University of Cincinnati
ASSESSING SUICIDE IN PEDIATRIC PRACTICE 2
Introduction
While well child visits have resulted in greater quality of life due to the elimination of
many previously deadly childhood diseases, there is a growing problem with concerns such as
risk behavior” (Schor, 2004, p.210) that is not currently being addressed by many pediatric
Tanner, Stein, Olson, Frintner, and Radecki (2009) determined that education, tools,
infrastructure within pediatric practices, and referral processes contribute to the “degree of
professionals. Pediatricians’ experience and comfort level and their awareness of outside
resources may limit their assessment of mental health conditions. However, the data suggest that
the suicide problem is a vital one for pediatricians to address. According to the CDC, the second
leading cause of death for both 10-14 and 15-24 year olds is suicide (Kochanek, Murphy, Xu,
Arias, 2017). Another startling piece of data about youth suicide is that over 80% of adolescents
who move from a suicide plan to a suicide attempt do so within one year of developing the
suicidal intent (Nock, et al., 2013, p.302). These data demonstrate the seriousness of addressing
The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study, or ACEs, is a series of questions that ask
about differing forms of abuse such as physical, emotional, or sexual, forms of neglect such as
ASSESSING SUICIDE IN PEDIATRIC PRACTICE 3
physical and/or emotional, and forms of household dysfunction such as family/relative mental
illnesses, domestic abuse, substance abuse, divorce, and/or incarcerated relative. (Starecheski,
2015) Subsequent ACE studies also include racism, bullying, foster care, and other family
member abuse ("Got Your ACE Score?", n.d.). The ACEs showed that there was a correlation
between higher test scores and risks such as chronic depression, alcoholism, perpetrating
domestic violence, liver disease, suicide attempt, use of antidepressant prescriptions, higher teen
sexual behavior, drug use, and smoking (Starecheski, 2015). The ACEs test is important because
it gives the practitioner a potential understanding of the causes of patients’ risk factor(s), and it
can alert the clinician of potential risk for those who score high early on (Faulkner, 2017).
There are positives and negatives regarding the use of screeners. In using screeners in a
pediatric office, Tanner et al. (2009) found that these standardized questionnaires regarding
behaviors and development actually stimulated discussion about areas of need with parents and
helped guide treatment for specialized conditions. However, the authors also noted that the
questions may not be answered to the best of the parents’ ability in a waiting room or exam
room, and that direct observation may be better than pressured questions in an unfamiliar setting.
Setting is important to pay attention to in another regard as well. Finkelhor (2017) noted that it’s
important to attend to outside resources in the geographical area after screeners are distributed in
order to appropriately care for patient in regards to the treatment needs found. Addressing both
of these concerns may increase the effectiveness of using screeners across a clinical setting.
ASSESSING SUICIDE IN PEDIATRIC PRACTICE 4
Schor (2004) recognizes that practitioners don’t often have enough time and resources
within their visits with families to adequately assess families individual needs. His suggestion is
office or at home home before the family sees the physician,” suggesting that effective
psychosocial screening tools are both useful and available for helping pediatricians meet the
diverse needs of their patients without taking in-office time to collect patient information.
People who fit the ACEs criteria have been well studied, and the adverse effects on their
quality of life have been proven and well documented. According to Mary Boullier and Mitch
Blair of the Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health (2018), “Those people who have experienced
four or more adverse childhood experiences (ACE) are at significantly increased risk of chronic
disease such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes as well as mental illness and health risk
behaviours” (p.132). There are numerous studies that confirm ACEs are a risk factor in various
physical and mental conditions, including suicide. The American Journal of Preventive Medicine
says, “Relationships between ACEs and alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, sexual promiscuity, and
suicide (which are related to causes of death that constitute a smaller fraction of total death)
exhibited strong, graded relationships across the ACE score” (Brown et al., 2009, p.395). In fact
studies show that those who have multiple ACEs are also more likely to use psychotropic
People with ACEs are far more likely to commit suicide and suffer from various mental
health conditions than those without. These concerns, among other reasons, are why an ACEs
ASSESSING SUICIDE IN PEDIATRIC PRACTICE 5
screener is an appropriate basis for assessing for complex trauma, and a necessary tool in
Screeners vary in cost, effectiveness, and ease of deployment. There is often a significant
amount of training required to properly implement a screener. One strong contender is the
ACES screener developed by the Center for Youth Wellness in San Francisco. Developed by
Nadine Burke Harris (2015), one of the best-known voices in the application of ACES data, this
screener has many benefits. The screener is short - only one page - and could easily be deployed
online, alleviating some of the concerns with in-office screeners. The CYW screener requires
only a registration to implement, and is therefore free of cost (Burke Harris & Renschler, 2015).
Along with the screener itself, CYW has produced training and administration
information, which is also free, and includes relevant links to AAP recommendations to support
use of the screener. Finally, as noted in the administration guide, data show that ACES increase
yearly, so early detection is key (Bucci et al., 2015). While the questions about how to best
connect pediatric patients with outside services persists, this screener option does address many
of the concerns noted throughout this introduction in giving pediatricians a first-step option in
References
Boullier, M., & Blair, M. (2018). Adverse childhood experiences. Paediatrics and Child Health,
Brown, David W., DSc, MScPH, MSc, Anda, Robert F., MD, MSc, Tiemeier, H., PhD, Felitti,
V. J., MD, Edwards, V. J., PhD, Croft, J. B., PhD, & Giles, Wayne H., MD, MSc. (2009).
Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortality. American Journal of
Bucci M, Gutiérrez Wang L, Koita K, Purewal S, Silvério Marques S, Burke Harris N. Center for
Youth Wellness ACE-Questionnaire User Guide. San Francisco, CA: Center for Youth
Wellness; 2015
Burke Harris, N. and Renschler, T. (version 7/2015). Center for Youth Wellness
ACE-Questionnaire (CYW ACE-Q Child, Teen, Teen SR). Center for Youth Wellness.
Faulkner, M. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study: The evidence behind what we know
https://txicfw.socialwork.utexas.edu/adverse-childhood-experiences-aces-study/
Finkelhor, D. (2017). Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): Cautions and
Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data
Brief, no 293. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017.
ASSESSING SUICIDE IN PEDIATRIC PRACTICE 7
Nock, M. K., Green, J. G., Hwang, I., McLaughlin, K. A., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., &
among adolescents: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent
doi:10.1542/peds.114.1.210
Starcheski, L. (2015). Take The ACE Quiz — And Learn What It Does And Doesn't Mean.
Retrieved from
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/03/02/387007941/take-the-ace-quiz-and-l
earn-what-it-does-and-doesnt-mean
Tanner, J. L., Stein, M. T., Olson, L. M., Frintner, M. P., & Radecki, L. (2009). Reflections on
849-857. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2351