580036500
Module 5
Doing and Using Educational Research
PART ONE
Provide a brief summary of the research proposal you discussed in your assignment for
Module 3 or provide a brief outline of a new research proposal (which may, but does not
necessarily have to, underpin your thesis). Use this summary/outline as the basis for a
critical discussion of the relative merits and drawbacks of a range of research methods
(techniques and procedures), including implications for data analysis, upon which you
could draw in conducting this research. Make appropriate reference to research
methodology literature and published research reports. Indicate any ethical
considerations which might need to be taken into account.
For Module 3 my proposed research was entitled ‘Teaching with a difference: How is
neurodiversity experienced in the teaching profession and how is this addressed in
teacher education programmes?’ and aimed to explore issues of neurodiversity in the
teaching profession. This remains the focus of my intended research with the key
outcome intended to inform and enhance inclusive approaches to teaching and learning
on a Masters in Education (Higher Education) programme. The field of education
inevitably includes political aspects concerning social justice and issues of equality and
within the MA Ed programme much consideration is given to legislative, organisational
and curricular aspects that reduce inequalities in access, provision and experience of
learning. The focus is on the ‘learner experience’ and how teaching methods,
curriculum design and modes of assessment may take appropriate and anticipatory
1
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
The most commonly identified specific learning need in HE within the umbrella term
‘neurodiversity’ is that of dyslexia. In my institution this accounts for over 13% of
students compared with 3% nationally (HESA 2009). While students may be willing to
disclose a specific learning difficulty, my experience on the MA Ed is that colleagues
tend not to disclose dyslexia as a disability and enter teaching in HE having developed
their own coping strategies within the terms and requirements of their roles.
The vocational nature of the courses places emphasis on the employable and
transferrable nature of knowledge, techniques, processes and craftsmanship (Peter
Dormer, 1994) coupled with an intuitive approach to teaching such skills (Claxton,
2000). There is a perception from such colleagues that they need to be seen as
‘academic’ in their approaches and that it would undermine their professional identity as
educators to express any difficulty with approaches to reading and writing in academia.
This manifests itself in a number of ways:
- The reluctance with which colleagues engage in writing research and funding
proposals
- The delegation of course report writing
- The divide between those who teach theory and those teaching practice
- Large scale non-disclosure to the HR dept.
Over the three years that I have run the MA in Education, 28% of staff have disclosed to
me verbally that they are dyslexic. Of these only three have disclosed this on their
application form for the course, and only one has disclosed to the HR department. All
these colleagues have engaged in other careers to a high level which have
necessitated sophisticated levels of knowledge, skills, critical and analytical capabilities.
They have developed organisational and procedural strategies to ensure that they can
cope with the demands required in their working roles. These capabilities have been
transferred to their teaching roles, yet when faced with the repositioning of their identity
to student of the MA Education course, deep seated insecurities about their abilities to
cope with the academic requirements of the course and their ‘fitness’ as educators. My
intended research project seeks to take an appreciative inquiry approach with
participants to collaboratively explore their identities as learners, as educators and as
creative practitioners to how their professional approaches (both practice-based and
educational) may influence the development of greater inclusivity in learning teaching
and assessment.
(780 words)
3
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
Perspectives on Narrative Inquiry
“If we wish to know about a man, we ask ‘what is his story – his real inmost story?’- for
each of us is a biography, a story. Each of us is a singular narrative, which is
constructed, continually, unconsciously, by, through, and in us – through our
perceptions, our feelings, our thoughts, our actions; and not least, our discourse, our
spoken narrations. Biologically, physiologically, we are not so different from each other;
historically, as narratives – we are each of us unique.”
Sacks (1986) p.105
4
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
Key to approaching this research project is keeping in mind the purpose or outcome.
Plummer (1983) recommends the guidance of two key questions: “Who are you writing
for?” and “What do you wish to accomplish?” In answer to the former I would respond
that principally for the HE teaching community and to the latter: to explore how a
teacher training programme may be made more inclusive for prospective teachers with
dyslexia. In effect this means exploring the disjunction between the traditional model of
teacher training and the practices of a creative curriculum that embraces the pedagogic
approaches of holistic thinkers. An important factor in this is the experience of those
who have undertaken teacher training programmes and who have experienced teaching
roles. It is hoped that an analysis of these professional and personal experiences will
reveal strategies and approaches that may be applied in a wider context to extend the
understanding of a creative pedagogy.
Approaching this research it seems important to start from a position of valuing the
contributors’ experiences of teacher training and teaching. These are a culmination of
their own education journeys and are inevitably bound within individual cultural, social
and political contexts. The literature of dyslexia contains many stories of people who
have had such negative education experiences that this has impacted on their choice of
career and rejection of tertiary or lifelong learning opportunities (Collinson, 2009). My
particular approach is to take an appreciative inquiry approach to exploring why some
people persist in education, despite the learning difficulties that dyslexia presents, and
overcome these barriers to achieve success. In particular why they choose teaching as
a career, when the fundamental attributes of reading, writing and organisation may pose
additional challenges. What strategies come into play to overcome these challenges
and are there approaches that may benefit all educational programmes?
5
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
This gives rise to questions about the researcher’s position in this dialogic relationship,
particularly as the respondents/narrators are likely to be colleagues of the researcher. It
is therefore important to reflect upon and articulate some of the values that may impact
on the dialogue. Whilst the narrator is the primary editor of the tale, it is through
dialogue that “mutual shaping and interaction” take place (Cohen and Manion 2007 p.
168)
Cohen and Manion (2007) argue that in this type of narrative inquiry it is the design of
the process of the dialogue that is almost more important than the outcomes which, if
they are in any way pre-determined, will inevitably influence the dialogue. (p. 168).
Other factors that may also influence the course of the dialogue include values of the
researcher, particularly when taking an appreciative inquiry stance, through which the
researcher may place herself in the position of advocate. Such issues of advocacy
would mean that political intent of the researcher may unintentionally influence the
direction of the conversation and bias the outcomes. Any such values should be
explored and through the dialogue so that as far as possible a position of equality and
7
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
mutuality may be achieved, though Cohen et al (2007) cite Flick in exploring some of
the positions that a researcher in life history may adopt such as stranger, visitor, insider
or initiate. This acknowledges how the researcher is inherently part of the social world
being researched.
Taking forward my direction of enquiry I am aware that there may be tacit power
structures inherent in the collegial relationship (roles, grades, subject specialisms etc.)
and that these need to be addressed and acknowledged at the outset in order to
establish and ethos of balance and trust. Achieving clarity of expectations and
commitment at the beginning of the research may help to establish a balance between
distance and involvement and avoid the emotional entanglement of dependency. Such
in-depth dialogue may well lead the narrator to reveal and reflect upon life-changing
decisions. Not all may be pleasant memories and the researcher requires good listening
skills, sensitivity and a high degree of emotional intelligence (Mortiboys, 2005) to
respond appropriately and create and ethos of what Plummer (1983) calls “non-
possessive warmth”.
Whilst the process of data collection is crucially important, the issue that faces the
research once a life-history has been told is how to analyse this and represent it without
losing the originality of the primary narration. The choice of ‘critical moments’ may be
negotiated but the essence of what is important in the ‘storying’ of a life is the choice of
the first teller of the tale. The discussion of that choice and its importance is the further
collaborative and exploratory activity of researcher and participant. Goodson and Sikes
(2001) argue that the process is both interpretive and iterative and that the mere
recording of the conversation in text removes it from actual life as lived. This ‘textuality’
may be seen through a post-modern perspective as questioning aspects of voice,
audience, perspective, temporality and inter-relationship and exploring how these may
be melded within a jointly mediated text (Goodson and Sikes 2001 p.16). Recently there
has been discussion about what might lie beyond post-modernism and how culture is
now shaped by increasing globalization and communication mediated through
8
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
researcher faces in analyzing and interpreting the large quantities of collected data. The
intense focus of the dialogue renders data that inevitable requires inductive analysis
and an emic approach that attempts to capture the narrator’s meanings rather than the
researcher’s objective interpretations. Atkinson (1998) suggests that it is the
researcher’s role to help the story-teller to make meaning, whilst Cohen and Manion
(2007) suggest that this is through a series of “messy confrontations” with the data and
that “meaning is continuous and evolving”. This necessarily becomes an iterative
process of review and revision and that the secondary level of selectivity is through co-
construction between the narrator and researcher through “mutual simultaneous
shaping” (Cohen and Manion 2007 p.167). Webster and Mertova (2007) make the point
that “In narrative research a finding is significant if it is important” (p.5).
From this point onwards the researcher is faced with what Clough (2002) terms “the
crisis of representation” (p.7); the tension between a naturalistic and authentic
representation of the words of the participant and the potentially intrusive
reinterpretation by the researcher. A key question of representation is whether to
present the findings as fiction, fact, autobiography, biography with commentary or a
more formal thematic research report. The field of ‘narratology’ has attempted to
fomalise the disciplinary approaches from literary theory to the construction and de-
construction of narratives, focusing on aspects of structural linguistics, narrative
grammar, rhetorical analysis and poetics (Webster and Mertova 2007 p. 26). Clandinin
and Connelly (2000) consider that the essential components of narrative are plot,
character, scene, place, time and individual perspective (p.49). If the co-construction of
meaning at representation stage remains part of the dialogic process, then the exercise
becomes hermeneutic in its intent through the meanings created by both parties who
are jointly and individually involved in a process of iterative and interpretive self-
authorship (Baxter-Magolda et al 2009).
narrator. Narrative structures may vary from the biographical and descriptive
representation that focuses on a critical incident (Webster and Mertova 2007 p. 79) to a
wholly fictionalized account that summarises a number of responses to create a
situation of plausible verisimilitude (Clough, 2002) or a commentary on a reflective
narrative that incorporates the voice of the original teller of the tale (Sacks 1985). This
gives rise to criticisms of the narrative method when compared with more positivist
notions of reliability, authenticity, objectivity, generalisability and measurability. These
need to be reframed and reinterpreted within a post-modern appreciation of multiple
perspectives and an understanding that no truth is absolute. In narrative research the
key importance is for the researcher to represent participants’ understanding of reality.
Webster and Mertova (2007 p. 99) argue that verisimilitude or plausibility are the
hallmarks of truthfulness of a narrative account, whether it is presented in either
factually biographical or a fictional synthesis. If it ‘rings true’ to the reader and provides
opportunities to generate new reflections or perspectives on experience, then the
narrative research may be considered to have value. Clough (2002) explores how the
researcher may create a “version of the truth” through a “hybrid text” and illustrates this
by exploring school-based critical incidents from a range of fictionalized perspectives.
The distinction between fact and fiction may be blurred in presentation but careful
exegesis of a range of similar narratives provide the opportunity to reveal common
characteristics. A simple comparative categorization structure is provided by Webster
and Mertova (2007 p.91) through critical incidents, ‘like’ events and ‘other’events in
which aspects of similarity and difference may be used to create a first level of coding
and analysis. Such comparison of life-history data provides some measure of
verisimilitude. Data may be compared with other sources external to the primary
research or against life-histories of other informants. Clough (2002) makes the point
that revelation of truth is based on trust and that the relationship between researcher
and primary narrator needs to be carefully established on trust for both parties. It might
be possible to check facts told against external sources, but the researcher would need
to consider carefully the effect of such checking on the relationship of trust. Cohen and
Manion (2007) suggest that the checks and balances should include points of
11
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
“autocritique” whereby the primary narrator reviews and revisits the representations of
their story.
So far I have approached the life-history research as though only one primary narrator
might be involved. Indeed, narrative research has been criticized for its small sample
size and restrictions in generalisability. There are a range of sampling strategies that
are appropriate to narrative inquiry, all of which focus on a small number of
respondents, sometimes on just one individual’s life-history. Interestingly Pollak (2002)
uses a narrative inquiry approach to his research on dyslexic students in higher
education, but has 32 respondents in is study which is based around a semi-structured
interview. One would argue whether this achieves the rich and iterative data collection
offered by a more limited sample. The huge quantity of data generated from such a
scale would require robust data management strategies. With a small number of
respondents it is important to justify the choice and applicability for the study: criterion
sampling offers choice of a ‘typical case’ participant who exhibits a profile of attributes
of the ‘average’ person within the topic of interest, whereas a critical case study would
display a set of extreme characteristics. If using more than one participant homogenous
sampling would look for participants with similar characteristics (Cohen and Manion
2007 p.176). Webster and Mertova in their critical incident approach to narrative inquiry
suggest that through a process of categorization of ‘critical’, ‘like’ and ‘other’ across a
number of participants, that the researcher reaches a natural point at which there is a
saturation of data and that new stories merely act to confirm existing data. Their
theoretical sampling approach is to take on new participants until this point is reached
through on-going analysis, though this may require altered characteristics of respondent
in order to test emergent theory. (Webster and Mertova 2007 p.33). Convenience
sampling is often used for its opportunistic qualities and the likelihood of attracting
respondents who willingly offer time and commitment rather than selecting participants
who are less amenable based on their appropriate characteristics. Such sampling also
allows the researcher to work within the limits of their own time and budget. In terms of
my proposed narrative inquiry the sampling would hope to include two or three
12
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
The fact that participants will also be colleagues creates extra consideration with regard
to the ethical aspects of the narrative inquiry. The researcher’s role in relation to the
participants may impact on the ways that life-histories are recounted and the primary
selection of emphasis by the narrator. Goodson and Sikes (2001) make the point out
that participant anonymity is particularly difficult to achieve in narrative inquiry and
careful assessment need to be accounted for risk and vulnerability if the information is
not sensitively handled and includes the revelation of compromising details. Such an
approach to research necessarily involves developing a close relationship between
researcher and primary narrator and there is likelihood of impact on self-knowledge and
identity for both parties.
13
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
Part Two
Give a critically reflective account of the work you have undertaken to date on the EdD
programme (including this assignment), making particular reference to any issues that
have had an impact on you in terms of your thinking, personal and professional
development, and understanding of research. Note any specific issues or ideas that you
may now wish to pursue in preparation for a thesis and/or in the development of your
professional practice.
The first two years of the University of Exeter EdD programme have provided a
stimulating personal and professional journey. Preparing to undertake educational
research has provided space to explore the interstices between personal and
professional interests and challenged me to refresh some of my own approaches to
teaching and learning. Keeping an on-line journal (blog) has allowed me to track some
of the key moments in the journey so far that have shaken certainties and challenged
assumptions.
There has been tangible impact on the courses I deliver as well as resulting
engagement in associated university activities, both locally and nationally. These
include revisiting and re-working the research methods units on the MA in Education to
incorporate new perspectives; becoming a point of contact for staff wishing to engage in
educational research; facilitating a visit from the inspirational Dr. Phil Bayliss to the
PGCHE course (participants still talk about this as a ‘WOW’ moment (Bamford, 2006));
and being invited to speak at a symposium on Education in the Arts (July 2010) based
on my assignment response to Assignment 3.
I came to the EdD unsure of my direction of research and the first assignment explored
an interest in how policy would impact on a small specialist institution focused solely on
a creative curriculum. This perspective remains of interest, but perhaps provides less
possibility for levering change as both the outgoing government and new coalition
government clearly see higher education linked to growth in UK economy. Evaluation of
14
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
the higher education skills agenda is a potentially enormous task and is already being
undertaken by such organizations as the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)
(Sastry, 2007). The second assignment explored the tensions around understanding of
professionalism in teaching. This provided a much needed reflection point for my role as
senior tutor/course leader on a course that is accredited by the Higher Education
Academy in accordance with the Professional Standards Framework for teaching and
supporting learning in higher education in the UK. It allowed a space to explore the
changing nature of higher education within a political climate that encourages increased
managerialism and accountability and how the teaching role may respond to such
changes. The Module 3 assignment provided the point at I began to realize where my
research interests lay in exploring a creative pedagogy that could draw on the strengths
and alternative cognitive capabilities of dyslexic, holistic thinkers. Looking back at my
proposed methodology I can now see that this was far too ambitious to achieve within a
two-year frame, but at least allowed exploration of a range of approaches.
This led me to question how far teachers with dyslexia feel that they have an ‘authentic
voice’ within a profession that operates in a largely linear and lexic mode. A further
trajectory of exploration also became possible after considering the impact of
technology on pedagogy and the burgeoning modes of e-learning in higher education.
Colleagues working in a research group exploring the interface between technology and
creative practice opened up the possibility of extending this to a third strand:
technology, creative practice and teaching. This tri-partite perspective, combined with
the fact that the numbers of staff and students in my institution with dyslexia is higher
than average across the sector, provides opportunity to consider what a creative
pedagogy might be in the 21st century.
Exploring my own arena of educational practice it is evident that I have a rich source of
potential data and the possibilities of generating and implementing new pedagogic
approaches to the MA in Education course. As mentioned above, the high incidence of
dyslexia in those applying to this course has given a source of inquiry that straddles a
16
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
It has been difficult to narrow the focus to a manageable topic, but Dr. Wendy
Robinson’s introduction to life-history research introduced possibilities for combining
creative practice with considerations of pedagogy whilst also drawing on my own
disciplinary background in literature and creative writing. I first considered using the
EdD to challenge myself to engage with quantitative and statistical inquiry within a
positivist paradigm, however I soon came to appreciate that this would be counter to my
innate strengths, inclinations, ways of working and disciplinary grounding. As much
educational research literature points out, the values and approaches of the researcher
inevitably impacts on the process and outcomes of inquiry (Cohen et al, 2007). The
course has offered insight into a range of qualitative and quantitative approaches and it
has been both an enlightening tour through a range of methodologies. This, combined
with exploring a range of research methods literature, has confirmed that my approach
is most comfortably situated in the qualitative, interpretive paradigm. In my blog of 9th
February 2010 I respond to Dr. Robinson’s session of life-history research:
“This really got me thinking. With my background in literature, poetry, creative writing
etc. I know that this provides opportunities to draw on my strengths and to apply my
17
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
love of stories to some meaningful research that I hope will support teachers with
dyslexia.” (Cash 2010)
I would still like to include in my narrative inquiry approach, the possibility of participants
illustrating their narratives with other personally created artifacts. I am conscious of the
fact that I am possibly turning the life-experiences of people, who have encountered
difficulties with reading and writing, into academic text. In order to mitigate this I would
like to offer participants the opportunity to create, produce, perform or develop
something that encapsulates their approach to learning and teaching with dyslexia. In
this way the story would be encapsulated in a visual or performative manner. Not only
would the research be about creativity, but it would embody creativity in its process. I
hope that this would ensure that the self-authorship and authorial voice remains
primarily with the participant, even if the text version is a secondary, possibly
fictionalized, version of the researcher.
In a world that is fast changing and frequently described in terms such as ‘fluid’,
‘chaotic’ and ‘uncertain’ the EdD programme has given the precious space through
which to reconsider my role and educational practice within the wider ‘supercomplexity’
of higher education (Barnett, 2004). At some points engagement with the EdD
programme has provided a site of struggle against this very such supercomplexity,
requiring co-ordination of the demands of work, home and family to set time aside for
reading, thinking and writing (such challenges as the birth of a litter of puppies, caring
for a parent after major heart surgery, a house move, plus institutional merger with
complete curricular and organizational restructuring). The benefits have thus far
outweighed the effort and, at some points, EdD study has become the island of calm
within the chaos.
(1721 words)
18
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
References
Atkinson, T. & Claxton, G. 2000, The intuitive practitioner : on the value of not always knowing what one
is doing, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Bamford, A.:. 2006, The WOW factor: Global research compendium on the impact of the arts in
education, Waxmann, Munster, Germany.
Barnett, R. 2004, "Learning for an unknown future", Higher Education Research and Development, vol.
23, no. 3, pp. 247-260; 247.
Brookfield, S.D. 1995, Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Clandinin, D.J. & Connelly, F.M. 2000, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research,
Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Clough, P. 2002, Narratives and Fictions in Educational Research, Open University Press/McGraw Hill,
Maidenhead.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (eds) 2007, Research Methods in Education, 6th edn, Taylor and
Routledge, London.
Coles, R. 1989, The Call of Stories: Teaching and the Moral Imagination, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Collinson, C. 2009, "In spite of the system, not because of it: Reflections of 'false generosity' and
'dehumanization' in the experience of dyslexic postgraduates.", Eighth Conference of CLTREdge Hill
University, .
Dormer, P. 1994, The Art of the Maker, Thames and Hudson, London.
Evetts, J. 1991, "The experience of secondary headship selection: continuity and change", Educational
Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 285-294.
Gardner, H. 2007, Five Minds for the Future, Massachusettes, USA: Harvard Business School.
Goodson, I. & Sikes, P. 2001, Life History Research in Educational Settings, Open University
Press/McGraw Hill, Maidenhead.
Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency 2009, 01 Sept 2009-last update, Table 11b First year UK domiciled
HE students by qualification, aim, mode of study, gender and disability. [Homepage of HESA],
19
EdD Generic Module 5 Student no.
580036500
[Online]. Available:
http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php/component/option,com_datatables/Itemid,121/ [2010, 1st June] .
Hodge, D.C., Baxter Magolda, M.B. & Haynes, D.A. 2009, "Engaged learning: Enabling self-authorship
and effective practice", Liberal Education, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 16-23.
Kirby, A.:. 2010, Successor states to an empire in free fall, Times, London.
Ludema, J. 2001, "From deficit discourse to vocabularies of hope" in Appreciative Inquiry: An emerging
direction for organisation development, eds. D.L. Cooperrider, P.F. Sorensen, T.R. Yager & D.
Whitney, Stipes Publishing, Champaigne, Illinois.
Ludema, J.D. 2002, "Appreciative Storytelling: A Narrative Approach to Organization Development and
Change" in Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Transformation: Reports from the Field, eds. R.
Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling & D. Whitney, Greenwood Publishing, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 239-261.
Mortiboys, A. 2005, Teaching with Emotional Intelligence: a step-by-step guide for higher and further
education professionals, Routledge, London.
Perks, R. 2009, June 2009-last update, Practical Advice: Getting Started, What is Oral History?
[Homepage of Oral History Society], [Online]. Available:
http://www.oralhistory.org.uk/advice/index.php [2010, 1st June] .
Plummer, K. 1983, Documents of Life: An introduction to the problems and literature of a Humanistic
Method, Allen & Unwin, London.
Pollak, D. 2002, Dyslexia, the self and higher education: learning life histories of students identified as
dyslexic, De Montfort University.
Roach, R. 2005, Teacher identities: a study of the use of a persuasive life history approach in educational
research , University of Warwick.
Sacks, O. 1985, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, Picador, London.
Sastry, T. & Bekhradnia, B. 2007, Higher Education, Skills and Employer Engagement, Higher Education
Policy Institute, Oxford.
Sikes, P. 2000, "Truth and Lies Revisited", British Educational Research Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 257.
Webster, L. & Mertova, P. 2007, Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: an introduction to using
critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching, 1st edn, Routledge, Abingdon,
Oxon.
20