K.C.A.B.A.C.

Kansas City Area Benefiting Abused Children—and families

3901 Main #201
Kansas City, MO. 64111
816-968-9287

March 3, 2005

RE: GAL fax to the Courts

Dated March 2, 2005

Honorable Judge Wilson;

Please take this as a non-prejudicial pleading. The mother, in this case, seeks the help
and refuge of this court, for justice for her and her daughter, as soon as possible.

After many repeated times of abuse, with the physical abuse being quite evident, and that
have been documented, and witnessed by many, some of these being hospital personnel,
and law officers. There has not been any real evidence that the mother has abused the
rights as a mother, or the rights of her child. She has tried, unsuccessfully, at this point,
to shield her daughter from the abuse that she “witnessed” first hand by her father,
subjected to her mother.

This mother asks this court to finally give her and her daughter refuge It is very difficult
to understand how this mother can be accused of “saying bad things” about the father,
when it is he who is doing these things, that are supposedly being repeated. The mother
cannot alienate the child from the father by “telling” things that the child has “witnessed”
herself. The father has obviously done a good enough job of alienating the daughter and
the mother and has convinced people that he is innocent, when in fact he is not.

Fortunately, it appears, that this erroneous information by the GAL shows the court that
this GAL needs to be removed from this case. Additionally since it appears that the GAL
is “biased” against the mother, and has not investigated the true facts of this case, and
found out the truth. The motion to remove the ‘biased’ and incompetent GAL from the
case has been noted since her appointment by the Honorable Judge Bruns June 24, 2004.

That Rikki hears… “…. Untrue comments…. from others about her dad…” It sounds as
if the information still keeps coming, it is as if these statements might be true. If this is
so—then how can the mother be faulted, when she is the victim of these errors?

How can or does this possibly connect to the mother…?

The Mother has ABSOLUTELY NO CONTACT with any one from that school, except
for the secretary, Mary. This contact is limited to co-coordinating lunches with the
daughter, through the case manager and the secretary. The Mother does not have any
contact with the father or Dr. Rodenheffer, who was REMOVED from the Courts Service
in the same Order that appointed the GAL, Jill Dikes to the case, June 24, 2004.

Everyone who knows what is going on…knows that this is wrong to keep a loving
mother away from her daughter…the only “…untrue statements…” are coming from dad
and the GAL, towards the mother as the above mentioned fax confirms. It is real sad that
the courts have not seen the real truth, in this case, and not see that they have been both
coerced and misled to erroneous facts.

These comments… IF…at all were said…then…what are they and whom did they come
from? Other children? As already brought to the Courts attention, other adults/parents
have been …’banned’…. from speaking to Rikki, because of there association with the
mother.

And even IF these ”Untrue comments” …were made they are NOT in ANY way a reason
to maintain supervised visits, or keep the mother away from her daughter and love the
child that she brought into this world, and love her to the best of her ability and what the
child needs and should have, This program “Safe Visit” is for those who abused their
children, and may still exhibit abuse to the child, and are then allowed their right to have
parenting time…in a SAFE manner for the child. This is not the case here; there has not
abuse by the mother to the child.

As the Safe Visit…has written a report…in the positive…to remove the need for safe
visits….

The GAL…on the last minute…. and again on the last hour…whom I am sure had
enlisted the help of Mr. Hoffman, as evidenced by his letter to the Honorable Judge
Wilson…. stating ”…. I believe Jill Dykes also has a conflict….” Is intentional and is
definitely causing a problem in this case that appears to….’muddy the waters’.

Again, this appears to be one of the most pure forms of Parental Interference, and more
than exceeds the reasons for a change of residential custody, based on these and more
errors

It appears that this is very unprofessional, very unethical…not to mention cruel, your
help and the help of this court can resolve these errors.

We beg and implore you and this court to let justice prevail in this matter. This mother
has sought our help and refuge in and for this matter. WE are not and do not profess any
connection with legal representation---this is a disclaimer. We are here to advocate and
support a woman and her child who are in desperate need to be heard and have their
rights protected, and upheld

Sincerely,

Michelle D. Wilson
(Advocate and founder of K.C.A.B.A.C.)