1 Name: Mahal Netis

2 Address: [8525] Reggio Street, Round Rock, Texas Republic, [78665] 18 USC §1151
3 Phone Number: 512.666.8089
4 E-mail Address: TonkawaofTexasLaw@gmail.com
5 Pro Se
6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

8 THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

9 Civil Action No. 18 – 1518 (UNA)

10
11 U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
12 Civil Action No.: 1:18-cv-720-LY-AWA
13
14
15
16 Mahal Netis aka Va Lyncia R. Wilder §
17 PLAINTIFF §
18 §
19 §
20 vs. §
21 §
22 §
23 JUDICIARY COURT OF TEXAS §
24 (WILLIAMSON COUNTY) et al., §
25 §
26 DEFENDANTS §

27
28
29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OBJECTION

30
31 Pursuant to U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, ANDREW W. AUSTIN, U.S. DISTRICT
32 COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION, Civil Action No.
33 1:18-cv-720-LY-AWA signed and filed on September 12, 2018;
34

REPORT RECOMMENDATION OBJECTION

Page 1 of 3
35
36 Plaintiff, Mahal Netis, a natural citizen and American Indian Aborigine Inhabitant,
37 HEREBY OBJECTS to the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES
38 MAGISTRATE JUDGE;
39
40 As recognized by the U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF D.C., Plaintiff is a full-blooded
41 American Indian, a natural citizen of the Aborigine American Indian Tribe, Onawa Taxas and
42 Tonkawa of Texas, not needing BIA Federal recognition; unlearned in law and requests the Court to
43 relax standards;
44
45 Plaintiff is the primary beneficiary and inhabitant of the restricted lands and property
46 commonly known as 8525 Reggio, Street, Round Rock, Texas 78665 lawfully owned and entrusted
47 to the Onawa Taxas of Tonkawa of Texas Tribal Trust; having standing and interest in this case,
48 with rights to the aboriginal title to the restricted lands and property under 18 U.S.C. 1151 and 25
49 U.S.C. 177; as a foreign national, non U.S. Citizen; Plaintiff has a right to sue Defendants;
50
51 Based on jurisdiction, a constitution challenge was made more than once to which was
52 ignored with courts issuing void ab initio judgment without due process in violation of U.S. Article
53 IV; the court ignored the challenge and reduced Plaintiff to 14th Amendment Chattel, which
54 Plaintiff is not; the court violated Plaintiff’s status and invoked jurisdiction where jurisdiction where
55 they have no jurisdiction and still has not been proven jurisdiction; thereby Plaintiff filed complaint
56 in Article III U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF D.C. seeking due process in Plaintiff’s proper venue;
57 noting that Plaintiff has no chance of justice in Texas Courts, under non Article III judges and
58 magistrates, et al. as manifest in this report;
59
60 Plaintiff requests case not be dismissed; moreover, be remanded back to U.S. DISTRICT
61 COURT OF D.C. where case was originally filed based on evidence of U.S. DISTRICT COURT
62 WESTERN DISTRICT IN AUSTIN, TEXAS’ prejudice;

REPORT RECOMMENDATION OBJECTION

Page 2 of 3
63
64
65
66 Plaintiff humbly submits this objection and prays for the U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF D.C.
67 to decline the recommendations, remand the case back to original court having Article III
68 jurisdiction; allow Plaintiff to proceed and not DISMISS complaint; proceeding with issuing service
69 upon the Defendants;
70

71 Sworn under my hand and seal

72
73
74 Dated: _____________________________
75
76
77
78 By: ___________________________________________
79 Mahal Netis
80 Natural Citizen and Chief of Tonkawa of Texas Tribe
81 Aborigine American Indian Inhabitant

REPORT RECOMMENDATION OBJECTION

Page 3 of 3