Bag House Connection Strength Calculation: Pt. Antam (Persero) TBK

PT.
ANTAM (PERSERO) TBK
PROJECT
EPC OF EAST HALMAHERA
FERRONECKEL PLANT DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
DOCUMENT NO.
TITLE
BAG HOUSE CONNECTION STRENGTH CALCULATION
ISSUED AS PER PIM

1
COMMENTS
0 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
B ISSUED FOR APPROVAL
A ISSUED FOR COMMENT TMN ST GT/WS - AH
REV DATE REVISION BY CHK ENG QA/QC PM
Bag House Connection Strength Calculation
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 5
1.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.3 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 5
2. MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATION ................................................................................ 6
2.1 Structural steel .................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Connection bolt ................................................................................................................ 6
2.3 Welding electrodes ........................................................................................................... 6
3. METHOD OF CALCULATION ......................................................................................... 7
3.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Bearing strength ............................................................................................................... 7
3.3 Bolt shear strength ............................................................................................................ 7
3.4 Block shear strength ......................................................................................................... 8
3.5 Element Shear Strength .................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Element Tension Strength ................................................................................................ 9
3.7 Bolt Tensile Strength in Combined Tension and Shear ................................................... 9
3.8 Member flexural strength ............................................................................................... 10
3.9 Flange and web with concentrated forces ...................................................................... 10
3.10 Weld strength .............................................................................................................. 12
Page 2 of 17
4. RESULT AND CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 14
4.1 Summary of result .......................................................................................................... 14
4.2 Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 15
5. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 16
APPENDICES
Appendix A Detail Bracing Support Bag House

Appendix B Connection Strength Calculation
Page 3 of 17
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Connection strength check summary .............................................................................. 14
Page 4 of 17
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
Proyek Pembangunan Pabrik Ferronickel Halmahera Timur (P3FH Project) planned by PT.
ANTAM (Persero) Tbk, an Indonesian public listed mining company, consists of FeNi Plant
designed for production of 13,500 metric tons per annum of Nickel in high carbon ferronickel shot.
The applied process is the proven RKEF (Rotary Kin – Electric Furnace) technology.
The project consist of the following System and Work:

1. System 1. Ore Preparation
2. System 2. Electric Smelting Furnace
3. System 3. Refinery
4. System 4. Utility Supply
5. Civil and Building Works
This document covers the report of Bag House Structural Analysis that included in System 2 of
P3FH Project.
1.2 Purpose
The objective of this document is to calculate Bag House steel structure connection based on steel
structure design standard and code.
1.3 Scope
The scope of this report is steel structure connection analysis of Baghouse.
Page 5 of 17
2. MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATION
2.1 Structural Steel

Material used for steel profile is JIS G3101 SS400 with parameter explained below:
 Minimum yield strength : 245 MPa
 Minimum tensile strength : 400 MPa
 Elasticity Modulus : 200000 MPa
2.2 Connection Bolt

Bolt type used in connection is High strength bolt using JIS B1186 F10T material with 1000 MPa
tensile strength.
2.3 Welding Electrodes

Welding electrodes used in analysis is AWS A5.1 E70 series with minimum 4000 kg/cm2
(392 MPa) yield strength and 4800 kg/cm2 (470 MPa) tensile strength.
Page 6 of 17
3. METHOD OF CALCULATION
3.1 General
Connection strength calculation is performed with using AISC LRFD specification as a main
standard. Connection strength calculation is based on failure mode of member or connection plate
that occured in connection when load applied. Failure mode is various for different types of
connection, and it is convenient to categorize them according to the type of loading as a limit state.
Loads in connection based on Bag House Steel Structure Model for strength calculation (Ref. 5).
3.2 Bearing Strength

The formula used to calculate bearing strength based on bolt configuration is in accordance with
AISC.
A possible failure mode resulting from excessive bearing is shear tear-out at the end of connected
element. The nominal bearing strength of a single bolt is determined as follows:
 Rn   1.2 lc t Fu   2.4 d t Fu (1)
where
lc : clear distance, in the direction parallel to the applied load, from the edge of the bolt to
the edge of the adjacent hole or to the edge of the material (mm)
t : thickness of the connected part (mm)
Fu : ultimate tensile stress of the connected part (MPa)
Ø : reduction factor = 0.75
3.3 Bolt shear Strength

Nominal bolt shear strength is determined as follows:
 Rn   Fnv Ab (2)
Page 7 of 17
where
Fnv : nominal shear strength (expressed as a stress) (MPa)

Ab : cross-sectional area of the unthreaded part of the bolt (nominal bolt area) (mm)
Ø : reduction factor for shear = 0.75
3.4 Block Shear Strength

For certain connection configurations, a segment or “block” of material at the end of the member
can tear out. Based on AISC, available strength for the limit state of block shear rupture along a
shear failure path and a perpendicular tension failure path shall be taken as follows:
 Rn    0.6 Fu Anv  U bs Fu Ant     0.6 Fy Agv  U bs Fu Ant  (3)
where
Agv : gross area subject to shear (mm2)

Ant : net area subject to tension (mm2)
Anv : net area subject to shear (mm2)
Ubs : factor taken as 1.0
Ø : reduction factor for shear = 0.75
3.5 Element Shear Strength

Based on AISC, available shear yield strength of affected and connecting elements in shear shall
be the lower value obtained according to the limit states of shear yielding and shear rupture.
For shear yielding of the element
 Rn   0.60 Fy Ag (4)
For shear rupture of the element
 Rn   0.60 Fu Anv (5)
Page 8 of 17
where
Agv : gross area subject to shear (mm2)

Anv : net area subject to shear (mm2)
Ø : reduction factor for shear = 1.00 (yield), 0.75 (rupture)
3.6 Element Tension Strength

Based on AISC, available strength of affected and connecting elements loaded in tension shall be
the lower value obtained accordng to the limit states of tensile yielding and tensile rupture.
For tensile yielding of cononecting elements
 Rn   Fy Ag (6)
For tensile rupture of connecting elements
 Rn   Fu Ae (7)
where
Ae : effective net area (mm2)

Ø : reduction factor for tension = 0.90 (yield), 0.75 (rupture)
3.7 Bolt Tensile Strength in Combined Tension and Shear

Based on AISC, available tensile strength of a bolt subjected to combined tension and shear shall
be determined according to the limit states of tension and shear rupture as follows:
 Rn   Fnt' Ab (8)
where
F’nt : nominal tensile stress modified to include the effects of shearing stress (MPa)
Fnt
Fnt'  1.3 Fnt  f  Fnt (9)
 Fnv v
Page 9 of 17
Fnt : nominal tensile stress (can be taken as 0.75 Fu) (MPa)

Fnv : nominal shear stress (MPa)
fv : required shear stress (MPa)
Ø : reduction factor for shear (= 0.75)
3.8 Member Flexural Strength

Limit states of connection member/part that bent about their major axis is yielding (plastic
moment). Based on AISC, available strength for yielding shall be determined as follows:
 M n   Fy Z x (10)
where
Fy : specified minimum yield stress (MPa)

Zx : plastic section modulus about the x-axis (mm3)
Ø : reduction factor for flexural = 0.90
3.9 Flange and Web with Concentrated Forces

There are two types of concentrated forces that applied to the member. A single-concentrated force
can be either tensile or compressive. Double-concentrated forces are one tensile and one
compressive and form a couple on the same side of the loaded member. When the required strength
exceeds the available strength as determined for the limit states listed, stiffeners and/or doublersa
shall be provided and shall be sized for the difference between the required strength and the
available strength.
1) Flange local bending

Based on AISC, flange limit for local bending shall be determined as follows:
 Rn   6.25 t 2f Fyf (11)
Page 10 of 17
where
Fyf : specified minimum yield stress of the flange (MPa)

tf : thickness of the loaded flange (mm)
Ø : reduction factor for bending = 0.90
2) Web local yielding

Based on AISC, limit for web local yielding shall be determined as follows:
 Rn   (5k  N ) Fyw tw (12)
where
k : distance from outer face of the flange to the web toe of the fillet (mm)
Fyw : specified miniimum yield stress of the web (MPa)
N : length of bearing (not less than k for end beam reactions) (mm)
tw : web thickness (mm)
Ø : reduction factor for yield = 1.00
3) Web crippling
The available strength for the limit state of web local crippling shall be determined as follows:
  tw   E Fyw t f
1.5
 N 
 Rn   0.80 t 1  3     
2
(13)
  d   t f  
w
tw
 
where
d : overall depth of the member (mm)

tf : flange thickness (mm)
Ø : reduction factor for crippling = 0.75
Page 11 of 17
3.10 Weld Strength

Based on AISC, strength of weld shall be the lower value of the base material and the weld metal
strength determined according to the limit states of tensile rupture, shear rupture or yielding as
follows:
For the base metal
 Rn   FBM ABM (14)
For the weld metal
 Rn   Fw Aw (15)
where
FBM : nominal strength of the base metal per unit area (MPa)
Fw : nominal strength of the weld metar per unit area (AISC table J2.5) (MPa)
ABM : cross-sectional area of the base metal (mm2)
Aw : effective area of the weld (mm2)
Ø : reduction factor = 0.75
For weld groups that concetrically loaded and consisting of elements that are oriented both
longitudinally and transversely to the direction of applied load, combined strength shall be
determined as the greater of:
Rn  Rwl  Rwt (16)
or
Rn  0.85Rwl  1.5Rwt (17)
where
Rwl : total nominal strength of longitudinally loaded fillet welds (N)

Rwt : total nominal strength of transversely loaded fillet weld (N)
Page 12 of 17
3.11 Column Base Plate Connection

When a column base resists only compressive column axial loads, the base plate must be large
enough to resist the bearing forces transferred from the base plate (concrete bearing limit), and the
base plate must be of sufficient thickness (base plate yielding limit).
1) Concrete bearing limit
AISC Specification, Section J8, provides nominal bearing strength as follows:
 Pp   0.85 fc' A (18)
where
fc’ : specified compressive strength of concrete (MPa)

A : area of steel concentrically bearing on a concrete support (mm2)
2) Base plate yielding limit
For yielding limit state, the required minimum thickness of the base plate can be calculated as
follows (Thornton, 1990) (AISC, 2005):
2 Pu
tmin  l (19)
 Fy B N
where
N : base plate length (mm)

B : base plate width (mm)
Fy : specified minimum yield strength of baseplate (MPa)
Pu : required axial compressive load (N)
Ø : resistance factor for flexure = 0.90
Page 13 of 17
4. RESULT AND CONCLUSION
4.1 Summary of Result
There are 23 numbers of connection that should be checked in accordance with limit states, depend
on its configuration. Loads at the connection are based on Bag House steel structure model output
(Ref. 5). Detail of connection is presented in Appendix A. Result of connection design check
presented in Table 1. Detail calculation for each connection presented in Appendix B.
Table 1 Connection strength check summary
Joint no. Connection type Remarks Note

Recalculation for revised
Joint Column Column splice NOT OK
design (see Appendix B.1.1)
Base Plate Base connection OK -
Detail no. 1 Beam-to-beam OK -
Detail no. 2 Bracing connection OK -
Detail no. 3 Beam-to-column OK -
Transverse stiffener required
Detail no. 8 Beam-to-column NOT OK
(See Appendix B.10)
Page 14 of 17
4.3 Conclusion
This document contain information and result of Bag House steel connection, which detailed
specification based on “Detail Bracing Support Bag House” technical drawing (Ref. 4).
From the result of calculation, connection for Joint Column does not meet criteria in bending so it
is recommended to change the plate thickness to 12 mm (recalculation presented in Appendix
B.1.2). Column transverse stiffeners are needed for Connection number 8 as the recommendation,
presented in Appendix B.10. The rest of the connection is considered adequate in meeting the
design criteria for limit state corresponding to AISC codes (Ref. 1).
Page 15 of 17
5. REFERENCES
International Codes and Standards
1. AISC Specification for Structural Steel Building
Project Document
2. P3FH-CV-9000-DBS- Design Criteria for Civil and Building Work in System -2,3,4
1001-R4
3. P3FH-NDIN-EM-2401- General Arrangement Bag House Item 2401
A2001-1001-001
4. P3FH-NDIN-EM-2401- Detail Bracing Support Bag House
DTL-1109-1901
5 P3FH-MS-2401-CAL- Bag House Steel Structure Strength Calculation
1001
Other References
6. AISC Design Guide Base Plate and Anchor Rod Design

7. SCI P358 Joints in Steel Construction, Simple Joints to Eurocode 3
8. SCI P398 Joints in Steel Construction, Moment-Resisting Joints to
Eurocode 3
Page 16 of 17
APPENDIX A
DETAIL BRACING SUPPORT BAG HOUSE
APPENDIX B
CONNECTION STRENGTH CALCULATION
APPENDIX B.1.1
JOINT COLUMN CONNECTION CALCULATION
APPENDIX B.1.2
REVISED JOINT COLUMN DESIGN RECALCULATION
APPENDIX B.2
BASE PLATE CONNECTION CALCULATION
APPENDIX B.3
DETAIL NO.1 CONNECTION CALCULATION
APPENDIX B.4
APPENDIX B.5
APPENDIX B.6
APPENDIX B.7
APPENDIX B.8
APPENDIX B.9
APPENDIX B.10
APPENDIX B.11
APPENDIX B.12
APPENDIX B.13
APPENDIX B.14
APPENDIX B.15
APPENDIX B.16
APPENDIX B.17
APPENDIX B.18
APPENDIX B.19
APPENDIX B.20
APPENDIX B.21
APPENDIX B.22
APPENDIX B.23

Bag House Connection Strength Calculation: Pt. Antam (Persero) TBK

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Bag House Connection Strength Calculation: Pt. Antam (Persero) TBK

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

PT.

ANTAM (PERSERO) TBK

BAG HOUSE CONNECTION STRENGTH CALCULATION

ISSUED AS PER PIM

1.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 5

1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 5

1.3 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 5

2. MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATION ................................................................................ 6

2.1 Structural steel .................................................................................................................. 6

2.2 Connection bolt ................................................................................................................ 6

2.3 Welding electrodes ........................................................................................................... 6

3. METHOD OF CALCULATION ......................................................................................... 7

3.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 7

3.2 Bearing strength ............................................................................................................... 7

3.3 Bolt shear strength ............................................................................................................ 7

3.4 Block shear strength ......................................................................................................... 8

3.5 Element Shear Strength .................................................................................................... 8

3.6 Element Tension Strength ................................................................................................ 9

3.7 Bolt Tensile Strength in Combined Tension and Shear ................................................... 9

3.8 Member flexural strength ............................................................................................... 10

3.9 Flange and web with concentrated forces ...................................................................... 10

3.10 Weld strength .............................................................................................................. 12

4. RESULT AND CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 14

4.1 Summary of result .......................................................................................................... 14

Appendix A Detail Bracing Support Bag House

Table 1 Connection strength check summary .............................................................................. 14

The project consist of the following System and Work:

2. MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATION

2.1 Structural Steel

2.2 Connection Bolt

2.3 Welding Electrodes

3.2 Bearing Strength

 Rn   1.2 lc t Fu   2.4 d t Fu (1)

3.3 Bolt shear Strength

Fnv : nominal shear strength (expressed as a stress) (MPa)

3.4 Block Shear Strength

 Rn    0.6 Fu Anv  U bs Fu Ant     0.6 Fy Agv  U bs Fu Ant  (3)

Agv : gross area subject to shear (mm2)

3.5 Element Shear Strength

For shear yielding of the element

For shear rupture of the element

 Rn   0.60 Fu Anv (5)

Agv : gross area subject to shear (mm2)

3.6 Element Tension Strength

For tensile yielding of cononecting elements

For tensile rupture of connecting elements

Ae : effective net area (mm2)

3.7 Bolt Tensile Strength in Combined Tension and Shear

Fnt : nominal tensile stress (can be taken as 0.75 Fu) (MPa)

3.8 Member Flexural Strength

Fy : specified minimum yield stress (MPa)

3.9 Flange and Web with Concentrated Forces

1) Flange local bending

 Rn   6.25 t 2f Fyf (11)

Fyf : specified minimum yield stress of the flange (MPa)

2) Web local yielding

 Rn   (5k  N ) Fyw tw (12)

d : overall depth of the member (mm)

3.10 Weld Strength

For the base metal

 Rn   FBM ABM (14)

For the weld metal

Rn  Rwl  Rwt (16)