Anda di halaman 1dari 4

REGISTRATION UNDER THE PROPERTY for alienation or disposition, the presumption is

REGISTRATION DECREE (PD NO. 1529) that the government is still reserving the right to
utilize the property; hence, the need to preserve its
ownership in the State irrespective of the length of
WHO MAY APPLY [SEC. 14(1) (2) (3) (4)] adverse possession even in good faith.”
 Possession is –
Sec. 14 (1) “Those who by themselves or their o Open when it is patent, visible, apparent, notorious
predecessors-in-interest have been in open, continuous, and not clandestine;
exclusive and notorious possession and occupation of o Continuous when uninterrupted, unbroken and not
alienable and disposable lands of the public domain under intermittent or occasional;
a bona fide claim of ownership since June 12, 1945, or o Exclusive when the adverse possessor can show
earlier.” exclusive dominion over the land and an
Sec. 14(2) “Those who have acquired ownership of appropriation of it to his own use and benefit; and
private lands by prescription under the provisions of o Notorious when it is so conspicuous that it is
existing laws” generally known and talked of by the public or the
people in the neighborhood. (Bienvenido v.
Sec. 14(3) “Those who have acquired ownership of Gabriel, GR No. 175763, April 11, 2012)
private lands or abandoned river beds by right of
accession or accretion under the existing laws.” NOTES:

Sec. 14(4) “Those who have acquired ownership of land  Before the case of Malabanan vs CA, there is a need
in any other manner provided for by law.” to show OCENPO. You must also show that the land
is already classified as A and D since June 12, 1945
 But when Malabanan vs CA was promulgated, it must
be proven only the classification as A and D at the
SEC. 14 (1)
time of filing of the application
Requisites:  Requisites for Original Registration
1. Declaration that the land is A and D at the time of
 The applicant must be a Filipino citizen. filing of the application for registration
 The land must be an agricultural land, already 2. Open and continuous possession in the concept of
classified as alienable and disposable (A and D) an owner since June 12, 1945
land at the time of the filing of the application
(Malabanan v. CA, Mercado v. Valley Mountain * the computation of period ay include the period of
Mines) adverse possession prior to the declaration that the
 Applicant must have been in open, continuous, land is A and D
exclusive and notorious possession and *For instance, land is declared A and D today. You
occupation (OCENCO) of the land, under a bona can invoke possession (since 1945 or earlier) even
fide claim of ownership before registration.
 Since June 12, 1945 or earlier.
*Example: You are in possession since 1945 or
 It must be shown that possession and occupation of earlier. Before it was classified as A and D in 2017, it
the land sought to be registered by the applicant was a forest land (or mineral land or national parks).
himself or through his predecessors-in-interest, Suppose you apply now for registration, can you
started on June 12, 1945 or earlier, which totally invoke or include possession prior to its classification
conforms to the requirement under Section 14 (1) as A and D in 2017? In other words can you include
 A mere showing of possession and occupation for the time when it was a forest land (or mineral or
thirty (30) years or more is no longer sufficient.” national parks)? NO, it should be agricultural lands
 Rationale for the rule that the land need be classified bcoz here it is forest land.
as A and D already at the time the application is filed:
 BASIC PRINCIPLES:
o “If the State, at the time the application is made,
1. June 12, 1945 qualifies possession and
has not yet deemed it proper to release the property
occupation, not the land classification as A and D
1
2. The agricultural land subject of application needs o Possession must be that of owner, and it must be
only to be classified as A and D at the time of the public, peaceful and uninterrupted. Acts of a
filing of the application PROVIDED the possessory character by virtue of a license or
applicant’s possession and occupation of the land mere tolerance are not sufficient.
dates back to June 12, 1945 or earlier o The present possessor may complete the period
3. PROOF TO SHOW THAT LAND IS A and D for prescription by tacking his possession to that
a. CENRO and PENRO certificate that the land of his grantor or predecessor-in-interest.
is A and D; and o It is presumed that the present possessor who
b. Certified true copy of the original was also the possessor at a previous time has
classification approved by the DENR Sec continued to be in possession during the
4. Basic principle #3 was relaxed in the case of intervening time.
Republic vs Go (2017) where it was discussed: 2. 10 to 30 year period of prescription commences
G.R. the court shall consider no evidence which only to run from the time it is declared as
has not been formally offered patrimonial property
XPN: the Court may allow in certain cases
belated submission on appeal of DENR or
CENRO CERTIFICATE only on appeal DISTINGUISH SEC. 14(1) AND SEC. 14(2)

14(1) 14(2)
SEC. 14 (2) Registration is based on Registration is based on
 Rule on prescription: possession prescription
a. Ordinary prescription – 10 years in good faith
Covered by PD 1529 and Covered by PD 1529 and
b. Extraordinary prescription – 30 years
CA 141 Civil Code
 The land must be patrimonial property for
prescription to apply. (Malabanan v. Republic, supra) 30 year period involves
 Lands of the public domain shall form part of the Period of prescription is extraordinary prescription
patrimonial property of the State when there is a without regard to Civil under Civil Code
declaration that: Code particularly Art. 1113 in
rel to Art. 1137
1. These are classified as agricultural land
2. These lands are alienable or disposable, and
3. Are no longer intended for public use or public
service.
 Only when such lands have become patrimonial can SEC. 14 (3)
the prescriptive period for the acquisition of the  Ownership of abandoned river beds by right of
property begin to run. accession:
 “The applicant must be able to show that the State, in o Under Article 461 of the Civil Code, river beds
addition to the said classification, expressly declared which are abandoned through the natural
through either a law enacted by Congress or a change in the course of the waters ipso facto
proclamation issued by the President that the subject belong to the owners whose lands are occupied
land is no longer retained for public service or the by the new course in proportion to the area lost.
development of the national wealth or that the However, the owners of the adjoining lands
property has been converted into patrimonial. shall have the right to acquire the same by
 Consequently, without an express declaration by the paying the value thereof.
State, the land remains to be a property of public o REASON: they are in the best position to utilize
dominion and, hence, not susceptible to acquisition the old river bed w/c is adjacent to their property.
by virtue of prescription.”
 BASIC CONCEPTS and PRINCIPLES
1. Concept of possession for purposes of
prescription

2
 The owners of the affected lands may not compel the  Requisites for the application Art. 457:
government to restore the river to its former bed, nor a. That the deposit be gradual and imperceptible;
can they restrain the government from taking steps to b. That it be made through the effects of the current
revert the river or stream to its former courts. of the water; and
o But the owners may themselves undertake the c. That the land where accretion takes place is
reversion of the river to its original course, but adjacent to the banks of rivers.
upon a permit issued by the government. (Art. 58,  In the absence of evidence that the change in the
PD 1067, Water Code) course of the river was sudden or that it occurred
o The ownership of the abandoned river bed is through avulsion, the presumption is that the change
transferred ipso facto to the owners whose was gradual and caused by accretion and erosion.
lands are occupied by the new course of the  Alluvial formation along the seashore is part of the
river “to compensate for the loss of the land public domain and, therefore, not open to acquisition
occupied by the new bed.” by adverse possession.
 Requisites for the application of Art. 461: “Art. 4. Lands added to the shore by accretion
a. The change must be sudden in order that the old and alluvial deposits caused by the action of
river may be identified; the sea, form part of the public domain. When
b. The change of the course must be more or less they are no longer washed by the waters of the
permanent, and not temporary overflooding of sea, and are not necessary for purposes of public
another’s land. utility, or for the establishment of special
c. The change of the river must be a natural one, i.e., industries, or for the coast-guard service, the
caused by natural forces (and not by artificial Government may declare them to be the property
means) of the owners of the estate adjacent thereto and as
d. There must be a definite abandonment by the an increment thereof.” (Spanish Law of Waters)
government;  Until a formal declaration by the government,
e. The river must continue to exist, i.e., it must not through the executive or legislature, that the alluvial
completely disappear. formation is no longer needed for coast guard service,
 Ownership by right of accretion for public use or for special industries, the same
o Under Art. 457, CC, to the owners of land continues to be part of the public domain not available
adjoining the banks of rivers belong the for private appropriation of ownership.
accretion which they gradually receive from the  The land is not subject to ordinary prescription as it is
effects of the current of the waters. outside the sphere of commerce.
Justifications:
o To offset the owner’s loss for possible erosion
of his land due to the current of the river; SEC. 14 (4)
o To compensate him for his burdens arising
from the subjection of his land to encumbrances  In Republic, rep. by the Mindanao Medical Center v.
or legal easements; and Court of Appeals (GR No. L-40912, Sept. 30, 1976),
o Owner is in the best position to cultivate it. the SC held that Proclamation No. 350 legally
(Cortex v. City of Manila, 10 Phil. 567) effected a land grant for medical purposes to the
 The owner must register the accretion under the Mindanao Medical Center validly sufficient for initial
Torrens system, otherwise the alluvial property may registration under the Land Registration Act.
be subject to acquisition through prescription by third  What and where to file
persons. (Grande v. Court of Appeals, 5 SCRA 524) o The application for land registration shall be filed
 The increment does not automatically become with the RTC of the province or city where the
registered land just because the lot which receives land is situated. The applicant shall file together
such accretion is covered by a Torrens title. It must be with the application all original muniments of
placed under the operation of the Torrens system. titles or copies thereof and a survey plan of the
(Cureg v. IAC, 177 SCRA 313) land approved by the Lands Management
Bureau. (Sec. 17, PD 1529)
o An application may include two or more parcels
of land belonging to the applicant/s provided they
3
are situated within the same province or city.
(Sec. 18, ibid.)
 Amendments
o Amendments to the application including joinder,
substitution, or discontinuance as to parties may
be allowed by the court at any stage of the
proceedings upon just and reasonable terms.
o Amendments which shall consist in a substantial
change in the boundaries or an increase in area
of the land applied for or which involve the
inclusion of an additional land shall be subject
to the same requirements of publication and
notice as in an original application. (Sec. 19,
ibid.)

Anda mungkin juga menyukai