Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Addressing Employee Turnover Problem: A Review of
Employee Turnover Core Models
Nithyajothi Govindaraju
Research scholar, Graduate school of Business
Segi University, Malaysia
Abstract:- The significance of employee turnover problem
has been widely acknowledged in turnover research.
Literature source has a handful number of employee
turnover models to address the issue of employee turnover.
However, it is a non-known fact that it can be applied in all
the cultural settings.This research aims to expand review
on employee turnover models that have a significant and
theoretical contribution to the employee turnover
literature.This investigation has attempted to comprehend
turnover inquire about models and gather all the worker
turnover models on a single stage. This paper builds up an
applied model of worker turnover dependent on a broad
audit of the writing. The proposed theoretical model
clarifies the turnover procedure that prompts the real
turnover. The proposed employee turnover model may
encourage academicians and industrialist to address the
issue of high employee turnover.
Keywords-: Employee turnover, employee turnover model,
retention, and disappointment.
I. INTRODUCTION
Employee turnover is an unavoidable term in an
organisation's life. The vast majority of the analyst’s centre
around the reasons for worker turnover in the turnover
research. Little work has been done on the discussion of the
employee turnover model. Because of the aggregate
experience examining turnover models, this exploration
sequentially talks about twentieth century and 21st-century
employee turnover models that are pertinent to deal with
worker turnover issue. The essential goal of this investigation
is to delineate the advancement of worker turnover
demonstrate from its humble beginnings to the multifaceted
research stream it has progressed toward becoming.Drawing
upon a broad review of the literature, this paper builds up a
conceptual model of worker turnover that recognises five
phases in the process influencing a person's stay aim and
original partition from work. The proposed worker turnover
model may encourage academicians and industrialist to
address the issue of high employee turnover.
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Price (1977) described worker turnover as the extent of
the number of organisational people who have left in the midst
of the period being seen as disengaged by the run of the mill
number of people in that relationship in the midst of the
period.As of late, Ngo-Henha (2017) characterised worker
turnover as the circumstance where an employee ceases to be
a member of an association. Consequently, Employee turnover
alludes to a worker partition from an association whether
voluntarily or involuntarily. Voluntary turnover alludes to a
worker's choice to end the relationship with an association.
Despite what might be expected, involuntary turnover alludes
to a worker's expulsion by the association (Thomas, 2009).
Notwithstanding, for each situation, a worker's departure
brings about a loss of a vital employee who must be
supplanted.
Turnover is adequate in the least numbers under a
specific situation, since it energises development with the
passage of fresh recruits, it balances potential staleness, wipes
out low performers. Then again, a lot of labourer turnover
intimation low execution and awkwardness in affiliations and
results with adverse outcomes (Ingersoll and Smith, 2003).A
few analysts discovered the unfavourable impacts of turnover
on the productivity of associations (Ajit and Pilani, 2016) on
the nature of items and administrations (Iyer, 2011; Ribiero,
2011) and acquired extensive substitution and enlistment costs
(Catalyst, 2016; Griffin, Hohan, and Lambert, 2014).
Literature source has countless models to address the
issue of employee turnover. Worker turnover has been a
standout amongst the most generally researched authoritative
wonders. Writing source has a sufficient number of turnover
models have been proposed every once in a while to
comprehend turnover issues (Singh and Sharma, 2015).
However, there is no universally accepted turnover model
(Hom et al., 2017). Besides, turnover models apply
differentially across different ranges (Hom et al., 2017). For
instance, rational decision-making models apply better with
long-term, highly educated employees in stable industries than
short-term, poorly educated employees in turbulent
environments (Hom et al., 2017). Likewise, satisfaction-based
models relatively embeddedness theory better explain quits
among fast-food workers (Young, 2012).
Numerous models have been created to clarify turnover
(Singh and Sharma, 2015) and numerous papers investigating
516
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
the different parts of turnover models (Ramesh, 2007). In any
case, none has been generally acknowledged (Singh and
Sharma, 2015).Turnover models can be chiefly named,
content model (clarifies why workers leave) and process
model (clarifies how employee leaves) (Singh and Sharma,
2016).Consequent upon, this research aimed to discuss
empirically tested employee turnover models under one roof
to assist academicians and industrial policymakers to handle
employee turnover problem better.
Moreover, this research also presents a conceptual
framework of employee turnover model based on the study
discussion.Segi sphere, online databases, google scholar, were
used to identify the available articles for these models. The
author altogether contemplated the content of the articles so it
very well may be collected in the ideal route conceivable
without missing essential data about the models.
A. March and Simon turnover Model (1958)
March and Simon model was the primary display mainly
intended to depict employee turnover. March and Simon
(1958) presented their point of interest theory of
organisational equilibrium, placing that job satisfaction
decrease the attractive quality of moving, accordingly
lessening employee turnover (Peterson et al., 2011).
Momentous turnover studies consider March and Simon
(1958) turnover framework.
March and Simon model was based on the theory of
organisational equilibrium of Barnard (1938). As per March
and Simon turnover model, individuals take an interest in the
association as long as incitements, for example, pay, match or
exceed the employee inputs and that the perceived desirability
(likened with occupation fulfillment) and seen simplicity of
development (compared with the number of choices) are two
essential factors that impact worker turnover (Lee and
Mitchell, 1994).
As indicated by March and Simon turnover model
employees choice to leave is caused by two factors, for
example, perceived ease of movement and perceived
desirability of movement. Perceived ease of movement,be that
as it may, alludes to the appraisal of perceived alternatives or
openings while perceived desirability of movement is
impacted work fulfilment (Samad and Yusuf, 2012). At the
point when the organisation builds promptings, this will bring
down the propensity of the labourers to leave and vice versa
(Morrell et al., 2001). Given by March and Simon model, the
likelihood of internal turnover is considered before settling on
external turnover (Long et al., 2012). March and Simon
stressed individual contrasts in capacity and bio-data, for
example, residency, age determinants, and age as primary
determinants of perceived ease of movement while
authoritative size and occupational fulfilment drive perceived
desirability of movement.
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Fig 1:- March and Simon model (1958) (Source: Adapted
from Ramesh (2007))
March and Simon (1958) battled that job satisfaction and
authoritative size effect work desirability. They incorporated
that a man's simplicity of development is influenced by the
amount of seen openings outside of the affiliation, which is
managed by the state of the Economy, the individual's
characteristics and properties, and the number of firms the
individual can get to (Ramesh, 2007). Walk, and Simon's
model needs adequate definite and observational legitimacy
(WeiBo, Kaur, and Zhi, 2010) as it neglects to catch and code
entangled process (Saridakis and Cooper 2016). The model
shows a static view and neglects to centre procedural
perspective of turnover.
The model did not consider the essential variables such
as role stress or different forms of organisational commitment
that influence the turnover process (Allen and Shannock,
2012).
Also, March and Simon model gives a static perspective
of choice to leave (Saridakis, and Cooper, (2016). A turnover
choice not just affected by a desire for advancement and
vocation type, yet additionally via profession stage and worker
improvement openings (Krau, 1981). Also, it is difficult to see
how this model is identified with hierarchical responsibility
and impact the turnover procedure (Holtom et al., 2006).
B. Farris Predictive model of turnover (1969)
Farris predictive turnover model (1969) also of critical
early studies of a turnover model.Farris (1969) set forward a
prescient model of turnover and recorded a portion of the
primary purposes behind turnover. They are recorded beneath;
1. Turnover helps vocation 2.Perceived simplicity of turnover
3. The power of inspiration 4. Execution 5. Pay and Rewards
6. Status and social arrangement 7. Singular qualities (Age,
Technical development, Education, Time point of view)
8.Working condition.This model proposed contrasts amongst
stays and turnovers in the indicators happen for performers
(Farris, 1969a). In any case, low entertainers, liberal
complexities among stays and turnovers occurred as foreseen
concerning simply age, annexing criticalness to reference
packs outside the affiliation, and having contacts outside the
affiliation (Farris, 1969b).
517
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
C. Porter and Steers Met Expectations Model (1973)
Porter-Steers Met Expectation model is the adjustment
of Vroom's Expectancy hypothesis (Long et al., 2012). Met
desire model proposes met desires as an essential determinant
in turnover choices. Met desires are characterised as the
complexity between what a man experiences at work and what
he anticipated that would experience (Porter and Steer, 1973).
Met desire display verbalises that when a person's desires
whatever they are, are not met, his proclivity to pull back
would increment. As a rule, the level of occupation fulfilment
mirrored the extending level of met specialist desires. The
game plan of wants a man has of a business may fuse
motivations, improvement, and relations with partners and
administrators. Unambiguously, rejected needs make
disappointment and likely reason the turnover choice (Porter
and Steers, 1973) by a man. Porter and Steers delineated three
shared components that depict inspiration. The three
denominators are a) what engages human direct; b) what
arranges or channels, for example, lead, and c) how this direct
is kept up and overseen. Doorman and steers see the basic
building squares of a model of motivation join necessities or
wants, direct, goals, and some info (Long et al., 2012).
Fig 2:- Porter and Steers internal factors of the expectancy
model (1973) (Source:Adapted from Porter and Stress ,1973)
Most of the early research gives attention to content
models (e.g., Farris 1969, March and Simon 1958; Porter and
Steers, 1973), which focused on the reasons "why" employees
voluntarily left the organisation (Singh and Sharma, 2015).
Notwithstanding, Traditional turnover models (content
models) were censured for their low prescient legitimacy, once
in a while clarifying over 25% of the difference in worker
turnover (Maertz and Camplion, 1998).
D. Mobley Intermediate Linkages Model (1977)
Mobley (1977) introduced the Intermediate Linkage
model to eliminate the poor predictive validity of Mobley
(1977) acquainted Intermediate Linkage model with taking out
the poor prescient legitimacy of customary models and to give
a comprehension of the brain science of withdrawal process
(Hom et al. 1984). Mobley's (1977) "Intermediate linkage
model" was one of the primary procedure models presented
and filled in as a format for the improvement of the future
process model. This model clarifies the procedure by which a
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
disappointed employee chooses to leave the association (Hom,
Griffeth, and Sellaro, 1984).
Mobley (1977) intermediate linkages model depends on
one's desire and esteem like the choice process in this way,
contrasting the present occupation and the accessible activity
options impact worker chooses to stop/remain). In the
meantime, Price (1977) presented another procedure turnover
display, i.e., the causal model, which guarantees that goal to
stop and see elective open doors decide turnover while work
fulfilment impacts turnover through its impact on the
expectation to stop (Boswell et al., 2008).
Mobley's model is based March and Simon's ease and
desirability of work concept and Porter and Steer's model of
met-expectation. This model is heuristic instead of descriptive.
Theoretical model proposed by Mobley expressed that the
central instrument for interpreting disappointment into good
turnover depends on three turnover comprehensions as
pursued:1. Considering stopping – A worker thinks about
leaving the association 2. Goal to seek – A worker chooses to
approach searching for an occupation outside the association
3. Goal to stop – A worker chooses to leave the association at
some unspecified point later on. As indicated by Mobley's
hypothesis, withdrawal conduct is a part of choice process
connected in a succession of subjective stages beginning with
the way toward assessing the existent activity pursued by
enthusiastic condition of satisfaction or dissatisfaction
(Mobley et al., 1979; Thwala et al., 2012; Abdullah et al.,
2011; Abdullah et al., 2012).
Mobley's model (1977) exhibited the intermediate
linkage in the connection between employment
(dis)satisfaction and turnover. Mobley nitty gritty the
procedure of choice procedures of stopping mentally and
causally. Mobley's (1977) linkage display proposes a
progression of the middle of the road linkages between
occupation fulfilment and turnover. In particular, work
disappointment produces a progression of withdrawal
comprehensions, for example, left goal, place of employment
seek utility assessments, and inquiry conduct that outcome in
pursuit of employment practices. Mobley (1977) initially
examined the brain research of the withdrawal choice process
and recognised conceivable middle of the road linkages in the
fulfilment turnover relationship (Yu, Benlian, and Hess
(2010).
When an employee found a more attractive alternative
job than the current job, an individual develops quit intention
and, consequently, leaves the organisation. Mobley (1977)
found negative correlations between satisfaction and
frequency of thinking to quit (Yu,Benlian, and Hess,2010).
Besides, Mobley et al. (1979) gave a more far nitty-gritty
process demonstrate prescribing that there are four primary
determinants of the decision to leave, specifically place of
business satisfaction, expected utility of choices employments
inside the affiliation, expected utility of elective occupations
outside the affiliation and non-work regards and employment,
which in this manner are affected by a couple of individuals,
affiliation and condition factors (Boswell et al. 2008).
518
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Fig 3:- Mobley (1977) Intermediate Linkage Model
(Source: Adapted from Mobley (1977, p.238))
The model has not exhibited as a bolt step succession
that all employee encounter indistinguishably. However,
analysts regularly test the model in that capacity (Singh and
Sharma, 2015). However, two or three delegates may maintain
a strategic distance from some movement or may experience
the other demand of steps (Lee and Mitchell, 1994). The
model was less stressed over the determinants (or causes) of
occupation frustration than with its result on the right turnover
decision. Hom, Griffeth, and Sellaro (1984) proposed another
difference in the main Mobley appear in which people need to
find fruitful work leave after their ceased decision without
scanning for a vocation. An outstanding commitment of this
model was to propose that activity fulfilment is most
straightforwardly identified with withdrawal perceptions
related with the choice to leave and just by implication
identified with the whole turnover process (Mowday et al.,
1984).
E. Price and Mueller comprehensive structural model(1981)
Price and Mueller (1981) recognised seven exogenous
factors prompts turnover. These are an opportunity (Increased
pay, power, and prestige); Participation; Instrumental
correspondence; Integration; Pay; Distributive equity;
Promotional opportunity (Becker, 1960). The upsides of Price
and Mueller approach is that it offers an efficient and thorough
audit of the writing and observational information on turnover
(Morrell and Wilkinson, 2001). Price and Mueller's model
offers causal connections which can be similarly connected to
all individuals from the association.
F. Steers and Mowday Turnover Model(1981)
Steers and Mowday (1981) turnover model merged all
earlier turnover models into a detailed process model of
voluntary turnover.Steers and Mowday (1981) recommended
that the grouping of activity is prompting a worker's choice to
stop/stay in the end. Exactly (1) (an.) Individual qualities and
occupation desires, conceptualized as met desires, (b.)
hierarchical attributes and encounters, conceptualized as a
person's "accomplished association reality" (Steer and
Mowday 1981), and (c.) work execution levels impact a
person's full of feeling reactions to employment and
association, including work fulfillment, work contribution and
authoritative responsibility (Singh and Sharma, 2015) (2)
Affective reactions could prompt (a). Change the circumstance
which this way will impact the person's demeanour, or (b)
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
impact the employee's craving to remain or leave, interceded
by an assortment of non-work impacts, for example, pregnant
life partner's activity. (3) Desire/expectation of leaving can
(an) end at real staying or stopping, or (b) start to seek conduct
prompting more appealing openings for work.Those people
engaged with looking conduct, for the most part, leave an
association simply after they discover another activity (Lee
and Mowday, 1987). Steer, and Mowday was a model further
developed and itemised about the determinants of employment
fulfilment and other full of feeling reactions. The excellent
contrast between these two models is that Mobley advocates
goal to stop pursuing the activity choices, while Steers and
Mowday (1981) considers that look for exchange pursues
purpose to stop (Lee and Mowday, 1987).
Fig 4:- Steers and Mowday turnover Model(1981)
(Source: Adapted from Ramesh (2012))
G. Sheridan and AbelsonCusp Catastrophe Model of
Turnover (1983)
Catastrophe theory had been used to explain the
employee turnover model by Sheridan and Abelson (1983);
Sheridan (1985). The reason for these examinations was to
expand the utilisation of fiasco hypothesis to the worker
withdrawal process. Bluedorn (1982) characterised withdrawal
as a decrease in the worker's socio-mental fascination or
enthusiasm for the work association.
Worker withdrawal connected with broken employee
practices, for example, declining execution, visit delay, non-
attendance, strikes, and coming full circle in voluntary
turnover/terminations. Sheridan and Abelson Cusp
Catastrophe Model of Turnover offers connections between
occupation fulfilment, work strain, hierarchical duty, and real
worker turnover (Holtom, Mitchell, and Lee, 2006; Mitchel
and Lee, 2001; Messersmith, 2007). It has three essential
characteristics. To begin with, this model portrays that
withdrawal lead is an arbitrary and dynamic process initiated
by unforeseen changes, showing a provocative uniqueness
from the traditional point of view of Mobley's turnover
system. In any case, concede rule is associated whereby
specialists will attempt to hold work in the relationship to the
extent may be achievable.
519
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Cusp Model withdrawal is believed to be controlled by
two factors: a splitting factor (Job tension) and an attractor
(Organizational commitment) (Thurau, 2000; Thwala et al.,
2012).
Encourage clarification of the part factor clarified that
activity pressure comprises three segments, to be job strife, job
vulnerability, and job precision. Job strife can be characterised
as the irregularity and hole between outer client and inner
client and the items or administrations the worker can convey.
Role uncertainty implies that employee is questionable
how the activity ought to be performed or how a man is
assessed and how remunerates are disseminated. At last, job
precision implies the observation exactness of what their
chiefs anticipate from them (Thurau, 2000). As for the
attractor here, hierarchical duty joins amass connection, for
instance, the congeniality and associates (Thurau, 2000)
Fig 5:- Cusp-Catastrophe model of employee
turnover(1983)(Source: Adapted from Sheridan and Abelson
(1983))
H. An Integrated Process Model of Jackofsky (1984)
The integrated process model was published by Ellen F.
Jackofsky, which was based on the concepts of ease of
movement and desirability of movement by March and
Simon’s model (1958). This model endeavoured to
incorporate the job performance with the turnover process. In
the essential model, the simplicity of development was alluded
to the chances and choices given by different associations or
additional authoritative factors, for example, right work
economic situations. While the attractive quality of
development was inferred to be the employee’s activity
fulfilment and for this, for the most part, alluded to
conceivable intra-authoritative elements (Abdullah et al.,
2011; Abdullah et al., 2012; Thwala et al., 2012). These two
developments would invigorate the expectation of employee to
leave the association deliberately (Long et al., 2012).
Notwithstanding, the deficiencies of the fundamental model
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
and significant components, for example, work execution was
unsuccessfully assessed and that ultimately set off the turnover
procedure.
March and Simon (1958) indicated that two huge
components impact worker turnover, "seen attractive quality
of development" operationalised as occupation fulfilment and
"seen simplicity of development" operationalised the same
number of other hierarchical options saw (Morrett et al.,
2001). This model predicts work turnover, which incorporates
development between and inside associations, as opposed to
anticipating hierarchical withdrawal (Singh and Sharma,
2015). A significant approach of this model is performance
related to a turnover.
The necessary, astounding exertion of this model is to
centre around the job of occupation execution in real turnover
in detail. Additionally, instead of merely utilising the
simplicity of development, as a variable associating with other
occupation dispositions to choose good turnover, similar to all
other earlier models, it made a point that it can likewise be a
wellspring of inspiration for the worker to leave.
Fig 6:- Jackofsky integrated Process Model(1984)
(Source: Adapted from Singh and Sharma (2015))
I. Hom and Griffeth alternative linkage model of turnover
(1991)
Hom and Griffeth (1991) recognised an alternative
linkage model of turnover (work disappointment advances into
turnover). Hom and Griffeth (1991) utilised structural
equation modelling(SEM) to propose another alteration of the
original Mobley model in which people who hope to discover
alternative employments effectively leave in the wake of
choosing to stop without hunting down work. On the other
hand, Gaertner (2000) found that none of the factors from the
above-talked about models clarified over 15% of the variance
in turnover.
520
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Fig 7:- Hom and Griffeth Alternative Linkage Model of
Turnover (1991)(Source: Adapted from Ramesh (2007))
J. Lee and Mitchellunfolding model of turnover (1994)
Lee and Mitchell's (1994) unfurling model of turnover
depends on Beach's 1990 hypothesis of global primary
leadership likewise named as picture hypothesis. As indicated
by the Image hypothesis single screen and translates data as
they assess alternatives. Singular screening depends on the
infringement of fit which implies surveying the degree to
which the encompassing condition coordinates an individual
esteem structure, and subsequently, these three pictures fill in
as the criteria (Mitchell and Lee, 2001). The screening method
by and extraordinary begins with some unmistakable event.
The event starts a man to relief and considers the essentialness
or proposal the event has concerning his or her movement.
Subsequently, individuals will this way think about whether
there is another elective when they feel that leaving is an
elective worth considering. As a made reference to previously,
Lee and Mitchell (1994) completed that the turnover system
begins with individuals separating for significant events. At
present, people reliably ask themselves whether the movement
gives the cash related favourable circumstances or pay they
needed.
This way, neglected requests increment the level of
employment disappointment and trigger the need to scan for
occupation options (Mitchell and Lee, 2001; Holtom,
Mitchell, Lee, 2006; Allen and Shannock, 2012). The
hypothesis fights that when individuals see that their
commitments to an affiliation outperform the promptings, they
get from that affiliation occurs as turnover. Two segments
widely influence this inducement- commitment modifies: (1)
one is hankering to move, which is all around a component of
one's satisfaction with the working environment, and (2) one's
simplicity of development, which is affected by full scale and
individual-level factors that choose employability.
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Fig 8:- Lee and Mitchell unfolding model of
turnover(1994)(Source: Adapted from Lee et al. (1999))
Lee and Mitchell (1991) think about was the first plan to
comprehend the later forms of the unfurling model that
comprises four components. This model features distinctive
mental ways that individuals take before stopping. As per Lee
and Mitchell (1994), the procedure of turnover is frequently
activated by an occasion that containers employees toward
contemplated judgments about their occupations additionally
called a stun. The stun is then interpreted of and facilitated
into the person's game plan of feelings and pictures. Right
when a stagger triggers the endorsement of a prior course of
action of development, the individual stops without
considering an individual related to the association or
occupation choices (Lee et al., 1999). On the other hand, if a
shock does not trigger a previous content, the individual
experiences additional intellectual thoughts, for example,
assessments of occupation fulfilment and employment options.
Fig 9:- Source: Adapted from Long et al. (2012)
Lee, Mitchell, Wise, and Fireman (1996) tried the Lee
and Mitchell unfurling model of turnover. They showed 63 per
cent of the precedent followed one of the methods for the
spreading out model, which extended to 92.6 per cent after
specific changes proposed by Mitchell et al. (1996).
Correspondingly, Lee et al. (1999) moreover revealed
comparable kind of results. Likewise, Donnelly and Quirin
(2006) widened created by spreading out the model by
including weaklings and furthermore stayers (who thought to
stop regardless remained). The examination demonstrated 86
per cent of the precedent leaving through one of the ways.
521
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
K. Mitchell and Lee job embeddedness model (2001)
Mitchell and Lee (2001) turnover approach concentrated
on the elements that lead an employee more prone to stay,
aside from the elements liable to influence a worker to leave
(Ramesh, 2007). Mitchell and Lee (2001) recommended that a
different individual connection prone to keep them away from
leaving regardless of whether they consider leaving because of
specific conditions. Mitchell and Lee presented Job
embeddedness ideas and delineates that people who are high
on work embeddedness may remain with the association
regardless of whether conditions are not as much as perfect.
Employment embeddedness depicts the different connections
an individual has with the association and the network
(Mitchell and Lee, 2001). A person's choice to leave an
association is not made in confinement yet is moulded by the
earth (both work and non-work) in which the individual is
'implanted (Mitchell et al., 2001).

Mitchell and Lee introduced three kinds of attachments (links,

fit, and sacrifice) with six dimensions (links – Organization,
Fit- Organization, Sacrifice- Organization, Links -
community, Fit - community, Sacrifice - community). An
individual links with the organisation and the community
embedded within the job and the individual has to sacrifice a
lot while leaving the organisation and community.
Fig 11:- Simplified Employee turnover Model (Source:
Developed for the study)

 Internal and external job-related disappointments

Fig 10:- Dimension of Mitchell and Lee job embeddedness
model (2001) (Source: Adapted from Ramesh (2007))
Job embeddedness is a relatively new model. There has
been an impressive proportion of accumulates that take a
gander at this construct (Lee et al., 2004; Mitchell et al., 2001;
Ramesh and Gelfand, 2010; Young, 2012). These
examinations prescribe work embeddedness is a construct with
many certifications for upgrading our understanding of the
turnover method.
L. Conceptual framework of employee turnover model
Based on the detailed discussion of past employee
turnover model, the researcher presented the following
simplified employee turnover model.
Employee turnover arise with lots of internal as well
external related factors such as compensation (Combs, 2017;
Gharib, Kahwaji, and Elrasheed, 2017); training (Ertuk and
Vergun, 2014); Tangthong, Trimetsoontorn, and Rojniruntikul,
2014); performance management (Chepchumba and Kimutai,
2017); Rubel, 2015); Development (Govindarju, 2014;
Karavardar, 2014);management (Harhara, Singh, and Hussain,
2015). Kasenga and Anna Karin, 2014));environment
(Carlson, Hunter, Ferguson, and Whitten, 2014; Zhang,
Punnett, and Gore, 2014);social support (Holmes, Baghurst,
and Chapman, 2013; Shrestha and Mishra, 2015)); justice
(Imran and Alli, 2016; Kaur, Mohindru, and Pankaj, 2013);
job autonomy (Delong, 2015; George, 2015; Rhatigan, 2016);
workload (Erat, Kitapci, and Comez, 2017; Jones et al., 2007;)
Work-life balance (Deery and Jago, 2015; Singh, Ganguli, and
David, 2017); job stress (Newton and Teo, 2014; Pryce, 2016);
personality traits (Christiansen, Sliter, and Frost, 2014; White
berry, 2016) Team player (Song, Lim, Kang, and Kim, 2014;
Ramamoorthy et al., 2014); self-efficacy (Garcia, 2015; Hicks
and McFrazier, 2014); long commute (Kim and Park , 2017;
Nivens and Nordstrom, 2012);
Different inward and outer occupation related
components start frustration with workers and the prompt
quest for new employment conduct. Whose qualities and
interests do fit with the substance of the business messages,
will be frustrated over the long haul once authoritative practice
does not compare with the upheld esteems and attributes
(Sandra and Groeneveld, 2011). This way, disappointment
prompts pursuit of employee conduct. Nonetheless, the active
development rate and joblessness rate in the household and

IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com 522

Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018
expert work advertise, number of unmistakable organizations,
and particular occupation offers may impact the employee's
perspectives on the fact that it is so natural to change work and
to support him/her to remain in the present working
environment or abandon it (Ozolina-Ozola, and Gaile-
Sarkane, 2017).
The activity accessibility that satisfies worker desires
results in turnover from the present business. Subsequently,
turnover is regularly a result of the mistake of a worker at
work. Hence, Meeting employees' desires either by moving
over to practical occupation reviews to bring down new
worker's activity desires or by attempting to give employees
genuine employment encounters is fundamental to constrain
worker turnover. On the other hand, a tight work showcase
pattern and low rate of chances will postpose turnover choice
till the employee lands his fantasy position. Employee duty or
worker embeddedness can make never again tie between
workers with their present job when such employee
experienced discontent in his job.
III. CONCLUSION
Various models have been advanced to clear up turnover
since the main model by March and Simon (1958); in any
case, there have been incredibly couple of extra factors that
contribute inside and out to elucidate turnover a long ways
past the principal proposed work perspectives and business
decisions. Various models have impelled extra factors, for
instance, seen utility of existing and elective business
(Mobley, 1977), pay, correspondence (Price, 1977), singular
qualities (Mobley et al.,1979), and work execution (Steers and
Mowday, 1981), yet even the most unpredictable of these
turnover models have just all over illuminated over 15% of the
vacillation in real turnover. Put in a sudden way, these models
have would in general wind up less niggardly, yet the
extension of different components has not achieved a different
augmentation in cleared up fluctuation. Along these lines,
these models broaden our understanding of the immense
number of components that could affect turnover, have not
been helpful in clearing up the most critical reasons that
labourers leave an affiliation.
Till date, a few models of turnover have been clarifying
why workers leave, and how employees take off. No all-
around acknowledged model for any of these is available
(Singh and Sharma, 2015). Past sources uncover diverse
models have made some astounding commitments to the
region of worker turnover, which comprehended the conduct
of employees towards stopping and remaining in the activity
(Singh and Sharma, 2015). This research responded to Long et
al. (2012); Singh and Sharma (2015) call to focus more on
momentous turnover models that have been proposed to date
to get a fuller understanding of the employee turnover models.
This research initiated a practical employee turnover model
that can be applied to any spectrum. The research models
might help to understand areas of concern for decision makers
to make effective retention policies. This research reviewed
past employee turnover models and provided a model based
on the understanding. Future researchers can test the models in
different cultural settings.
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
REFERENCES
[1]. Abdullah, A., Bilau, A.A., Enegbuma, I.W., Ajagbe,
A.Mand Ali, K.N (2011). “Evaluation of Job Satisfaction
and Performance of Employees in Small and Medium
Sized Construction Firms in Nigeria” Paper presented at
the 2nd International Conference on Construction and
Project Management, vol.15, IACSIT Press, Singapore,
22-23rd June, pp: 225-229.
[2]. Abdullah, A., Bilau, A.A., Enegbuma, W.I., Ajagbe,
A.M and Ali, K. Nand Bustani, S.A. (2012). Small and
Medium Sized Construction Firms Job Satisfaction and
Evaluation in Nigeria. International Journal of Social
Science and Humanity, 2(1): 35-40.
[3]. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of
inequity, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
67,422.
[4]. Ajit, P, and Pilani, B (2016). Prediction of Employee
Turnover in Organizations using Machine Learning
Algorithms a case for Extreme Gradient Boosting.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial
Intelligence, Vol. 5, No.9.
doi:10.14569/IJARAI.2016.050904
[5]. Allen, G.D. and R.L. Shanock, 2012. Perceived
organisational support and embeddedness as
fundamental mechanisms connecting socialisation tactics
to commitment and turnover among new employees.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, DOI:
10.1002/job.1805.
[6]. Ang, S., and Slaughter, S. (2000). The missing context
of information technology personnel: a review and future
directions for research, in Framing the domains of IT
management: projecting the future from the past, R. W.
Zmud (ed.), Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational
Resources.
[7]. Banks, C.H., (2007). Met expectations hypothesis: the
use of direct measures to develop participant surveys.
Online Journal of Workforce Education and
Development,2(4): 1-16.
[8]. Becker, H.S. (1960). Notes on the concept of
commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42.
[9]. Bluedorn, A.C. (1982) "The Theories of Turnover:
Causes, Effects, and Meaning." In Research in the
Sociology of Organizations, edited by S. Bacharach,
Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.
[10]. Boswell, Wendy R., Lily R. Ren, and Andrew T.
Hinrichs. (2008)."Voluntary Employee Turnover:
Determinants, Processes and Future Directions." The
Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior, edited by J.
Barling and C. L. Cooper, vol . 1, 192-216. New Delhi,
Sage Publication.
[11]. Boyar, L.S., V.R. Carl and R.P.M. Sinha, (2012).
"Linking turnover reasons to family profiles for IT/BPO
employees in India," Journal of Indian Business
Research, 4(1): 6-23.
[12]. Carlson, D.S., Hunter, E.M., Ferguson, M. and Whitten,
D. (2014). Work-family enrichment and satisfaction are
mediating processes and relative impact of originating
and receiving domains. Journal of Management, 40, 845-
865.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311414429.
523
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
[13]. Catalyst. (2016). Turnover and retention. Retrieved
from: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/ turnover-and-
retention.
[14]. Chepchumba, T.R and Kimutai, B.D (2017). The
relationship between employee compensation and
employee turnover in small businesses among Safaricom
dealers in Eldoret municipality, Kenya. International
journal of economics, commerce, and management of
the United Kingdom. Vol. v, issue, 2.
[15]. Christiansen, N., Sliter, M and Frost, C.T. (2014). What
employees dislike about their jobs: Relationship between
personality-based fit and work satisfaction. Personality
and Individual Differences, 71, 25-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.013.
[16]. Combs, M.K. (2017). Strategies for Retaining
Employees for Call Centers, Doctoral thesis, Walden
University, Pro Quest.
[17]. Deery, M., and Jago, L. (2015). Revisiting talent
management, work-life balance, and retention strategies.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, 27, 453-472. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-12-
2013-0538.
[18]. Delong, S, R (2015). Critical strategies for retaining
information technology professionals, Doctoral thesis,
University of Laverne, California.
[19]. Donnelly, D. P., and Quirin, J. J. (2006). An extension of
Lee and Mitchell's unfolding model of voluntary
turnover. J. Organiz. Behav., 27: 59-77.
doi:10.1002/job.367.
[20]. Dugguh, S.I and Dennis, A (2014). Job satisfaction
theories: Traceability to employee performance in
organisations, Journal of Business and Management
Volume 16, Issue 5. Ver. I, PP 11-18. Retrieved from:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bb50/91f61cbd4a024ad
d34d032b4bb0951015de2.pdf.
[21]. Erat, S., Kitapçi, H., and Comez, P. (2017). The effect of
organisational loads on work stress, emotional
commitment, and turnover intention, International
Journal of Organizational Leadership 6(2017) 221-231.
Retrieved
from:http://aimijournal.com/Pages/DownloadHandler.as
hx?DownloadObject=ArticleandId=5431dfdd-d37f-
4de7-8baf-554f2d53a487.
[22]. Erturk, A. (2014). Influences of HR practices, social
exchange, and trust on turnover intentions of public IT
professionals. Public Personnel Management, 43, 140-
175. doi: 10.1177/0091026013517875.
[23]. Farris, G. F. (1969a). Organisational factors and
Individual performance: a longitudinal study. Journal of
Applied Psychology. 1969, 53, 87-92.
[24]. Farris, G.F., (1969b). Some antecedents and
consequences of scientific performance. IEEE
Transactions on Engineering Management, 1969, EM-
16, 9-16.
[25]. Garcia, G.F (2015) The Relationship between self-
efficacy and employee commitment among
Perfusionist’s, Doctoral thesis, Walden University.
Retrieved From:
http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations.
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[26]. George, C. (2015), "Retaining professional workers:
What makes them stay?" Journal of Employee Relations,
Vol 37, pp 102-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-
2013-0151.
[27]. Gharib, M.N., Kahwaji, A.T., and Elrasheed, M.O.
(2017). Factors Affecting Staff Retention Strategies
Used in Private Syrian Companies during the Crisis.
International Review of Management and Marketing,
Vol, 7, Issue 2. Retrieved from:
https://econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/
4392/ pdf.
[28]. Govindaraju, N (2014). Rethinking of retention strategy:
An emerging need in the Indian IT Industry, Paper
presentation at IISRO International Multi-conference,
Feb 14-15, Malaysia, pp 126-129.
[29]. Griffin, M.L., Hohan, N.L., and Lambert, E.G. (2014).
Career stage theory and turnover intent among
correlational officers, Criminal justice and behaviour,
41, 4-19. doi:10.1177/0093854813503638.
[30]. Harhara, A.S., Singh, S.K and Hussain, S.M. (2015).
"Correlates of Employee Turnover Intentions in the Oil
and Gas Industry in the UAE," International Journal of
Organizational Analysis, Vol. 23 Iss 3 Pp. 493 – 504.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2014-0821.
[31]. Hicks, T., and McFrazier, M. (2014). College student
self-efficacy research studies. Prerie View, TX: A and M
University.
[32]. Holmes, P.D.M., Baghurst, T., and Chapman, T (2013).
Employee Job Embeddedness: Why People Stay,
International Journal of Business, Management,
Economics research, Vol 4(5), 802-813.
www.ijbmer.com | ISSN: 2229-6247.
[33]. Holtom, B.C., T.R. Mitchell, and T.W. Lee, (2006).
"Increasing human and social capital by applying job
embeddedness theory," Organizational Dynamics, 35(4):
316-31.
[34]. Hom, P. W., Griffeth, R. W. and Sellaro, L. (1984) ‘The
validity of Mobley’s (1977) model of employee
turnover’, Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance 34: 141 – 74.
[35]. Hom, P.W., and R.W. Griffeth. (1991). "Structural
equations modelling test of a turnover theory: cross-
sectional and longitudinal analysis," Journal of Applied
Psychology, 76: 350-66.
[36]. Hom, P.W., Lee., Thomas, W., Shaw, J.D., Hausknecht.,
and John, P. (2017). One hundred years of employee
turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied
Psychology, Vol 102(3), 530-545.
[37]. Houseman, R, Hatfield, J, and Miles E. (1987). A new
perspective on Equity Theory’. TheEquity Sensitivity
Construct’, Academy of Management Review. 12(2):
232.
[38]. Imran, R., and Allil, K. (2016). The Impact of
Organizational Justice on Employee Retention: Evidence
from Oman, International Review of Management and
Marketing, Vol 6, Issue 2. Retrieved from: at
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301348621.
[39]. Ingersoll, R., and Smith, T. M. (2003). The Wrong
Solution to the Teacher Shortage. Retrieved from
https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/126.
524
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
[40]. Jackofsky, E.F. (1984). Turnover and Job Performance:
An Integrated Process model. The Academy of
Management Review, 9(1): 74-83. [53].
[41]. Joseph, D., Koh, C.S.K., and Hao Foo, A.C. (2010).
Sustainable IT-specific human capital: coping with the
threat of professional obsolescence.International
Conference on Information Systems Proceedings,
Retrieved from [54].
http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/46.
[42]. Kaplan, D.M., and Lerouge, C. (2006) Managing on the [55].
edge of change: Human resource management of
information technology employees, Human Resource
Management, 46, 3, 325-330. [56].
[43]. Karavardar, G (2014). Perceived Organizational Support,
Psychological Empowerment, Organizational
Citizenship Behavior, Job Performance, and Job
Embeddedness: The research on the Fast Food Industry [57].
in Istanbul, Turkey. International Journal of Business
and Management. Vol. 9, No 4.
doi:10.5539/ijbm.v9n4p131.
[44]. Kasenga, F., and Anna-Karin, H. (2014). Staff
motivation and welfare in Adventist health facilities in [58].
Malawi: A qualitative research. BMC Health Services
Research, 14, 486-500. doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0486-4.
[45]. Kaur, B., Mohindru and Pankaj (2013). Antecedents of
Turnover Intentions: A Literature Review, Global [59].
Journal of Management and Business Studies. Research
India publications, Volume 3, Number 10, pp. 1219-
1230. Retrieved from: [60].
http://www.ripublication.com/gjmbs.htm
[46]. Kim, H and Park, J. (2017) "The effects of longer
commutes, unsolicited job offers, and working in the
Seoul metropolitan area on the turnover intentions of [61].
Korean employees," International Journal of Manpower,
Vol. 38 Issue: 4, pp.594-613.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2015-0211.
[47]. Krau, E (1981). Turnover analysis and prediction from a
career developmental point of view, Personnel [62].
phycology, 34:771-790.
[48]. Lee T. W ., Mitchell T. R., Holtom B. C., McDaniel L.
S. and Hill J. W. (1999). The Unfolding Model of
Voluntary Turnover: A Replication and Extension. [63].
Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4): 450-462.
[49]. Lee T. W. and Mitchell T. R. (1991). The Unfolding
Effects of Organizational Commitment and Anticipated
Job Satisfaction on Voluntary Employee Turnover. [64].
Motivation and Emotion,15 (1): 99-121.
[50]. Lee T.W. and Mitchell T. R. (1994). An Alternative
Approach: The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Employee [65].
Turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19 (1): 51-
89.
[51]. Lee, T., Mitchell, T., Wise, L., and Fireman, S. (1996).
An Unfolding Model of Voluntary Employee Turnover.
The Academy of Management Journal,39(1), 5-36. [66].
Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256629.
[52]. Long, C.S., Ajagbe, M.A., Md Nor, K and Suleiman, E.S
(2012). The Approaches to Increase Employees’
Loyalty: A Review on Employees’ Turnover Models.
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(10):
282-291, Retrieved from
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ba49 /49b8db
341062b5ae4cb5d8134052c6ddc4fc.pdf.
Maertz, Carl P., and Micheal A. Campion. (1998) “25
Years of Voluntary Turnover Research: A Review and
Critique” in International Review of Industrial and
organisational psychology edited by L. L. Cooper and I.
T. Robertson, 49-83.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
March J. G. and Simon H. A. 1958. Organisations,
London, Wiley.
Messersmith, J. (2007). "Managing work-life conflict
among information technology workers," Human
Resource Management, 46(3): 429-51.
Mitchell TR, Brooks CH, Thomas WL, Chris JS, Miriam
E (2001). Why people stay: Using job coupling to
predict voluntary turnover. Acad. Manage. J., 44(6):
1102-1121.
Mitchell, T. R., and Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding
model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness:
Foundations for a comprehensive theory of
attachment.Research in Organizational Behavior, 23,
189-246.
Mobley, W.H. (1977) Intermediate Linkages in the
Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee
Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237.
Mobley, W.H., R. Griffeth and B. Meglino, (1979). A
Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee
Turnover Process, Psychological Bulletin, 86 493-522.
Morrell, K., Loan-Clarke, J and Wilkinson, K.(2001).
Unweaving Leaving: The Use of Models in the
Management of Employee Turnover. Business School
Research Series, pp: 1-65.
Morrell, K., Loan-Clarke, J and Wilkinson, K. (2001).
Lee and Mitchell's unfolding model of employee
turnover- a theoretical assessment. Occasional Paper,
Loughborough: Business School, Loughborough
University. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/2020.
Newton, C, and Teo, S. (2014). Identification and
occupational stress: A stress - buffering perspective.
Human Resource Management, 53, 89-113.
doi:10.1002/hrm.21598.
Ngp-Henha, P.E (2017). World Academy of Science,
Engineering, and Technology, International Journal of
Economics and Management Engineering, Vol:11,
No:11.
Nivens, V. and Nordstrom, C.R. (2012), "The effect of
workers' driving commute on stress and burnout,"
Psychology Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 73-83.
Ozolina-Ozola, and Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2016). Job
Change in Latvia: The Role of Labor Market Conditions
and Employees’ Socio-Demographic Characteristics,
Procedia Computer Science 104, 197 – 204 doi:
10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.106.
Peterson, S.J; Luthans, F; Avolio, Bruce J; Walumbwa,
Fand Zhang, Z (2011). Psychological Capital and
Employee Performance: A Latent Growth Modeling
approach". Management Department Faculty
Publications. 143. Retrieved from:
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/managementfacpub/143.
525
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
[67]. Porter, L.W. and R.M. Steers, (1973). Organisational,
work, and personal factors in turnover in employee
turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80(2):
151-176.
[68]. Price J. L. (1977). The Study of Turnover. Iowa, Iowa
State University Press.
[69]. Price, J., (2001). Reflections on the Determinants of
Voluntary Turnover. International Journal of Manpower,
22: 600-624.
[70]. Price, J.L. and Mueller, C.W. (1981). A causal model of
turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal,
24, 543–565.
[71]. Price, J.L. and Mueller, C.W. (1986). Absenteeism and
Turnover of Hospital Employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press.
[72]. Pryce. C.A. (2016). Strategies to reduce employee
turnover in small retail business, Doctoral thesis, Walden
University. Pro Quest.
[73]. Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P.C., Kulkarni, S.P., and
Gupta, A. (2014). Individualism-collectivism and tenure
intent among knowledge workers in India and Bulgaria:
Moderating effects of equity perceptions and task
interdependence. Journal of High Technology
Management Research, 25, 201-209.
doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2014.007.005.
[74]. Ramesh, A. (2007). Replicating and extending job
embeddedness across cultures: employee turnover in
India and the United States, PhD Dissertation. Retrieved
from:
https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/6841/u
mi-umd-4330.pdf?sequence=1.
[75]. Ramesh, A., and Gelfand, M.J. (2010). Will they stay or
will they go? The role of job embeddedness in predicting
turnover in individualistic and collectivistic cultures.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 807–823. DOI:
10.1037/a0019464.
[76]. Rhatigan, C. (2016). Managing Employees' Workload
Effectively to Prevent High Turnover, TINY PULSE,
Retrieved from
https://www.tinypulse.com/blog/managing-workload-
more-effectively.
[77]. Ribiero, J. (2011). Indian outsourcers quality hit by staff
issues. CIOasia.com. http://www.cio-
asia.com/mgmt/outsourcing/indian-outsourcers-quality-
hit-by-staff-issues/
[78]. Rubel, B.R.M. (2015). Compensation, performance
management practices and employee turnover intention
of ready-made garment (RMG) industry in Bangladesh,
PhD dissertation, University Sains Malaysia.
[79]. Samad, S. and Y.S. Yusuf (2012). The Role of
Organizational Commitment in Mediating the
Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover
Intention. European Journal of Social Sciences Vol.
30(1): pp.125-135.
[80]. Sandra and Groeneveld, (2011) "Diversity and employee
turnover in the Dutch public sector: Does diversity
management make a difference?", International Journal
of Public Sector Management, Vol. 24 Issue: 6, pp.594-
612, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111163675.
IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[81]. Saridakis, G, and Cooper, C.L (2016). Research on
employee turnover, New Horizons in management,
Edward Elgar, UK.
[82]. Schein, E.H. (1978). Career Dynamics: Matching
Individual and Organizational Needs, Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA.
[83]. Sheridan, J.E. (1985). A catastrophe model of employee
withdrawal leading to low job performance, high
absenteeism, and job turnover during the first year of
employment. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 88–
109.
[84]. Sheridan, J.E. and Abelson, M.A. (1983). Cusp
catastrophe model of employee turnover. Academy of
Management Journal, 26, 418–436.
[85]. Shrestha, A.K and Mishra, A. K. (2015). Perceived
organisational support, organisational identification, and
employee outcomes. Journal of Personnel Psychology,
9(1), 17-26. Doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000007.
[86]. Singh, S., Ganguli, S., and David, R. (2017). Women
Workforce Attrition Dynamics in Indian IT/ ITES sector.
The Qualitative Report, 22(5), 1211-1226. Retrieved
from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss5/1.
[87]. Singh, N and Sharma, L.S (2015).Process Models of
Employee Turnover during 1975-1995: A Review,
European academic research, Vol.III, Issues.2.
[88]. Song, J.H., Lim, D.H., Kang, I.G and Kim, W. (2014)
"Team performance in learning organisations: mediating
effect of employee engagement," The Learning
Organization, Vol. 21 Issue: 5, pp.290-309.
https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-07-2012-0049.
[89]. Steers, R. and Mowday, R. (1981). Employee turnover
and post-decision accommodation processes. In
Cummings L. and Staw, B. (eds), Research in
Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
[90]. Tangthong, S., Trimetsoontorn, J and Rojniruntikul, N
(2014). HRM Practices and Employee Retention in
Thailand. A Literature Review, International Journal of
Trade, Economics and Finance, Vol. 5, No. 2. Doi:
10.7763/IJTEF.2014.V5.362.
[91]. Thomas, T (2009). Voluntary Turnover: Why It Exists
and What It Costs, Retrieved from
http://www.thomasconcept. com/docs/ Voluntary%20
turnover-
hy%20it%20Exists%20and%20What%20it%20Costs.pd
f.
[92]. Thurau, Thorsten Hennig, (2000). Relationship
Marketing Gaining Competitive Advantage Through
Customer Satisfaction and Customer Retention.
Springer.
[93]. Thwala, D.W., A.M. Ajagbe, W.I. Enegbuma, A.A.
Bilau, C.S. Long, (2012). Sudanese Small and Medium
Sized Construction Firms: An Empirical Survey of Job
Turnover. Journal of Basic, Applied Scientific Research,
2(8): 7414-7420.
[94]. WeiBo, Z., Kaur, S, and Zhi, T (2010). A critical review
of employee turnover model (1938- 2009) and
development in perspective of performance, African
Journal of Business Management Vol. 4(19), pp. 4146-
4158, December Special Review, Available online at
http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM.
526
Volume 3, Issue 11, November – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[95]. White berry, K (2016). The 6 Personality Types and
How They Impact Your Career Choice, Office, Texas.
Retrieved from https://www.iofficecorp.com/blog/.
[96]. Xiaoni, Z., Sherry, R., Prybutok, V.R. and Kappelman, L
(2012) Perceived Obsolescence, Organizational
Embeddedness, and Turnover of IT Workers: An
Empirical Study, Vol- 43, pp12- 32. doi-
10.1145/2398834.2398837.
[97]. Young, J.A. (2012) "Job embeddedness theory: can it
help explain employee retention?" PhD dissertation,
University of Louisville. Electronic Theses and
Dissertations. Paper 1625.
https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1625.
[98]. Yu, Y., Benlian, A., and Hess, T (2010). Explaining
Perceived Turnover in Open Source Software Projects
based on Hygiene Factors.16th Americas Conference on
Information Systems. Vol.3.
[99]. Zhang, Y.J. (2016). A Review of Employee Turnover
Influence Factor and Countermeasure, Journal of Human
Resource and Sustainability Studies, 4, 85-91.
doi:10.4236/jhrss.2016.42010.

IJISRT18NV27 www.ijisrt.com 527