3 December 2018
Table of Contents
V. Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………......15
I. An Overview of the Relationship between Mental Health,
Fatal Encounters with Law Enforcement, and Institutionalization
At least one in four individuals killed by police in the United States is suffering from a
severe1, often untreated, mental illness. This figure is likely also an underestimation, due to
incomplete data on the psychiatric condition of police shooting victims (Fuller, Lamb, Biasotti &
Snook, 2015). The vast majority of social programs for these individuals are underfunded,
understaffed, and typically can only intervene when individuals are considered to be violent or
suicidal; therefore, what few programs remain are, by design, unable to provide the preemptive
and ongoing psychiatric and therapeutic treatment necessary for ensuring long-term, sustainable
management of mental health disorders (Position Statement 22: Involuntary Mental Health
treatments even for those who have insurance, and the forced decline of government support for
persons with mental illness since the beginning of the neoliberal era, has culminated in half of
the nearly 8 million Americans with severe mental illnesses being unable to receive care and/or
Waiting until symptoms are severe and pose a risk to the safety of the individual or
society necessitates that treatment is often administered through forced hospitalization, which
often results in decreased trust between the patient and mental health providers, along with
increased feelings of low self-esteem and stigmatization (Johnson & Stern, 2014). In many cases,
involuntary psychiatric commitment also results in significant financial burdens for the patient
upon release; the average cost after insurance reimbursement for a 7-day hospital stay in the
United States was found to be anywhere between $8,509 at the highest and $3,422 at the lowest
1
A severe mental illness is defined as a psychiatric condition that significantly affects the individual’s thinking,
behavior, and ability to exist in society, such as schizophrenia, some subsets of bipolar disorder, and major
depression that results in suicidality (What Is “Serious Mental Illness” and What is Not?).
(Stensland, Watson & Grazier, 2012). This dissuades or prevents patients from seeking treatment
in the future, even when their crisis is serious. These culminating factors have created a reality in
which mentally ill individuals in America are most often allowed to simply suffer untreated until
their symptoms are overwhelming and manifest in an episode that requires immediate
intervention. Since there are very few reliable, accessible crisis teams to take this role, these
situations most often result in an interaction with police and the carceral system. Police officers
are not social workers and have not been trained to appropriately respond to people experiencing
mental health crises. The statistics reflect this; when data on fatal law enforcement encounters
was examined across Nevada, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom, it revealed that
mental illnesses may have factored in up to one half of all deadly police interactions (Fuller, et
al, 2015). Furthermore, incarceration exacerbates mental illness in those who already have it—
and in many cases, imprisonment has resulted in the onset of mental illness symptoms in
In order to reduce the number of civilians killed by the police and to avoid the negative
must be imminent focus on reforming the legal system’s response to individuals experiencing
mental health episodes, and create a public system of accessible, affordable healthcare. In order
to begin to understand the complexity of this issue—an often overlooked crisis that resulted in
the preventable deaths of 236 American citizens with mental illnesses in 2017 (Sullivan,
Anthony, Tate & Jenkins, 2018)—it is necessary to first examine the social and political factors
responsible for these statistics, and then explore possible, realistic alternatives to legal and
In order to understand the lack of public support for persons with mental illness, it is
essential to explore the history of the social safety net in the United States. The New Deal of the
1930s ushered in a period of guaranteed social support through programs like Social Security and
widespread access to public goods such as transportation, education, and public spaces. Though
supposedly universal, this new “social wage” was mainly reserved for white, male Americans;
65% of African-Americans were ineligible for Social Security the year it was signed into law
(Coates, 2018). The way that white America thrived from 1935 to 1965 was by denying people
of color and women their owed amount of social capital through systems of oppression like Jim
Crow. Their portion of the social wage was then redistributed to white, middle-class America in
the form of the interstate system, home loans, schools and hospitals, and more (Prashad, p. 192,
2005). Johnson’s Great Society policies in the 1960s originally expounded upon the New Deal,
extending services like healthcare to more Americans than ever before with Medicare and
Medicaid. This was soon followed by the passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1965,
which suddenly rendered the intentionally racially-exclusive nature of the New Deal and the War
on Poverty illegal. Finally, it seemed that Americans of every race could expect to reap the
bounty of the social safety net. Before this could become a reality, however, social pressure
from the upper echelons of American society—politicians, business owners, and powerful
individuals who were not willing to look beyond their entrenched racism—coalesced old racial
hatred and exclusion into new law and order politics meant to undermine the social wage; in
essence, the systemic denial of people of color into the prosperity of American society was
subordination without the vulgarity of Jim Crow” (Prashad, p. 193). A new era of American
public policy, specifically redesigned to continue to deprive certain peoples their right to
participate in and reap the benefit of society, had begun. This would have crushing effects for
everyone dependent on the state, including the poor of every race and especially the mentally ill.
Concurrent with the desire to continue to exclude black Americans from social services
was also the desire to settle unrest, stop violence, and crack down on what was perceived to be
record-high numbers of crimes committed in the country during the late 1960s. Poverty was
understood to cause crime, but criminal activity was falsely (due to racist notions and statistics
like those found in Johnson’s Secretary of Labor’s report “The Negro Family”) attributed to
“community behavior and not structural exclusion” (Hinton, 2015, p. 103). Believing
a subsequent push for the heavy involvement of law enforcement in social programs originally
created to address poverty, and the adoption of community policing meant that police presence
and “soft surveillance” (Hinton, p. 107) became an everyday fact of life for already-marginalized
Americans. A significant part of the restructuring of American society following the Civil Rights
Act was the shift from funding and augmenting War on Poverty programs to assimilating public
funds and programs into the War on Crime. During the late 1960s through the 1990s, the budget
kept increasing for law enforcement, while money for necessary social services—such as public
hospital beds for the treatment of psychiatric patients—was routinely nowhere to be found. By
1996, the government was spending more annually on law enforcement budgets than it was on
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (Prashad, p. 194). The trend has continued into the
present day, and directly affects the lives of those with mental illness; between 2009 and 2011,
mental health funding was cut by an alarming 4 billion USD (Fisher, 2013).
This process of revoking funding for community programs while increasing the scope of
law enforcement has had specific, and severe, repercussions for the mentally ill. The shuttering
of state psychiatric hospitals and the transfer of much of mental healthcare from the public to
private sector in the 50s and 60s has resulted in more than 100,000 individuals with the most
severe mental illnesses living on the streets without proper access to a hospital bed or treatment
commitment for long periods of time has a myriad of negative psychological effects, the
community-based clinics that were intended to take the place of institutions and continue
offering assistance to the severely mentally ill were never realized due to the cuts to the welfare
state. Since this occurred simultaneously with the mass expansion of community policing, these
vulnerable individuals are now at a high risk for encountering police officers, because there are
often no other agencies to call when they experience episodes, and they often end up committed
in jails and prisons instead. Additionally, these individuals are the focus of many 911 calls for
minor civil infractions such as disturbing the peace and loitering; if they survive their encounters
with police, these individuals often find themselves cycled endlessly between the criminal justice
system for failing to pay fines, back to living on the streets, and receiving their healthcare in
emergency rooms (Fuller, et al). In Chicago in 2012, six of the twelve city public health clinics
were shut down due to a lack of funding (Fisher, 2013). The intentional relegation of societal ills
to law enforcement agencies has been overwhelmingly successful when considered in the realm
of mental health treatment and policy and has made punitive police interactions a fact of life for
Understanding that the vast majority of individuals suffering from mental health
conditions are unable to access treatment and care still does not entirely elucidate why these
people are so vulnerable to police brutality. The explanation primarily returns to the fact that a
severe mental illness, when left untreated, will often result in a crisis that necessitates some kind
of intervention. Due to the dismantling of the public healthcare system described above, this
often, out of a lack of any other options, is handled by law enforcement agents.
intervention is in an altered state, one which poses significant barriers to perceiving, processing,
and responding to the world around them as they usually would; suicidal ideation, paranoia, or
delusional thinking can severely reduce one’s ability to comprehend and follow day to day life,
let alone police orders (Vitale, p. 82). Training police to recognize signs of suicidality or severe
mental illness is inherently difficult and problematic; officers are not doctors and cannot be
reasonably expected to make the kind of accurate, clinical assessments in the field which could
offer them insight on the best way to manage the situation. For this reason, mental illness crisis
response should not be handled by the police at all. Despite widespread police training that
emphasizes the necessity for nonviolent de-escalation in these situations, standard protocol is
still for officers to arrive on the scene and immediately begin shouting commands and
brandishing weapons—two acts which often appear extremely threatening to individuals in crisis
and can cause them to flee or slip into delusions further, inspiring violent police response. If the
person is violent or intends to evade police, seeing that the officer is armed may cause them to
escalate the situation violently to protect themselves or to wound the officer before they can be
apprehended; it has been proven that there would be fewer police deaths if officers carried no
weapons at all (Vitale ,p. 26, 2018). Additionally, some individuals may be physically unable to
hear and respond to commands due to their condition, which can be perceived as noncompliance
and therefore turns the individual into a threat in the officer’s mind (Vitale, p. 78).
Once someone is perceived as a potential threat, there is a high likelihood that the officer
will respond with lethal force; this can be attributed to military-style training scenarios that show
repeated scenarios and examples of how routine interactions with the public, such as traffic
stops, can turn deadly for officers in a split second. In this way, the police are systematically
trained to view any hint of threat as “us versus them” moments, where its either the citizen’s life
or theirs; the dedication to officer safety takes precedence over any trainings that might instruct
police on how to operate with sensitivities to mental health episodes (Vitale, p. 10). In calls
regarding someone experiencing a mental health crisis, societal prejudice against the mentally ill
and the readiness to classify severely mentally ill individuals as inherently dangerous and violent
(Corrigan & Watson, 2002) often results in officers responding to mental health calls with the
assumption that they will be entering an already threatening situation. This likely makes them
The combination the officer’s concern for their life during every interaction with citizens
and the stigma against severely mentally ill people has resoundingly been a deadly
amalgamation, such as is evidenced in the 2015 police shooting of Jason Harrison. Harrison was
a 39-year-old schizophrenic black man who was killed by Dallas police officers when his mother
called 911 after he refused to take his medication. Although Harrison’s mother had often called
the police to help her with her son and they knew he was in crisis, the police shot Harrison
multiple times mere seconds after he refused to drop a screwdriver he was holding—he was not
threatening the officers in any way, according to an officer’s body camera footage, but since he
did not drop the ‘weapon’ after the fourth command, he was killed. The officer faced no criminal
charges (McLaughlin, 2015). Unfortunately, this is not an uncommon occurrence; police often
routinely shoot individuals, especially those with mental illnesses, on sight who are perceived to
be in possession of ‘weapons’; these items have ranged from screwdrivers to brooms (Ovalle,
2016) to hammers. This phenomenon occurs all over the nation. In 2014, Phoenix police
attempted to take 50-year-old Michelle Cusseaux into mental health custody following a court
order and forced their way into her apartment when she did not answer the door. Upon finding
her, she raised a hammer above her head in a way that was deemed ‘threatening’ and was fatally
shot; the officer faced no charges and was simply demoted for violating department policy
(Wasser, 2016).
The reason officers face such impunity in killing someone even when it was proven that
their life was not directly threatened is largely due to the 1989 Supreme Court case Graham v.
Connor, which found that officers were justified in using force during arrests if they “reasonably
believe[d]” the individual posed a threat to them or someone else, and that the “split-second
nature of police decision making” should be considered when cases are brought to court (Vitale,
p. 19). These two things are typically more than enough to exonerate police of guilt in the
shooting of mentally ill people, especially considering that the jurors responsible for convicting
the offending officers will likely hold the same negative stereotypes and fears of the inherent
criminality of mentally ill people (Corrigan & Watson, 2002) that the police possess. There are
few repercussions for police officers who kill the mentally ill. Another large contributor to the
indemnity is that there is only one federal database which seeks to collect data on the mental
health status of people slain by police; additionally, accurate information on any type of police
brutality across all 50 states is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain, due to the fact that
submission of data to even Congressionally-mandated databases is entirely voluntary. Only 36
states have contributed each year to the federal arrest-related deaths (ARD) database, and the
state of Georgia has never submitted a single piece of data (Fuller, et al, 7). Funding for these
programs often expires, which in the case of the ARD database, resulted in an almost decade-
long blind spot in police brutality data from 2006-2014. Most of the data about police violence
that the public has access to is compiled from a list of independent organizations, such as the
Washington Post, which keeps its own tally of mentally ill police shooting victims (Fuller, et al).
It is difficult to quantify the disturbingly high number of mentally ill murdered by police in
America as an epidemic in the eyes of the law if, according to the government, such statistics do
not exist. One of the reasons that mentally ill people are routinely killed by police is because they
There are a variety of other factors that cause mentally ill individuals to come into
frequent, and therefore potentially deadly, contact with law enforcement. As previously
discussed, homeless individuals are forced to interact continuously with the criminal justice
system, and this can have devastating effects for the homeless with psychiatric disabilities. One-
third of homeless people have untreated, severe mental illnesses (Mondics, 2014), and a lack of
reliable housing or income only serves to exacerbate their symptoms, make what little treatment
exists much harder to obtain, and therefore increases the chance that they will exhibit symptoms
of their disorder in public and be more likely to come into contact with police. Although the
Department of Justice found that it violated the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel
and unusual punishment to criminally charge someone for sleeping outside when there were no
beds or housing available for them (Badger, 2015), 33% of all US cities still have city-wide bans
on sleeping in public, and violation of the ban could result in fines or arrests (Vitale, p. 92).
When homeless people are ticketed and fined for minor infractions like sleeping outdoors, they
rarely have the ability to pay the fee, which results in further interactions with the criminal
justice system. As fines continue to build without payment, they will often be arrested and serve
short jail sentences; this only contributes to their inability to find stable housing or employment,
as their interactions with social assistance will be frequently interrupted and their “rap sheet” of
minor offenses will show on background checks when applying for jobs or apartments (Vitale, p.
91). This almost guarantees that the person will come into contact with police again, whether it is
for the crime of simply being homeless, or because their symptoms have been so augmented by
this cycle of instability that they experience a crisis in public which garners police attention. If
the individual in crisis is also under the effects of alcohol or drugs—approximately 38% of
homeless people also suffer from alcohol dependency and 26% struggle with substance
addictions (Substance Abuse and Homelessness, 2009), conditions that, similarly to mental
illnesses, require an amount of support, treatment, and stability to overcome that is simply not
available while living on the street—it greatly increases the likelihood that they will be viewed
as unpredictable or a threat, which will increase their chance of being fatally shot by police.
The reason that mentally ill people are sixteen times more likely to die at the hands of the
police is because they have a high statistical likelihood of interacting with police due to systemic
denial of the ability to live in a society that offers them treatment, compassion, understanding
and care. They have been forced to go without the medicine or therapy necessary to treat their
disorders and are often unable to maintain steady housing or employment and therefore must live
on the street, an act which is not illegal in and of itself but is treated as such by our city laws. Not
only are they subject to a judicial system that intentionally excludes them from statistics of
police brutality and allows law enforcement extreme latitude for exercising fatal force against
them, but they also live in a society that expects police officers to handle mental health crises
without proper training, and has provided no public infrastructure to provide the support and
healthcare necessary for their long-term well-being and overall health. The murder of mentally ill
individuals at the hands of police is, by all accounts, a form of state-sanctioned violence.
IV. No More Deaths: Recommendations for How to Prevent Killings of Mentally Ill
Individuals by Police through Healthcare Reform and by Reimagining Law
Enforcement Response to Mental Health
Much attention has been given to attempting to create more comprehensive police
training programs on how to de-escalate interactions with mentally ill people. This approach
ignores the fact that police “warrior-mentality” training (Vitale, p. 10) is a large part of the
problem in the first place, since police are taught to react immediately and forcefully in any
circumstance where they could possibly be threatened, which is antithetical to how most persons
with mental illness need to be treated in a time of crisis. Additionally, since police are not mental
health professionals, they cannot— and should not—be diagnosing and attempting to make
clinical judgements in the field. Training alone cannot rectify the problem of police brutality.
However, there are some police reform alternatives that may be more effective and realistic,
although they require a complete reimagining of the police’s role in crisis response. The
Memphis Police Department began experimenting in 1988 with selecting a few key active-duty
officers to respond to mental health calls, and offering them rigorous training on the common
symptoms and types of mental health disorders, the appropriate de-escalation tactics and
treatments for each, and the ability to make the kind of assessments mental health workers could
do in the field in order to identify the best next steps for treatment. This program became the
failing of this approach is that police cannot reroute mentally ill people to appropriate public
services for treatment if they do not exist, and the necessary services overwhelmingly are not
available. This type of response merely resolves their problem in the short-term and almost
necessitates that further punitive interaction will occur when they inevitably experience another
crisis. Additionally, the police are still allowed and motivated to use forceful arrest if their de-
escalation tactics do not work, which will always be more dangerous for mentally ill people. A
somewhat more promising approach that is now common in Europe and Canada is to include
trained, civilian mental health workers on these types of calls who take the lead and involve the
officers as a complete last resort, only if they are completely unable to resolve and respond to the
crisis on their own. These mental health workers have the proper training to make accurate
assessments about people with mental health conditions and can stabilize them while connecting
them to appropriate outpatient services, which reduces the number of arrests, use of excessive
force, and the amount of forced hospitalization, the negative effects of which were discussed at
Since it is impossible to completely prevent mentally ill individuals and law enforcement
from ever interacting, it is necessary to prudently consider and enact reforms to the criminal
justice system that allow for fairer and less lethal treatment for the mentally ill—but the fact
remains that police should not be the first responders to people experiencing a mental health
crisis, and have become such only due to the systematic dismantling of public and accessible
mental health care. This is a problem that needs immediate rectification. Focusing solely on
police reforms to remedy the issue does not address the root cause of why so many persons with
mental illness come into contact with the criminal justice system in the first place, and even the
best trained, most well-intentioned officer can never be a suitable replacement for long-term,
pre-emptive treatment. Police reform efforts also do nothing to address the root causes of
problems like instability in housing and societal stigma faced by people with mental illnesses;
merely resolving part of the issue still means that the high likelihood of further lethal interaction
still exists. An ideal solution would be that the majority of mental health crises are addressed
before a 911 call is ever made, and this can only occur through the revitalization and funding of
appropriate outpatient care, lowering the cost of and increasing the accessibility of prescription
medication, and expanding the availability of robust and affordable treatment teams comprised
of doctors, behavioral therapists, and networks of support for the persons with mental illness and
their family. Even individuals with the most severe mental health disorders, such as paranoid
schizophrenia, can live full, independent, safe and rewarding lives when provided with long-term
care, and stable housing and income. Medication on its own is not an effective or sustainable
form of treatment; support networks are required to ensure that the individual continues to take
their medication and check-in frequently with their care team, another thing that is not possible
The epidemic of police brutality against the mentally ill is a tragedy that is entirely
preventable. Understanding how the historical and intentional dismantling of social support for
people with mental illnesses has contributed to this crisis, and recognizing that these statistics are
not due to criminality or violence inherent to persons with psychiatric disabilities but is directly
due to the systemic denial of care, the criminalization of homelessness, the negligence of our
government to recognize victims of police violence, and brutality on part of law enforcement and
the criminal justice system makes it evident that this problem is due to a failure on behalf of the
federal government. Now that the problem has been defined, it is easy to see that there are clear,
attainable solutions to implement that can immediately improve the lives of those with mental
illness and serve to protect them from further law enforcement violence. Police officers can
respond to calls alongside mental health care workers who are more equipped to handle the
situation, can be held responsible for using excessive force against unarmed mentally ill people,
and the availability of more comprehensive and accessible psychiatric care will ensure that most
mental health crises are resolved before police are even involved.
Badger, E. (2015, August 13). It's Unconstitutional to Ban the Homeless From Sleeping Outside,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/08/13/its-unconstitutional-to-ban-
the-homeless-from-sleeping-outside-the-federal-government-
says/?utm_term=.19a24f99c4da
Coates, T. (2018, June 22). The Case for Reparations. Retrieved November 18, 2018, from
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). Understanding the Impact of Stigma on People with
Mental illness. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association
Fisher, N. (2013, October 10). Mental Health Loses Funding As Government Continues
https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/10/mental-health-loses-funding
-as-government-continues-shutdown/#3a064a4b5690
Fuller, D. A., Lamb, H. R., M.D., Biasotti, M., & Snook, J. (2015). Overlooked in the
Undercounted: The Role of Mental Illness in Fatal Law Enforcement Encounters (pp.
doi:TACReports.org/overlooked-undercounted
Haney, C. (2016, February 17). From Prison to Home: The Effect of Incarceration and Reentry
aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/prison-home-effect-incarceration-and-reentry-children-families-
and-communities
Hinton, E. (2015). "A War within Our Own Boundaries”: Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society and
the Rise of the Carceral State. Journal of American History, 102(1), 100-112.
doi:10.1093/jahist/jav328
Kohler-Hausmann, J. (2015). Guns and Butter: The Welfare State, the Carceral State, and the
Politics of Exclusion in the Postwar United States. Journal of American History, 102(1),
87-99. doi:10.1093/jahist/jav239
McLaughlin, E. C. (2015, April 23). Grand Jury: No Indictment in Dallas Police Shooting.
Retrieved from
https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/23/us/dallas-jason-harrison-shooting-grand-jury-decision/i
ndex.html
Mondics, J. (2014, July 25). How Many People with Serious Mental Illness Are Homeless?
https://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/fixing-the-system/features-and-news/2596-ho
w-many-people-with-serious-mental-illness-are-homeless
Ovalle, D. (2016, February 4). No Charges for Miami Gardens Officer who Fatally Shot
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/
miami-gardens/article58513108.
doi:10.3167/015597705780886194
Position Statement 22: Involuntary Mental Health Treatment. (2017, July 26). Retrieved
http://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/positions/involuntary-treatment
Stensland, M., Watson, P. R., & Grazier, K. L. (2012). An Examination of Costs, Charges, and
Substance Abuse and Homelessness. (2009, July). Retrieved December 1, 2018, from
http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/addiction.pdf
Sullivan, J., Anthony, Z., Tate, J., & Jenkins, J. (2018, January 06). Nationwide, Police Shot and
Killed Nearly 1,000 People in 2017. Retrieved November 18, 2018, from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/nationwide-police-shot-and-killed-
nearly-1000-people-in-2017/2018/01/04/4eed5f34-e4e9-11e7-ab50-
621fe0588340_story.html?utm_term=.ef0652e882d2
What is "Serious Mental Illness" and What is Not? (2017, September 07). Retrieved
December 2,
Wasser, M. (2016, April 03). Phoenix Cop Who Killed Michelle Cusseaux Violated Department
https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/phoenix-cop-who-killed-michelle-cusseaux-
violated-department-policy-ppd-board-rules-7670775