Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • Timeline MAB Case No. 0171-08

    Diunggah oleh

    Mayverii
    41 tayangan3 halaman
    1) Holcim Philippines Inc. and Neutron Construction and Marketing Corp. both applied for mining permits covering the same area. Holcim protested Neutron's application. 2) Over several years, both parties filed various motions, comments, and appeals as they argued their positions to the Panel of Arbitrators. 3) In November 2018, the resolution from the Panel of Arbitrators was received, presumably deciding which company would be awarded the mining permit for the disputed area.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    MAB case sample timeline

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    1) Holcim Philippines Inc. and Neutron Construction and Marketing Corp. both applied for mining permits covering the same area. Holcim protested Neutron's application. 2) Over several years, both parties filed various motions, comments, and appeals as they argued their positions to the Panel of Arbitrators. 3) In November 2018, the resolution from the Panel of Arbitrators was received, presumably deciding which company would be awarded the mining permit for the disputed area.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    41 tayangan3 halaman

    Timeline MAB Case No. 0171-08

    Diunggah oleh

    Mayverii
    1) Holcim Philippines Inc. and Neutron Construction and Marketing Corp. both applied for mining permits covering the same area. Holcim protested Neutron's application. 2) Over several years, both parties filed various motions, comments, and appeals as they argued their positions to the Panel of Arbitrators. 3) In November 2018, the resolution from the Panel of Arbitrators was received, presumably deciding which company would be awarded the mining permit for the disputed area.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 3

    HOLCIM PHILS. INC. VS. NEUTRON CONSTRUCTION AND MARKETING CORP.

    [MAB Case No. 0171-08] [MSC-III-02-07]


    April April June 29 to August October November December December January January 24,
    November September December January
    23, 1999 2004 01, July 13, 13, 2007 01, 28, 2007 06, 2007 10, 2007 16, 2008 2008
    25, 1977 12, 1988 6, 1991 1, 1997
    1992 2004 2007 2007

    Neutron filed an
    application for Posting of Notice
    MPSA-P-III-26 of Application for Holcim filed its
    MPSA of Neutron Pre-trial Brief
    (MPSA-P-III-26)
    Holcim filed an
    application for Schedule of
    Holcim Preliminary
    MPSA-P-III-31 Neutron filed an Philippines Inc. Conference
    amended MPSA filed a Protest
    application to Neutron’s
    MPSA Parties to submit
    CCC and Bacnotan application Position Papers,
    Central Cement
    Corp. (CCC) entered Cement Corp. Union Cement Reply and Draft
    into Deed of merged; BACNOTAN Corporation Neutron served decisions
    Assignment and/or CEMENT amended its AOI its Comment to
    Mortgage with CORPORATION as changed its name to the Protest filed Holcim filed its
    different assignors surviving Holcim Philippines, by Holcim Position Paper
    corporation Inc.
    Deed of Assignment filed with
    Panel of
    MGB; CCC again entered into Union Cement Corp.,
    Bacnotan Cement Corp. Arbitrators (PA)
    an Agreement with several issued Notice of
    individuals, all owners of and Davao Union Cement
    Corp. merged; UNION Preliminary
    mining rights
    CEMENT CORPORATION Conference/ Pre-
    as surviving corporation Trial
    HOLCIM PHILS. INC. VS. NEUTRON CONSTRUCTION AND MARKETING CORP.
    [MAB Case No. 0171-08] [MSC-III-02-07]

    August 05, September 15, October 14, August 19, August 24, September July 04, July 04, August January- September
    June 30, 2008
    2008 2008 2008 2010 2010 29, 2010 2017 2017 15,2017 June 2018 12, 2018

    Holcim filed its


    Draft Decision

    Holcim filed Holcim filed Holcim filed 4


    Panel of PA denied
    its Reply to Judicial Affidavit Urgent Motions
    Arbitrators (PA) Holcim’s MR Neutron filed
    Neutron’s of Federico to Resolve (i) the
    dismissed a Motion for
    Comment Jacoba, Jr. Motion for
    Holcim’s Protest Extension of
    Time Clarificatory
    Neutron filed a Hearing, (ii) the
    Holcim filed a Holcim filed a Motion
    Comment to Appeal
    Motion for for Clarificatory Hearing
    Holcim’s
    Reconsideration Memorandum of Neutron filed an
    (MR) against the
    Appeal Opposition to
    Order of the PA
    Holcim filed a Holcim’s Motion
    Memorandum of for Clarificatory
    Appeal Hearing
    contesting PA’s
    decision
    HOLCIM PHILS. INC. VS. NEUTRON CONSTRUCTION AND MARKETING CORP.
    [MAB Case No. 0171-08] [MSC-III-02-07]

    November 15,
    2018

    Resolution
    received by Atty.
    Din

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai