Unit 1 :
Concept Of Sustainability
Carrying Capacity
Sustainable Development
Bruntland Report
Ethics And Vision Of Sustainability
Basic Definitions
SOCIETY
bearable equitable
Sustainable
ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY
viable
Sustainable View of Community
Environment
Society
Economy
Traditional Thinking
Sustainable Measures
History of SD
1. THE BEGINNING
Conference themes
The interdependence of human beings and the natural environment;
The links between economic and social development and environmental
protection; and
The need for a global vision and common principles.
THE ROAD TO RIO
2.Towards Rio
1972 Oil Crisis
Evidence mounts for increasing scarcity
1980 World Conservation strategy released (IUCN)
Towards Sustainable development
Poverty, population pressure, inequity, trade
Global 2000 commissioned
1983 World Commission on Environment and Development formed
Gro Harlem Brundtland (chair)
1984 Worldwatch publishes the first State of the World Report
1985 Antarctic ozone hole found
1985 Villach Austria, climate change predicted
1986 IUCN Conference on Environment and Development
1987 “Our Common Future “Published
Prompts the Earth Summit in Rio
Sustainable Development
“Sustainable development is
development that meets the needs of
the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet
their own needs"
Brundtland Commission
“Our common future” 1987 after its chair,
Norwegian diplomat Gro Harlem Brundtland
OUR COMMON FUTURE – SECOND MILESTONE
• Growth that is forceful, and at the same time environmentally and socially sustainable.
• Three dimensions of SD
– Environment
– Economics
– Social
• From: To:
• short-term thinking long-term thinking
-- Weak Sustainability:
1. Depletion of resources, breaking down of ecosystems and species extinction can be
compensated for if this takes place in a process that supports opportunities for
continued maintenance or expansion of economic opportunities.
2. Nature, in this respect, is a form of capital, which can be substituted with other
kinds of capital.
3. Development is sustainable for as long as it does not harm the prospects of the
continued fulfilment of economic necessity.
-- Strong Sustainability:
1. Development not leading to irretrievable loss of resources.
2. Plants and animal species, ecosystems and raw materials have a value in themselves
and not just as input in the economic process.
Back-casting
The Natural Step to planning for success!
Future
Sustainable Measures
Sustainability objectives
HOW WE SHARE
Ensure that people everywhere are treated fairly and with respect to enable them
to meet their needs efficiently – look after people, share resources fairly
"…carrying capacity is determined jointly by human choices and natural constraints. Consequently,
the question, how many people can the Earth support, does not have a single numerical answer,
now or ever. Human choices about the Earth's human carrying capacity are constrained by facts of
nature which we understand poorly. So any estimates of human carrying capacity are only
conditional on future human choices and natural events." Joel Cohen
The earth could not indefinitely support an ever-increasing human population.
The planet, would check population growth through famine if humans didn't check
themselves.
There is a certain population number above which a species starts to damage its habitat, and
life as it stands at that moment cannot go on.
Typically, it's starvation that kicks in to cull the herds down to a manageable number. This
limit is called the Carrying Capacity.
A sustainable habitat is one in which supply of and demand for these resources are
balanced.
It's a very basic idea -- sustainability requires balance.
Sustainability is about finding the balance point among population, consumption, and waste
assimilation.
The theory publicized by Malthus is known
as the Carrying Capacity of Earth
Imagine a field of grass shared by 6 farmers, each with one cow…
A few facts: Each cow currently produces 20 liters of milk per day The carrying capacity of the
commons is 8 cows. For each cow above 8, the milk production declines by 2 liters (due to
overgrazing, there is less grass for each cow: less grass, less milk!).
20 liters 20 liters
20 liters
20 liters
20 liters 20 liters
20 liters 20 liters
20 liters
20 liters
20 liters 20 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 120 liters (6 cows)
Do the farmers sit back and stay at 6 cows? Not if they are individual profit maximizers (here
simplified as milk production maximizers)
40 liters 20 liters
20 liters
20 liters
20 liters 20 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 140 liters (7 cows)
We are now at the carrying capacity -- do they stop? No.
40 liters 40 liters
20 liters
20 liters
20 liters 20 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 160 liters (8 cows)
They are now at the maximum total milk production. But do they stop? No…
36 liters 36 liters
“I’ll get another cow”
18 liters
36 liters
18 liters 18 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 162 liters (9 cows)
32 liters 32 liters
16 liters
32 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 160 liters (10 cows)
28 liters 28 liters
14 liters
28 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 154 liters (11 cows)
“Well, everyone else is getting one,
24 liters 24 liters
so me too!”
24 liters
24 liters
24 liters 24 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 144 liters (12 cows)
“Well, I can still increase milk production if
I get a third cow”
30 liters 20 liters
20 liters
20 liters
20 liters 20 liters
Total daily milk production for the commons: 130 liters (10 cows)
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
The term ‘sustainable development’ was first given currency by the World Conservation
Strategy (IUCN, UNEP, WWF 1980) and
Later reinforced by the Brundtland Report (World Commission on Environment and
Development 1987). However, it is an evolving concept.
The World Conservation Strategy primarily sought to protect essential ecological processes,
life-support systems and genetic diversity through the sustainable utilisation of natural
resources. The Strategy linked poverty, development and environment by drawing attention
to the dilemmas facing rural people in some developing countries who are sometimes
compelled to over-utilise natural resources in order to free themselves from starvation and
poverty.
It gave increased prominence to the root social, political and economic causes of the
environmental crisis.
These ideas were to inform the development of the framework for the recommendations in
the Brundtland Report.
Three essential aspects of Sustainable Development:
•Economic:
An economically sustainable system must be able to produce goods and services on a
continuing basis, to maintain manageable levels of government and external debt and to avoid
extreme sectoral imbalances which damage agricultural or industrial production.
•Environmental:
An environmentally sustainable system must maintain a stable resource base, avoiding over-
exploitation of renewable resource systems or environmental sink functions, and depleting
non-renewable resources only to the extent that investment is made in adequate substitutes.
This includes maintenance of biodiversity, atmospheric stability, and other ecosystem
functions not ordinarily classed as economic resources. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
•Social:
A socially sustainable system must achieve fairness in distribution and opportunity,
adequate provision of social services including health and education, gender equity, and political
accountability and participation
TWO KEY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS:
EQUITY
the concept of needs, particularly the essential needs of the world’s poor
LIMITS TO GROWTH
the idea of limitations (ecological, technological, and social) which affect the
environment’s ability to meet present and future needs
“The report that called for a strategy that united development and the environment –
described by the now common term « SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT”.
The definition:
Development that meets the needs of the present without Compromising
the ability of the future generations to meet their needs.(WCED-1987)
KEY ISSUES
1. Development is not just about bigger profits and higher standards of living for a
minority. It should be about making life better for everyone and
2. It should not involve destroying or recklessly using up our natural resources, nor
should it involve polluting the environment.
OBJECTIVES
The report illustrates how the problems of poverty and population are
interconnected. By examining the interactions between the problems facing the
1. Ethics of sustainability makes clear why the sustainability framework is not only an
approach to addressing and solving the many difficult problems facing us, but why
it is in fact the right approach, the right thing to do.
2. It is holistic, in theory, in so far as it is guided by a vision in which social,
economic, and environmental values not only coexist but, in many cases,
reinforce each other.
To clarify some of the specific ethical fields and approaches that are most directly relevant for the ethics of sustainability
the three “legs” of sustainability as often defined: the social, the economic, and the environmental.
Social equity:
Places the priority on satisfying the diversified needs of the population, such as food, health and
Self-reliance is also often perceived as a desirable goal of social development, which goes against
economic concepts such as comparative advantages and globalization.. It implies aid mechanisms to help
Economic efficiency
Related to achieve or sustain economic growth, maximize profits and expand markets.
promotes growth in a differential manner as regions or nations capture its opportunities differently.
Environmental responsibility
Tries to respect the carrying capacity of environmental systems, to conserve and recycle resources and