where V0 is steam rate (kg·h−1), HV0 is enthalpy of heated vapor (kJ·kg−1) and HC is
enthalpy of condensate heated vapor.
In this case, the heat of vaporization (∆HV0) is defined as follows:
where the difference between the enthalpy of emitted vapor and enthalpy of concen-
trated liquid approximately equals the latent heat of vaporization for solvent or water
in the tested liquid (ΔHV).
Also, the energy balance (Equation 17.12) may be written in terms of latent heat of
vaporization and specific heat as follows:
where θ is the boiling temperature of the liquid in the evaporator, θF is the temperature
of the feed, Cp is the specific heat of the feed, and Q is the rate of heat transfer (kJ·h−1)
or heat exchanged. Generally, the units for Q are W (J·s−1) or kW (kJ·s−1).
Thus, the steam requirement is:
FCp (θ − θ F ) + V∆HV
V0 = (17.14)
∆HV0
Also, if the liquid feed in the evaporator is about at its boiling temperature (θ ≈ θF),
the steam flow rate approximately equals the emitted vapor flow rate. In this case,
the condensation of 1 kg of steam will evaporate 1 kg of water from the solution.
Types of Evaporator
Many types of evaporator are used for the concentration of liquid food. The choice of
evaporator may be determined according to the properties of the liquid food, such as
high viscosity or heavy solids, heat transfer property, maintenance required, past plant
experience, and energy and cost factors. Some common types used in the food industry
are described in Chen and Hernandez (1997), Saravacos and Kostaropoulos (2002),
Glover (2004), and Ali Adib (2008).
466 Handbook of Food Process Design: Volume I
Emitted vapor
Feed in
Steam
Feed in
Steam in
C
Condensate out
Concentrate out
one-fifth and one-third the height of the tubes, because this has an important effect
on the heat transfer coefficient. These evaporators produce high heat transfer rates at
high temperature differences. Overall heat transfer coefficients range from 1000 to
1500 W·m−2·°C−1 (Chen and Hernandez, 1997) depending on liquid viscosity and tem-
perature difference (steam/boiling liquid). An overall heat transfer coefficient of
2600 W·m−2·°C−1 is usually found for water at atmospheric pressure (Leleu, 1992). The
advantages of the short-tube evaporator include high heat transfer rates at high tem-
perature differences, low headroom, suitable for liquids with moderate tendency to
scale, ease of cleaning, and low initial investment. Disadvantages include relatively
high liquid holdup and poor heat transfer rates at low temperature difference or high
viscosity; it is not suitable for temperature-sensitive materials and for crystalline
products.
Vapor out
Air purge
Steam in
Concentrate out
Condensate
Feed in
at the bottom of the evaporator produces bubbles at the surface that grow and are
carried in the mainstream of the liquid. The volume fraction of vapor increases and
individual bubbles coalesce to form vapor “slugs” (second zone). The slug zone is fol-
lowed by an annular flow zone where the liquid forms a film. This film moves along
the inner surface, while vapor moves at greater velocity through the core of the tube,
and finally the liquid forms droplets in the vapor (mist). However, it is recommended
that this final zone is not attained in this type of evaporator; more details of two-phase
flow are provided by Incropera and Dewitt (2002). Therefore, temperature differences
and overall heat transfer coefficients can be quite dissimilar at the bottom and the top
of the evaporator. Because of static head and pressure drop, boiling points increase at
the bottom of the evaporator by 5–10 °C and holdup times vary between 2 and 3 min
(Chen and Hernandez, 1997). In this type of evaporator, the heat transfer coefficient
is still high because shear is raised along the inner tube surface, even for liquids
assumed to be very viscous. Typical evaporators have vertical stainless steel tubes 7 m
long on average and they are commonly used for the concentration of tomato and for
sugar solutions. An overall heat transfer coefficient of 3000 W·m−2·°C−1 is usually found
for water at atmospheric pressure (Leleu, 1992). This type of evaporator is one of the
most widely used tubular evaporators (Glover, 2004). The advantages of rising film
evaporators are ability to handle foamy liquids, relatively high heat transfer coeffi-
cient, and reduced floor space requirements. The disadvantages are high headroom
requirement, that the hydrostatic head at the bottom of the tubes may increase
product temperature (so not recommended for heat-sensitive materials), and that
there is a lower pressure drop through the tubes compared with the falling film
evaporator.
Feed in
Liquid distributors
Steam in
Condensate
Concentrate out
of the vapor accelerates the downward movement, the liquid film becomes thinner.
Both liquid and vapor leave the tube toward the bottom of the evaporator, where phase
separation takes place. An overall heat transfer coefficient of 4000 W·m−2·°C−1 is usually
found for water at atmospheric pressure (Leleu, 1992).
Others types of evaporator may be found, such as forced circulation evaporator,
horizontal tube falling film evaporator, and plate type evaporator (Minton, 1986;
Sacadura, 2000; Incropera and Dewitt, 2002).