From the process of creating the unit, one new thing I learned about myself is how
resourceful I am when faced with a problem. Despite being used to the prevalence of Hawaiian
word means. This can pose a challenge, especially when confronted with different assignments
with similar sounding names (e.g. Lau Kukui, Kumu Kukui, Hoʻolohe, Hoʻopuka, etc.). To
resolve this issue, I would use a variety of sources (e.g. wehewehe.org, my peers, the resources
given from class, etc.) in order to construct a little miniature dictionary of phrases to help me
understand and remember what they all mean in relation to education. This initially came off as
surprising, as previously I did not do this type of thing, but rather rely on the help of my fellow
cohort members to explain how the assignments with Hawaiian names was supposed to be
completed.
One of the most challenging things from this assignment was ensuring that all my lessons
in the Lau Kukui were interconnected together by the common goal of meeting what was laid out
in the Kumu Kukui. Being that I am used to creating standalone lessons, constructing an entire
unit composed of multiple lessons was a new task for me. Because of the unfamiliarity of
creating lessons under a larger unit, I essentially went into this process nearly blind and thus
struggled to ensure that the lessons were interconnected and related to the Kumu Kukui outline.
One thing that was safe from this project was the creation of different lessons under the
unit. At this point, I am fairly confident on my ability to construct different activities for a lesson
based on a given topic or theme. Making five of them for a unit was not an issue. The problem
laid more in making sure they were all interconnected to lead to a final task.
In the unit’s Hoʻolohe, I tried a variation of the activity called Think-Pair-Share in one of
my lessons. While the Hoʻolohe’s activity required students to share a personal story, which can
take longer depending on each student’s experience, in relation to a prompt, the strategy I used
required students to answer a prompt that is relevant to themselves culturally. In each version,
students had to draw on their own experiences, which are often personal in nature, when sharing
to another person.
I was “political” in my unit through the historical content in itself. Unlike most U.S.
History courses when discussing World War II, this unit focused on the darker aspects of U.S.
involvement in the war regarding the unequal treatment of its own civilians despite touting itself
as the pinnacle of Democracy and Freedom. Considering how important World War II to the
American consciousness when defining itself as a global Democratic superpower that promotes
freedom and liberty, the unit’s focus would be considered politically controversial in its
I attempted to bridge the curriculum to the students through two activities: The Hoʻolohe
and the Hoʻopuka. With the former, I used the concept of change to construct an activity that
requires students to reflect and share to their peers about an event that changed the way they
perceived an idea or issue. From there I would connect the stories that they share to the content
through an explanation of how World War II helped to change the perception of America as a
Democracy and freedom in a society that restricts those two aspects for half of the population.
By giving an explanation to connect the similarities of their own stories of change to the
historical events in my curriculum, students can see the relationship between their own lives and
students to place themselves in the perspective of a woman or African American during World
War II. Through engaging students in this form of writing, students can “see” and “feel” the
events and tribulations that occur in this time period as if they were either a woman or an African
American. In a sense, this activity would make the curriculum come to life for the student, as
they immerse themselves in the role of the groups (e.g. what they went through, how they felt,