Anda di halaman 1dari 2


The E.P.A.’s Civil Rights Problem

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
An oil refinery in a predominantly African-American neighborhood in Beaumont, Tex. A
hazardous waste disposal site in Chaves County, N.M., a largely low-income, largely Hispanic
area. Two power plants in Pittsburg, Calif., where most of the residents are from minority

These facilities were the subject of civil rights complaints filed with the Environmental Protection
Agency more than 10 years ago. The complainants in most of them are still waiting for


Pittsburg, Calif. Credit Chip Chipman/Bloomberg

The E.P.A.’s Office of Civil Rights is supposed to enforce Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of race by any recipient of federal money. So when state or
local regulatory agencies that get federal assistance allow refineries, landfills or other facilities to
disproportionately affect the health or safety of minority communities, those communities have a
right to turn to the Office of Civil Rights for help.

Under the rules, the E.P.A. is supposed to decide within 20 days of a complaint whether to
investigate, and to issue a preliminary finding within 180 days. But in practice, the agency takes
an average of 350 days just to determine whether it will investigate, according to an analysis by
the Center for Public Integrity, and a number of investigations by the agency have been open for
years. The office has dismissed or rejected more than 90 percent of the complaints it has
received and has never made a formal finding of discrimination.

Newsletter Sign UpContinue reading the main story

Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial
board and contributing writers from around the world.

Enter your email address

Sign Up

You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products
and services.


The environmental law firm Earthjustice sued the E.P.A. in Federal District Court in California on
behalf of the complainants in the Beaumont, Chaves County and Pittsburg cases and two other
groups, alleging that the E.P.A. “unlawfully withheld and unreasonably delayed” action on the
cases. Part of the challenge, environmental advocates say, is that the E.P.A., accustomed to
enforcing clean air and water rules, has not made antidiscrimination enforcement a priority. A
lack of clear standards for determining compliance with Title VI is another problem.

The Office of Civil Rights seems aware of these concerns and has been hiring new employees
with civil rights experience. The office is also working on clearer guidance to help recipients of
federal money comply with antidiscrimination law.

In May, the E.P.A. issued a draft of its five-year plan for ensuring that all communities have
equal protection from environmental threats. The period for public comment on the plan was to
close on Thursday, but has been extended to July 28. The plan calls for changes to the
agency’s rule-making, permitting and enforcement practices, as well as programs to reduce
exposure to lead and other hazards in low-income and minority neighborhoods. If the agency
hopes to hold states and cities accountable for shielding vulnerable residents from
environmental harm, it will need to address complaints more rigorously — and much more
quickly — than it has.