ACID RATIO = (CURRENT ASSETS – INVENTORY) / CURRENT LIABILITIES
2010 = (808240 – 0)/139114 = 5.81 2011 = (1368081 – 0)/509901 = 2.68 2012 = (581148 – 0)/560727 = 1.04 2013 = (13717557- 560890)/11670914 = 1.13 2014 = (19529452 -786751)/11128142 = 1.68 Trend: Decrease to Increase The acid-test ratio is a measure of how well a company can meet its short-term financial liabilities. Acid-Test ratio provides a more rigorous assessment of a company's ability to pay its current liabilities. It does this by eliminating all but the most liquid of current assets from consideration. Obviously, it is vital that a company have enough cash on hand to meet accounts payable, interest expenses, and other bills when they become due. The higher the ratio, the more financially secure a company is in the short term. A common rule of thumb is that companies with an Acid-Test or quick ratio of greater than 1.0 are sufficiently able to meet their short-term liabilities. In general, low or decreasing acid- test ratios generally suggest that a company is over-leveraged, struggling to maintain or grow sales, paying bills too quickly, or collecting receivables too slowly. On the other hand, a high or increasing acid-test ratio generally indicates that a company is experiencing solid top-line growth, quickly converting receivables into cash, and easily able to cover its financial obligations. CASH RATIO = (CASH + CASH EQUIVALENTS) / CURRENT LIABILITIES 2010 = 785048/139114 = 5.64 2011 = 1113382/509901= 2.18 2012 = 277518/560727 = 0.50 2013 = 6660627/11670914 = 0.57 2014 = 3845367/11128142 = 0.35 Trend: Decrease The cash ratio indicates to creditors, analysts, and investors the percentage of a company’s current liabilities that cash and cash equivalents will cover. A ratio above 1 means that the company will be able to pay off its current liabilities with cash and cash equivalents. Although there is no ideal figure, a ratio of not lower than 0.5 to 1 is usually preferred. The cash ratio figure provides the most conservative insight into a company’s liquidity since only cash and cash equivalents are taken into consideration. PROFITABILITY RATIO NET PROFIT MARGIN = (NET PROFIT / REVENUE) X 100 2010 = (424607/0) X 100 = INVALID 2011 = (5443430) X 100 = INVALID 2012 = (44722/0) X 100 = INVALID 2013 = (778243/2592111) X 100 = 30.02% 2014 = [(665361)/4258554] X 100 = -15.62%
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN = (OPERATING INCOME / REVENUE) X 100
2010 = (672417/0) X 100 = INVALID 2011 = (877642/0) X 100 = INVALID 2012 = (506611/0) X 100 = INVALID 2013 = (2493313/2592111) X 100 = 96.18% 2014 = (1729132/4258554) X 100 = 40.63% SOLVENCY RATIO TOTAL DEBT TO EQUITY = TOTAL LIABILITIES / TOTAL EQUITY Trend : Decrease to Increase 2010 = 4529759 / 425607 = 10.64 2011 = 7198912 / 944183 = 7.63 2012 = 8376435 / 1157645 = 7.24 2013 = 42277238 / 2383627 = 17.74 2014 = 48967786 / 2441656 = 20.06 A higher debt-equity ratio indicates a levered firm, which is quite preferable for a company that is stable with significant cash flow generation, but not preferable when a company that is in decline. Conversely, a lower ratio indicates a firm less levered and closer to being fully equity financed.
LONG TERM DEBT TO EQUITY = TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES /
TOTAL EQUITY Trend: Decrease to Increase 2010 = 4390645/425607 = 10.32 2011 = 6689011/944183 = 7.08 2012 = 7815708/1157645 = 6.75 2013 = 30606324/2383627 = 12.84 2014 = 37839644/2441656 = 15.50 When the ratio is comparatively high, it implies that a business is at greater risk of bankruptcy, since it may not be able to pay for the interest expense on the debt if its cash flows decline. This is more of a problem in periods when interest rates are increasing, or when the cash flows of a business are subject to a large amount of variation, or w hen an entity has relatively minimal cash reserves available to pay down its debt obligations ROA = (NET INCOME / TOTAL PERIOD-END ASSETS) X 100 Trend : Decrease 2010 = (424607 / 4955366) X100 = 8.57% 2011 = (544343/8143094) X100 = 6.68% 2012 = (44722/9534080) X100 = 0.50% 2013 = (778243/44660865) X100 = 1.74% 2014 = [(665361)/51409442] X100 = -1.29% Return on Assets (ROA) is a type of return on investment (ROI) that measures the profitability of a business in relation to its total assets. This ratio indicates how well a company is performing by comparing the profit it’s generating to the capital it’s invested in assets. The higher the return, the more productive and efficient management is in utilizing economic resources. ROCE = [NET OPERATING PROFIT / (TOTAL ASSETS – CURRENT LIABILITIES)] X100 Trend : Decrease 2010 = [672417 / (4955366 – 139114)] X100 = 13.96% 2011 = [877642 / (8143094 – 509901)] X100 = 11.50% 2012 = [506611 / (9534080 – 560727)] X100 = 5.65% 2013 = [2493313 / (44660865 – 11670914)] X100 = 7.56% 2014 =[1729132 / (51409442 – 11128142)] X100 = 4.29% Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), a profitability ratio, measures how efficiently a company is using its capital. Simply put, ROCE measures how well a company is using its capital to generate profits. The return on capital employed is considered one of the best profitability ratios and is commonly used by investors to determine whether a company is suitable to invest in or not. ROI = (NET INCOME / COST OF INVESTMENT) X 100 Trend : Decrease 2010 = (424607/4139125) X100 = 10.26% 2011 = (544343/6891214) X100 = 7.90% 2012 = (44722/1949362) X100 = 2.29% 2013 = (877673/18494628) X100 = 4.75% 2014 = [(669554)/20728253] X100 = -3.23% Simple ROI compares returns to costs by making a ratio between cash inflows and outflows that follow from the investment. By definition, the ROI ratio calculates as net investment gains divided by total investment costs.