more common. ple and may be ulcerated.113 Lung disease may be
Cross-sectional imaging of the kidneys demon- manifest as nodules or as infiltrate. Malignant effu-
strates renal enlargement associated with hypoat- sions may be present. Bone involvement is com-
tenuating cortical masses. Dissemination to CNS, mon and the lesions may simulate primary bone
bone marrow, or gonads may be present at diag- tumors. Rarely, there is involvement of the pan-
nosis. Bone, soft tissue, and peripheral lymph no- creas, kidneys, liver, or gastrointestinal tract.
des can be involved (Fig. 28).108,109 CNS and bone marrow involvement are
CNS involvement is common. CNS prophylaxis uncommon.114,115
is given to all patients, even if CNS disease is not
detectable at presentation.
IMMUNODEFICIENCY-ASSOCIATED LYMPHOMAS
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
BL is the most common form of lymphoma identified
The majority of patients present with disseminated in HIV-infected children unlike in adults, in whom
disease. Among patients who have ACLC, 90% DLBCL is more common.116 Among children who
present with peripheral adenopathy, an important have AIDS, 4% develop primary CNS lymphoma
clinical feature.110 Mediastinal masses are com- representing the AIDS-defining diagnosis in 0.4%
mon (Fig. 29).111 Retroperitoneal adenopathy of these children.117,118 These CNS lymphomas
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 333
Table 7
Summary of late effects identifiable with imaging studies
Data from Robison LL. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a resource for research of long-term outcomes among adult
survivors of childhood cancer. Minn Med 2005;88:45–9.
usually are associated with EBV.119 On imaging Secondary neoplasms occur in all form of child-
studies, solitary or multiple contrast enhancing hood lymphoma, more commonly in HL than in
lesions are seen in the periventricular white matter, NHL.122,123 In patients who have HL, the risk of
in the basal ganglia, or at the gray/white matter secondary leukemia plateaus 10 to 15 years
interface. The lesions may demonstrate ring post therapy.122 Autologous stem cell transplan-
enhancement.117 Extranodal sites of involvement tation for the treatment of lymphoma is associ-
include lung, gastrointestinal tract, and bone.118 ated with secondary myelodysplastic syndrome
Congenital immune deficiency syndromes, such and acute myelogenous leukemia. The incidence
as Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, are associated with of NHL after HL is reported to be 4% to 8%.92
an increased incidence of NHL, in particular The risk for secondary solid malignancies, includ-
DLBCL. The risk for malignancy increases with ing sarcoma; melanoma; and lung, thyroid, gas-
age. These patients develop extranodal disease, trointestinal, brain, and breast cancer, increases
including brain involvement.120 with time and is greater in patients who are youn-
ger at diagnosis and relapse. There is an
RELAPSE increased incidence of hypothyroidism and thy-
roid cancer in patients receiving mantle
HL can recur in areas original disease and in new radiation.92,117,124
sites. Recurrence in retroperitoneal lymph nodes Lymphoma survivors exposed to anthracycline
and spleen can be seen, even when these areas or thoracic radiation are at risk for long-term car-
initially were disease free. diac toxicity, including delayed pericarditis, pan-
Evaluation of lymph nodes is essential for diag- carditis, pericardial and myocardial fibrosis,
nosing relapsed or progressive disease, in both functional valve injury, conduction defects, and
HL and NHL. In NHL, evaluation with CT, MR imag- coronary artery disease.52,125 Anthracycline is par-
ing, and PET may be necessary to determine the ticularly associated with cardiomyopathy. Youn-
full extent of the relapse. New PET-based criteria ger age at diagnosis and female gender are risk
for evaluating response to therapy have been factors for developing cardiomyopathy.126
developed.121 Pulmonary fibrosis is an uncommon sequela of
childhood lymphoma. It is more common in
LATE EFFECTS patients who have received radiation therapy
than in those who have received pulmonary toxic
Although advances in the therapy for childhood chemotherapy, such as bleomycin.127
lymphoma have resulted in improved survival, Radiation effects on the ovary are age and dose
treatment-related long-term effects are seen. dependent, increasing with age.
334 Abramson & Price
Avascular necrosis is a not infrequent complica- 7. Gandhi MK, Tellam JT, Khanna R. Epstein-Barr
tion of steroid therapy and radiation therapy in virus-associated Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Hae-
children who have lymphoma (Fig. 30).52 matol 2004;125:267–81.
Table 7 describes the more common treatment- 8. Massarweh S, Udden MM, Shahab I, et al. HIV-
related complications in childhood lymphoma that related Hodgkin’s disease with central nervous
are identifiable on imaging. system involvement and association with Epstein-
Barr virus. Am J Hematol 2003;72:216–9.
9. Glaser SL, Clarke CA, Gulley ML, et al. Population-
SUMMARY based patterns of human immunodeficiency virus-
related Hodgkin lymphoma in the Greater San
HL and NHL represent 10% to 15% of all malig-
Francisco Bay Area, 1988–1998. Cancer 2003;98:
nancies occurring in children younger than 20. Ad-
300–9.
vances in cross-sectional imaging and the
10. Lukes RJ, Butler JJ. The pathology and nomencla-
increasing availability of PET and PET-CT have
ture of Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer Res 1966;26:
had a major impact on the imaging and manage-
1063–83.
ment of pediatric patients. This article reviews
11. Hudson MM, Donaldson SS. Hodgkin’s disease.
the clinical features of lymphoma and focuses on
Pediatr Clin North Am 1997;44:891–906.
the spectrum of imaging findings seen in the diag-
12. Hutchinson RE, Uner A. Biology and pathology of
nosis, staging, and follow-up of pediatric patients
Hodgkin’s disease. In: Weinstein HJ, Hudson MM,
who have HL and NHL. Pediatric NHL is divided
Link MP, editors. Pediatric lymphomas. Berlin:
into four major histologic subtypes: BL, DLBCL,
Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 7–27.
ALCL, and LBL. The most important subtype of
13. Cairo MS, Raetz E, Perkins SL, et al. Non-Hodgkin’s
HL is NS.
lymphomas in children. London: B.C. Decker Inc.;
2003.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 14. Sandlund JT, Downing JR, et al. Non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma in childhood. N Engl J Med 1996;334:
The authors wish to thank Ms. Evelyn Tolliver- 1238–48.
Lopez and Ms. Rachel Kronman for their help in 15. Burkitt DP. The discovery of Burkitt’s lymphoma.
the preparation of this manuscript. Cancer 1983;51:1777–86.
16. Ferry JA. Burkitt’s Lymphoma: clinicopathologic
features and differential diagnosis. Oncologist
REFERENCES
2006;11:375–83.
1. Percy CL, Smith M, Linet M, et al. Lymphomas and 17. Iverson O, Iverson U, et al. Cell kinetics in Burkitt’s
reticuloendothelial neoplasms. In: Ries LAG, S M, lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 1974;10:1507–12.
Gurney JG, et al, editors. Cancer incidence and 18. Sanger W. Primary (8q24) and secondary chromo-
survival among children and adolescents: United some abnormalities (1q, 6q, 13q, 17p) are similar
States SEER Program. Bethesda (MD): NIH; 1999. in pediatric Burkitt lymphoma/Burkitt leukemia &
p. 35–50. Burkitt-like lymphoma: a report of the international
2. Parker BR, Castellino RA. Hodgkin’s disease. St. pediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma study.
Louis (MO): CV Mosby; 1977. Blood 2003;102:845a.
3. Jackson H Jr, Parker FJ. Hodgkin’s disease and al- 19. Diebold J. Burkitt lymphoma. In: Jaffe E, Harris N,
lied disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; Stein H, et al, editors. Pathology and genetics of tu-
1947. mours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues.
4. Portis T, Dyck P, Longnecker R. Epstein-Barr Virus Washington, DC: IARC Press; 2001. p. 181–4.
(EBV) LMP2A induces alterations in gene transcrip- 20. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Pro-
tion similar to those observed in Reed-Sternberg ject. National Cancer Institute sponsored study of
cells of Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2003;102: classifications of non-Hodgkin’s lymmphomas:
4166–78. summary and description of a working formulation
5. Fingeroth JD, W J, Tedder TF, et al. Epstein-Barr for clinical usage. Cancer 1982;49:2112.
virus receptor of human B lymphocytes is the C3d 21. Burkitt D. A sarcoma involving the jaws in African
receptor CR2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1984;81: children. Br J Surg 1958;46:218–23.
4510–4. 22. van den Bosch CA. Is endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma
6. Jarrett RF. Risk factors for Hodgkin’s lymphoma by an alliance between three infections and a tumour
EBV status and significance of detection of EBV promoter? Lancet Oncol 2004;5:738–46.
genomes in serum of patients with EBV-associated 23. Magrath IT. African Burkitt’s lymphoma. History, bi-
Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2003; ology, clinical features, and treatment. Am J Pediatr
44(Suppl 3):S27–32. Hematol Oncol 1991;13:222–46.
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 335
24. Blum KA, Lozanski G, Byrd JC. Adult Burkitt leuke- 39. van Krieken JH. Lymphoproliferative disease asso-
mia and lymphoma. Blood 2004;104:3009–20. ciated with immune deficiency in children. Am
25. Hecht JL, Aster JC. Molecular biology of Burkitt’s J Clin Pathol 2004;122:S122–7.
lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3707–21. 40. Perkins SL, Morris SW. Biology and pathology of
26. Young L, Alfieri C, Hennessy K, et al. Expression of pediatric non-hodgkin lymphoma. In:
Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated Weinstein HJ, Hudson MM, Link MP, editors. Pedi-
genes in tissues of patients with EBV lymphoproli- atric lymphomas. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2007. p.
ferative disease. N Engl J Med 1989;321(16): 91–127.
1080–5. 41. Heerema N, Poirel H, Swansbury J, et al. Chromo-
27. McClain KL, Joshi VV, Murphy SB. Cancers in somal abnormalities of pediatric (ped) and adult
children with HIV infection. Hematol Oncol Clin diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) differ and
North Am 1996;10:1189–201. may reflect potential differences in oncogenesis.
28. Gong JZ, Stenzel TT, Bennett ER, et al. Burkitt An international pediatric mature B-cell non-
lymphoma arising in organ transplant recipients: Hodgkin lymphoma study (FAB/LMB96). Blood
a clinicopathologic study of five cases. Am J Surg 2003;102:3139.
Pathol 2003;27:818–27. 42. Perkins SL. Work-up and diagnosis of pediatric
29. Knowles DM. Etiology and pathogenesis of AIDS- non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Pediatr Dev Pathol
related non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol Oncol 2000;3:374–90.
Clin North Am 2003;17:785–820. 43. Reddy KS, Perkins SL. Advances in the diagnostic
30. Carbone A, Gloghini A. AIDS-related lymphomas: approach to childhood lymphoblastic malignant
from pathogenesis to pathology. Br J Haematol neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;122:S3–18.
2005;130:662–70. 44. Reiter A. Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. In:
31. Patte C, Auperin A, Michon J, et al. The Societe Weinstein HJ, Hudson MM, Link MP, editors. Pedi-
Francaise d’Oncologie Pediatrique LMB89 proto- atric lymphomas. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2007. p.
col: highly effective multiagent chemotherapy 175–92.
tailored to the tumor burden and initial reponse in 45. Brugieres L, Deley MC, Pacquement H, et al.
561 unselected children with B-cell lymphomas CD30(1) anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in chidl-
and L3 leukemia. Blood 2001;97:3370–9. ren: analysis of 82 patients enrolled in two consec-
32. Shukla NN, Trippett TM. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma utive studies of the French Society of Pediatric
in children and adolescents. Curr Oncol Rep Oncology. Blood 1998;92:3591–8.
2006;8:387–94. 46. Alessandri AJ, Pritchard SL. A population-based
33. Seidemann K, Tiemann M, Lauterbach J, et al. study of pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma with Cancer 2002;94:1830–5.
sclerosis in pediatric and adolescent patients: 47. Massimino M, Gasparini M, Giardini R. Ki-1 (CD30)
treatment and results from three therapeutic stud- anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in children. Ann
ies of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group. J Clin Oncol 1995;6(9):915–20.
Oncol 2003;21(9):1782–9. 48. Kinney M, Collins R, Greer JP, et al. A small-cell
34. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Leroy K, et al. Molecular predominant variant of primary Ki-1 (CD30)1
diagnosis of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma T-cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17(9):
identifies a clinically favorable subgroup of diffuse 859–68.
large B-cell lymphoma related to Hodgkin lym- 49. Kinney MC, Kadin ME. The pathologic and clinical
phoma. J Exp Med 2003;198:851–62. spectrum of anaplastic large cell lymphoma and
35. Savage KJ, Monti S, Kutok JL, et al. The molecular correlation with ALK gene dysregulation. Am
signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas J Clin Pathol 1999;111:S56–67.
and shares features with classical Hodgkin lym- 50. Goldsby RE, Carroll WL. The molecular biology of
phoma. Blood 2003;102:3871–9. pediatric lymphmas. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol
36. Lones MA, Perkins SL, Sposto R, et al. Large-cell 1998;20:282–96.
lymphoma arising in the mediastinum in children 51. Oertel J, Huhn D. Immunocytochemical methods in
and adolescents is associated with an excellent haematology and oncology. J Cancer Res Clin
outcome: a Children’s Cancer Group report. J Clin Oncol 2000;126:425–40.
Oncol 2000;18:3845–53. 52. Weinstein HJ, Hudson MD, Ling MP. Pediatric
37. Cotelingham J, Witesby E, et al. Malignant lym- lymphomas. Berlin: Springer; 2007.
phoma in patients with the Wiscott-Aldrich syn- 53. Tschammler A, Ott G, Schang T, et al. Lymphade-
drome. Cancer Investigation 1985;3:515–22. nopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant
38. Preciado MV, Fallo A, Chabay P, et al. Epstein Barr disease–color Doppler US assessment of in-
virus-associated lymphoma in HIV-infected chil- tranodal angioarchitecture. Radiology 1998;208:
dren. Pathol Res Pract 2002;198(5):327–32. 117–23.
336 Abramson & Price
54. Kellenberger CJ, Miller SF, Khan M, et al. Initial staging and follow-up of pediatric lymphomas.
experience with FSE STIR whole-body MR imaging Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:524–31.
for staging lymphoma in children. Eur Radiol 2004; 68. Mody RJ, Bui C, Hutchinson RJ, et al. Comparison of
14:1829–41. (18)F Flurodeoxyglucose PET with Ga-67 scintigra-
55. Bar-Shalom R, Mor M, Yefremov N, et al. The value phy and conventional imaging modalities in pediat-
of Ga-67 scintigraphy and F-18 fluorodeoxyglu- ric lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;48:699–707.
cose positron emission tomography in staging 69. Furth C, Denecke T, Steffen I, et al. Correlative
and monitoring the response of lymphoma to treat- imaging strategies implementing CT, MRI, and
ment. Semin Nucl Med 2001;31:177–90. PET for staging of childhood Hodgkin disease.
56. Kaste SC, Shulkin BL. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;28:501–12.
PET/CT in childhood lymphomas. PET Clinics 70. Weinblatt ME, Zanzi I, Belakhlef A, et al. False-
2006;1:265–73. positive FDG-PET imaging of the thymus of a child
57. Rini JN, Leonidas JC, Tomas MB, et al. 18F-FDG PET with Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med 1997;38:
versus CT for evaluating the spleen during initial 888–90.
staging of lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1072–4. 71. Meany HJ, Gidvani VK, Minniti CP. Utility of PET
58. Depas G, De Barsy C, Jerusalem G, et al. 18F-FDG scans to predict disease relapse in pediatric
PET in children with lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood
Mol Imaging 2005;32:31–8. Cancer 2007;48:399–402.
59. Miller E, Metser U, Avrahami G, et al. Role of 72. Kaste SC, Howard SC, McCarville EB, et al.
18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and follow-up of 18F-FDG-avid sites mimicking active disease in
lymphoma in pediatric and young adult patients. pediatric Hodgkin’s. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:141–54.
J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:689–94. 73. Hollingshead LM, Goa KL. Recombinant granulo-
60. Edeline V, Bonardel G, Brisse H, et al. Prospective cyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF). A review
study of 18F-FDG PET in pediatric mediastinal lym- of its pharmacological properties and prospective
phoma: a single center experience. Leuk Lym- role in neutropenic conditions. Drugs 1991;42:
phoma 2007;48:823–6. 300–30.
61. Montravers F, McNamara D, Landman-Parker J, 74. Jadvar H, Connolly LP, Fahey FH, et al. PET and
et al. [(18)F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical PET/CT in pediatric oncology. Semin Nucl Med
utility and impact on management. Eur J Nucl 2007;37:316–31.
Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:1155–65. 75. Jerusalem G, Hustinx R, Beguin Y, et al. Evaluation
62. Yamamoto F, Tsukamoto E, Nakada K, et al. of therapy for lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 2005;35:
18F-FDG PET is superior to 67Ga SPECT in the 186–96.
staging of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Nucl 76. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. Early
Med 2004;18:519–26. restaging positron emission tomography with
63. Hudson MM, Krasin MJ, Kaste SC. PET imaging in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in
pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Pediatr Radiol patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
2004;34:190–8. Ann Oncol 2002;13:1356–63.
64. Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, et al. Whole- 77. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Verhoef G, et al. Positron
body positron emission tomography using 18F- emission tomography with [(18)F] FDG for therapy
fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation response monitoring in lymphoma patients. Eur
in Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:S97–105.
has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than 78. Zinzani PL, Chierichetti F, Zompatori M, et al.
classical computed tomography scan imaging. Advantages of positron emission tomography
Blood 1999;94:429–33. (PET) with respect to computed tomography in
65. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont PL, et al. Prog- the follow-up of lymphoma patients with abdominal
nostic value of positron emission tomography presentation. Leuk Lymphoma 2002;43:1239–43.
(PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose 79. Zinzani PL. Lymphoma: diagnosis, staging, natural
([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non- history, and treatment strategies. Semin Oncol
Hodgkin’s lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid 2005;32:S4–10.
alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? 80. Frush DP. Imaging evaluation of the thymus and
J Clin Oncol 2001;19:414–9. thymic disorders in children. In: Lucaya J,
66. Bar-Sever Z, Keidar Z, Ben-Barak A, et al. The in- Strife JL, editors. Pediatric chest imaging: chest im-
cremental value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric aging in infants and children. New York: Springer
malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; Verlag; 2002. p. 187–208.
34(5):630–7. 81. Francis IR, Glazer GM, Bookstein FL, et al. The thy-
67. Hernandez-Pampaloni M, Takalkar A, Yu JQ, et al. mus: reexamination of age-related changes in size
F-18 FDG-PET imaging and correlation with CT in and shape. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:249–54.
Imaging of Pediatric Lymphomas 337
82. Toma P, Granata C, Rossi A, et al. Multimodality im- 100. Au V, Leung AN. Radiologic manifestations of lym-
aging of Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lympho- phoma in the thorax. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;
mas in children. Radiographics 2007;27:1335–54. 168:93–8.
83. Siegel MJ, Glazer HS, Wiener JI, et al. Normal and 101. White KS. Thoracic imaging of pediatric lympho-
abnormal thymus in childhood: MR imaging. Radi- mas. J Thorac Imaging 2001;16:224–37.
ology 1989;172:367–71. 102. Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr, Harbin WP, et al.
84. Sklair-Levy M, Agid R, Sella T, et al. Age-related Appearance of lymphomatous involvement of the
changes in CT attenuation of the thymus in children. mesentery by ultrasonography and body com-
Pediatr Radiol 2000;30:566–9. puted tomography: the ‘‘sandwich sign’’. Radiology
85. Swischuk LE, John SD. Normal thymus extending 1980;134:467–73.
between the right brachiocephalic vein and the in- 103. Neumann CH, Parker BR, Castellino RA. Hodgkin’s
nominate artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166: disease and the non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. New
1462–4. York: Pergamon; 1985.
86. Smith CS, Schoder H, Yeung HW. Thymic extension 104. Rosenberg HK, Markowitz RI, Kolbeg H, et al.
in the superior mediastinum in patients with thymic Normal splenic size in infants and children: sono-
hyperplasia: potential cause of false-positive find- graphic measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol
ings on 18F-FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:119–21.
2007;188:1716–21. 105. Boerma EG, van Imhoff GW, Appel IM, et al.
87. Bogot NR, Quint LE. Imaging of thymic disorders. Gender and age-related differences in Burkitt
Cancer Imaging 2005;5:139–49. lymphoma–epidemiological and clinical data
88. Michel F, Gilbeau JP, Six C, et al. Progressive from The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:
mediastinal widening after therapy for Hodgkin’s 2781–7.
disease. Acta Clin Belg 1995;50:282–7. 106. Magrath I. Small noncleaved cell lymphomas (Bur-
89. Levine JM, Weiner M, Kelly KM. Routine use of PET kitt and Burkitt-like lymphomas). In: Magrath I, editor.
scans after completion of therapy in pediatric The non Hodgkin’s lymphomas. 2nd edition. New
Hodgkin disease results in a high false positive York: Arnold; 1997. p. 781–811.
rate. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;28:711–4. 107. Magrath IT. Malignant Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
90. Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, et al. Report of and practice of pediatric oncology. In: Pizzo PA,
a committee convened to discuss the evaluation Poplack DG, editors. Principles and practices of
and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: pediatric oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Wil-
Cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:1630–6. liams and Wilkins; 2002. p. 661–705.
91. Rademaker J. Hodgkin’s and Non Hodgkin’s lym- 108. Lin P, Jones D, Dorfman DM, et al. Precursor
phomas. In: Hricak H, Panicek DM, editors. Radio- B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a predominantly
logic clinics of North America: update on radiologic extranodal tumor with low propensity for leu-
evaluation of common malignancies. Philadelphia: kemic involvement. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:
Elsevier/Saunders; 2007. p. 69–83. 1480–90.
92. Sullivan MP. Hodgkin’s disease in children. Hematol 109. Neth O, Seidemann K, Jansen P, et al. Precursor
Oncol Clin North Am 1987;1:603–20. B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in childhood and
93. Murphy S. Childhood non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. adolescence: clinical features, treatment, and
N Engl J Med 1978;299:1446–8. results in trials NHL-BFM 86 and 90. Med Pediatr
94. Donaldson SS, Link MP. Childhood lymphomas: Oncol 2000;35:20–7.
Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 110. Reiter A, Schrappe M, Tiemann M, et al. Successful
Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins; 1986. treatment strategy for Ki-1 anaplastic large-cell
95. Parker BR. Leukemia and lymphoma in childhood. lymphoma of childhood: a prospective analysis of
Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:1495–516. 62 patients enrolled in three consecutive Berlin-
96. Mandell GA, Lantieri R, Goodman LR. Tracheo- Frankfurt-Munster Group Studies. J Clin Oncol
bronchial compression in Hodgkin lymphoma in 1994;12:899–908.
children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:1167–70. 111. Williams DM, Hobson R, Imeson J, et al. Anaplastic
97. Jeffrey GM, Mead GM, Whitehouse JMA. Life- large-cell lymphoma in childhood: analysis of 72
threatening airway obstruction at the presentation patients treated on The United Kingdom Children’s
of Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1991;67:506–10. Cancer Study Group chemotherapy regimens. Br J
98. Blinova GA, Kolygin BA. Clinical and morphological Haematol 2002;117:812–20.
correlation of Hodgkin’s disease in children. Tumori 112. Mori T, Kiyokawa T, Shimada H, et al. Anaplastic
1973;59:409–18. large-cell lymphoma in Japanese children: retro-
99. Krikorian JG, Portlock CS, Mauch PM. Hodgkin’s spective analysis of 34 patients diagnosed at the
disease presenting below the diaphragm: a review. National Research Institute for Child Health and
J Clin Oncol 1986;4:1551–62. Development. Br J Haematol 2003;121:94–6.
338 Abramson & Price
113. Kadin ME, Sako D, Berliner N, et al. Childhood syndrome. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1999;11:
Ki-1 lymphoma presenting with skin lesions and 283–5.
peripheral lymphadenopathy. Blood 1986;68: 121. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised
1042–9. response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin
114. Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Roberts WM, et al. Clincopa- Oncol 2007;25:579–86.
thologic features and treatment outcome of chil- 122. Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL, et al. High risk of
dren with large-cell lymphoma and the subsequent neoplasms continues with extended
t(2;5)(p23;q35). Blood 1994;84:2467–71. follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease: report
115. Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Santana VM, et al. Clinical from the late effects study group. J Clin Oncol
features and treatment outcome for children with 2003;21:4386–94.
CD301 large-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 123. Inskip PD. Thyroid cancer after radiotherapy for
J Clin Oncol 1994;12:895–8. childhood cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;36:
116. McClain KL, Leach CT, Jenson HB, et al. Molecular 568–73.
and virologic characteristics of lymphoid malignan- 124. Acharya S, Sarafoglou K, LaQuaglia M, et al.
cies in children with AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Thyroid neoplasms after therapeutic radiation for
Syndr 2000;23:152–9. malignancies during childhood or adolescence.
117. Jeanes AC, Owens CM. Imaging of HIV disease in Cancer 2003;97:2397–403.
children. Imaging 2002;14:8–23. 125. Adams MJ, Lipsitz SR, Colan SD, et al. Cardiovas-
118. Mueller BU. Cancers in human immunodeficiency cular status in long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s
virus-infected children. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr disease treated with chest radiotherapy. J Clin
1998;23:31–5. Oncol 2004;22:3139–48.
119. Fallo A, De Matteo E, Preciado MV, et al. Epstein- 126. Kremer LC, Caron HN. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity
Barr virus associated with primary CNS lymphoma in children. N Engl J Med 2004;351:120–1.
and disseminated BCG infection in a child with 127. Mertens AC, Yasui Y, Liu Y, et al. Pulmonary compli-
AIDS. Int J Infect Dis 2005;9:96–103. cations in survivors of childhood and adolescent
120. Gilson D, Taylor RE. Long-term survival following cancer. A report from the Childhood Cancer
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma arising in Wiskott-Aldrich Survivor Study. Cancer 2002;95:2431–41.