INTRODUCTION
BASICALLY,an extended-aeration sewage treatment plant consists of an aeration tank,
designed to provide 18-24 hr sewage flow detention time, followed by a final settling
tank, designed to provide a 3--6 hr settling period and 100 per cent return of the settle-
able solids to the aeration tank. Some modifications of this basic design provide sludge
holding tanks to allow removal of excess sludge instead of permitting it to discharge
in the plant effluent. Most plants are equipped with a screen or comminutor or both
prior to the aeration tank and secondary units such as sand filters or oxidation ponds
are occasionally used to further improve the final effluent.
Sludge accumulation
In the extended aeration process, as in all aerobic biological treatment processes,
there is a net production of biological cell material. This excess material eventually
leaves the system, either intentionally as excess sludge or unintentionally as "sus-
pended solids" in the process effluent. On the North American continent, extended-
aeration systems are usually allowed to waste the net growth in the process effluent
and consequently COD removals from normal domestic sanitary flows are typically
only in the range 75-85 per cent.
Studies by SYMONSand MCKINNEY (1958) and WASHINGTONand SYMONS(1962)
revealed that the excess volatile material which accumulated in extended-aeration
systems was an inactive, biologically inert extracellular mass composed primarily
of polysaccharides.
Since the volatile suspended solids (VSS) content of biological sludge is commonly
used as a measure of the active cell concentration present in an activated sludge, the
accumulation of large amounts of biologically inert volatile material may lead to
incorrect estimates of the amount of active cells present. To avoid such inaccuracies,
MCKINNEY (1960) has employed the organic nitrogen content of biological solids as
an indication of the active cell content of biological sludge. However, recent data
by WEDDLE and JENKINS (1968) have shown that little relationship exists between
viable cells and the nitrogen content of biological sludge.
Denitrification
The loss of nitrogen from wastewater during treatment by the extended aeration
activated sludge process may be possibly regarded as both a blessing and a curse.
Denitrification in final clarifiers, with its accompanying loss of nitrogen gas, may buoy
up activated sludge particles and allow them to escape into the secondary effluent.
39
40 E.J. MIDDLEBROOI~,D. JENKINS,R. C. NEAt.and J. L. Pmu.n,s
Denitrification, however, may significantly reduce the ettiuent nitrogen content and
thereby reduce its potential to fertilize receiving waters.
The rising or floating of sludge floes in secondary sedimentation basins is a rather
common problem in activated sludge plants. Early investigations by O'SHAUGm,mSSY
and HEWIrr (1935) reached the conclusion that nitrogen gas was released in the sludge
by the reduction of nitrates and thus resulted in buoying the sludge so that it eventu-
ally floated. Based on experiences at the Bruma Works, Johannesburg, South Africa,
McLACHLAN (1936) verified these findings and showed that poorly stabilized mix-
tures of activated sludge and sewage were the most prone to rise. BRAGSTAOand
BRAOr,mY (1937) concluded that rising sludge at the Sioux Falls, South Dakota,
treatment plant was due to gaseous nitrogen released from nitrates.
Recent studies on nitrate utilization and the consequent release of gaseous nitrogen
in waste stabilization (McKar~Y, 1956; McIOi,~t,~Yand CoNwAY, 1957; and SYMONS
and MclrdNr,my, 1958) together with the general inability to account for all the nitro-
gen losses in activated sludge plants, appear to confirm Wuhrmann's idea (1954)
that nitrogen loss in activated sludge processes occurs as nitrogen gas.
Purposeof study
The purpose of this study was (i) to determine the significance of polysaecharide
material as a component of activated sludge solids and the effluent from a field-scale
extended aeration plant and (ii) to perform a nitrogen balance on a field-scale ex-
tended aeration plant to determine the significance of nitrogen loss by denitrification
EXPERIMENTAL
Design details for the extended aeration plant, which served an Air National Guard
installation with a personnel complement of approximately 200, are given in TABLE1.
The plant received daily operational maintenance during the four-month sampling
program. Hourly samples of irtfluent and effluent were composited in proportion to
plant flow. Equal volumes of hourly mixed liquor samples were eomposited. Samples
for nitrogen analysis were preserved by the addition of approximately 2 ml concen-
trated H 2SO,/1.
TABLE I. DESIGN PARAMETERSOF TIIE EXTENDED AERATION
PLANT
Design details
Type o f plant Oxigest
Material of construction Steel
Approximate population served 200
Aeration tank capacity(gad 15,000
Settling tank capacity(gad 3368
Preliminarytreatment Comminutor
Sludge return method Air lift
Sludge wastingfacilities None
Aeration method Diffused
Compressors/blowers 2x2.5 hp
Settling tank retention (hr) 3.85
MaximumBOD (lb/day) 6O
Maximumair flow (CFM) 144
Chlorination Hypochlorinator
and Contact tank
Kinetics and Effluent Quality in Extended Aeration 41
Polysaccharide was determined by the anthrone method (Tm~wLYAN and HARRISON
1952). Suspended and volatile suspended solids (VSS) were determined by filtration
through Whatman GF/C glass fiber filters (JENKINS, 1962). All other analyses were
by Standard Method (1965) techniques
0.40
1 i I I I I 1 1 I I
0.50 - -
0.20 - 2.0
I
•0
oD
0
0 O. tO - - LO .D
009C -- .9 .~.
I
0 O. 08C
0.070 000
0 060-- O0 o .6 "5
0.050 -- D
0 040 --
[] • 0 0
.4
8
¢.J
0o °
]34
Jm
w
0030
' {IC
._1 0 0
g 0.020 i~
[] Ib COD REMOVED/Ib Org. N - d o y
..J
o
0
0 Ib C O D R E M O V E D / I b VSS-d0y
0.010 I T T I ~ I I I ] ! ,IO
2 tO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 98 99
PERCENTAGE
FIG. 1. Log-normal probability plot of removal rate, lb COD removed/lbVSS/day and lb COD
removed/lb organic nitrogen/day.
influent COD (160-2300 mg/1) and by a steady decline in MLVSS throughout the
study (5110 to 1810 mg/1). Notwithstanding this extremely wide variation in organic
loading, effluent quality measured as soluble COD remained at the low and relatively
constant level of 16+8 mg/1. Effluent quality was, in fact, determined to a far more
significant degree by its suspended matter content which had a median value of
25 mg/l and varied from 8 to 216 mg/1 (FIG. 2). Effluent suspended solids accounted
for 26 mg/1 of the median total effluent COD value of 42 mg/l (FIG. 3).
42 E.J. MIDDLEBROOKS,D. JENIaNS, R. C. NEAL and J. L. PmLL~S
PERCENTAGE
2% 5 I0 15 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 85 90 95 98
6
5--
L L L I J l I l J I ~ L
4--
"3-
2--
I0~ --
8--
0 0 0
0
> 3--
F-
z
w 2-- 000
J
u. 0
0
O0
~a O0
6-- 0 0 0
5 --
4
3--
2 0
80
70 - - 0~l 30
d
6o
oOfi/" d
o
o 5o -~
/4 Yo/ z0 m
40 / r~ //0
/ [] /ooO
30 / ,g'o°-- IO u.
w
[3 /
I0
20 o/c~o 0 MEAN Eft. TOTAL C 0 D - 4 2 4- 18
0 / I-IMEAN Eft, SOLUBLE C00=16"1"8
I I I I I I I I I 1 i I I
2 5 iO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 SO 95 98 99
PERCENTAGE
FIo. 3. Normal probability plot of the effluent COD and the effluent soluble COD, mg/l.
Kinetic parameter. Even though there was a wide variation in the daily substrate
removal rate during the sampling period, the average operating data derived from
this plant are consistent with other field-scale activated sludge plant data when plotted
according to the kinetic model proposed by PEARSO~q(1966). FIGURE4 shows that data
T~ ~= Yq--kd ,~ /
-- Y : 0.336 ~ --
. 0.3
kd = 0 . 0 i 6 /rl .
CORRELATION j-
d COEFFICIENT = 0.98B / Z ~ ,
~g 0.2 O~ V i
/~O
NATIONAL "SANITATION FOUNDATION;
/ I
- GOODMAN 1966
/ IO SERL PILOT PLANT; JENKINS & MENAR 1967[
(:3 [ ] / = = I1 EXTENDED/UERATION;JACKSON, MISS. [
0.1 - - ~ ---- ] A 5AN RAMON, CALIF.; JENKINS 1967 ] --
~ 1 0 W H I T T I E R NARROWS, LOS ANGELES CALIE
uJ
u
~ 1 - ~ , O'N'~Y............ I
/ /A I A PON~NA, LOS ANGELES, CALIF., JENKINS &]
~/,.~ I - _ _ _ _ J
I i I i i I i I I I I [ I
-'OJ 02 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 I.I 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
'SUBSTRATE REMOVAL R A T E , q, Ib COD REMOVED /tb V S S - d o y
1=Io. 4. Linear plot of the materials balance equation for cell material.
collected from this study and from other field-scale activated sludge plants through-
out the United States (GOODMAN, 1966; JEtqKrss and M~NAg, 1967; JEsICrSs, 1967;
44 E.J. MIDDLEBROOKS,D. JENKINS,R. C. NEALand I. L. PI-ImLiPS
GARRISON, 1967; JENKINSand GARRISON, 1967), fit the materials balance equation for
cell material:
1
--= Yq-ka
Oc
where
0c = mean cell residence time, days
lb VSS in system
lb VSS lost from system per day
Y = cell yield
lb VSS formed
lb COD removed
q = substrate removal rate
lb COD removed per day
lb VSS
ka = solids decay coefficient
lb solids lost per day
lb solids in system
Values of the yield and decay coefficient obtained from the combined data in FIo. 4
are Y = 0.34 Ib VSS/lb COD and ka = 0.016 day -1.
A significant proportion of both the soluble effluent C O D and the activated sludge
solids was anthrone-reactive, or polysaccharide-like material. The presence of such
quantities of material both in sludge and effluent lends credence to the idea proposed
by TENI,mY and STtrMM (1965) that it is present as an extracellular capsular material
and is involved in the flocculation properties of activated sludge.
Nitrogen data and calculations of nitrogen losses support the contention that much
of the nitrogen in an extended aeration plant is removed by reduction of nitrates
in the secondary settling tank.
REFERENCES
BRAGSTADR. E. and BI~AD~YL. (1937) Packinghouse waste and sewage treatment at Sioux Falls,
South Dakota. Sewage WksJ. 9, 959-969.
DowNrNo A. L., PAmTEn,H. A. and KNOWLESG. (1964) Nitrification in the activated sludge process.
J. Proc. Instn Sew. Purif Part 2, 130-158.
GARRISONW. M. (1967) Private communication.
GOODMANB. L. (1966) Package plant criteria development. Part I: extended aeration. 39th Ann.
Conf. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed., Kansas.
JENmNSD. (1967) Unpublished data.
46 E.J. MIDDLEBROOKS,D. JENKINS,R. C. NEALand J. L. PHmLIPS
JENKINS D. and GAgRISONW. M. (1967) Control of activated sludge by mean cell residence time.
Presented to California Water Pollution Control Association, Long Beach, Calif.
JENKINSD. and MENARA. B. (1967) The Fate of Phosphoras in Sewage Treatment Processes. Part I.
Primary Sedimentation and Activated Sludge. SERL Report No. 67-6, Sanitary Engineering
Research Laboratory, Universityof California, Berkeley.
LACKEYJ. B. (1958) Effects of fertilization on receiving waters. Sewage ind. Wastes 30, 1411-1416.
LUDZACK F. J. and ETTINGERM. B. (1962) Controlling operation to minimize activated sludge
nitrogen. J. War. Pollut. Control Fed. 34, 920-931.
McKINNEY R. E. (1956) The role of chemically combined oxygen in biological systems. Proc. Am.
Soe. Cir. Engrs 82, 1053-1075.
Mc~Y R. E. and CoNWAYR. A. (1957) Chemical oxygen in biological waste treatment. Sewage
ind. Wastes 29, 1097-1106.
McKINleY R. E. (1960) Biological oxidation of organic matter. Proc. 3rd Conf. Biological Waste
Treatment, Manhattan College.
McLACHLANJ. A. (1936) The settlement and rising of activated sludge. J. Proc. Instn Sew. Purif. 49,
130-146.
M~DLEBROOKS E. J. (1966) Kinetics of the extended aeration activated sludge sewage treatment
process. Dissertation, Mississippi State University, State College, Mississippi.
O'SnAUGHNr.SSX,,F. R. and HEwrrr C. H. (1936) Phenomena associated with the role of nitrogen in
biological oxidation. Appl. Chem. 54, 167-180.
PEARSONE. A. (1966) Kinetics of biological treatment. In Advances in Water Quality Improvement
pp. 381-394. University of Texas Press.
SAWYER,Clair N. (1962) Causes, effects and control of aquatic growths. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed.
34, 279-288.
SYMONSJ. M. and M c ~ v R. E. (1958) The biochemistry of nitrogen in the synthesis of activated
sludge. Sewage ind. Wastes30, 874-890.
TARZWELLC. M. and GAUFINA. R. (1953) Some important biological effects of pollution often dis-
regarded in stream surveys. Proc. 8th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, Extension Service,
295.
T E ~ Y M. W. and STUMMW. (1965) Chemical flocculation of microorganisms in biological waste
treatment. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 37, 1370-1388.
WASI~qOa'OND. R. and SYMONSJ. M. (1962) Volatile sludge accumulation in activated sludge sys-
tems. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 34, 767-790.
WEDDLEC. L. and J~NicrNsD. (1968) Unpublished data.
WUnRMA~ K. (1954) High-rate activated sludge treatment and its relation to stream sanitation.
Sewage ind. Wastes 26, 1-27.