That's one
thing I like about what I do: free press.
When I insult, please know, it's only because I have nothing but utter
contempt for you; that's all, but if you take that personally...
.........
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.
Ben Franklin
Check out my new book Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the World's Last Custody Trial
Here is the most updated article. You'll let me know if anything is inaccurate.
.........
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.
Ben Franklin
Check out my new book Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the World's Last Custody
Trial
Best,
Alyssa
.........
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.
Ben Franklin
Check out my new book Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the World's Last Custody
Trial
I believe you were in contact with Ms. AnnMarie O’Neill, Mr. Jeff Shorba, Ms. Kristina Ford, Ms.
Lissa Finne, and Mr. Kyle Christopherson yesterday with similar messages as the one below and
the other email you distributed yesterday. Staff are limited in what we are permitted to
comment on, which you can view here—please see What CIO Cannot Do tab for a full
explanation. I have done my best to respond to the process questions I believe were contained in
the two emails you sent yesterday.
In regards to your questions about the issuing of an order from Chief Judge Cleary: The record in
this case indicates that the Appellant filed a motion regarding an informal brief and addendum.
Motions are referred to judges for written rulings. Chief Judge Cleary issued an order because it
is the role of a judge to respond to motions. A judge’s response to a motion comes in the form of
an order. Each month the Court of Appeals issues approximately 150 orders.
The order you sent does not contain a requirement for the Appellant to provide copies of
transcripts. Transcripts related to appeals come to the Court of Appeals with the rest of the
record, not as a part of a party’s addendum.
2. On or before December 26, 2018, appellant shall serve and file a brief with an
addendum in compliance with Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 130.02. Appellant's brief and
addendum shall be accompanied by proof of service on respondent's counsel.
3. Appellant may file an informal brief and addendum, in compliance with Minn. R.
Civ. App. P. 128.01, subd. 1.
4. Respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days after service of appellant's brief
with a conforming addendum, in accordance with Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 131.01, subd.
2.
Sincerely,
Alyssa
Alyssa,
your colleauges, Mr. Berentsen, Ms. Rinne, have not responded and Mr. Christopherson
seems out of the office. I think you have an appeals judge involved in Judicial racketeering. I
why did Judge Edward Cleary issue the order attached attached? For
instance, he says that the appeal as filed is deficient; if that is the case isn't
an administrator supposed to take care of that, not the judge.
If she was to follow all these orders she would need to submit 4,000 pages
approximately; I believe he is violating her due process rights forcing her to
submit this many pages.
This order is bogus. You all know it and if nothing is done, you are
implicated. I want answers and if I don't get them, that's exactly how I'll paint
all of you.
.........
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.
Ben Franklin
Check out my new book Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the World's Last Custody
Trial
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Minnesota Judicial Branch. Do
not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
the content is safe. If this email appears suspicious, or is asking you to provide
sensitive information, contact the ITD Service Desk for further guidance.