Poblacion 7, Water System, Can Avid

Planning and Design WS
Reservoir Sizing
Name of Sub-Project Construction of Pinanag-an Level I Water System (Gravity Driven)

Sub-project Type Creek Source
Municipality Borongan City
Province Eastern Samar
Region VIII
I -DESIGN OF RESERVOIR:
A. Reason for installing a reservoir

To balance the supply and demand in the system, pressure breaker, fire hydrant reserve, settling or point of
disinfection.
Source discharge = 0.5 lps. Average Source Flow (ASF)
Demand (users) = 0.377 lps. Average Day Demand (ADD)
B. Location of the reservoir

Invert elevation = 176 m. (from plan and survey data)
Reason for choosing the location.

The reservoir is lower than the spring and generally higher than the distribution areas.
C. Capacity of the reservoir
Criteria:
Particular Description Data
Number of Household Actual number of household beneficiaries 86
Average Household Member 6 members 6
Total Population (No. of HH)(Ave. HH Member) 516
Average Population Growth Rate Percent annualy 0.03
Design Lifespan No. of years 10
Design Population (Total Population)(1+PGR)^life span 693
Average Daily Water Demand liters per capita per day 47
per Capita per Day
Average Daily Demand (ADD) (Design population)(ADWD/capita/day) 32,593
Average Demand per Second ADD/(24x60x60) 0.377
Consumption Standards 30 to 60 lps per capita per day demand for level 2
Design Period 5-15 years
Reservoir capacity:
1) By rule of thumb
Reservoir capacity = 1/4 (ADD)

= ADD/(4x1000)
= 8.15 cu.m.
2) By theory
Reservoir capacity = (Demand-Supply)(Ave. Day Length)

= (ADD-ASF)(60)(60)(12)/1000
= (5.30) cu.m.
3) Considering spring flow (100%)
Reservoir capacity = (Spring discharge)(Ave. Day Length)

= (ASF)(60)(60)(12)/1000
= 21.60 cu.m.
4) Adopted result
Reservoir capacity = 8.15 cu.m.
5) Reason for adoption

Use an average reservoir capacity which could meet the demand for the design period
and minimal investment cost consideration.
6) Reservoir dimension
Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 2.01 cum

use
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
Length 2.01 = 2.01 m. 2.10 m.

Breadth 2.01 = 2.01 m. 2.10 m.
Height 2.01 = 2.31 m. 2.40 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10
Therefore width length height

Use reservoir dimension = 2.10 2.10 2.40
Actual reservoir capacity = 9.26 cu.m.
Note: Computed dimension is INSIDE DIMENSION. 1.11 if + answer the size is OK
ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Simple Ratio Method
Calculate the ratio (R) of the average source flow (ASF) (for spring sources) over the
Average Day Demand and refer to the table below:
R = ASF ÷ ADD TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS
Minimum Time to Fill

Balancing Reservoir
Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio (in hours)
< 1.0 inadequate source
1.0-2.0 ½ of the average daily used
2.0-3.0 ¼ of the average daily used 1.32545 5.15
3.0-4.0 1/8
of the average daily used
> 4.0 no storage facility required
Note: The source above in the sample is inadequate and to balance the demand and supply-the minimum
required hours to fill a balancing reservoir is 5.15 hours
DEMAND-SUPPLY ANALYSIS BASED ON THE AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND (ADD)
DEFICIT(__)
YEAR DEMAND SUPPLY RESERVOIR SURPLUS
1 24,979.56 43,200.00 9,261.00 27,481.44
2 25,728.95 43,200.00 9,261.00 26,732.05
3 26,500.82 43,200.00 9,261.00 25,960.18
4 27,295.84 43,200.00 9,261.00 25,165.16
5 28,114.71 43,200.00 9,261.00 24,346.29
6 28,958.16 43,200.00 9,261.00 23,502.84
7 29,826.90 43,200.00 9,261.00 22,634.10
8 30,721.71 43,200.00 9,261.00 21,739.29
9 31,643.36 43,200.00 9,261.00 20,817.64
10 32,592.66 43,200.00 9,261.00 19,868.34
11 33,570.44 43,200.00 9,261.00 18,890.56
12 34,577.55 43,200.00 9,261.00 17,883.45
13 35,614.88 43,200.00 9,261.00 16,846.12
14 36,683.33 43,200.00 9,261.00 15,777.67
15 37,783.83 43,200.00 9,261.00 14,677.17
Note: Recommendation is to look for additional water source on the 4rth year or decrease water consumption per capita
per day or reduce household to be served etc…can no longer increase size of tank since beyond 12 hours filling already
MASS DIAGRAM METHOD OF ANALYSIS (RESERVOIR SIZING) FROM WATER DEMAND VARIATION:
HOURLY CUMULATIVE
DEMAND HOURLY DEMAND SUPPLY MINUS
TIME ADD RATIO (liters) (liters) SUPPLY (liters/hour) DRAFT (liters)
1 0.32 434.57 434.57 1,800.00 1,365.43
2 0.38 516.05 950.62 1,800.00 1,283.95
3 0.39 529.63 1,480.25 1,800.00 1,270.37
4 0.33 448.15 1,928.40 1,800.00 1,351.85
5 0.48 651.85 2,580.25 1,800.00 1,148.15
6 0.95 1,290.13 3,870.38 1,800.00 509.87
7 1.93 2,620.99 6,491.37 1,800.00 (820.99)
8 2.06 2,797.54 9,288.91 1,800.00 (997.54)
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
9 1.98 2,688.89 11,977.80 1,800.00 (888.89)

10 1.58 2,145.68 14,123.49 1,800.00 (345.68)
11 1.89 2,566.67 16,690.16 1,800.00 (766.67)
12 1.29 1,751.86 18,442.01 1,800.00 48.14
13 1.23 1,670.37 20,112.39 1,800.00 129.63
14 0.95 1,290.13 21,402.51 1,800.00 509.87
15 0.99 1,344.45 22,746.96 1,800.00 455.55
16 0.96 1,303.71 24,050.67 1,800.00 496.29
17 1.07 1,453.09 25,503.76 1,800.00 346.91
18 1.33 1,806.18 27,309.93 1,800.00 (6.18)
19 1.36 1,846.92 29,156.85 1,800.00 (46.92)
20 0.87 1,181.48 30,338.33 1,800.00 618.52
21 0.64 869.14 31,207.47 1,800.00 930.86
22 0.54 733.33 31,940.81 1,800.00 1,066.67
23 0.42 570.37 32,511.18 1,800.00 1,229.63
0 0.38 516.05 33,027.23 1,800.00 1,283.95
The storage capacity required is the sum of the positive storage variation and negative
variation
Total Capacity in liters
Total Capacity in cubic meters
Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 2.04 m.

use
Length 2.04 = 2.04 m. 2.10 m.
Breadth 2.04 = 2.04 m. 2.10 m.
Height 2.04 = 2.34 m. 2.40 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10


Simple Ratio Method
R = ASF ÷ ADD TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS

Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)

2.0-3.0 ¼ of the average daily used 1.32545 5.15
3.0-4.0 1/8
2.5
1.5
Ratio to ADD
1 TIME
Colum
Colum
ADD R
KALAHI-CIDSS 0.5
PROJECT
Joey P. Zalavarria
0
Ratio to ADD
Reservoir Sizing1 TIME
Colum
Colum
ADD R
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (Hours)
TYPICAL WATER DEMAND VARIATION
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
avity Driven)
ng or point of
Unit
HH
No.
No.
%
Years
No.
Liter
Liter
LPS
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
er the size is OK
ACTOR ANALYSIS

Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)
5.15
REMARKS
Start of deficit on the

4rth year
sumption per capita

ond 12 hours filling already
STORAGE
VARIATION (liters)
1,365.43
2,649.38
3,919.75
5,271.60
6,419.75
6,929.62
6,108.63
5,111.09
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
4,222.20
3,876.51
3,109.84
3,157.99
3,287.61
3,797.49
4,253.04
4,749.33
5,096.24
5,090.07
5,043.15
5,661.67
6,592.53
7,659.19
8,888.82
10,172.77
5,397.48
3,103.47
8,500.95
8.50
er the size is OK
ACTOR ANALYSIS

Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)
5.15
TIME
Column B
Column C
ADD RATIO
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir TIME
Sizing
Column B
Column C
ADD RATIO
24
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
Joey P. Zalavarria
Reservoir Sizing
Joey P. Zalavarria
Annex 1

Sub-project Type Groundwater Source
Region VIII
I -DESIGN OF RESERVOIR:
A. Reason for installing a reservoir

To balance the supply and demand in the system, pressure breaker, fire hydrant reserve, settling or point of
disinfection.
As measured Equivalent Discharge for 8 hours pumping
Pump Discharge = 1.28 0.426667 lps.
Demand (users) = 0.45 lps. Average Day Demand (ADD)
B. Location of the reservoir

Invert elevation = 5 m. (from plan and survey data)
Reason for choosing the location.

The reservoir is lower than the spring and generally higher than the distribution areas.
C. Capacity of the reservo
Criteria:
Particular Description
Number of Household Actual number of household beneficiaries
Average Household Member 6 members
Total Population (No. of HH)(Ave. HH Member)
Average Population Growth Rate Percent annualy
Design Lifespan No. of years
Design Population (Total Population)(1+PGR)^life span
Average Daily Water Demand liters per capita per day
per Capita per Day
Average Daily Demand (ADD) (Design population)(ADWD/capita/day)
Average Demand per Second ADD/(24x60x60)
Consumption Standards 30 to 60 lps per capita per day demand for level 2
Design Period 5-15 years
Reservoir capacity:
1) By rule of thumb
Reservoir capacity = 1/4 (ADD)

= ADD/(4x1000)
= 9.74 cu.m.
2) By theory
Reservoir capacity = (Demand-Supply)(Ave. Day Length)

= (ADD-ASF)(60)(60)(12)/1000
= 1.04 cu.m.
3) Considering spring flow (100%)
Reservoir capacity = (Spring discharge)(Ave. Day Length)

= (ASF)(60)(60)(12)/1000
= 18.43 cu.m.
4) Adopted result
Reservoir capacity = 9.74 cu.m.
5) Reason for adoption

Use an average reservoir capacity which could meet the demand for the design period
and minimal investment cost consideration.

use
Length 2.14 = 2.14 m. 2.20 m.
Breadth 2.14 = 2.14 m. 2.20 m.
Height 2.14 = 2.44 m. 2.50 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10


Simple Ratio Method
R = ASF ÷ ADD
Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

2.0-3.0 ¼ of the average daily used 0.94652
3.0-4.0 1/8
DEMAND-SUPPLY ANALYSIS BASED ON THE AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND (ADD)
DEFICIT(__)
YEAR DEMAND SUPPLY RESERVOIR SURPLUS
1 29,849.40 36864 10,648.00 17,662.60
2 30,744.88 36864 10,648.00 16,767.12
3 31,667.23 36864 10,648.00 15,844.77
4 32,617.25 36864 10,648.00 14,894.75
5 33,595.76 36864 10,648.00 13,916.24
6 34,603.64 36864 10,648.00 12,908.36
7 35,641.74 36864 10,648.00 11,870.26
8 36,711.00 36864 10,648.00 10,801.00
9 37,812.33 36864 10,648.00 9,699.67
10 38,946.70 36864 10,648.00 8,565.30
11 40,115.10 36864 10,648.00 7,396.90
12 41,318.55 36864 10,648.00 6,193.45
13 42,558.11 36864 10,648.00 4,953.89
14 43,834.85 36864 10,648.00 3,677.15
15 45,149.90 36864 10,648.00 2,362.10
Note:
MASS DIAGRAM METHOD OF RESERVOIR SIZING (Equivalent 8 hours Pumping spread over 24 hours)
HOURLY CUMULATIVE
DEMAND HOURLY DEMAND SUPPLY MINUS
TIME ADD RATIO (liters) (liters) SUPPLY (liters/hour) DRAFT (liters)
1 0.32 519.29 519.29 1,536.00 1,016.71
2 0.38 616.66 1,135.95 1,536.00 919.34
3 0.39 632.88 1,768.83 1,536.00 903.12
4 0.33 535.52 2,304.35 1,536.00 1,000.48
5 0.48 778.93 3,083.28 1,536.00 757.07
6 0.95 1,541.64 4,624.92 1,536.00 (5.64)
7 1.93 3,131.96 7,756.88 1,536.00 (1,595.96)
8 2.06 3,342.92 11,099.81 1,536.00 (1,806.92)
9 1.98 3,213.10 14,312.91 1,536.00 (1,677.10)
10 1.58 2,563.99 16,876.90 1,536.00 (1,027.99)
11 1.89 3,067.05 19,943.95 1,536.00 (1,531.05)
12 1.29 2,093.38 22,037.34 1,536.00 (557.38)
13 1.23 1,996.02 24,033.36 1,536.00 (460.02)
14 0.95 1,541.64 25,575.00 1,536.00 (5.64)
15 0.99 1,606.55 27,181.55 1,536.00 (70.55)
16 0.96 1,557.87 28,739.42 1,536.00 (21.87)
17 1.07 1,736.37 30,475.79 1,536.00 (200.37)
18 1.33 2,158.30 32,634.09 1,536.00 (622.30)
19 1.36 2,206.98 34,841.07 1,536.00 (670.98)
20 0.87 1,411.82 36,252.88 1,536.00 124.18
21 0.64 1,038.58 37,291.46 1,536.00 497.42
22 0.54 876.30 38,167.76 1,536.00 659.70
23 0.42 681.57 38,849.33 1,536.00 854.43
0 0.38 616.66 39,465.99 1,536.00 919.34
variation

use
Length 2.17 = 2.17 m. 2.20 m.
Breadth 2.17 = 2.17 m. 2.20 m.
Height 2.17 = 2.47 m. 2.50 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10


Simple Ratio Method
R = ASF ÷ ADD
Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

2.0-3.0 ¼ of the average daily used
3.0-4.0 1/8
> 4.0 no storage facility required 0.94652
2.5
1.5
Ratio to ADD
1 TI
C
C
0.5 A
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Ratio to A
1 TI
C
C
0.5 A
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (Hours)
TYPICAL WATER DEMAND VARIATION
MASS DIAGRAM METHOD OF RESERVOIR SIZING (8 hours pumping) (Fill and Draw Operation)
ADD 38,946.70 lit/day
Average Hourly Demand 1,622.78 lit/hour 0.45 lps

Pump Discharge 1.28 lit/sec
HOURLY CUMULATIVE
DEMAND HOURLY DEMAND SUPPLY FROM PUMP SUPPLY MINUS
TIME TI ADD RATIO (liters) (liters) (liters/hour) DRAFT (liters)
1 0.32 519.29 519.29 (519.29)
2 0.38 616.66 1,135.95 (616.66)
3 0.39 632.88 1,768.83 (632.88)
4 0.33 535.52 2,304.35 (535.52)
5 0.48 778.93 3,083.28 (778.93)
6 0.95 1,541.64 4,624.92 (1,541.64)
7 1.93 3,131.96 7,756.88 (3,131.96)
8 2.06 3,342.92 11,099.81 4,608.00 1,265.08
9 1.98 3,213.10 14,312.91 4,608.00 1,394.90
10 1.58 2,563.99 16,876.90 4,608.00 2,044.01
11 1.89 3,067.05 19,943.95 4,608.00 1,540.95
12 1.29 2,093.38 22,037.34 4,608.00 2,514.62
13 1.23 1,996.02 24,033.36 4,608.00 2,611.98
14 0.95 1,541.64 25,575.00 4,608.00 3,066.36
15 0.99 1,606.55 27,181.55 4,608.00 3,001.45
16 0.96 1,557.87 28,739.42 (1,557.87)
17 1.07 1,736.37 30,475.79 (1,736.37)
18 1.33 2,158.30 32,634.09 (2,158.30)
19 1.36 2,206.98 34,841.07 (2,206.98)
20 0.87 1,411.82 36,252.88 (1,411.82)
21 0.64 1,038.58 37,291.46 (1,038.58)
22 0.54 876.30 38,167.76 (876.30)
23 0.42 681.57 38,849.33 (681.57)
0 0.38 616.66 39,465.99 (616.66)
variation

use
Length 4.97 = 4.97 m. 5.00 m.
Breadth 4.97 = 4.97 m. 5.00 m.
Height 4.97 = 5.27 m. 5.30 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10

Time to Fill Reservoir if distribution gatevalve is fully closed 27.13 hours

from 8PM to 3AM
System (Gravity Driven)
ve, settling or point of
1.28m dropdown into level 0 from max. level
Data Unit
161 HH
6 No.
966 No.
0.03 %
10 Years
1298 No.
30 Liter
38,947 Liter
0.451 LPS
if + answer the size is OK
Time Factor Analysis

Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)
6.93
the minimum
DEFICIT(__)
SURPLUS REMARKS
17,662.60
16,767.12
15,844.77
14,894.75
13,916.24
12,908.36
11,870.26
10,801.00
9,699.67
8,565.30
7,396.90
6,193.45
4,953.89
3,677.15
2,362.10
read over 24 hours)
SUPPLY MINUS STORAGE

DRAFT (liters) VARIATION (liters)
1,016.71 1,016.71
919.34 1,936.05
903.12 2,839.17
1,000.48 3,839.65
757.07 4,596.72
(5.64) 4,591.08
(1,595.96) 2,995.12
(1,806.92) 1,188.19
(1,677.10) (488.91)
(1,027.99) (1,516.90)
(1,531.05) (3,047.95)
(557.38) (3,605.34)
(460.02) (4,065.36)
(5.64) (4,071.00)
(70.55) (4,141.55)
(21.87) (4,163.42)
(200.37) (4,363.79)
(622.30) (4,986.09)
(670.98) (5,657.07)
124.18 (5,532.88)
497.42 (5,035.46)
659.70 (4,375.76)
854.43 (3,521.33)
919.34 (2,601.99)
4,596.72 Extreme positive variation

5,657.07 Extreme negative variation
10,253.79
10.25
Time Factor Analysis

Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)
6.93
the minimum
TIME
Column B
Column C
ADD RATIO
21 22 23 24
TIME
Column B
Column C
ADD RATIO
21 22 23 24
w Operation)
SUPPLY MINUS STORAGE

DRAFT (liters) VARIATION (liters)
(519.29) (519.29)
(616.66) (1,135.95)
(632.88) (1,768.83)
(535.52) (2,304.35)
(778.93) (3,083.28)
(1,541.64) (4,624.92)
(3,131.96) (7,756.88)
1,265.08 (6,491.81)
1,394.90 (5,096.91)
2,044.01 (3,052.90)
1,540.95 (1,511.95)
2,514.62 1,002.66
2,611.98 3,614.64
3,066.36 6,681.00
3,001.45 9,682.45
(1,557.87) 8,124.58
(1,736.37) 6,388.21
(2,158.30) 4,229.91
(2,206.98) 2,022.93
(1,411.82) 611.12
(1,038.58) (427.46)
(876.30) (1,303.76)
(681.57) (1,985.33)
(616.66) (2,601.99)
74,235.90 Positive Variation

48,592.22 Negative Variation
122,828.12
122.83

Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis
ANNEX 1
II -PIPELINE DESIGN ANALYSIS:
Design criteria
The pipeline must be designed to handle the maximum hour demand or Peak Flow (PF)=2.5ADD of the area to be
Minimun pressure at the remotest end of the system should be 3.0 meters (Approx. 4.26 psi) and 7.0 meters at th
mainline
Maximum Velocity of flow in the pipes:
a. Main pipes… 3.0 meters per second
b. Distribution pipes… 1.5 meters per second
Water flow per tapstand ranges from 0.125 lps to 0.225 lps
Additional: Consider most economical pipe size and layout
Additonal: Best location of tank ( if any)
A. Pipeline Design Input/Output

Pipeline Section Household Peak Node Pipe Pipe
Section Node Length Served Flow Elev. Diameter Diameter
from to Difference Option
(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm)
a b c d e f g h i
0
B. Pipeline Analysis
Branch Node Remarks
No. of Household Total Headloss Compare Elev Head
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 20of 4

Recommendation:
For all the branch nodes, the total headloss is greater than the elevation head. It is therefore
recommended to increase the diameter of pipe to effect efficient flow in the system.(?) reject
Column Description:
Column Description
a Pipe section under consideration
b-c Node section under consideration
d Length of pipe section under consideration (meter)
e Number of household served
f Computed Peak Flow (liter per second)
g Difference in elevation between nodes under consideration (meter)
h Computed Pipe Diameter (mm), using the Darcy Weisbach Formula
i Nominal Diameter available in the market (mm)
j Headloss per 100 meters (refer to table 9.1 or 9.2)
k Actual Headloss

Formula:
Column f:
PF = 2.5 x GRF x N x Average Household Size x PCWC / 86,400
Where:
PF = Peak flow.
GRF = Growth rate factor (1+GR)^life span
N = Total number of household served by the pipe section.
PCWC = Per capita water consumption.
Column h:
HF = (8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/D^5(g)(pi)^2
D^5 =(8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/HF(g)(pi)^2
Where:
HF = Headloss or the difference in elevation between the pipe in

consideration.
F = Coefficient of friction (approximately 0.02).
L = Length of pipe section in consideration.
Q = Water discharge.
D =Pipe diameter (mm).
g =gravitational value (9.81)
pi =3.1415
Simplifying:
D^5 = (0.00165(L)(Q/1000)^2/HF)(1000)(mm)
= (0.00165(Column d)(Column f/1000)^2/(Column g))(1000)
Column j:
From table 9.1 or 9.2, (interpolate when necessary).
Column k:
Actual Headloss = (Headloss per 100 M)(Section Length)/100

= (Column j)(Column d)/100

III -PIPELINE DESIGN ADJUSTMENT:
A. Pipeline Design Input/Output

(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm)
a b c d e f g h i
a 1 2 30 15 0.105 0.3 17.8633 32
b 2 3 37.6 30 0.210 0.3 24.6597 32
c 3 4 47.6 30 0.210 0.3 25.8506 32
d 4 5 26.7 20 0.140 0.31 19.4521 32
e 4 6 51.5 50 0.350 0.92 25.7464 32
f 6 7 9.67 70 0.490 0 0.0000 32
g 7 8 53.84 40 0.280 0 0.0000 32
h 8 9 94.2 20 0.140 0.31 25.0308 32
i 9 10 43.06 20 0.140 0.3 21.5441 32
j 10 11 31.39 10 0.070 0.3 15.3271 25
k 7 12 21.2 90 0.630 7.70 17.8316 38
l 12 13 11.43 161 0.464 8.00 13.8387 50
m 12 14 54.76 71 0.497 8.61 19.1743 63
n 14 15 861.86 71 0.497 2.43 42.8543 63
o 15 16 108.42 46 0.322 0 0.0000 38
p 16 17 57.48 10 0.070 1.52 12.5043 38
q 16 18 48.4 26 0.285 0.92 19.5761 38
r 18 19 35.99 11 0.077 0.61 14.1992 25
s 15 20 20.23 25 0.175 0.62 17.5155 38
t 20 21 171.93 15 0.105 3.05 15.9284 25
B. Pipeline Analysis (checking by comparing the Total HL and Elevation Head and check Minimum Res
Branch Node Remarks
No. of Household Total Headloss Compare Elev Head
1-2 15 0.0165 < 7.98
2-3 30 0.132 < 7.87
3-4 30 0.168 < 7.83
1-2-3-4 30 0.316 < 7.68
4-5 20 0.045 < 7.95
4-6 50 0.469 < 7.53
6-7 70 0.163 < 7.84
4-5-6 50 0.514 < 7.49
4-5-6-7 70 0.677 < 7.32
4-5-6-7-8 70 0.997 < 7.00
1-2-3-4-6 50 0.786 < 7.21
1-2-3-4-6-7 70 0.949 < 7.05
1-2-3-4-6-7-12 70 1.181 < 6.82
3-4-6 50 0.637 < 7.36
3-4-6-7 70 0.800 < 7.20
3-4-6-7-12 70 1.033 < 6.97
10-11 10 0.041 < 7.96
9-10 20 0.073 < 7.93
8-9 20 0.160 < 7.84
7-8 40 0.320 < 7.68
7-12 90 0.233 < 7.77
9-10-11 20 0.114 < 7.89
8-9-10-11 20 0.274 < 7.73
7-8-9-10-11 40 0.594 < 7.41

7-8-9-10-11-12 90 0.827 < 7.17

16-17 10 0.000 < 8.00
18-19 11 0.057 < 7.94
16-18 26 0.050 < 7.95
15-16 46 0.307 < 7.69
20-21 15 0.490 < 7.51
15-20 25 0.015 < 7.98
14-15 71 0.000 < 8.00
12-14 71 0.000 < 8.00
12-13 161 0.018 < 7.98
15-20-21 25 0.505 < 7.49
16-18-19 46 0.107 < 7.89
15-16-17 71 0.307 < 7.69
15-16-18-19 71 0.364 < 7.64
14-15-20-21 71 0.505 < 7.49
12-14-15-20-21 71 0.505 < 7.49
14-15-16-18-19 71 0.414 < 7.59
12-14-15-16-18-19 71 0.414 < 7.59
14-15-16-17 71 0.307 < 7.69
12-14-15-16-17 71 0.307 < 7.69
The total headloss is less than the elevation head and therefore accept adjusted size but there are still critical node
with < 3m residual head (Hr)

Graph of Hydraulic Gradeline of Mainline, Pipeline and Ground Elevation

(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm)
a b c d e f g h i
a 1 2 30 15 0.105 0.3 17.8633 32
b 2 3 37.6 30 0.210 0.3 24.6597 32
c 3 4 47.6 30 0.210 0.3 25.8506 32
d 4 5 26.7 20 0.140 0.31 19.4521 32
e 4 6 51.5 50 0.350 0.92 25.7464 32
f 6 7 9.67 70 0.490 0 0.0000 32
g 7 8 53.84 40 0.280 0 0.0000 32
h 8 9 94.2 20 0.140 0.31 25.0308 32
i 9 10 43.06 20 0.140 0.3 21.5441 32
j 10 11 31.39 10 0.070 0.3 15.3271 25
k 7 12 21.2 90 0.630 7.70 17.8361 38
l 12 13 11.43 161 0.464 8.00 13.8387 50
m 12 14 54.76 71 0.497 8.61 19.1743 63
n 14 15 861.86 71 0.497 2.43 42.8543 63
o 15 16 108.42 46 0.322 0 0.0000 38
p 16 17 57.48 10 0.070 1.52 12.5043 38
q 16 18 48.4 26 0.182 0.92 19.5761 38
r 18 19 35.99 11 0.077 0.61 14.1992 25
s 15 20 20.23 25 0.175 0.62 17.5155 38
t 20 21 171.93 15 0.105 3.05 15.9284 25
18.00
17.50
17.00 Reservoir
16.50
16.00
15.50
15.00
14.50 Pip
14.00 ma
13.50
13.00 Hyd
12.50 Gra
12.00 Elev
11.50 ma
11.00
10.50 Gro
10.00 Elev
9.50 ma
9.00
8.50
8.00
7.50
7.00
6.50
6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00 Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 25of 4
2.50
7.00
6.50
6.00
5.50 Analysis
Pipeline Hydraulic
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

k Flow (PF)=2.5ADD of the area to be served

Approx. 4.26 psi) and 7.0 meters at the
Headloss Actual
per Headloss
100 m.
(m) (m)
j k
not the exact data refer downward for brgy. 7
Remarks Residual Remarks

Accept Head (Hr)


(m)

Headloss Actual
per Headloss
100 m.
(m) (m)
j k
0.055 0.0165
0.352 0.132
0.352 0.168
0.170 0.045
0.910 0.469
1.681 0.163
0.594 0.320
0.170 0.160
0.170 0.073
0.130 0.041
1.099 0.233
0.158 0.018 reservoir
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.283 0.307
0.000 0.000
0.103 0.050
0.158 0.057
0.075 0.015
0.285 0.490
tion Head and check Minimum Residual Head)

Remarks Residual Remarks
Accept Head (Hr)
okey 7.96 Pass
okey 7.74 Pass
okey 7.66 Pass
okey 7.36 Pass
okey 7.91 Pass
okey 7.06 Pass
okey 7.68 Pass
okey 6.98 Pass
okey 6.64 Pass
okey 6.00 Pass
okey 6.42 Pass
okey 6.10 Pass
okey 5.64 Pass
okey 6.72 Pass
okey 6.40 Pass
okey 5.94 Pass
okey 7.92 Pass
okey 7.86 Pass
okey 7.68 Pass
okey 7.36 Pass
okey 7.54 Pass
okey 7.78 Pass
okey 7.46 Pass
okey 6.82 Pass

okey 6.34 Pass

okey 8.00 Pass
okey 7.88 Pass
okey 7.90 Pass
okey 7.38 Pass
okey 7.02 Pass
okey 7.97 Pass
okey 8.00 Pass
okey 8.00 Pass
okey 7.96 Pass
okey 6.99 Pass
okey 7.78 Pass
okey 7.38 Pass
okey 7.28 Pass
okey 6.99 Pass
okey 6.99 Pass
okey 7.18 Pass
okey 7.18 Pass
okey 7.38 Pass
okey 7.38 Pass
sted size but there are still critical nodes

Headloss Actual Hydraulic

per Headloss Gradeline
100 m. Pipe Point Ground Available
(m) (m) Elevation Elevation Elevation Head
j k masl masl masl
0.055 0.0165 8.34 15.30 8.84 6.96
0.352 0.132 8.64 15.19 9.14 6.550
0.352 0.168 8.34 15.15 8.84 6.810
0.170 0.045 8.04 15.27 8.54 7.230
0.910 0.469 8.04 14.85 8.54 6.810
1.681 0.163 7.12 15.16 7.62 8.040
0.594 0.320 7.12 15.00 7.62 7.880
0.170 0.160 7.43 15.16 7.62 7.730
0.170 0.073 7.73 15.25 7.93 7.520
0.130 0.041 7.73 15.28 8.23 7.550
1.099 0.233 7.12 15.09 7.62 7.970
0.158 0.018 6.82 15.30 7.32 8.480
0.000 0.000 6.82 15.32 7.32 8.500
0.000 0.000 6.21 15.32 6.71 9.110
0.283 0.307 8.64 15.01 9.14 6.370
0.000 0.000 8.64 15.32 9.14 6.680
0.103 0.050 8.64 15.27 9.14 6.630
0.158 0.057 9.56 15.26 10.06 5.700
0.075 0.015 8.64 15.30 9.14 6.660
0.285 0.490 9.26 14.83 9.76 5.570
Pipe Elevation
masl
Hydraulic
Gradeline Point
Elevation
masl
Ground
Elevation
masl

15 16 17 18 19 20

Schematic Diagram/Project Area Map
ANNEX 1
Schematic Diagram of
Poblacion 7, Can avid Eastern Samar
Q= 0.464 lps
elev. 7.32
Dug well
13 elev. 7.62 8 elev.
94.2 m
11.43 m h
F5
Elevated tank to l g 9
8.00 m 12 53.84 m HH= 10
elev 7.32 elev
RESERVOIR Tank k elev. 7.62
m 21.2 F6 7 8.23
6.71 54.76 HH=20 F3 5
14 9.67 f HH=20
elev. 7.62 6
861.86 51.5 26.7 d
n elev. 8.54
e 4 c
47.6 3
15 8.84 F2
9.14 108.42 16 HH=10 HH=15 37.6
o 9.14 b elev
F9
20.23 57.48 17 2
s q p F10 HH=10
20 48.4 7.62
F7 HH=10 18
9.76 F11 10.06
HH=15
t r
171.93 35.99
19
21 F12 9.45 m
F8 HH=15 HH=11
6.71
Preparation of schematic diagram as basis for pipeline design:

Steps:
1. Locate tapstand and name it F1…n starting from farthest
to the reservoir and or water source.
2. Determine the number of nodes and name it in numbers
starting from farthest to the reservoir and or water source.
3. Determine the number of sections and name it in letters
starting from farthest to the reservoir and or water source.
4. Indicate the number of HH per tapstand, the elevation of
the nodes, the length of the sections from survey results.
5. Design for the pipe diameter of the sections (see pipeline analysis)
and indicate final pipe sizes in the schematic diagram.
F1
KALAHI-CIDSS
F1
KALAHI-CIDSS Subproject Name Prepared Drawing Title

PROJECT SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
Sheet Title
Location Checked Schematic Diagram
Scale
NTS
KALAHI-CIDSS
R
ANNEX 1
PROJECT AREA MAP
Prepare a map showing the area to be served and the location of the source(s) of water. It should be drawn to a
convenient scale or with measurements of distance between important structures along roads and pathways.
Include elevation. Indicate houses, schools, churches, markets, existing water systems, public faucets, reservoir
and other important land features.
Legend
House
School
Church
Public faucet
Existing pipeline
Proposed pipeline
R Reservoir
Gate valve
Check Valve
KALAHI-CIDSS
Reducer
Clinic
Contours
º123 Elevations
S Spring Box
KALAHI-CIDSS Subproject Name Prepared Drawing Title

PROJECT Project Area Map
Sheet Title
Location Checked Project Area Map
Scale
NTS
KALAHI-CIDSS
Samar
11
HH=10 F4
7.93
7.93
31.39
F5
43.06
i j
8.23
10
8.84
HH=15
F1
F3 1
30.00
a
9.14
KALAHI-CIDSS
Sub-Project No.
ematic Diagram
Sheet No.
KALAHI-CIDSS
ce(s) of water. It should be drawn to a

uctures along roads and pathways.
ater systems, public faucets, reservoir
KALAHI-CIDSS
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
KALAHI-CIDSS
PUMP DESIGN
Water
Pump
Design Horse Brake
Data Capacity
Paramet Power Horse
Parameters lps
ers Power
a b c d e
1.Drawdown (m) 1.28

2.Static Water Level (SWL) (m) 2.38
3.Pumping Water Level (drawdown+SWL) (m) 3.66
4.Height of Discharge Point Level (m) 8.5
5.Suction and transmission Discharge Friction
3.77
Headloss (HL) (meters)
TDH (3+4+5) 15.93 1.74 0.36 0.90
Pump operation (hours) 12
Number of Household 103
Ave. person per HH 6
Growth Rate Factor 0.03
Design Period 15
Design Population 962.82
Water Consumption per capita per day 60
Average Daily Demand (ADD) (lit/day) 57,769.20
Maximum day demand (lps) * 1.3 0.87
Data from Georesistivity Survey or from Pumping Test Result of Existing Wells or from Newly Bored Well:
1. Target Well Discharge (lps) 0.464

2. Total Dynamic Head (m) 15.93
3. Well depth (m) 4.94
Design Consideration:
Case I : Fixed maximum well yield and target household, adjust pumping hour.
Case II: Fixed maximum pumping hour to 12 and target household, locate sufficient well yield on site.
Case III: Fixed maximum well yield and 12 hour pumping, adjust target household.
Formula:
1. Pump Capacity: Q=maximum day demand* 24 hours / 12 hours pumping
2. Break Horsepower: BHP= Q * TDH * g/ e / 0.746 / 1000
3. Actual Discharge: Qactual= BHP * e * .746 *1000 / g / TDH
Where : g = gravitational factor 9.81

e = pump efficiency 40%
4. Height of discharge point is the difference in elevation of reservoir (maximum water level) and the pump
5. The headloss computation will be referred to table 9.1 & 9.2

Solve for initial size of transmission pipe Q=AV
assume V= 3 m/s
A=1/4 (pi()) d^2
d= ((4*Q/3.14)*V)^.5
Q (lps) V (m/s) d (mm)

1.74 3 28
Refer to headloss table per 100 meters and equivalent length of connection accessories:
Headlos
Length of
Q (lps) d (mm) s/ 100
Pipe (m)
(m)
1.75 28 7.9 25.59
Note: insert for the other sizes
Analysis:
Compare the Design Pump Discharge and the Well Capacity if there is a need for reservoir.
Equivalent Length of Connections for the Computation of Headlosses

Nominal
Dia.
Elbow, 45 Gate Valve,
(mm.) of Elbow, 90 deg Tee
deg Fully Open
Accessori
es
32 Equivalent Length per pc 1.14 0.52 2.29 0.24
Number 2 1 4
Equivalent Length 2.28 0.52 9.16 -
Number 2 1
Equivalent Length 3.24 0.76 - -
Number 2 1
Equivalent Length 5.00 1.16 - -
Total
Equivalen 22.12 10.52 2.44 9.16
t Length
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Type of
Pump
f g h
Q
BHP
TDH (m) (actual)
(HP)
(lps)
11.43 m
ground level elev. 7.32
2.38 m Pump discharge

15.93 1.72 0.90 1.00 HP SWL
drawdown = Consumption per
1.28 m capita per day
PWL pop. Growth rate
design period
1.28 m
wly Bored Well:
1000 gal/1 cu.m

1000 =
yield on site.
vel) and the pump

Equivale
Total
nt Total HL
Length
Length (m)
(m)
(elbows)
22.12 47.71 3.76909
the Computation of Headlosses
Globe Angle Foot Check

Faucet,
Valve, Valve, Valve, Valve,
Fully Strainer
Fully Fully Fully Fully
Open
Open Open Open Open
11.28 5.49 - 2.13 4.88 2.74
- - - - - -
16.76 8.54 - 2.74 6.10 4.27
- - - - - -
25.90 12.80 - 3.66 7.62 5.79
- - - - - -
Design: Capacity Q (gpm) 25.80

Brake Power (HP)
Head (ft) 52.25
Efficiency (%) 40%
2.00
2.50 m
to Brgy. Maliunao
8.00 m
m
elev. 7.32 m
Pump discharge 2.5 lps.

HH 161 ?
Consumption per to Pob. 7
capita per day 30 lps
pop. Growth rate 3%
design period 10 years
Sub-project Type Groundwater Source
Region VIII
PUMPING TEST
Pump Specification Used Size of Dugwell constructed per info from the installer
Pump : SPERONI
HP : 0.75 0.69m NGL
Type Cam 50
v : 230 2.38 m
Hz : 60 max. water level
rpm : 3400 4.94m
1 PH ~ A 3.4 1.28m
0.90 m
A. Container Vol. 20 Liters

Time
1 39.6 sec.
2 40.3 sec.
3 40.9 sec.
4 41.6 sec.
5 41.8 sec.
40.84 sec. Average
Q1 = 0.489716
Qave. = 0.489716 lps QA
Start 10:43
3:25 Pumping Time till drained t1 12300
Stop 14:08
Recharge period t2 300
Start 14:13
1:30 Pumping Time till drained t3 5400
Stop 15:43
Vol = QA x t1
Vol = 0.489716 x 205 x 60
= 6023.506 liters Pump out volume
Let QA= Discharge rate of water pump used

QB= Recharge rate of the ground water
t1= Pumping period till drained

t2= Recharge period
t3= Second pumping period till drained
V1= Volume water pump out at t3

V2= Volume recharge from t2 and t3
V1= V2
QA x (t3) = QB x (t2+t3)
0.48972 x 5400 = QB x ( 300 + 5400
2644.46621 = 5700 QB
QB = 0.464 lps ground recharge
Volume of existing ground cistern
V = (QA-QB) X t1
V= ( 0.489716 - 0.464 ) X 12300
V= 316.31 Liters
V= 0.31631 = Pi()*D^2/4
Diameter=[4V/pi()]^0.5
Diameter= 0.634616735 m. Confirmed that 1 pc of 0.61 m. diameter of RCPC was installed
QB = 0.464 lps Source Discharge to be used

info from the installer
0.69m NGL
max. water level
1.28m
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
)
RCPC was installed

Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS
Q PIPE SIZE (mm)

LPS 13 19 25 32 38 50 63
0.01 0.10
0.02 0.40
0.03 0.80 0.11
0.04 1.40 0.19
0.05 2.10 0.30
0.06 3.00 0.41 0.10
0.07 4.00 0.50 0.13
0.08 5.00 0.65 0.17
0.09 6.30 0.82 0.22
0.10 7.60 1.06 0.26
0.11 9.10 1.18 0.31 0.11
0.12 10.70 1.50 0.36 0.13
0.14 2.00 0.48 0.17
0.15 2.10 0.55 0.18
0.16 2.50 0.62 0.22
0.18 3.10 0.77 0.27 0.10
0.20 3.80 0.94 0.32 0.13
0.25 5.80 1.42 0.48 0.20
0.30 2.00 0.67 0.23
0.40 3.40 1.15 0.47 0.12
0.50 5.10 1.74 0.71 0.18
0.60 7.20 2.40 1.00 0.25
0.70 3.20 1.33 0.33 0.11
0.80 4.10 1.70 0.42 0.14
1.00 6.30 2.60 0.64 0.21
1.20 8.80 3.60 0.89 0.30
1.40 4.40 1.20 0.40
1.50 4.90 1.35 0.44
1.60 5.50 1.52 0.51
1.80 7.35 1.88 0.64
2.00 8.40 2.30 0.77
2.50 3.50 1.20
3.00 4.95 1.65
3.50 6.95 2.19
4.00 9.20 3.00
4.50 11.85 3.60
5.00 4.50
6.00 6.20
7.00 8.60
8.00
10.00
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN METERS PER 100 METERS

PLASTIC PIPE - PVC, PE, PB
TABLE 9.1 FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN PLASTIC PIPES
Q PIPE SIZE (mm)

LPS 13 19 25 32 38 50 63
0.01 0.20
0.02 0.80
0.03 1.60 0.22
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----54of 3

0.04 2.80 0.38

0.05 4.20 0.60
0.06 6.00 0.82 0.20
0.07 8.00 1.00 0.26
0.08 10.00 1.30 0.34
0.09 12.60 1.64 0.44 0.15
0.10 15.20 2.12 0.52 0.18
0.11 18.20 2.36 0.62 0.22
0.12 21.40 3.00 0.72 0.26
0.14 4.00 0.96 0.34 0.13
0.15 4.20 1.10 0.36 0.15
0.16 5.00 1.24 0.44 0.16
0.18 6.20 1.54 0.54 0.20
0.20 7.60 1.88 0.64 0.26 0.70
0.25 11.60 2.84 0.96 0.40 0.10
0.30 4.00 1.34 0.46 0.14
0.40 6.80 2.30 0.94 0.24
0.50 10.20 3.48 1.42 0.36 0.12
0.60 14.40 4.80 2.00 0.50 0.17
0.70 6.40 2.66 0.66 0.22
0.80 8.20 3.40 0.84 0.28
1.00 12.60 5.20 1.28 0.42
1.20 17.60 7.20 1.78 0.60
1.40 8.80 2.40 0.80
1.50 9.80 2.70 0.88
1.60 11.00 3.04 1.02
1.80 14.70 3.76 1.28
2.00 16.80 4.60 1.54
2.50 7.00 2.40
3.00 9.90 3.30
3.50 13.90 4.38
4.00 18.40 6.00
4.50 23.70 7.20
5.00 9.00
6.00 12.40
7.00 17.20
8.00
10.00
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN METERS PER 100 METERS

GALVANIZED IRON PIPE (GIP)
TABLE 9.2
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN GI PIPES

RESISTANCE OF VALVE AND FITTINGS*
Gate Globe Angle

Nominal Elbow, 90 Elbow, 45 Faucet,
Tee Valve, Valve, Valve,
Dia. (mm.) deg deg Fully Open
Fully Open Fully Open Fully Open
13 0.55 0.24 1.04 0.11 4.88 2.56 4.88
19 0.69 0.3 1.37 0.14 6.4 3.66 6.4
25 0.84 0.41 `1.77 0.18 8.23 4.57
32 1.14 0.52 2.29 0.24 11.28 5.49
38 1.36 0.61 2.74 0.29 13.71 6.71
50 1.62 0.76 3.66 0.38 16.76 8.54
63 1.98 0.91 4.27 0.43 19.61 10.06
75 2.5 1.16 4.88 0.53 25.9 12.8
100 3.35 1.52 6.71 0.7 33.54 12.8
150 5.03 2.04 9.76 1.01 48.78 24.39
EQUIVQLENT LENGTH STRAIGHT PIPE METERS
*WHEN THE LENGTH OF PIPE IS GREATER THAN 1000 TIMES ITS DIAMETER, THE LOSS OF HEAD DUE TO VALVE
AND FITTINGS MAYBE DISREGARDED.
EQUIVALENT LENGTH OF PIPE FITTINGS, VALVES, ETC.

(mm)
75 100 150
INTERPOLATION
Discharge Friction Headloss per 100 meters

Upper
Middle x
Lower
0.09
0.12
0.17
0.19
0.21
0.26
0.32 0.08
0.48 0.12
0.68 0.17
0.90 0.22
1.15 0.28
1.43 0.35
1.74 0.43 0.06
2.44 0.60 0.09
3.20 0.80 0.11
4.15 1.20 0.14
6.50 1.55 0.21
(mm)
75 100 150

INTERPOLATION
Discharge Friction Headloss per 100 meters

Upper
Middle
Lower
0.70
0.91
0.12
0.18
0.25
0.33
0.37
0.42 0.10
0.52 0.13
0.64 0.16
0.96 0.24
1.36 0.33
1.80 0.44
2.30 0.37
2.86 0.71
3.48 0.86 0.12
4.88 1.20 0.17
6.40 1.60 0.22
8.30 2.40 0.28
13.00 3.10 0.42

Foot Check
Valve, Strainer Valve,
Fully Open Fully Open
1.22 3.05 1.16
1.52 3.66 1.58
1.83 4.27 1.98
2.13 4.88 2.74
2.44 5.49 3.35
2.74 6.1 4.27
3.05 6.71 5.18
3.66 7.62 5.79
4.57 9.15 7.62
6.42 12.21 11.59
E METERS
AMETER, THE LOSS OF HEAD DUE TO VALVES AND

RPOLATION
riction Headloss per 100 meters

RPOLATION
riction Headloss per 100 meters




CONSTANT DISCHARGE AQUIFER PUMPING TEST DATA
Name of Sub-project : Construction of Pinanag-an Level I Water System (Gravity D

Location : Poblacion 7, Can avid Eastern Samar
Well No./Name : Dugwel
Well Depth : 4.94m
Pump Type : Type Cam 50
Pump Setting : 2.38m (orig. ground/top of the well)
Static Water Level : 1.28
Time Pump Started : 12:02 AM
Time Pump Stopped : 3:37 PM
Q ave. 0.49 lps
CLOCK Time After FLOW WATER DRAW SPECIFIC

READING Pump Started (Q) LEVEL DOWN CAPACITY
min. lps m m lps/m
12:02 0 0 2.38 0 0
12:07 5 0.49 2.15 0.23 2.13
12:12 10 0.49 1.99 0.16 1.26
12:17 15 0.49 1.92 0.07 1.06
12:22 20 0.49 1.86 0.06 0.94
12:27 25 0.49 1.8 0.06 0.84
12.32 30 0.49 1.75 0.05 0.78
12:37 35 0.49 1.71 0.04 0.73
12:42 40 0.49 1.67 0.04 0.69
12:47 45 0.49 1.64 0.03 0.66
12:52 50 0.49 1.61 0.04 0.63
12:57 55 0.49 1.59 0.02 0.62
1:02 60 0.49 1.57 0.03 0.60
1:07 65 0.49 1.55 0.02 0.59
1:12 70 0.49 1.53 0.02 0.58
1:17 75 0.49 1.52 0.02 0.57
1:22 80 0.49 1.51 0.01 0.56
1:27 85 0.49 1.50 0.01 0.55
1:32 90 0.49 1.49 0.01 0.55
1:37 95 0.49 1.48 0.01 0.54
1:42 100 0.49 1.47 0.01 0.54
1:47 105 0.49 1.46 0.01 0.53
1:52 110 0.49 1.44 0.02 0.52
1:57 115 0.49 1.42 0.02 0.51
2:02 120 0.49 1.41 0.01 0.51
2:07 125 0.49 1.40 0.01 0.50
2:12 130 0.49 1.39 0.02 0.49
2:17 135 0.49 1.38 0.01 0.49
2:22 140 0.49 1.37 0.01 0.49
2:27 145 0.49 1.36 0.01 0.48
2.32 150 0.49 1.34 0.03 0.47
2:37 155 0.49 1.33 0.01 0.47
2:42 160 0.49 1.32 0.01 0.46
2:47 165 0.49 1.31 0.01 0.46
2:52 170 0.49 1.30 0.01 0.45
2:57 175 0.49 1.29 0.01 0.45
3:02 180 0.49 1.29 0.01 0.45
3.07 185 0.49 1.28 0.01 0.44
3:12 190 0.49 1.28 0.00 0.44
3:17 195 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:22 200 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:27 205 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:32 210 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:37 215 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:42 220 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:47 225 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:52 230 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
3:57 235 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:02 240 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:07 245 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:12 250 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:17 255 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:22 260 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:27 265 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:32 270 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:37 275 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
4:42 280 0.49 1.28 0 0.44
Pumping Test Conducted by: Noted:

RECOVERY TEST DATA
Name of Project : Construction of Level II Water System (Pump Driven)

Location : Poblacion 7, Can avid Eastern Samar
Well No./Name : Dugwel
Well Depth : 4.94m
Static Water Level : Type Cam 50
Recovery Started : 4.94 (orig. ground/top of the well)
Recovery Stopped : 2.38 m
CLOCK Time AfterTime After WATER RESIDUAL

RATIO
TIME Pump Started Pump Stopped LEVEL DDOWN
t(minutes) t' (minutes) (t/t') m m
2:08 0
2:13 5
Recovery Test Conducted by: Noted:
NT DISCHARGE AQUIFER PUMPING TEST DATA
Construction of Pinanag-an Level I Water System (Gravity Driven)
(orig. ground/top of the well)
REMARKS
0
0.23
0.16
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0
0
0
RECOVERY TEST DATA
Construction of Level II Water System (Pump Driven)
(orig. ground/top of the well)
REMARKS
Detailed Estimates
ANNEX 1a
FORMAT OF DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
The presentation of the materials, labor and equipment in details is helpful when implementing the subproject by c
account.
ITEM RESERVOIR ( 8 cu.m. )
A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Compu Material Quantity
Description Specs. Factor ted Compu- Say Unit
Volume ted
B. LABOUR COST
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate

Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day
ted
C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST

Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL
Particular Duration Manpower MD Inkind CASH
(P)
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 73 of 7
Detailed Estimates
Note: cost not current
Detailed Estimates
ITEM SPRING BOX ( Improvement )
A. MATERIALS
Volume ted
B. LABOUR COST
ted

(P)
Detailed Estimates
ITEM PIPELINE
A. MATERIALS
Particular Pipeline Section Quantity
Unit Section/ Length Compu-
Description Specs. Location ted Say
(m)
Pipes and fittings
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. a 500
G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. a
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. a
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. a
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. a
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. a
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. a
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. a
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. a
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. a
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 19 mm pc. b

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 19 mm x 6 m pc. b 10
G.I. Coupling 19 mm pc. b
G.I. Union patente 19 mm pc. b
G.I. Tee 19 x 19 mm pc. b
G.I. Plug 19 mm pc. b
G.I. Reducer Bushing 19 x 13 mm pc. b
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. b
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. b
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. b
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. b
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. c 1,200

G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. c
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. c
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. c
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 25 mm pc. d

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. d 20
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. d
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. d
G.I. Tee 25 x 25 mm pc. d
G.I. Plug 25 mm pc. d
G.I. Reducer Bushing 25 x 13 mm pc. d
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. d
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. d
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. d
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. d
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. e

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. e 240
G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. e
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. e
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. e
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 25 mm pc. f
Detailed Estimates
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. f 320

G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. f
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. f
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. f
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. f
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. f
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. f
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. f
Detailed Estimates
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. g 200

G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. g
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. g
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. g
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. g
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. g
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. g
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. g
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. g
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. g
Brass Gate valve 38 mm pc. h

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. h 60
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. h
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. h
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. h
Brass Gate valve 25 mm pc. i

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. i 100
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. i
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. i
G.I. Tee 25 x 25 mm pc. i
G.I. Plug 25 mm pc. i
G.I. Reducer Bushing 25 x 13 mm pc. i
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. i
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. i
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. i
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees25 mm pc. i
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. i
Brss Gate valve 25 mm pc. j

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. j 710
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. j
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. j
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees25 mm pc. j
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees38 mm pc. at reservoir overflow

Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. drain at spring box & res.
G.I.Nipple, sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. drain at spring box & res.
Perforated PVC Pipe 25 mm x 0.3 m pc. strainer at inlet of spring box
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. faucet at tap stands
Others (tools to be turned-over to the (BWSA) association)

Teflon seal tape 3/4 inch roll accessories
Pipe wrench 12 inches long unit tools
Pipe wrench 14 inches long unit tools
Pipe threader 13, 19, 25, set tools
31, 38 mm
Hack saw unit tools
Hack saw blade pc. tools
TOTAL 3,360
Detailed Estimates
B. LABOUR COST
ted
TOTAL 0

Particular Duration Manpower MD In Kind CASH
(P)
Detailed Estimates
ITEM CREEK / RIVER CROSSING ( 2-Suspended type, 2-Submerged type)
A. MATERIALS
Volume ted
TOTAL
B. LABOUR COST
ted

(P)
Detailed Estimates
ITEM TAP STAND ( 6 Units )
A. MATERIALS
Volume ted
B. LABOUR COST
ted

(P)
Detailed Estimates
n implementing the subproject by community force
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
Total
Labour
Cost
Percent
Weight
(%)
Detailed Estimates
Detailed Estimates
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
Total
Labour
Cost
Percent
Weight
(%)
Detailed Estimates
Unit Total
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
Detailed Estimates
Detailed Estimates
Detailed Estimates
Total
Labour
Cost
Percent
Weight
(%)
Detailed Estimates
d type, 2-Submerged type)
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
Total
Labour
Cost
Percent
Weight
(%)
Detailed Estimates
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
Total
Labour
Cost
Percent
Weight
(%)
KALAHI-CID
Project
Sub-Project Name
Elevation and Reinforcement of Spring Box

Location
Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
Sheet Title
Elevation and Reinforc
Scale
1 : 20 meters
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CID
Project
Project Name
Plan and Reinforcement of Spring Box
Location
Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
Sheet Title
Plan and Reinforceme
Scale
1 : 20 meters
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CID
Project
Sub-Project NameSub-
Manhole cover
Location
Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
Sheet Title
Manhole Cover
Scale
1 : 20 meters
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Elevation and Reinforcement
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
1 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Plan and Reinforcement
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
2 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Sub-Project NameSub-
Manhole Cover
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
3 of 4
BAR SCHEDULE-SPRING BOX
Total Quantity of 6-meter KALAHI-CIDSS
Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar Project
10 mm 12 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.) (pcs.)
B Sub-Project Name
D Location
E Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
TOTAL Sheet Title

Elevation and Reinforcem
TABLE OF QUANTITIES Scale

Particular Unit Quantity Remarks
Description Specs.
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Elevation and Reinforcement
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
4 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title
Project CREEK / RIVER CROSSING
Sheet Title
Location Checked Profile (Suspended type)
Scale
NTS
Sheet Title
Location Checked Profile (Submerged type)
Scale
NTS
Sheet Title
Location Checked Concrete Post Reinforcement Detail
Scale
NTS
TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Particular Unit Quantity Remarks
Description Specs.
Suspended crossing
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) cu.m. 0.48 For the two concrete posts
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 5
Sand cu.m. 0.25 (13 cans)
Gravel cu.m. 0.5 (25 cans)
RSB 12 mm x 6 m pc. 6 For stirrups
16 mm x 6 m pc. 8 For vertical bars
G.I. Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 2 As tie wire
Gauge # 4 roll 1 As suspension wire
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x pc. 2 To hold the pipeline and where the
1/8 x 6 m suspension wire is attached to
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 0 Re-use from reservoir
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Common nails kg. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Submerged crossing
RSB 12 mm x 6 m pc. 4 To anchor pipeline to river bed when
crossing under water. (One hook = 1 m)

Sheet Title
Location Checked Table of Quantities
Scale
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
1 of 4
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
2 of 4
Sub-Project No.
Concrete Post Reinforcement Detail

Sheet No.
3 of 4
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
4 of 4
(REHABILITATION / IMPROVEMENT)
PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT

PROGRAM OF WORK

DETAILED ESTIMATE

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM

DRAWINGS

RESERVOIR CAPACITY DESIGN
and
PIPELINE DESIGN and ANALYSIS

SPRING BOX

RESERVOIR

TAPSTAND

RIVER / CREEK CROSSING

BAR CHART

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS

UNIT COST OF MATERIALS

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
Particular
Description Specs. Unit Qty. Remarks
A. Pipes and fittings

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. 10
31 mm x 6 m pc. 358
25 mm x 6 m pc. 194
19 mm x 6m pc. 2
13 mm x 6 m pc. 3
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. 1
31 mm pc. 33
25 mm pc. 18
19 mm pc. 1
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. 8
31 mm pc. 321
25 mm pc. 171
19 mm pc. 1
13 mm pc. 6
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. 2
25 mm pc. 3
13 mm pc. 12
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. 2
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. 1
31 x 31 mm pc. 5
25 x 25 mm pc. 2
19 x 19 mm pc. 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. 1
38 x 25 mm pc. 1
31 x 25 mm pc. 2
31 x 19 mm pc. 1
31 x 13 mm pc. 3
25 x 13 mm pc. 2
19 x 13 mm pc. 1
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. 2
25 mm pc. 2
19 mm pc. 1
Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. 2
38 mm pc. 1
25 mm pc. 1
13 mm pc. 6
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. 6
G.I. Nipple sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. 4
Perforated PVC pipe 31 mm x 0.3m pc. 1
B. Accessories
Teflon sealing tape 3/4 inch roll 100
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Summary of Materials - page 128 of 142

C. Tools
Pipe Wrench 12 inches long pc. 1
14 inches long pc. 2
Pipe Threader 13, 19, 25, set 1
31, 38 mm
Hacksaw pc. 1
Hacksaw blade pc. 5
D. Others
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 55
Sahara compound pack 37
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 18
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 50
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x 1/8 x 6 m pc. 2
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 62
12 mm x 6 m pc. 33
16 mm x 6 m pc. 8
G.I. Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 7
Gauge # 4 roll 1
Common nails #4 kg. 25
# 1-1/2 kg. 3
Sand cu.m. 3.23
Gravel cu.m. 5.35
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Summary of Materials - page 129 of 142

UNIT COST OF MATERIALS
Particular Unit Unit Remarks

Description Specs. Cost
A. Pipes and Fittings

G.I. Pipe sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. 550.00
do 31 mm x 6 m pc. 468.00
do 25 mm x 6 m pc. 332.00
do 19 mm x 6 m pc. 285.00
do 13 mm x 6 m pc. 184.00
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. 116.00
do 31 mm pc. 88.00
do 25 mm pc. 62.00
do 19 mm pc. 47.00
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. 41.00
do 31 mm pc. 32.00
do 25 mm pc. 24.00
do 19 mm pc. 20.00
do 13 mm pc. 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. 60.00
do 25 mm pc. 35.00
do 13 mm pc. 15.00
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. 35.00
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. 52.00
do 31 x 31 mm pc. 42.00
do 25 x 25 mm pc. 32.00
do 19 x 19 mm pc. 24.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. 32.00
do 38 x 25 mm pc. 34.00
do 31 x 25 mm pc. 26.00
do 31 x 19 mm pc. 28.00
do 31 x 13 mm pc. 30.00
do 25 x 13 mm pc. 25.00
do 19 x 13 mm pc. 20.00
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. 20.00
do 25 mm pc. 12.00
do 19 mm pc. 8.00
Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. 245.00
do 38 mm pc. 205.00
do 25 mm pc. 102.00
do 13 mm pc. 65.00
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. 65.00
G.I. Nipple, sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. 44.00
Perforated PVC Pipe 25 mm x 0.3 m pc. 27.00
B. Accessories
Teflon sealing tape 3/4 inch wide roll 20.00
KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT Unit Cost of Materials - page 130 of 142

C. Tools
Pipe Wrench 12 inches long unit 550.00
do 14 inches long unit 650.00
Pipe Threader Set (one handle, set 6,000.00
one 13 mm (1/2),
one 19 mm (3/4),
one 25 mm (1),
one 31 mm (1-1/4),
one 38 mm (1-1/2))
Hacksaw unit 85.00
Hacksaw Blade pc. 40.00
D. Others
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 140.00
Sahara compound pack 22.00
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 375.00
Rough lumber 2"x 2' x 8' pc. 53.00
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x 1/8 x 6 m pc. 250.00
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 70.00
12 mm x 6 m pc. 77.00
16 mm x 6 m pc. 103.00
G.I.Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 43.00
Gauge # 4 roll 1,500.00
Common nail #4 kg. 30.00
# 1-1/2 kg. 35.00
KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT Unit Cost of Materials - page 131 of 142

PROGRAM OF WORK WS
OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

Barangay ____________________________
Municipality of __________________________
Province of ____________________________
SUB-PROJECT PROGRAM OF WORKs
Sub-Project Title
Category
Physical Target
Total Sub-Project Cost
Project Description: Sub-Project Duration

Equipment Needed
Technical Personnel
Scope of Work %
Item No. Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
(Direct Cost) Wt.
Total
Breakdown Estimated Sources of Fund
Project Cost KALAHI-
Community Local Gov't.Units Other Source Total Cost
CIDSS Grant
A. Direct Cost
KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 1 of 2

PROGRAM OF WORK WS
Materials Cost
Equipment Rental
Labor Cost:
a. Skilled
b. Unskilled
Sub-Total A

PROGRAM OF WORK WS
B. Indirect Cost
Pre-Engineering
Supervision
Contractor's Profit
Taxes
Hand Tools
Material Testing
Admin and Overhead
Sub-Total B
TOTAL (A+B)
ADD: Contingency
%
Total Estimated Cost
ADD: O&M (Other amenities)
Grand Total
Prepared by: Approved by:
Sevice Provider/Municipal Engineer BSPMC Chairperson
Reviewed by: Concurred by:
Deputy Area Coordinator Barangay Chairperson
Noted:
Municipal Mayor
Regional Infrastructure Engineer
Note: Costing to be used on the MIBF will be the Total Estimated Cost

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE WS
BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT WORK SCHEDULE & PHYSICAL PROGRESS REPORT

For the Month of __________________, 200___
Name of Sub-project: ___________________________________ Total Sub-Project Cost:_______________________

Physical Target: _____________________________ Direct Cost:
Region: __________________________________ Indirect cost:
Province : __________________________________ Date Started:________________________________
Municipality : _______________________________ Target Completion Date: ______________________
Barangay: __________________________________ Mode of Implementation:
I. To be filled up by Deputy Area Coordinator

WEIGHT Physical Previous
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT AMOUNT
(%) Target Cumm. Month 1
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
TOTAL 0 0
II To be filled up by Deputy Area Coordinator

PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (PLANNED)
CUMULATIVE
PHYSICAL

PHYSICAL
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL)
CUMULATIVE
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (PLANNED)
CUMULATIVE
CASH FLOW
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL)
CUMULATIVE
III. Major Issues Encountered: IV. Recommendations
Prepared by: _____________________________ Concurred by:

PIT Chair/Skilled Person/Contractor Monitoring Team Leader
Approved by: _____________________________ _____________________

BSPMC Chairperson Deputy Area Coordinator
Note: Attach Material Records Sheet if physical accomplishment lags behind financial disbursements.

CAL PROGRESS REPORT

200___
Labor Ave.
Generat Total No. of Days Rate/Da
ed S-Curve
y
Male
Skilled
Female
Male
Unskilled
Female
TOTAL
DURATION
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recommendations
_____________________
Monitoring Team Leader Municipal Engineer
Noted:
Regional Infrastructure Engineer

Poblacion 7, Water System, Can Avid

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Poblacion 7, Water System, Can Avid

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Planning and Design WS

Name of Sub-Project Construction of Pinanag-an Level I Water System (Gravity Driven)

A. Reason for installing a reservoir

B. Location of the reservoir

Reason for choosing the location.

C. Capacity of the reservoir

Reservoir capacity = 1/4 (ADD)

Reservoir capacity = (Demand-Supply)(Ave. Day Length)

Reservoir capacity = (Spring discharge)(Ave. Day Length)

Reservoir capacity = 8.15 cu.m.

5) Reason for adoption

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 2.01 cum

Length 2.01 = 2.01 m. 2.10 m.

Therefore width length height

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Minimum Time to Fill

DEMAND-SUPPLY ANALYSIS BASED ON THE AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND (ADD)

9 1.98 2,688.89 11,977.80 1,800.00 (888.89)

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 2.04 m.

Therefore width length height

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Minimum Time to Fill

< 1.0 inadequate source

TYPICAL WATER DEMAND VARIATION

Minimum Time to Fill

Start of deficit on the

sumption per capita

Minimum Time to Fill

Name of Sub-Project Construction of Pinanag-an Level I Water System (Gravity Driven)

A. Reason for installing a reservoir

B. Location of the reservoir

Reason for choosing the location.

C. Capacity of the reservo

Reservoir capacity = 1/4 (ADD)

Reservoir capacity = (Demand-Supply)(Ave. Day Length)

Reservoir capacity = (Spring discharge)(Ave. Day Length)

Reservoir capacity = 9.74 cu.m.

5) Reason for adoption

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 2.14 cum

Therefore width length height

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

< 1.0 inadequate source

DEMAND-SUPPLY ANALYSIS BASED ON THE AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND (ADD)

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 2.17 cum

Therefore width length height

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

TYPICAL WATER DEMAND VARIATION

ADD 38,946.70 lit/day

Average Hourly Demand 1,622.78 lit/hour 0.45 lps

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 4.97 cum

Therefore width length height

Time to Fill Reservoir if distribution gatevalve is fully closed 27.13 hours

ve, settling or point of

1.28m dropdown into level 0 from max. level

Time Factor Analysis

Minimum Time to Fill

read over 24 hours)

SUPPLY MINUS STORAGE

4,596.72 Extreme positive variation

if + answer the size is OK

Time Factor Analysis

Minimum Time to Fill